I totally agree with you. From my personal experience of managing a reputed bounty campaign, I was often warned and treated like shit by a senior manager who I was supposed to report to. I was managing the bounty but the payments were handled by this person who actually worked for that ICO. Whenever I was aggressive with the alt's, scammers and shit-posters, they said please don't be rude because you're putting our company's name at risk and I must respect all the participants. They so-called participants are shit-posting brain-dead idiots who can't write a line in English. So the bounty managers have to respect their 'Seniors' and not give many fucks about the alt's or whatever. Yes, it's a waste of time to link such accounts as managers don't even care about the trust ratings anymore.

They're not a scam site, or at least your case doesn't look like a scam. They might be verifying your selfie which often takes time. Have you tried contacting their support? You should get a clear update on your case through the support. You can close this thread for discussion at the moment and come back again when you hear something from the support.

No, it shouldn't be discouraged. I don't see any reason why/how it will be against any of the forum rules. The service advertiser sees potential in a thread and chooses to advertise it. However, that thread is redundant since there are almost 10 threads in the same section listing out the bounty managers.

So what's the catch? I assume everything you mentioned above is true and despite you trying to doge Vod's questions about the money proof, how do you make money? You wouldn't just distribute bitcoins for free correct? How does your company make money?

That's true lol He should have been banned from bitcointalk a long time ago but anyway, someone as smart as him would get famous again with a different user-name. As much I hate his intentions on bitcointalk, I like how he mentions this

Meaning you gotta take care of your own shit because the world out there is ruthless.

User_Name : Joel_Jantsen
Post_Count : 4987

Address : bc1qfsgr779l83xwqz9dzksmg9v6fnw52gdf6hkr5k

[Signature will be updated on acceptance]

lol what's next? Do you want someone to send you a personal notification as soon as a new spot is announced? Not like posting here first is going to ensure you'll be accepted.

Man, that is some work lol I remember having to write such code for 8086 processors and I always hated it. I could make this work but need some reference to study the sample programs or see how the registers function. If I come up with something, I'll post here.

How? I literally got attacked by the malware through Electrum.. You don't really verify stuff when you're using a particular application for months right? The vulnerability that was injected was part of bad coding or not enough penetration testing or whatever. It's an open source project so I don't really expect much. My point being, it's not that I wasn't safe, I just blindly trusted a pop-up that came from within an application I was using since ages.

It's not a small exploit if it modifies the response from the server. Verifying the domain before downloading it yes that's my fault.

Thanks man! As for now, I'm not using Electrum because I'm highly skeptical such exploits will not happen in the future.

I pity the company that used your Pajeet service to market their ICO. No doubt they are going to regret it. What would one expect when they let a Pajeet with 0 experience and reputation let manage an ICO. Rest in Peace for the fallen soldiers who spent their 2 satoshi's to market their project.

I disagree with that. One doesn't really need to be on a DT because they do trades on bitcointalk. The trust feedback left after successful trades by other traders speaks for them. Such feedback is enough for other members to consider them trustworthy. A suitable DT candidate should be the one that actively contributes to the forum, tags accounts as you said and helps in cleaning the forum off scammers. One can just be here for the trades and not spend enough time to do anything that helps the rest of the community. I don't think we want such members on the DT.

For anyone like me who likes to stay away from the entire Tapermonkey/Greasemonkey stuff, I wrote my own extension which does that. I could put the extension up in the official Chrome store but it's not necessary since one can inject it locally and tweak the code according to your needs. Follow the steps given below.

1. Create a new directory, name it whatever you want.

2. Create a file manifest.json and add the below code to the file


3. Create a new file contentscript.js in the same directory and add the following code to the file


Now, this is your extension which you've to upload in your chrome extensions. Google how to do that or



Should work! You can do much more in the same contentscript.js file.

Is the issue resolved OP? Blockchain.com's wallet has an issue with refreshing your form inputs :-
1 . Make sure your browser's cache is cleared.
2 . Check the proper fees for the network at the time of broadcasting a transaction and use that as a measure to decide a custom fee instead of blockchain.com's priority or regular fee.

The scam sites are not limited to just slots but all the games in general. A reputed site wouldn't just run all the games fairly and scam people on the slots. I'd suggest you try slots on https://www.bitdice.me or https://www.crypto-games.net They both have a reputation and are provably fair.

Thanks but they will be up again with the new servers in no time. To solve the problem from the root, old versions of electrum should throw an error message to update the wallet using the official link. The phishing error is thrown when we hit the send button, the update to wallet message must be displayed on opening electrum.

Yes, I figured that out.

You certainly can! However, there is no straight forward way of doing it. That API returns a JSON string which can be converted to an excel using the documentation here https://support.office.com/en-ie/article/connect-to-a-json-file-f65207ab-d957-4bf0-bec3-a08bb53cd4c0 You're looking at converting a JSON string to the destination readable format. You can programmatically, do it with a few lines of code. I'm not sure how your excel stuff would work to give a specific suggestion.

Who knows you could have just bought an old account to pull this scam? Accounts are easily bought here.   Anyway, no further elaboration is needed on the topic. You could either upload some pictures and show proofs of the mystery box or shut the service.

It is not against the rules as long he bumps the threads once in 24 hours. However, his threads seem like he is selling a similar service which are somehow related to each other that is digital goods/accounts. He could just create one thread and advertise all the services there. That will be more organized and won't need bump in 20 different threads. You could report his posts to the mods and they probably will warn him.

No one is hating you. Would you pay your hard earned money to a random newbie on the forum who claims to be having a mystery box? You have 0 reputation, your account is new and no proofs of you owing a mystery box.

Upload the photos of the box containing the items and not the items itself. This way you can show you have a fancy box unless you deliver it and it's not filled with cow shit.

You will be considered as a scammer if you can't provide any proofs of the items you're selling. Even I can say I have a mystery box with Dinosaur eggs but people won't believe me unless I show some proofs.

How is he not related to the trust system? Every member on the forum is part of the trust system by default. Being on the trust list has nothing to do with dealing with scams or being an active scam hunter.

AFAIK, they're logical, contribute statistically to the forum and make valid points.

Who said DT's are formed to protect the newbies? Stop making those assumptions. You should discuss your concerns with the people who included them on the DT, the opinions of the rest of the community wouldn't make a difference.