yes or the explanation on the faucet itself;

"We are aiming to pay out every 2-6 hours. In the event that payouts take longer than normal, don't worry. All of your successful ReCaptcha solves are recorded and you will receive distribution for all of your work. "

+1

yes paying people to dev a coin kind of defeats half the purpose of needing an alternative to fiat in the first place 

thats what maxcoin holders where saying before startcoin 

so where is the max guys, he going to ever make things good  or is he one of those bankster types he criticizes so much 

AiakosGatana

so you are talking lets be completely centralised?

so one central leader (dev who bailed on the coin) gave you the right to be in charge   not the community that actually stuck around? so the community has no say, just the self appointed supreme leader.

that's almost the textbook definition of a hostile takeover.

if you have any respect for decentralised p2p cryptos you'll give the community full detail of your proposal then put it to a community vote. i'm lost how is that not the right thing to do?


if the community votes to accept your proposal (after you give them the full details) then i have no problem.

how is it a false allegation   its a response to your words, are you not going to premine the lot and then keep for the dev team whats not swapped? you claim people already mined them so its fair   but you didn't mine them and you are claiming the premine of the ones who don't swap? no?

cryptopia's ANI markets been unfrozen, and delisting's put on hold, after i (and other community members) contacted them, they and this community needs a clearer picture of whats going on.

the takeover is so airy fairy, i'm confused and the community deserves a clear picture and a vote, or its just a hostile takeover.

you can't just plow on with a swap without giving the community time to understand whats even goin on.


like you are going to premine   then claim the unswapped   then later buy the original coins off the unswapped users   with what   you mean raising money/btc via dumping the premine............way to double spend  


now you need to premine because you want to pay devs monthly wages, pay people who didn't swap, and donate to all these charities (you threw in to gain attention)   so you're goin to dump the premine to  "get enough economic strength"  

i'm curious at who actually contact you guys, as no coin swap has yet been voted on by the community 

actually thats one thing i'm really lost with, how this takeover guy who has no funds intends on raising funds 

stealing could be another way of puting it seeing how it was someone elses mining and someone not claiming obviously ain't giving it too you.

detlails need to be announced yet they had it delisted telling cryptopia there was a swap? no community vote just a hostile take over.

if you don't burn the non swapped coins its the same as premine.

also you now have gone out of your way to delist anime from cryptopia for those of us who want to continue with and revive the real anime.  

instead of a hostile take over why not a community vote?

always amazes me how many newbie accounts continually tell us how irrelevant litecoin is 

now if its so irrelevant why do so many waste so much time telling us this 

burning non claimed coins is the only option (unless you hold indefinitely for people to claim) or otherwise its no different to premine scams. 

Firstly no crypto has mainstream traction.

Eth is getting a few minutes of fame within the crypto community because of its price pump (nothing more the the greater fool theory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_fool_theory).  mostly off pseudo news like the microslop azure bs (which accepts any crypto that signs up).

ask anyone outside of the very small crypto community if they've heard of Ethereum  mainstream traction lol

so called innovative coins are their own worst enemy, ie none will gain any traction due to the fact their entire crowd will move on to the next flavor of the month innovative coin 

sorry what "Innovation Wave"  

oh you mean the term 'innovation' that's used to pump 1001 coins/platforms etc ?

really what do we need in a p2p currency?

the only innovation that's needed it simplification which is the exact opposite to what all the so called 2.0 coins/platforms are doing.

all the newbies think its "innovation or bust" when p2p currency is "innovation or bust trust" and I'll take trust any day over innovation.

as i've said before tis currency not a mission to mars.

nope, worst idea ever   sounds like a bank. tis meant to be an alternative to the banks.

does really concern me with crypto across the board the mindset of everyone, seems everyone's forgetting the whole point of developing p2p currencies, and now its more about ROI, and who's getting paid 

the single most useful point in cryptos is being p2p currency that leaves the money changes out of the equation, without there basically is no point.

tis becoming just another banking platform.

the huge advantage in litecoin is no premine and one of the cleanest coin as in the dev didn't make it to make $$$$; colbee had seen the way the scene was going and all the coins launching where the devs get a cut and thought the only way to be successful was for the dev not to take a cut......and guess what?

HE WAS RIGHT.......schools out.

well i totally object to an ICO for this coin.

i'll happy instruct the dev howto do a legal ICO, but its not a simple thing to comply with regulations in this regard, its not like you can just say oh lets do one and then just pump it out the next day.

cool i do think its important to keep a connection to the past where ever the future leads, or else whats the point in reviving this coin.

i  disliked the faucet idea for many reasons, including the dev doing all the hard work while a few (many that have no interest in the tech of the coin) find ways to make profits out of it.

gets worse when those riding on the devs work almost demand he give them constant free money.

starting off a freely distribution coins then flipping to ICO is worse though, i could go on forever with that.

there is a proper an legal way to do a ICO which i will eventually go through directly with the dev (just typing post in between a crazy busy week). its alot of work and i'd only approach that if you're thinking properly big.

many have done, under the radar, with little legal knowledge/advice, ICOs via this forum where devs have made serious money, yes, but sooner or later many are going to find themselves in serious hot water.

i get where the devs initial concept of slow free distribution (to replicate mining distribution) is coming from, and yes ideally great idea, but the executions are killer.

even the current auction if it goes ahead will kill the legitimacy of this coin.

also from the start you'll notice my first post saying i liked the coins concept (alot), no fan of the faucet idea (already knew the outcome of that idea when greed kicks in).

do i have solutions and plans yes, (nothings perfect though). but i can tell u guys once the gates open well no point in all this time and effort.

i suggest (strongly) a halt on everything distribution related til a proper plan is thoughout. adhoc like now big regret later.

everything being kick around here is nothing new, its kinda wasting time throwing around ideas without researching the history of such discussions.

trust me on one thing; at the very least pause the auction plan and not let any be sold that way before this is sorted. i'll try and find time for proper live chat with the dev.

well if its about making money developing in crypto aint for you. for a crypto to genuinely be successful dev has to let go of thing of a return money wise. and more create something of value.

almost 99% of the crypto community is heading down a path that would have you kicked off this forum and lablelled a scammer by the community in the early days.

added to that there is so many legal issue this community is completely ignorant of, and often think things are ok because its been the wild west and the law hasn't fulltime clean up this place.

you do the real reason satoshi went anon? (and that was with something that wasn't an ICO).