Irrelevant.
How is pointing out the several ways in which you are mistaken irrelevant? You pretend to be against politically motivated investigations but I haven't seen a peep of protest from you over the Russiagate clusterfuck over 3 years, but this is worthy of criticism?
I stayed out of the whole Russia mess because I could care less about it. This issue speaks directly about Trump's character. Which is slimy. Nothing new here, or technically illegal. You still are pushing the narrative that the real issue is Trump's action's and not Biden's.
Wrong again. As I've been saying since the beginning, both are non-issues. I just realized you've now shifted the focus entirely on me. This is lame. I'll be back when something new happens. Exactly, you didn't give a fuck about these kind of politically motivated investigations, that is until they aligned with your values, then suddenly it is worth calling out demonstrating you don't actually hold this principle. "both are non-issues" but lets talk about how Trump doesn't look good and conveniently create false equivalency between being tacky and actual corruption. Not sure how I am going to point out how full of shit you are without focusing on your double standards. Of course you haven't focused on me personally at all during this exchange right? Standards are only for everyone else are they?
|
|
|
You're a steaming bowl of nuts. I don't even like Biden. I see, so now Trump's crime is being tacky? Did I say it was a crime? Three years of politically motivated unending accusations and investigations over Russiagate resulting in nothing is no issue at all, but a single request for an investigation and this is grounds for impeachment is it? You are a steaming bowl of horse shit.
Hey asshole. Did I begin the impeachment inquiry? Again, this is what I said: I don't think its enough to proceed with the impeachment, or if they do, he will probably be acquitted. Get a grip. Irrelevant. You pretend to be against politically motivated investigations but I haven't seen a peep of protest from you over the Russiagate clusterfuck over 3 years, but this is worthy of criticism? You still are pushing the narrative that the real issue is Trump's action's and not Biden's.
|
|
|
So if in my opinion the memo looks fine, let me ask this. How would someone like Trump ask ANYTHING of another president, such that it could not be accused that he was asking for help in "investigating a political rival?" The only way I can see is for him to stay quiet.
To answer your question, he could have said ANYTHING other than "Can you please investigate Biden?" Basically it was extremely tacky to bring up Biden during what was supposed to be a congratulatory phone call and ask for help. Of course Trump being Trump said the phone call was "perfect." There is no give-me-this and i'll-give-you-that in that conversation. There are no threats or anything that could be construed that way...
I realize that, and legally speaking you are correct. Which is why Trump's handlers cleared him to release the memo. However, when Bill Lumberg asks you to come in and work on the weekend, you do it if you know what's good for you. https://www.austinchronicle.com/binary/9ef6/screens_feature3-1.jpg"Yeah if you could just go ahead and investigate my political rival for me, that would be just great." Lumberg isn't making any demands, nor is he making any promises. He's just implying that something needs to be done. And if you know what's good for you, you'll do it. Of course the relationship between the two parties isn't boss/employee, but the inference being made is relatively the same. RAR!
You're a steaming bowl of nuts. I don't even like Biden. I see, so now Trump's crime is being tacky? No one said you liked Biden, but you have made it more than apparent you suffer from Trump derangement syndrome. According to you the fact that Trump asked for an investigation into corruption that happened during the previous administration is a crime while a vice president explicitly demanding the removal of an investigator looking into the illegal activities of his son "or else" is less of an issue clearly demonstrates your hypocrisy. Three years of politically motivated unending accusations and investigations over Russiagate resulting in nothing is no issue at all, but a single request for an investigation and this is grounds for impeachment is it? You are a steaming bowl of horse shit.
|
|
|
3. Where did I say that I drink H2O2 regularly? You are making that up. 3. Ahaha, you deleted your post. Since I was summoned on this, I'll post here. I think you're looking for this: Many people drink a little H2O2 on a regular basis for health. I have in the past. It's not deleted, but I scraped it anyway. I have no idea what this is all about That's what he was on a mission to uncover? Don't worry you aren't missing anything, it is just as retarded and senseless as it appears.
|
|
|
Waw! That's really huge step in btc adoption, I hope Mr Trump will not have problem with such great news, because clearly this shows blockchain technology is has a role to play after all, this is certainly the beginning of more adoption, slow and stead we go to the top.
