A bit correction, they didn't create an empty token, they deliberately create this token to mislead people into investing, thinking that their claim is true. There is an active flag and scam accusation against them, it is explained more detailed there.

I'll move your reply --which act as your defense against this open accusation-- from your ann thread to this thread to make it easier for people to follow the progress.

---

---

Semantics, but very well, I'll concede, I stand corrected. 10 months for presale. And how long will your public ICO sale be? I can't see any entry for ICO on your roadmap, only presale, almost like... you use both term interchangeably. Did you not know that they're different stages?


An agressive move, I like it, it's a nice change of scenery from the usual playing victim "we just hired a content writer and didn't know they copy pasted the content". With that said, lets move to the matters at hand.

First, your "tax number and everything and we are legit", with "everything and we are legit" I assume you're talking about your company registration, where exact can we find these info? The first things I usually do whenever I visited a website is scrolling down to the bottom of their page as usually it's where all the legal stuff like company name and registration and address were written, and I'm rather sure it's not there, I even double checked to see if I was wrong, even utilizing a search button for your whitepaper.

Second, about your last sentence which imply that I didn't read carefully and missed an important part as below,



And the problem here is, in spite of your claim that you've do the proper citation by crediting the original content on your "bibliography" --which sadly still inadequate as you didn't properly cite the source as well as crediting other articles you plagiarize-- well.. you see, the thing is, we always archive everything. Those blue archived words scattered on the opening post? Yeah, those ones, like the one i left unsnipped from the post pyramid and the one on previous sentence. It means, we have a record of the original content --be it a whitepaper, webpage, or other things-- as per the accusation being published, which also means  even though you edited them later on to bury the evidence or whatsoever reason, we still have a reference of the original content.

My eyes rolled so high at these roadmap timeline. 1 year of presale? Presale? Anyway, I find something that's a bit worrying on your whitepaper. Mind to answer the concerns here?

Oh, almost forgot the nice red eye catcher:

What happened: Plagiarizing whitepaper
Suspect's Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3477669
Suspect's Website: https://www.polybtc.net/ | archived
Suspect's ANN thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5399524.0 | archived
Suspect's Whitepaper: https://www.polybtc.net/whitepaper | archived
Plagiarized Documents:
At least these two:
[1] https://www.binance.com/en/blog/ecosystem/introducing-bnb-chain-the-evolution-of-binance-smart-chain-421499824684903436/
[2] https://inform.tmforum.org/archive/2014/06/rise-cryptocurrency/

Additional Notes:
And of course, to complete the scammer traits, they have this:

 
Some screenshot for easy view:

 

 

---

---

Notifying the suspect.

Again, did that already. Three times now as I keep checking back just in case you've add those info, and since you didn't but keep insist on that answer for my questions... have you check my question properly?

Two questions that I asked are simple. One, I am curious about why almost none of your team mentioned their employment on Bitconia, not even the CEO. The only thing that tied you with the CEO is that he works on Future Trends, which you also mentioned as your strategic partner, which unfortunately, their website couldn't do the same for you. So there goes the ties. I think it is quite justified if we questions whether those people you mentioned as part of your team really works for bitconia or you just borrowed their name without their consent. This issue is very easy to tackle, though, all they need to do is just updating their linkedin.



Second, the award. Can't find which organization crowned you as the best ICO 2022

Did that, both of them, and still didn't find answer for any of the two questions I asked. Unless you want to point me to the specific page where the information is written, I'll suggest that it'll be easier to share them here right away

CMC these days are no longer CMC on their former glory, project with enough fund can just pay a third party to help them getting listed. They'll help the project to meet CMC requirement for listing, like --fake-- daily trading volume, --fake-- bid/ask order, etc. And not only CMC, CG and other site alike too, as evidenced by an accidental self-incrimination by Tokpie during their case with one of their client

What's the purpose of gradually releasing 2,500 token monthly for 100 months? First, the amount is almost insignificant to the circulating supply that it'll affect current price or buying power, second, 100 months. Really? You're that confident of your project that you're so she it'll still be around after 8+ years?

I think you understand things wrongly here, we are not judging and sentencing that you're the wrong one, we are simply looking for the truth behind the story, and only after that we can determine which user told lies and which one is the victim. The red tag given by DireWolfM14 was initialy raised to merely catch your attention toward this thread. It is not impossible that --if adequate evidences are given-- the real story here is the OP lied for whatever reason. But, so far, OP has evidences that incriminate you, so the ball is in your court.

There is no need to prove that you can fabricate evidences to deceive people, no one challenging you to edit photos to work in your favor. What we asked is for you to give counter-evidence that the screenshot given by OP is not correct, but not by editing another image to fabricate evidences, if both of you keep doing this, everything will go downhill.

As you said that you do sent a PM to the OP in the middle of, I assume, a job negotiation, I think it is safe to say that at least that evidence is valid. So, the story so far according to OP, you approached them to offer your service, asked for an upfront full payment --50 dollars, and I'll repeat myself just for thr record, IMO the amount is too small to risk a reputation-- and leave after you got the transfer.

With OP claiming you deleted the entire chat -but it seems, not before they can archive some screenshot-- and blocked them, and you claimed they deleted the chat after you refused the job --unfortunately, before you can archive the convo to work in your favor--, the case turns into a whodunnit.

I'll suggest we can start from whether TG name "Crypto Has" is really you or not, because I can't find your username using the handler you posted months ago, so I can't confirm it myself.


And then, after we established if the name is correct --and thus, the screenshots provided were at least bear some truth in it-- I'll suggest you to point out, according to your version, which part of conversation is true and from which part is fabricated.

