|
Neat Stuff. Tried claiming a few forks but unfortunately had no coins on them. When are you planning to add new forks like BTH? The coin is already tradable on a few infamous exchanges. I sort of found a bug while selecting the fork options. The selection is not highlighted as soon the tabs for 'Electrum Seed'/'WIF' resulting in the menu not be updated. Like even when I selected WIF format the place to put my private keys didn't show up.
|
|
|
|
I never seen any response from admin or medareror. Service Announcement (Altcoins) board also not less important from meta. Because it's question of forum reputation and money of investor. If ICO team delete all bad comment them no one can know that this is scam project. I think self moderate remove from Service announcement ( Altcoins) ASAP.
1. Please stop creating threads about the topics which have been discussed a number of times already. 2. This warning message is self -explanatory Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor.
Sums up everything. If you aren't smart enough to figure out if a project is scam, you shouldn't be investing in the first place. The only people falling for such shit-coin scams are the one wishing to get rich in two days. It's investors duty to search deeply about the projects before blindly sending them money. No action from forum staff is required. |
|
|
|
Thanks I choose 37. Inviting cryptohead |
|
|
|
Sure mods have all the time in the world to go through your post and selectively check post history of every account in that thread to ban them.You should just link the profiles of the accounts that you think need a ban. |
|
|
|
You and your friends have dirt on your hands too, I could dig deeper but no need.
You should have. (*Hint : You have already hit the bottom) I have nothing personal against you, but before accusing someone of something make sure you are clean yourself. Why didn't you make your research as signature campaign OP before starting a sig campaign for a scammy project?
Oh he's clean.Very clean. I was one of the members who created the ANN thread and acted as a Development Manager for the project.Technically, you should directing your queries towards me and not the escrows involved.You went from defending Wapinter to attacking Lutpin. Must admit you are taking it way too personally. |
|
|
|
Name
Address
Phone
Last 4 SSN
Mother's Maiden
ID (front and back)
ID & Selfie
Verified Paypal Account
Quite worth a negative feedback from the DT member. |
|
|
|
This is the main reason why people aren't getting their posts merited--the only good sections of bitcointalk IMO are Meta and Reputation.
That is bad. Meta and Reputation are the boards where most of the forum politics, bitching takes place. I'm surprised you called them good sections because it dissolves the entire point of running a bitcoin forum. Most happening topics in those boards revolve around leaving feeback back to each other and how untrustworthy someone is. Everything else is just a spam-fest,
Excluding Development & Technical Discussion/ Technical support sections. |
|
|
|
Had that been the case, I don't think actmyname and DarkStar_ would have countered it(,unless you think actmyname and DarkStar_ are Anduck's alts and actmyname and DarkStar_ are also chipmixer shills, well....Digaran......)
Regardless, according to my trust settings both their feedback appear as untrusted so the counter part din't really had any effect. Do you think that he red-rated me, because I didn't change my rating? If you think that's not the reason, why do you think he red-rated me?
13 pages of the thread, either you should have gotten the answer or you are just not digesting it. Either way, what I think doesn't really matter since feedback's are subjective and I can't tell Vod whom to trust. |
|
|
|
Vod does seem to have left retaliatory feedback and the PM conversation is definitely not helping Vod's side. I had asked Vod a question a few days ago but it was buried, thanks digaran, so Vod do answer this: Why did you change your feeback to Anduck from neutral to negative, is it because Anduck said he doesn't trust you, so you wanted to change it?Because he can? I'm not speaking on his behalf but I don't think he exactly owes you an explanation for that question. I used to trust a person somewhat and I don't feel like trusting him anymore, I can always change my feedback from neutral to negative? It's completely fine to do that provided a valid reason is tagged along with it.(which seems to be the case here) |
|
|
|
Thanks for sharing about how to make payment with BTC. I have recently came to know about litecoin, do you think that that one can do it with litecoin. Why litecoin mate, you can use the bitcoin directly to buy the products in the amazon.com via purse website. With this website all have the option to buy the things and additionally you will get the points to make the more purchase with half the price bro. There is the no way to use the btc on amazon expect this. There are ways you can use bitcoin to buy stuff from amazon.Obviously not the amazon supported ways but third party services.Purse.io have had some serious accusations of stealing bitcoins and not delivering products. I would be careful using their service. |
|
|
|
Did you get more than one copy of the first signed file from the other party?