Triumph has nothing to do with US air force endorsement on blockchain use for there job. If the air force see it as necessary, it will go through process, either to the floor of the house. The US is a liberal state. Moreover, whether US or not, others are adopting and using blockchain. Is a technology that won't go away in a long time. Mr. Triumph is going to be in peach.
|
|
|
There was no quid pro quo. The Ukrainian foreign minister denies any pressure was applied.
Yes I read the article you are quoting these points from as well. The levels of hypocrisy coming from people claiming abuse of investigations in order to smear political opponents after 3 years of Russia collusion hysteria is reaching the point that it can only be explained by mental breakdown. Though given your personal propensity for confirmation bias and reaching a conclusion you prefer then trying to craft a narrative around it, this viewpoint from you is not exactly unexpected.
What is my "narrative" here? You were in such a rush to chastise me that you didn't even read the end of my post: I don't think its enough to proceed with the impeachment, or if they do, he will probably be acquitted.
Biden's career is over, and lots of very prominent dems are going down with him. The last 3 years have been nothing but a desperate last ditch attempt to escape their inevitable fate behind bars or dangling at the end of a rope.
I really doubt all of this. I don't need to quote from an article to make simple observations. Your narrative is that this has anything to do with wrong doing on Trump's part when this is nothing but a desperate attempt to draw attention away from the MASSIVE amounts of corruption Biden is about to be held accountable for. The end of your post is irrelevant because this story is about Biden's corruption no matter how much you wish it was about Trump. You have about as much sense as a can of smashed assholes, so your doubts don't mean much. Just don't make yourself scarce when it all breaks like Flying Hellfish and his Russia delusions, because it would be such a shame for the rest of us to not get to witness the final stage of your mental breakdown over having been supporting traitors an thieves while continually condemning anyone who says otherwise. I can tell by the shift in the tone of your words you are already having doubts, but you have gone to far to back out now. You feel compelled to keep doubling down in the desperate hope that you will be able to claim some kind of twisted semantic out over this in the din of the resulting chaos.
|
|
|
https://i.imgur.com/vs9rAv2.pngI dunno. Sounds pretty bad. Sounds like Trump is using his position of the presidency to ask another president to investigate his political rival. I'm not the only one who thinks this. Rep. Adam Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said: The notes between the call between the president of the United States and the president of Ukraine as well as the legal opinion drafted by the Department of Justice in an effort to prevent the whistleblower complaint from coming to our committee. And I have to say that I'm shocked by both. The notes of the call reflect a conversation far more damning than I or many others had imagined. It is shocking at another level that the White House would release these notes and felt that somehow this would help the President's case or cause. Because what those notes reflect is a classic mafia-like shakedown of a foreign leader. But as we all know, even when Trump loses, he wins. I don't think its enough to proceed with the impeachment, or if they do, he will probably be acquitted. There was no quid pro quo. The Ukrainian foreign minister denies any pressure was applied. The levels of hypocrisy coming from people claiming abuse of investigations in order to smear political opponents after 3 years of Russia collusion hysteria is reaching the point that it can only be explained by mental breakdown. Though given your personal propensity for confirmation bias and reaching a conclusion you prefer then trying to craft a narrative around it, this viewpoint from you is not exactly unexpected. Biden's career is over, and lots of very prominent dems are going down with him. The last 3 years have been nothing but a desperate last ditch attempt to escape their inevitable fate behind bars or dangling at the end of a rope.
|
|
|
I can say with quite high levels of confidence, you are shit out of luck. The money is long gone.
|
|
|
How many times do you I have to tell you that this isn't a court of law? Stop using terms like "innocent" and "guilty." Nobody here is thinking along those lines except for you. The fact stands you didn't even oppose the flag or try to work with theymos' new system. If you don't like it, cry to him about it, not us.
