Agreed. Zero Hedge selectively caters to doomsday fanatic nimrods. I can't believe people swallow that stuff up without realizing their lunatic mindset is being selectively targeted as a reader. Its a site that exists to comfort people about their wacky, unfounded beliefs, and not much more. We're not on the brink of: - war with Iran - civil war - World War 3 - financial collapse - the apocalypse - armageddeon - or widespread chaos and anarchy in any form If we were, people sure as hell wouldn't keep commenting in this forum. This is one of the foremost examples of leisure activity, representative of a society functioning at a very high level, where people have time to kill arguing about abstract nonsense. Opportunist as always. You can't engage in debate yourself so you need a sold sock puppet account and a moderator who can't tolerate open debate to back you up. What about your post is at all on topic other than the fact you said the words "war with Iran" with in it? Of course the leftist moderator seething with butt hurt over being exposed over and over again will not do anything about your off topic posts because they serve his personal interests. Let me know when you have a logical argument instead of a bunch of personal attacks little boy.
|
|
|
No one said anything about equality of outcome so why are you still strawmanning? No one claimed any of the goals I listed were communism. In fact, the argument was that modern leftist ideology is nothing like what the article was debunking.
I'm still not sure you know what capitalism means. Social welfare programs are not a form capitalism. Capitalism involves private owners and profit seeking. Capitalism in this context would be a corporation having a program that feeds hungry children and turns a profit off of the tax breaks and free marketing. A for-profit education system would be an example of capitalism. Social democracies have government-based safety nets that provide everyone with the essentials to have basic opportunity. The idea that capitalism and socialism take place simultaneously in a country still alludes you.
No you didn't say it, you described it then claimed it was equality of opportunity. If social welfare programs are not based on Capitalism, how are they paid for? So you just wave your magic sickle over a pile of sand and make a bag of groceries? If the corporation is feeding children, what the fuck is the problem? Isn't that what you claim you want? You keep telling me about how you don't advocate for collectivization and state control, but here you are literally complaining about kids being fed at the expense of state control. "Government based" is meaningless. The government doesn't produce anything, the government can only provide what it has taken from the productive by force or coercion. Your "social democracies" pay for these exceptionally smaller scale entitlement programs with a combination of extremely high taxes and natural resources sold on the world market, both dependent on what is known as Capitalism. You aren't revealing some secret to me. I know they both can exist at the same time. The problem is you don't have any concept of the fact that Communism (Socialism) requires Capitalism to operate, but Capitalism does not require either Communism or Socialism to operate. Additionally there comes a point where entitlement programs become destructive of the very mechanisms which fund them. You however seem to think we can just keep handing out more and more and more, and because you feel on an emotional level that it is moral, some how magically it will work.
|
|
|
Tag me, flag me, any way you want me . I'll be working towards finding a solution and trying to mend LiveCoins reputation as that seems like more of a challenge than just pointing fingers and exercising a feeling of power. But that might just be me, as long as I'm on DT (I've messaged theymos about blacklisting me) I will counter any negative given to participants in the LiveCoin campaign. I might share any updates in this thread, the campaign thread or somewhere else but as of right now it's back to work. As I suspected, your request to be blacklisted from the default trust was a preemptive action to compensate for the criticism you knew you were going to get for continuing to support this exchange for your personal profit. How much exactly was your reputation worth Hhampuz? You create the narrative anyhow you want it tecshare, but then again were you not accusing me of trying to distract from this scam accusation? What exactly is it you are doing now? To answer your question though, I'd say my reputation was is worth more than yours so Not distract from this scam accusation, distract from the incoming wave of criticism bound to be directed at you for your involvement with them. I wouldn't know how much my reputation is worth, because mine is not for sale. You be mad at me if you like for pointing this out, but we both know you are doing this to yourself by avoiding the hard choices with little default trust games. More rules for thee but not for me right? Suddenly you see the value in people being left the fuck alone now that it is your turn don't you?
|
|
|
Tag me, flag me, any way you want me . I'll be working towards finding a solution and trying to mend LiveCoins reputation as that seems like more of a challenge than just pointing fingers and exercising a feeling of power. But that might just be me, as long as I'm on DT (I've messaged theymos about blacklisting me) I will counter any negative given to participants in the LiveCoin campaign. I might share any updates in this thread, the campaign thread or somewhere else but as of right now it's back to work. As I suspected, your request to be blacklisted from the default trust was a preemptive action to compensate for the criticism you knew you were going to get for continuing to support this exchange for your personal profit. How much exactly was your reputation worth Hhampuz?
|
|
|
Have an offer. Will be selling in a couple days at highest offer.
