you mean repeating the same dribble ad nauseam. and yes you're all in on goldcoin so you see things very slanted.

hey I'm a large gldcoin holder but i see things clearly ie gldcoin won't get anywhere, crazy premine, block rewards reduced by you in a vain attempt to pump and its only reached its peaks trading wise by random pumpers that themselves had no interest in the coin.

we know your angle, seriously you've played it out before 

hint though if I was the dev of a coin i'd be looking after my own coin rather then trying to FUD others. you do yourself no favors just make enemies of your own coin.

microguy your same FUD over and over again tis getting old no?

and everyone knows by now the 90% positive on litecoin is this thread gets deleted by the troll OP.

well if getting continuous free btc/ltc off you guys is helping out, guess i'm always happy to help  

really  , you guys are giving me top dollar (well btc ltc) for them, always able to buy back in a great stab lower myself (with patiences a few days later and slowly as ur vols pathetic) , so your stupidity is always appreciated  

yes and I halted that little pump in its tracks   and will continue to do so    though goldcoins normal daily vol puts one to sleep....seriously tis pathetic and should be delisted.

i'd agree that doesn't give a great impression of ftc lead dev, tbh someone I never had a great impression of in the first place, i.e. ftc started as a copy paste ltc job and a really bad one at that

however i don't think in its current form its a lost cause, in fact quite the opposite.

yes I've been there since I made my previous post. posted, offered suggestions etc etc etc

i do think the community behind ftc might just come through and make something decent out of it, better chances then most around here.

sorry how the hell do you guys even imagine this project will even be remotely successful, except traded by a few cryptonerds?

sorry but hey THINK

having just got another chance at a stake, from not valid ssl certs, through to bad links to whatever client may or may not exist at this point  

i mean i could get it up and running if i put the effort in....but no way in hell would anyone outside of crypto bother and less then zero chance joe public would.



KISS currency HAS to be simple or FAIL, no ifs no buts no maybes.

just someone has to tell you guys straight, you are really really wasting your 70 devs time on this.

just frustrating from a proper (not in it for the fiat) crypto lover

a good one that fits into your project would be an old coin called gamecoin (GME), not dead just sleeping don't think anyones running it and its still listed on cryptsy.

just the name seems to suit your project;

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263600.0

Not sure if here in Australia we have a legit one?

still connecting and staking just fine for me, and still in play trading wise.

pay me 160k then troll me 24/7 

seems modern people (especially US citizens) are so ingrained with having controlling bodies they can't deal with not having one.

sure their not? as we speak bitcoin powers to be are trying to hold a monopoly over cryptocurrency, under the guise of alts being a distraction from the main game   sidechains and the like 

bankers and their monopolies 

yeah sure @ 160k I'm guessin most normal people would put up with (or simply ignore) a few internet trolls  

Agree Foundations just a US centered seemingly self appointed group, that others pay to join, more concern is the control over the code the core developers have., also the foundations input into various US regulations regarding bitcoin.

Gavin by his own admission only needs to convince 5 others and pretty much anything can be changed in the code. trustless system doesn't mean trust 5 random internet people (that could have any self serving personal interests, or paid by commercial interests) with the code.

In an opensource community why pay the core devs so much, really Gavin needs 100k? Correct me if I am wrong but last time I looked he had atleast 25k bitcoin?

yeah you see alot on this forum and around the bitcoin nerd community about blockchain technology, but as i've often said it makes it seem like much of blockchain tech is a solution looking for a problem.

well yes for wall street bitcoin liquidity is on the small side (though its marketcap of in the billions is nothing to be sneezed at, even for wall street)

words spoken by a true bitcoin foundation life member in it for the fiat

example even from just your last post ; "k, I didn't get rich arguing about bitcoin. I got here understanding it."

so I ask you whats the point of being a alternative to the greedy bankers controlled fiat, if those in control of bitcoin are the new greedy bankers?