In short it seems as if you're intent on being the new resident Reputation troll.
As many times as you need to feel better about yourself I suppose. Innocent and guilty are very simple terms with clear meaning even outside of the legal system. Your semantic dance does nothing to change the fact that you have come to a conclusion first based on suspicion alone and are demanding that your suspicions be proven wrong rather than presenting actual evidence of malfeasance. This system of rule is the hallmark of totalitarians and dictators throughout history, and always results in many many more victims as those making the accusations almost never have any accountability if they are wrong. People aren't going to respect a system that is so arbitrary and open to abuse, resulting in even less people willing to play by the rules, thus creating even more breakdown of the community and people more willing to cheat and steal. I am absolutely working within Theymos's system, and furthermore I was one of the primary proponents of him introducing a standard of evidence of theft, contractual violation, or violation of applicable laws of which this new system is based upon in order to help prevent exactly these kind of arbitrary accusations. You and your mob buddies are the ones not working within the system and are intent on raising your own profiles at the expense of the overall community which you pick out of a hat one by one to accuse. This accusation is especially retarded as cryptocurrency is inherently a risky endeavor, let alone trading. You are attempting to enforce a standard that no one using a similar business model could ever meet. In effect you are dictating to this user what trading practices he may or may not use rather than bringing evidence of wrongdoing on their part. You might as well start tagging every gambling service if this is your standard of evidence. You and your wannabe internet police friends are the Bitcoin version of "permit Pattie." This is exactly what many people turn to cryptocurrency to escape, and here you are stripping that ability to have privacy, independence, and voluntary trade without 3rd party interference.
|
|
|
As always, first they yell scam/ponzi, give red trust, open flags.. all without having the necessary knowledge to understand the technical workflow of our business model or even 1 piece of evidence against us. Then when they receive the answers, pooof. disappeared. That's why "spineless". Never bend the knees if you are running a legit business. Let the facts and your clients talk for your business and exploit the visibility that trolls give you. Hopefully our story will teach something. As has been pointed out to you several times already, you are a habitual liar incapable of honestly representing yourself and your services. Despite your massive arrogance and litany of unsubstantiated, over-the-top claims, you've only managed to actually demonstrate that you've made winning trades equaling to $11 across the span of 20 days. Had you made these trades for you clients they would currently be sitting on a loss, thanks to owing you 30% of their profits + a $10 a month "VPN fee". Why are you charging every client this fee anyway? The more clients you have, the less the fee should be for each one. Every time you speak you raise more questions than you can provide answers for. Your one defender in this thread didn't even bother to oppose the flag against you. Shows you how much support you actually have here. I don't see cryptohunter err tecshare's name on here, do you? So now some ones innocence or guilt is determined by how many people defend them? This is the popularity contest I was speaking of previously in addition to the burden of being judged guilty until proven innocent. Not only do people have to prove themselves innocent to the mob, but if they don't grovel sufficiently it doesn't matter how much they prove their innocence. Plenty of people have no one defend them even when they did nothing wrong simply based on the fact that they don't want to be the next target of the mob for daring to contradict them, exactly like is being done to FruitBasket.
|
|
|
Hello Mr. Nasty, I am special agent Steve Kyle from Internal Revenue Services of United States of America. Your name appear on our records due to report by Mr. Vod. We have officer in your location that will serve warrant for you're arrest unless you pay taxes Now.
If you would like to settle this matter outside of a courthouse you must drive to your local Walmart, CVS, 7-11, Best Buy, or other store nearby which sell gift cards.
You owe in the amount of six figures as Mr. Vod has suggest. Please ask the cashier for Google Play cards and to load them with the amount $1000 dollars each. DO NOT tell them you are buying them for the IRS because they will charge you 20% to 30% extra. Apple itunes cards also accepted, sorry sir Mr. Nasty this is the only payment accepted by the Internal Revenue Services because red flag will appear under your name if you pay credit card & PayPall.
Contact us when you have the Google Play Cards and we will cancel the arrest warrant. If not you will calling from behind bars,, the officer is stand by.