I don't use this forum anymore. Legendary account for sale AS IS. You can do whatever you want with it.
Best offer takes it. Escrow will be used for transaction.
Quoting for reference. https://archive.is/7AGnx
|
|
|
Odd that from someone who makes so much noise. You are as bad as cryptohunter you wet streak of piss.
Everyone the DT mob disagrees with seems to be "as bad as cryptohunter" now days. Cryptohunter wishes he was as effectual as I am. No just 2 cunts with a similar level of retard fella. There is no mob, just a few people who speak off forum, some memebers of the forum “mob” aren’t even in the off forum “mob” Mind blown for you pajeets hey I don't really care how you characterize yourselves. You have one set of rules for people in your club and one set of rules for people outside your club.
|
|
|
Odd that from someone who makes so much noise. You are as bad as cryptohunter you wet streak of piss.
Everyone the DT mob disagrees with seems to be "as bad as cryptohunter" now days. Cryptohunter wishes he was as effectual as I am.
|
|
|
Dreaming? What leads you to believe I endorse this war anywhere? More like a warning. I bet you think CNN is a reputable news source though right? I wonder if they ever found those weapons of mass destruction... Most of the really dumb people I know make assumptions based on no information whatsoever. Oh, hey there! EDIT: Way to prove how right you are abusing the trust system because you can't handle criticism, but I am the unstable one right?
|
|
|
I don't know what laws they have there but is she even allowed to do that? I mean these are senators and they're supposed to be in a separate branch from the governor right?
I am pretty sure it is not legal, but some one will have to take it to court to get anything done about it.
|
|
|
It seems any time I make a report in Politics & Society for an off topic post they always go unhandled. " Child Kidnappings by the Western-European States" Facts are facts. 72% of undocumented immigrants work compared to 60% of the entire population so they are actually an economic plus. If you normalize their status they can live above ground while paying full taxes. Hearings are currently being scheduled for 2022 it is short term style housing but will be used long term and even as some of those people are sent home, they will just be replaced by a ballooning amount of more refugees.
775 per day for four years is more than the average american makes in a lifetime. Its over a million dollars. The permanent recurring cost would be negative in the form of the income taxes 73% of these people would be paying if they were free. The moral argument is clear, but there is no logical economic argument on your behalf. Its not even close. The cost of detaining these people is astronomical and we aren't even counting the money being spent "securing the border" and funding ICE which is money that could instead be spent replenishing the resources you say these people are a burden to.
Sounds on topic to me.
|
|
|
Children who don't get good education don't have opportunity to develop skills. Children arrive at school hungry or sick don't have the opportunity to absorb that education even if it is good. Children who go home to an economically stressed environment don't have the same opportunity to follow through with their education. You could solve this by guaranteeing every child has a dignified physical home with equal access to good schools, food, health and psychological support.
At that point, we would have a meritocracy.
I talked about children from the start. Goalposts never moved. Children do not have control over their parents. Bad parents is something "out of their control". Children without parents able to provide for them already have existing programs to do so Ok then we agree these programs should just be made effective enough to reach every child that needs them because tons of kids aren't getting it. Thats my whole point. The existence of ineffective programs with the goal of ensuring opportunity does not mean there is universal opportunity. First of all there is simply no way that a viable tax plan to pay for this could ever be formed. Even if you taxed everyone at 100% (slavery by any definition), you couldn't pay for all of this. In order for you to have the policies you advocate for there would have to be theft of rights and state mandated labor. If only there were other countries that we could look to and see how these goals are actually accomplished without the things you fear.... This is part of what I mean by having a limited perspective. You are advocating for equality of outcome not equality of opportunity. Equality of outcome is not possible. You go ahead and give examples of countries and I will give examples of how much smaller they are, and how those programs are based in Capitalism not Communism.
|
|
|
It's odd, then, that you should take any part in such a system.