---

---

I think it is rather futile at this point, but... keraldk, we are still waiting for the proof that ThatsMod blocked you from TG

---

---

DireWolfM14, as ThatsMod is already present here and to give an equal position for both parties, would you mind to retract the negative tag for now --or at least change them into neutral-- until it is proven which side lied and which side told the truth?

Why'd almost none of the team on your project list or at least mention Bitconia on their employment record? Not even the CEO. Second, I know it is most likely a marketing words, but it doesn't hurt to ask, on which standard and what organization entitled you the best ICO for 2022?

First thing to be confirmed, were the screenshot of the conversation is true, i.e. you're "Crypto Has" and the conversation between you and him really happened, at least up to the screenshot below? Not judging which side said the truth and which side lied as it is too soon to pass the judgement, but suppose the answer for both question is yes, and that you're really waiting for him to send transaction before proceeding to do the job, why didn't you say anything when he gave a screenshot of transaction to the address --assuming, if they lied, then the address on the screenshot is not yours because if it is, then keraldk would have finished their side of contract by paying you-- knowing that they gave a screenshot of a transfer to a wrong address.

For reference, the address is indeed credited with USDT and immediately drained, https://bscscan.com/address/0x0707d5e717f3090bdc6f8893fee2c3d12c27bb05

I'm trying to understand this, so you agreed to pay him upfront, 50 USDT, to fix your coding error, and after he received payment, he deleted all of your conversation? Is there any proof to backup this claim? Like the empty chat room or a sign that they blocked you? I am not doubting anyone, just trying to be logical as 50 seem... too low to risk a reputation.

Meanwhile, I see that ThatsMod is online today, I'll try to reach him through PM to invite him here and give his side of the story.

---

---

Edit: invited

What happened: Either a seriously severe case of plagiarism and recycle, or rugpull, or both.
Suspect's Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3410072
Suspect's Website:

• BabyShibaFloki - archived
• ShibaGamesToken - archived
• FlokiMonk - archived
• ShibaSurfers - Error
• ShibaHunter - archived
• MetaFarmDAO - Seemingly no longer active
• MetaCity - I can't find their website
• FighterShiba - archived
• MetaVillageDAO - archived
• MetaDragonCity - archived
• MetaTownship - archived
• ArabianCity - archived special thanks to mandor for digging their web address

Suspect's ANN threads list: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3410072;sa=showPosts | archived

And this is the part where things get a tad bit more interesting. The suspect seems to recycle their whitepaper from the old projects to the new ones, which... the original WP itself is copying from other sources [see screenshot section below]. Basically, they create a project, abandoned it after a few days, and made another one, an exact copy, with different name. So if Cryptokool001 said they're just hired to be a CM, they did an extremely awful job of DD because they can't even spot plagiarized materials which an exact copy of the project they previously moderated. With that said, I think it is safe to rule out the old "I'm not part of team" excuse.

Second, rug pull. 2 out of 12 of their projects telegram group are no longer available, and the others were not so good, with months of gaps in between chat, all were only made by the team because they limit their members from writing on the group, most likely to prevent people asking something like this:


which wouldn't be too far fetched to think that the latest and the ones that is yet to come will also be a quick money grab before they abandoned their TG group. Departing from this opinion, I think I am not too harsh to the suspect if I raised a newbie-warning flag against them, and hopefully people will support to activate it.

Flag raised: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2963

Some screenshot for easy view:

Nice findings! This is as what I'm afraid of, I've has a feeling that they'll raise one or two red flag, like fake team or plagiarism. The source they plagiarized though, is another project by the OP that seems to be failed. I think I'll launch a deep look into the user --not the project-- once I get some free time at hand.

I read your entire post yesterday and tried to give it a good night sleep and re-read them again today in hope for a new perspective. And the impression I get still the same as last night:

Where exactly on your narrative is the scam attempt happen? I haven't read or do any DD on 5Dimes, just a glance at their website, and although the website looks... worrying, based on your narrative --unless you can provide further info and evidence on whichnpoimt amd what form does the scam happen-- the impression I get from both time is that this is a simple case of Karen. And no, not only when you pull the card to[ask for manager, it's from the exact point where you demanded something so technical about 30% discount.

Forgive me if I'm wrong, I have no idea about gambling terms at all, but wasn't what you insisting are explained here already?

The way I see it, you're being banned for wasting their time with 2 hours of chat, spamming their helpdesk by asking on multiple chat topic, and ultimately asking something rather personal and completely not related to the topic in discussion.

That should be the first big red flag, I think it is a rather general and common understanding that a legit and reputable service --any service-- will not try to reach their customer first. Included within, not adding people to their tg group through any means.

Where can I find your website and other useful info regarding your project details? It doesn't seem that you have a website yet, because even Google didn't bring me a result. I assume you also didn't have any prototype, MVP, or even a teaser yet?

Edit: fixing autocorrect --swipe-typing, actually-- typo

How do they lure their victim on the first case? They're a telegram group, so either you need to be invited by someone or you joined yourself with a link provided somewhere, correct? So how does it exactly begin?

We can start from solving the case of whether you're really hired by a "team" or not. So far, you've been asked three times on your ann thread to provide a proof that you're really hired. And so fr you keep evading it. Repeatedly insisting that you're just hired --like the post you made on your thread, I quote below-- without giving any concrete proof is rather... not convincing enough. Something like a screenshot of your discussion with the "team" or a screenshot of your contract from Fiverr is simple to be provided in matter of seconds if it's real... unless the team is nonexistent and you need to photoshop the said screenshot from nothing. That'll take time.

Excuse me? Like... You're planning to create many alt-accounts to "get involved" in a "discussion" of your project? Like this one I quote below, is one of your alt you use to... make a lot of discussion?