If not then you should probably ask for another just in case your signed file has been corrupted along the way.
No it isn't corrupted.I'm able to decode it properly. Check that it's definitely the right wallet you're trying to sign the transaction in also.
That could be the problem. First party have signed it using Bitcoin Core which I believe is not compatible with Electrum since it's a HD wallet. first make sure you have installed the latest version of Electrum which currently is 3.1.3 ( https://electrum.org/#download). it is a common problem that people try to sign a transaction made by a new version, in an old version and the old version fails to understand (parse) the transaction. that is why the dialog closes. Updated the version and now it throws an error. Unhandled expression, please report the issue.List-Index out of bound exception. to make sure your transaction is fine you can a use an online decoding tool to verify it. like this one: https://btc.com/tools/tx/decode if something is wrong with it then you will see an error saying "Decode failed" Nope the JSON is valid. |
|
|
|
The quality of this forum deteriorates by the minute. I remember years ago reading a post about how to make a bitcoin hardware wallet by soldering wires together from electronic boards. Now there's scams and people asking stupid questions and answers are even more stupid.  That is how the revolution will be. Back in the day people dreamt of flying in the air and making a bomb that could destroy the other country, now we have selfie sticks and cat-brushes.We really are progressing backwards. I agree with you the projects posted here on daily basis are worthless. Most of them are 'crypto-profile-management' or 'price-tickers',we don't want that kind of negativity around here. |
|
|
|
There are so many bounty managers here but do we know who to choose? I am suggesting here that what if, bitcointalk.org must have an accredited "Bounty Managers" ? Those bounty manager must under go on,
Who decides that? We don't want to centralise the forum than it actually is. 1. Verification, the purpose of it is to know if that person really exist.
No. Pretty sure people love anonymity and let's keep it that way. From what I have seen, managers willing to dox themselves over bounty management would be the incompetent ones. 2. Capable, in managing the project and has a complete team members because he/she can't handle it alone.
Again, who creates such metrics ? 3. Membership, bitcointalk.org must set a requirements to become a "BM", rules and regulation to be among the most trusted and accredited BM in bitcointalk.org.
How about someone starts offering a course in Udemy about 'Journey to become a Trusted Bounty Manager on Bitcointalk' ? |
|
|
|
Didn't see BetKing.io mentioned yet even considering it's one of the oldest sites, most trusted sites.
Time flies isn't it? You gotta keep up with the market trends to continue be at the top. Las time I checked you were selling the website. what happened to that? Or it is under the new administration already? But then I don't pay anyone to come in and pretend to vote on their favorite  Technically speaking, it's called marketing and that's how it is suppose to work.Why would other companies invest a good amount of money in the signature campaigns anyway. |
|
|
|
If I read above I have to wait at least for 30 days to post image? No, you don't have to. You can buy a copper membership as described in this post : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2385104.msg24371150#msg24371150Additonal I need to do some post. I am just wondering why such restrictions exists.
If we allow all the newbie accounts to post images, it wouldn't be hard to create bots which overload the servers by uploading a number of images at the same time. No bot developer would pay per account to buy copper membership. |
|
|
|
This thread appears to be getting some attention by staff so I'll quote lists I had made in another thread here also:
If you give admins posts in this format, they're likely to not do anything.You should try to make it easier for them to take an action quickly without having to navigate links. You don't really want them to open profiles and then check the posts. Either way, this thread is only meant to report ICO pumping accounts. More accounts involved in plagiarism.
If they're copy-pasting stuff, report them in LoyceV's plagiarism thread. |
|
|
|
|
Put him on ignore and lock this thread. Forum is beautiful as it is
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