Well the votes for DT say a different story fella. Democracy over. Dictatorship and you keep getting voted out, perhaps if you weren’t such a narcissistic Cunt it would be a different story
Hey can you guys keep it down? I can't read over the deafening sound of you jerking each other off.
|
|
|
Aliens are absolutely among us. In fact I saw one selling oranges by the highway yesterday. They look just like us.
|
|
|
TOP-200 of the most trusted members has been updated again.
Jeez, looks like I'm back on DT? A'ight then. What's even weirder is that I'm trusted by TECSHARE, apparently, unless I'm reading it wrong. Never would have thought that would be the case and I'm not sure what changed his mind about me being a degenerate scumbag. Congrats to those who made it onto the list and thank you Coin-1 for alerting me of this via your post. I haven't been paying much attention to who's on DT lately. That is correct. You have demonstrated to me you have grown a set of nuts and are willing to stand up for what is right, not just parroting what is popular all the time. IMO you could still do more of this, but it is a start. For the record I am pretty sure I never called you a "degenerate scumbag" but feel free to quote me if I did.
|
|
|
Please note the words in bold. You will notice they are not the same word. What is the difference? One is a multiple and one is an individual. One account also does not equal all accounts, the other accounts were still damaged even if your claim is correct. Regardless of your assertion, considerations were still made forming an agreement. The seller may or may not have known the account was hacked, and was never given the opportunity to rectify the situation. I have seen many account sellers in the past return hacked accounts willingly upon proof of ownership at their own expense. Regardless of ALL OF THIS, bob123 still entered into a contract with intend to defraud the seller of his legal rights. That alone makes the flag valid.
You people don't seem to get this is not about defending account sellers. It is about defending the rights of everyone here from wanna be internet police vigilantes who think because they intend to do some thing positive they don't have to follow the rules themselves and can pick and choose on their own who can trade, and what they trade.
As I said, that proves nothing because of VPNs. I could do whatever you or anybody else here wants, there will always be somebody saying: "But this is still no evidence, do this and do that!" This will be a never ending story. I'm the real zackie and this account is not for sale. Believe it or not, I don't care. Have you checked https://bitcointalk.org/myips.php ? You have only 30 days to see the account thief's IP address. Holy crap! Thanks for that link. Here is the result: 2019-06-25 18:52:29 2019-06-25 19:53:15 xx.xxx.xxx.xx XXXXXXXx, Germany 2019-06-24 22:00:53 2019-06-24 22:01:56 xxxx:xx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx XXXXXXXX, Germany 2019-06-24 20:03:48 2019-06-24 20:52:38 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx XXXXXXX, Germany 2019-06-19 09:38:21 2019-06-20 14:02:48 42.201.183.65 Karachi, Pakistan Indeed, somebody from Pakistan used my account! But hey, you know.... I could have used a VPN.... We are talking about trying to sell a hacked account. The claim from the OP was: He made an agreement for both of us that he will buy the account if we prove ownership and use SebastianJu as an escrow if proved that the accounts is within our hands and we are not scammers by sending a message to him which trustedseller has done but he broke the agreement/contract and compromised a confidential information about our transaction.
If you will notice, you didn't actually reply to anything I said. Furthermore there was no way bob123 could have known this when he committed an act of fraud by entering into a contract he never intended to honor.
|
|
|
This is unsurprising. I don’t doubt that forcing consensus for trust ratings (flags) will lead to lauda being discredited.
If lauda was just making baseless flags that would be one thing, but they are clearly actively ignoring the pre-requisites for even creating the flag as laid out by the administration. Essentially lauda wants to make their own rules and refuses to operate within the community. It really depends on how you define discredited, but I would say that qualifies.
|
|
|
I suspect this is a pre-emptive distraction from the incoming Livecoin drama bound to unfold...
|
|
|
|