Is there any way you can calculate your profits with PB mining per GHS? The normal calculators are only for if you own your own hardware, it seems.
|
|
|
Give the guy some time. Good lord, its 3pm on the 15th for god's sake in the US, and he hasnt been on today (last night he was on last.) Chill out.
You're right, didn't consider he might live in the US. Altho most signature campaigns use forum time as their standard.
|
|
|
Did anyone get paid so far…? I've got some serious doubts against OP, just a couple hours left of this day.
I am waiting its almost 12 hours I send pm but currently no response from op I guess he has some negative trust incoming then, lol. Perhaps he's just busy, but still, it's the 15th.
|
|
|
Where's my margarita?
Have you lost it?
|
|
|
Did anyone get paid so far…? I've got some serious doubts against OP, just a couple hours left of this day.
|
|
|
and more Quite the hypocrite arent you. Ponzis == free speech complaining about scams = STFU AND STOP WHINING. Shill identified.Not saying you're not allowed to whine like a b*tch, but do it in the same thread and keep yourself up to date on whatever is happening. Free speech is one thing but being upright annoying is another.
|
|
|
I am keen about this, as anybody received any payment yet?
It's not the 15th yet. I'll PM op tomorrow about the posts I did in this advertising campaign before the rules were changed. I'll update in this thread if he pays or not.
|
|
|
Oh, there is actually an owner of freebitcoinwin willing to show his face? The site is a copy trying to steal freebitco.in passwords, and has not paid out. Also someone provided screenshots of winning the biggest win by rolling 10 000, however was only rewarded with 0,02 btc rather than the promised 0,2. Plus he never got paid at all. Stay away from this guy, not only is he a scammer, but he's most likely lying about the page views etc.
|
|
|
No you don't understand I invested early in those and didn't get paid because the owner left with the money; that is very different from not getting paid because you lost the game by being a late depositor
Ponzis are gambling but taking the depositors money is sc.amming
I'm gonna be the one to say it. I'm sorry, but you deserve to lose that money for being stupid enough to fall for obvious and clear scams. See it as a very expensive lesson.
|
|
|
I love how everyone, if you go back in the thread a bit, has posted [insert Month 1-3 months from post being made here] is when we reach 1000. And it's still going on, haha.
|
|
|
What blows my mind every time i visit the gambling section why they allow a flood of ponzi sites to clutter the first page. Why would they even allow people to promote SCAMS on their forum? I really do not understand this at all.
To me it seems like everyday there are more and more of these ridiculous ponzi scams. It becomes brutal to swift through them all so you can find a thread worth reading.
Its makes me question whether the mods are in on these ponzi schemes to allow a blatant scam to be promoted.
Ponzis are not gambling they are a SCAM they will always be a SCAM how can you allow con artist and liars promote SCAMS?!?!?
It's allowed cause it is, it's not up to you to decide. If someone posts something racist here, does that mean the forum staff promotes it? No. Anyways, updates about the issue is discussed here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=510636.msg5657950#msg5657950, and we'll post likely see a new forum section soon. Quit whining already.
|
|
|
I've seen this requested in the meta section before. About time it happens. Goodie goodie.
|
|
|
My guess would be that a third of ponzis were sc.ams, is it a lot or not I let you decide Ponzicoin has been paying and is now using escrow (my idea ) it feels pretty safe to gamble them, it advertises itself as a ponzi and I would estimate that more than 90% of the money bet is bet by players knowing they are gambling and they can lose Ponzis are bad in the sense that it is gambling and ponzis on bitcointalk have been used by sc.ammers to get a quick buck; it could be solve by blocking newbies to create new threads on the ponzi section once created It's up to everyone to make their own risk-reward calculation when gambling.
|
|
|
C'mon guys, keep the thread clean. Beginning for signups or even posting a referral link should not be allowed IMO.
I don't think it's allowed at all on this forum, at least I had my first post with referral links deleted even tho I included no referral ones.
|
|
|
You can't argue with it being a solution. What a poor comparison though. Oh what problems you have, you have to ignore ponzis in the gambling section of a forum. What a cruel world, it's just as bad as living in poverty. Bohoo.
Idiot.
Yeah, you're right, I can't argue with a little kid who has an intellectual ability of a potato. If you cannot understand what hyperbole is please go find a dictionary (if you know what one is) and learn. Lol, someone is obviously upset cause he's embarrassed about a horrible comparison and his pathetic rants about his first world problems. Ran out of arguments - jumped to personal insults. Classic.
|
|
|
After new rules many singature campaigns are going to be dead and some losing very active members every where silent is this ok or no If you would not be here without the signature campaigns, you shouldn't be here at all. Fuck that, Quit contradicting yourself, All you sorry ass losers can suck some of Stunnas nuts. Fucking morons. and yea, If you chose to ignore me, That wont help since I know you cant resist some shit talking hahaha. How much did you lose mr red trust guy? From my point of view you're the sorry ass loser, not us, we're enjoying getting paid for posting. Like I said dont contradict, I tried the site, I didnt lose shit other than people listening to me, Now your the victim, Go on with your smart ass quotes, Its quite entertaining, Because I know you guys are the ones who get mad every single day fucking feeding this guy money that you rage on. You sent positive trust to Stunna claiming that he is legit. Talk about hypocrisy... Rofl, busted. This guy has got nothing going on, let's leave it at that. You seem to be too personal about the matter. What is it really, what are the reasons for being like that? How's it personal other than him flaming on a bunch of people collectively? If you get offended over the internet you shouldn't be here in the first place, I'm just fine. Oh, well, I misquoted a bit (read "this guy" referred to Stunna in your post). I meant U1TRA_L0RD attacking Stunna and indirectly all of us "feeding" him (and both of you are in the red zone, lol)... Aha. That explains quite a lot. I guess feeding him is wrong, but it's how the internet works isn't it.
|
|
|
^ ... There are things that people try not to do, without needing laws to specifically prohibit them. Farting at the theater is one such thing. Advertising Ponzis is another. I swear, this is like arguing with a 4-year-old.
Let's stop going around in circles. The illegalities of advertising Ponzis for an American person operating a website from American soil are numerous, and have been stated throughout this thread. They are unimportant. The bad publicity, needless attention from government agencies, and giving a great foothold for Bitcoin's detractors -- those are the important bits. Lol, yet you're wrong and accomplished nothing. /thread
|
|
|
I think it's interesting that most people hanging around here are so liberal when it comes to weapon and drug trade but get all christy when it's about Ponzi schemes, because they're soooo illegal. I'm not defending ponzis, but to be honest if you can't handle it, turn off your computer, and you won't be exposed to it, I promise.
That solution is one so extreme that it's stupid. It's equivalent to someone living in poverty and getting told they should kill themselves if thy can't handle it. Back on topic, ponzis are a pain in gambling and should be moved. You can't argue with it being a solution. What a poor comparison though. Oh what problems you have, you have to ignore ponzis in the gambling section of a forum. What a cruel world, it's just as bad as living in poverty. Bohoo. Idiot.
|
|
|
water on mars? they found it apparently *ba dum tiss* It doesn't count though. The chocalate bar name should be in quotes. ouch my bad! Technically I guess that's rather 'water in a glass on mars'. Just the thought of it is ridiculous.
|
|
|
Let the people make their own bad decisions, ignore these offers if you're smart enough to see what they're really about. Don't ban something just cause a small % of the forum user base gets scammed. #prochoice
|
|
|
|