Xoshic or whatever hid handle is, has also started a non moderated vrc thread. He wants to keep the conversation alive -and not censored, obviously- but somehow he wants control to manage it at will... or he doesnt like the crowd here. Ah the guy from Minnesota likes to do things his way... funny, funny...

Anything undrr 90% if you are among the top 6 addresses is just trivial and yes, a pathetic non-effective gimmick. Butvyou are quite wrong otherwise: If current amount is didtributed in a fair way the allows for a community to exist and support the project, it is immaterial if there are 300k coins or 3 million. With proper distribution it would have some value while with current distribution it has none. And will nevrr have more than that: ZERO. You knoe it, regardless of your wishful thinking, and so does everyone else. Further realization will very soon become quite apparent.

You must be a new kind of stupid, really. Everyone with s pulse knows yhat I only have one handle... and a pretty activr one at that. Oh and, unfottunately, I dont have a coin of my own like it appears IE does. Furthermore I included him in THE WALL OF SHAME for not returning the black coin donationd that I still think is very wrong and dederving of all the shit he's getting and will continue getting for it. I dont like his oversized ego -mine's no slouch either- or his pumps but I admit he's, by far, the guy with more ideas, besides me of course, for promotion in crypto... albeit many not very ethical. Furthrrmore everyone knows I hail from the Wedt Coast and Im caucasian while he lives in New York and is black. Oyher than that, practically tweens...

What a fucking idiot you have to be....

Yep, triple duty. Go pant-man, go...

Oh boy, pant-man doing double-duty... triple duty soon? Like he is not transparent the moment he posts 5 words... WOW!

UK, there's no confusion: Acts speak much louder than any words. Besides, they have never denied that, if up to them, they would silence.... me, for instance. Or you (Nosker bumped you off IRC), so the proof is in the pudding, no confusions, no interpretations.

Now, that said and being absolutely provable truth, there's another influence now that cannot be underestimated: James (jl777) has always demanded, from the get go, total unanimity in support of VRC if he were to be involved. He is committed now and, quite frankly, left with no other option to have a "clean face" for his SuperNET, since there are not even one developer in crypto -that I know of- that is not either anonymous or tainted, if not both. These three are also, but, for now, in what James believes it is a manageable manner. He absolutely needs them to be his face and voice if SuperNET is to ever get anywhere remotely close to what he has envisioned (very arguable given the fact that it is losing interest quite fast by adding ridiculous "assets" such as Kevondo's radio and by the downward spiral in price), since otherwise he could not remain anonymous himself, something he's more than willing to pay high numbers to achieve. So this closing of the thread may very well be James' imposition.

In any event, I am beginning to agree with you in your statement that alts are doomed all, especially now that you have to go back to the basic ones of longer history to find a few that are not outright scams or, like in the case of Vericoin, led by the Stooges. Even Bitcoin itself may be in serious danger after the last drastic -and ongoing- drop in price.

I am convinced now, at the risk of being wrong, that VRC's "life" is going to be very, very short, SuperNET or no SuperNET. I also believe that SuperNET will go nowhere anymore, nor will any of the other James' endeavors, clever as they are, they have had their time and the only thing left if for him to cash out... which I envision happening very, very soon. The house of cards if quickly falling down and can't be stopped with copy/paste shit and corruption overall being prevalent, so it is, quite frankly, time to cut losses and run. If you really believe digital currency has a future (I know blockchain tech has, but not necessarily as support of digital currencies, exchanges at the consumer level or anything like that; as a matter of fact the boys are going to be dumped all over now that IBM is going to come in with a blockchain itself), then there's no better place than on BTC itself at current low -and going lower, seemingly-, prices. No other project, I don't care which, can offer even remotely the level of both safety and potential profitability that BTC can.

Most certainly, neither VRC nor SuperNET -or any other alt, for that matter-.

There's no misunderstanding and, of course, from your perspective, the only other possible explanation would be that I am an idiot, which is so easily recognizable, right? That HAS TO be it.

Never mind the fact that, since the value of the coin presently is ZERO (actually 1 satoshi per seed, if the bid doesn't disappear as soon as there's any significant offer) and your memorable text implies the obvious, that burning 90% of the coins held in the top 10 wallets would actually increase the value of the remaining coins, you are, in fact, making the case for what I have proposed a long time ago which is condition sine qua non for the survival of this coin and to actually bring holders, big and small, some real value that they can trade out for real money, instead of the current and future ZERO. Get it now bright light? You were making the argument for the idea that you were supposedly opposing... numb nuts.

UK, although it could easily be taken as a standard, reality is that many Vericoin supporters, although willfully blind to the reality of the project are quite far in their behavior from these two, pantsman and the unemployable seudo graphics pro from Portugal. It is not fair to put all of them in the same basket.

To accuse Nosker and Dave of censorship, on the other hand, is simply reflecting on one of the many "qualities" that adorn them both... which, by the way, are the cause of the eventual demise of Vericoin, of course.