IRS Special Agent Steve Kyle Badge Number 215F4 United States America
I am sure you think this is hilarious, but I thought you might like to know you just committed a felony with a potential sentence of 3 years in prison on an open forum. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/912
|
|
|
Isn't it better to just hire more people? Enforcing minimum weekly post counts probably has a negative effect on post quality if people know they *have* to post enough or they'll be kicked out of the campaign.
If there's concern about transaction fees (especially if fees increase), people could always create accounts on whatever service they advertise and get paid there.
Or just set a minimum payout rate to accumulate to before sent.
|
|
|
Usually I think that this is not an accurate way of looking at things, but maybe this was actually 4D chess by Trump? Maybe he set up the Dems to freak out about this, and now he's slowly, painfully going to release info proving his innocence and making the Dems look like fools and Biden look like a crook. You are starting to get the idea, but you are underestimating what is about to happen here. Trump is about to immolate the Democrat party. What is coming is without precedent. A coup was attempted against the legitimately elected leader Trump, and the corruption about to be exposed is going to be the biggest political scandal in US history. Hasn't he been doing this all this time? Remember, "I was wiretapped" and them all calling him a liar.. I hope all the truth comes out no matter what it is, but isn't Trump already the biggest political scandal of all time? I'm not sure I've heard of this amount of insanity in history.. the left are even batshit crazy in their agendas of basically every last thing they talk about in the debates.. They all are extremists in every policy.. I mean with proof and evidence resulting in prosecution and conviction, not just collective hysteria. He has been proving them wrong over and over again, but the media just keeps pushing the original false narrative to save their own asses because they are complicit. He has been slow walking this in order to build the evidence as well as let his opponents burn their own credibility in order to reduce the risk of unrest and riots. If he had just come out with this info right away, many people would have believed the narrative that it was to cover up for his own crimes, potentially resulting in massive unrest and civil war. He gave them all the time in the world to bring evidence against him but they never had any. Essentially he as been easing the left into the reality that they lost legitimately, then dropping the hammer on those responsible for this attempted coup.
|
|
|
Usually I think that this is not an accurate way of looking at things, but maybe this was actually 4D chess by Trump? Maybe he set up the Dems to freak out about this, and now he's slowly, painfully going to release info proving his innocence and making the Dems look like fools and Biden look like a crook. You are starting to get the idea, but you are underestimating what is about to happen here. Trump is about to immolate the Democrat party. What is coming is without precedent. A coup was attempted against the legitimately elected leader Trump, and the corruption about to be exposed is going to be the biggest political scandal in US history.
|
|
|
The death of the Democrat party is beginning...
|
|
|
You have fun beating your cocktail wiener to your necrophilic fantasies while we take back our nation.
Funny bit is how republicans had control of government for 2 years in all 3 branches, yet "take back our nation" rhetoric is strong with them... Bunch of dipshits tbh. They promise they can get shit done, but even with all 3 branches, they couldn't come up with a solution to healthcare. I wonder if that has anything to do with the 3 years of Trump derangement syndrome and obstructionism at all costs perpetrated by the Democrats as well as Neocons. They have been preventing progress in any way they can even at the cost of the citizens of the USA simply because they don't want Trump to take any credit for any progress. Trump's entire first term has seen nothing but autistic screeching and fit throwing from the dems over their inability to accept their loss of power. The people are noticing this pattern. You keep telling yourself this is about Republican vs Democrats. This is about traitors and criminals in both parties vs patriots. The Republican party just happens to be less far gone than the Democrats. Routing out deeply ingrained corruption takes time. Don't worry though, serious house cleaning is about to take place, especially in the dumpstercrat party. After an entire presidential term of this delusional behavior, the democrat party has zero credibility left.
|
|
|
You had literally agreed by asking if it should be by a noose?
i don't get you in the least.
I'm just wondering what method of execution would be used. Not familiar on capital punishment for treason in the modern century You have fun beating your cocktail wiener to your necrophilic fantasies while we take back our nation.
|
|
|
|