It's a very interesting day in the altcoin market: ViaCoin is transforming into a crypto giant while this tragicomic operation is entering into its final phase. The contrast couldn't be bigger between VeriCoin and ViaCoin. VIA keeps delivering fantastic results for ViaCoin holders, thank you btcdrak for your hard work and keep innovating.  

As for the clowns who brought Vericoin to 6K, if you don't work, mislead investors, delivery nothing but empty promises, fail to innovate, then don't be surprised that your coin is a failure.

I'm actually developing a modification to the Proof of Stake protocol right now for the VRC long run.  Many perceptions are jaded by price.

That's quite a lot of crickets you got there barbie  

Your BS is there in the locked thread for everyone to verify. Those who want to, can do so (large tub of popcorn recommended).... not going to indulge you in reruns of that lame sitcom again here.


And by the way, Its India, not Pakistan. Its the difference between Canada and US. A bit of education goes a long way you know... especially when you want to "appear credible"  

Hi Barabbas. Have we turned you into a buyer yet ??  Please say yes.

I don't keep up with the BTC price, but as you note the "200+" is patently wrong and should be corrected.

Or alternatively:
Somewhat arsehole-proof; critical thinking welcome.

The OP needs updating, because it should be something like 19.23 M coins at launch.

If the BTC price is $400, this makes the market cap $7.7 M at the 1000 BRO/BTC pricing.

The 200 M+ total coins is probably the money supply after several years of staking.

Cute, and exactly the knee-jerk response that I'd expect from you. You're nothing if not predictable. Classic Barbarras.

Last night, I was talking with a friend that I haven't talked to in a while. He has maybe 10K VRC and checked on it yesterday for the first time since the price was in the 20K+ range. He checked the BCT Thread and then sent me a message. We chatted for a bit before the subject of you came up. His immediate question was, "Why does that guy even post in that thread anymore?"

This is a question that has been put out there multiple times, but I don't believe that it's ever been answered. It usually just disregarded with some derogatory remark such as "That's a typical fanboy question". My friend's certainly not a fanboy; he rarely even reads the forums and checks on VRC maybe once every two months, yet he still thought it was a legitimate question.

I jokingly suggested that he post the question himself, to which he responded, "Yea, right! And have that guy attack me? No f'ing thank you."   That's the vibe that you give off.

All I can really do is speculate, but I attempted to answer the question myself. This is what I told him (feel free to make corrections):

"AltcoinUK was very supportive of the coin and the developers a few months ago, so much so that he probably fit the current definition of a 'cheerleader'. As time went on, he became unhappy with the rate at which features were being implemented as well as the direction that the devs were going with some of the planned features (like the Coinsis Card). The price decline has just added fuel to the fire since he views it as a direct result of feature stagnation and the coin not going in a direction that he wants. Now he believes that, in desperation, the developers have given up control of VeriCoin to James, the SuperNET guy, and are allowing him to dictate the future direction of the coin. He seems to believe that if he berates the developers enough and makes the same points over and over again, he can convince them to get back on a development track that he believes will be more productive for the coin."

My friend's response to that was to quote Albert Einstein, "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."

Someone buying hard on bittrex.

Dat feel when you realized youve been squabbling with IconicExpert this entire time.