"Transparent reputation", you say? You know that is has been proven by the screen shots, irrefutably, that he has been acting unethically for months if not years? Do you know that he was part if not the main part, of the dev team in HAL and TIMELY -for Prometheus- also produced his trademark "code review" of HAL? There's no escaping that one, no matter what. Do you know that he has not called Prometheus a liar for saying (on the screenshots) that he was on his (Prometheus') payroll? I mean, I understand your clinging for dear life to any and all hopes of recouping your investment in anything that has anything to do with Metcalf, be it XC or the Blocknet or whatever else his tentacles have dirtied forever, but came on...

It's game, set and matych. Dan Metcalf has committed crypto harakiri.

Hey man, at least a minimum of decorum, ok? You told the guy in the screen shots that Metcalf  was on your payroll. He denies it but has not accused you of being a liar (as far as I know). What is it? Were you lying or is he? You cannot have it both ways, you know?

I find what you BOTH -you and Metcalf- have been doing for too long already, absolutely shameful. You both should already be in jail and quite probably that's where you both will end. I don't know who the fuck you are in real life -although I have a solid suspicion- but Dan Metcalf just subjected himself to crypto harakiri. There's not even a question regarding his unethical involvement not only in HAL but in many other coins. He is now poison, as both XC and Blocknet investors are going to quickly find out. Game, set and match. Done.

You? under another handle, will continue scheming and scamming until thrown in jail to rot with the rats, but until then, you still have mileage. Unfortunately.
Nature of the beast. But be sure that the fall is nearing. And it won't be pretty at all.

Ask someone a bit smarter than you, because you still dont seem to get what you wrote... wow.

Perhaps you should take a closer look at what you wrote, think it ovrr a bit, maybe discuss it with someone you consider smarter than you and then rephrase your post? Just a suggestion...

Dan, I would appreciate if you don't insult my intelligence, ok?

Pretending now that your association with an "honest promoter" is not BY DEFINITION, willingly and for pay associate with a DUMPER, is insulting me and anyone with an IQ above 50, alright?
Desperation makes us do very stupid things... I would advise to try fading out with at least some semblance of dignity, but it's your funeral.

Dan you have only yourself to blame for destroying your reputation, sorry.

You were well known and at some point respected... why use a seudonym? By definition, you know what that means: posting stuff that Dan Metcalf wouldn't. No two-ways about it.

Not to mention the fact that having already one handle instead of your well known name makes quite difficult to believe you dont have others, whether true or not.

The accusations are very specific. There's no avoiding it and it doesnt matter if they can be proven or not. There's no burden of proof in crypto. Anf for what I have read, it's game, set and match for you.

How can you even pretend any credibility after reviewing your own code in HAL? Not to mention the actions that followed thrre...

Bye bye Dan Metcalf. Think of another handle because as Dan Metcalf and "actsecure", you are done.

Isnt creating a puppet account to post this nonsense setting a whole new level of pathetism, trouser man?

To delete posts -even the fact that you have a self-moderated thread- is very, very wrong and counter productive; much better and classier to respond to negative views/accusations with "we are sorry that you don't like our project..."

Give anyone, including yourself, the chance to censor contrarian comments and 100 out of 100 times, he will do exactly that. Even when doing it will result in shooting himself on the foot. Sad reality.

I am not asking anyone anything; i am telling everyone the ONLY way this coin would ever have ANY value at all. Top 6 wallets would be a great follow up to the 300k. Top 10 would be much better. Top 20 almost perfection... goal being a market cap 6-10 times the (false) current one.

I am sharp enough to know that it wont happen though, hence this coin will never be worth anything.

That said it is fair to recognice what could potentially be a good start.

Now thinking with your greed will only only produce the same results than thinking with your ass...

Make that 650,000 instead, AND convince yhe other top ten to throw 90% of thrir stake and you will have something. Othrrwise it's just a meaningful but too small step in the right direction.

Will you ever see the light? I guess hope springs eternal.

Let me propose to you an scenario and lets see what you think: if iwere thr vrrijayjsy guy or any of the stoogrs, I would stick it to UK and didcredig him by not just denying his opinion but actually posting the addresses of all my wallets to irrefutably demontrate that he id 100% wrong. And wigh no credibility. I KNOW that you will post some BS to kiss ass as usual but wouldn't you do it too? Of course if such a transparent move would demonstrate it of course; if it would prove that UK is in fact right, obviously I wouldn't. What do you think the jsyjay guy and the stooges are going to do? Well one of yhese days these "good guys" are giing to surprise us. I still have faith that they will...

Oh and by the way you DO know yhat in the real world yhey are OBLIGATED BY LAW to make public knowledge of duch yhkbgd, don't you? So when regulation comes -or earlier- we all are going yo know who did what and when...

Ahh the mendacity...! The euphemisms! The outright lies!

You are being PAID by Arch. You are not "helping", you have been hired to provide a srrvice for money. Cut the crap.

Zynga/viacoin is not going to help matters here...