now thats just wishful thinking not a statement of fact.

you'll be surprised at times how little you even need (surprises me), as overtime buyers have thinned out alot.

its not always been the case, but now, at this point, all coins are controlled completely by market forces. what gives any crypto a 'price' is simply the greater fool economics theory. take away the chance of people being able to sell to some fool for higher and you have no supporters.

Firstly I don't need to prove anything to you.

This is not an extortion attempt, there is nothing I want from you, nor anything you can say to change it (i'm not bcx i don't need you to make funny videos for me or anything), I'm simply giving you a statement of fact into what I have been and will continue to do to DGC.

So why would I even post this here? well

a) to back up my answer to your question at the start of this thread. b) because people knowing what I am doing makes my job of doing it somewhat easier (not an easy task even with a decent holding, as its on multiple exchanges, and after said dumps I also need to buy back cheaper and there is often bargain hunters etc etc etc).

but if to you a genuinely curious, I do not know how much ddos costs me, I trade the markets irl, the downtime could have cost me more then your marketcap, could have cost me nothing or could have even saved me money (ie might have missed a bad day or so)....can't say what trades I could have or would have done a I trade live.

much higher grade then i rate your coin, or your lame PR.

let me break it down for you;

if your coin rises at any time by any significant amounts I dump it back down.

why? because attacks members of your community did (which may have cost more then the total of you pathetic market cap is).

seems the community round this coin thinks if baritus isn't around all is good, baritus around all is bad..........when seriously people you're flogging a dead horse.

the core of DGC was full of rotten apples, ddos anyone in their way then anyone who said hey this community doesn't roll like that, baritus was probably the best of them.

now you guys are just backstabbing your founder and lead dev just to get another round out of this trash.

move on DGC won't amount to anything.

now doesn't that just leave yet another with a big stash to dump anytime dgc moves forward?

Not too up to date on the alt history are you?

Tenebrix and Fairbrix died because I personally exterminated them along with a few of the other early alts that were pieces of shit. In all fairness TBX and FBX were prototype coins and I was asked by the devs to stress them. They were the forerunners of Litecoin.

Back on topic.

The title of the thread is "If you were the President of the DGC Foundation, what would be your next step"

There seems to be a real concern by people about Baritus still being involved. Count me in as one of those people and as I am sure Ahmed can tell you, having experienced first hand that I can be a significant barrier to any coin I desire to be.

What would convince me is that if kenel or the DGC Foundation publicly and clearly stated that Baritus is not involved in any manner, never will be and more than likely stole the $30K of DGC, I would consider the matter closed. The last I heard from the DGC Foundation was that Baritus was not involved but was considered a valuable friend and would remain behind the scenes while building his exchange.

So kenel, how about that clarification on Baritus and his involvement in the BS story?


~BCX~

Your crew didn't seem to what to hash it out with me on IRC at the time, tried on several occasions, baritus though not directly involved (as far as I know) chose to stay silent on the matter even after pleading with him to rain in his lap dogs.

This individual and I are in a sort of informal debate over Bitcoin. 

He says, in response to one of my arguments:

You state: "What interests me a bit, are the new applications that crypto-currency allows for: "smart contracts", "decentralized autonomous organizations", machine to machine transactions." None of these are new: smart contracts - options; decentralized autonomous organizations - commercial banks; machine to machine transactions - internet transactions and ATMs.  The environment might be different but the ideas and their applications already exist.

I feel like he's shown his cards here, and his lack of understanding of these technological applications.  Are there any great examples that could be presented to best demonstrate that to him? 

and by a past that got on peoples bad side I wasn't talking just Baritus, a few core members of dgc earlier on took to ddos.......hint didn't make some of us so happy did my defence by building a dgc holding war chest

dude stick to your own coin instead of spreading FUD about others, I mean you have alot to do to prevent the big bagholder with all the premine from dumping all the goldcoin at any time your coin spikes in price.

you're question has always been what would be 'your' next move, and in reference to me that's exactly what I would do, tis not at all advice on what you should do.

and to quit sounds like sound advice, as you stated you can't change the past, so dgc will always be haunted by its past.