Please refrain from adding multiple images to highlight the connections.They make the thread loading slow and images can be manipulated so it becomes difficult to consider them as a solid proof.Instead,archive the quoted posts and drop the links here.Images can be can exception in case of spread-sheets/other conversations.

Accused Account : erience

Some of the shit posts which are repetitive and spammed all over the forum : -






I have tried reporting them multiple times but don't see any action taken.Offering a service is a different thing but spamming same shit all over again is annoying.Moreover,it doesn't add any constructive content to the forum.

What the fuck does that have anything to do with OP's case ? You sure it's the gmail account ? How did the hacker take his Exodus password ? By running a theft across his memory lane ?

Did you even cared reading the entire thread ? Just so you know,they had 2fa and their phone number was hacked.Tell him something that he doesn't know already.

OP,best bet is to post the addresses money were sent to in this thread and keep a track of wherever the money is moved.Pretty sure it will hit some exchange at some point of time and then you can contact the exchange to freeze those funds by presenting your case.

This rule is not set by the forum.Forum has nothing to do with additional rules introduced by the 3rd party services.

I disagree with you.It is not direct censorship but adds restrictions to express one's opinion.The post might be of no value to you or the mods but that doesn't make it completely invaluable.Having said that,this is a private forum and users must comply with the rules while using the service so deleting posts which are against the rules is totally okay.

I would like to recommend this service which I have been using actively without any issues : https://www.vpsserver.com/ They are reliable and support is more than good.They accept bitcoins through BitPay which is quite a hassle if you don't use a wallet which support exporting addresses out of links.Also they don't charge you after buying the service,you will billed after your first months cycle.

Most of the tutorials will have redundant stuff copied from other blogs with the titles like
 "Tutorial - How to sign wallet from blockchain.info"
"Tutorial - How to get your BCH from Coinomi"
"Tutorial - How to send bitcoins from Coinbase"

Not exactly but something along those lines.From the quality of users we have on the forum there would hardly any tutorial showing how to do complicated stuff like "Running a Full-Node on your CentOs/Kali Linux"

There are n number of courses offered on udemy and other blogs.Newbies can certainly use them as a reference.

Would have been better if you could tagged him at the earliest.Considering if it was someone with dark green trust,they could use these 3 days as a buffer time to scam more members.Since the feedback can always be revised,it doesn't really make a difference.That account was involved in various shady activities in the past.Even if he replies and has substantial amount of proof he is not guilty,the feedback should stay as a warning.

Not anyone I remember.Did the ask you to do that ? Maybe the proofs you provided didn't seem genuine ? What's the problem in taking a selfie video if you already trusted them with a selfie image ? I understand this can get real frustrating but to filter out the scammers,such measures are indeed necessary.

They wouldn't ask you for anything since you're here on bitcointalk for a long time.Their primary scam targets are the newbies.I have never seen a high ranked member on bitcointalk ever open a scam accusation against them.Since you're a regular player there,what's your stance on their lotteries,raffles and leaderboard ?
Previous accusations clearly show they have known for manipulation the contests/raffles but adding their shill accounts.I wonder why you still continue to play there known they're run by a scam agency.

Stop horsing around

You probably guessed it right.They might be unable to open the website due to sever connectivity issues as the Ddos continues to overload the server.I'm surprised cloudflaire isn't helping much.Not sure if theymos is using a Load balancer.Forum still loads very slow for me and takes a few seconds to open threads with substantial amount of content.  

You're right.Malicious exchanges are the reason people tend to lose their money and that has nothing to with bitcoin.You are solely responsible for your loss as it has been said repeatedly to not trust exchanges with amounts you can't afford to lose!

Take care of yourself as crying over spilled milk doesn't help.

Honestly,ICO/Bounty related stuff shouldn't be considered as a valid scam accusation.I mean you're not losing anything but your precious time you wasted on trusting a bunch of strangers on the internet.You take a big risk by participating in the bounties which are
1.Not escrowed
2.Managed by a reputed bounty manager

As for as you keep all the ICO related information away from the website,there are more chances you will have mature readers.It's good to explore new technologies and show how blockchain is utilised to decentralise something but bringing ICO's into the picture ruins it all.People like me,who are fond of reading technical stuff are usually pushed away if they come across "ICO's and Token" news.

Mind elaborating the running costs since you seem to know a lot about them ? Not sure if you guys are cheated by some rookie developers or you have that high standards of living which permits paying $30000 as running costs for a website.Being someone who has worked with exactly similar kind of market,$30000 will just do fine for everything else but marketing.

You think manipulating the market should not be considered as a scam ? Well,it depends how many people are affected and if people are losing money due to the fake numbers.In our case,cmc is exactly doing the same.I would leave the decision of calling them a scam/not-scam to you but they certainly shouldn't be trusted anymore.Better yet,stop visiting their website.

He is asking the Gift Card Sellers to send him a working gift card which will prove (to a certain extent) that the seller is someone who has gift cards and not a bullshitter.A good first step to be honest.Would you rather prefer someone having a gift card posting there or someone who doesn't even know what a gift card is ? I agree the concerned person is making profit out of each vouch but can you think of a better way ?

Like I said,his list is not to be trusted.

I don't think anything is wrong with this approach.I just think it's not efficient enough.Any scammer for the heck of verification will send him a legit $30 gift card.Scammers will just use that $30 verification method to scam much higher amounts.

The conclusion is,that list is not to be trusted.

Wait..a second..Don't want to coach you with the HTML/CSS basics but adding cursor : not-allowed just adds that cross icon overlay on hover of the button and doesn't actually disable the button.To disable the button,an additional attribute "disabled" should be added to the button tag programatically. Like so

<button type="button" disabled>Claim</button>

Sorry Lutpin,you know I'm not a fan of posting such stuff in the official threads.I hope you'll forgive me.

How far are we from getting all such ICO tracker apps banned from the play-stores ? Medium/Facebook/Twitter have already taken steps to ban ICO/Crypto related repetitive blogs/pages.I don't think it would take  too much time for Google/Apple to throw such apps from the market.

Just so you know,every other day a similar "portfolio app" is posted here.Creativity,where the fuck are you

I disagree.Considering how members are selected does matter.For instance, The Pharmacist was added to the DT because they actively tag scammers/spammers which somehow adds to spam reduction.They can certainly be trusted with their tagging skills but not with the money as they don't have a history of doing so.Having said that,I'm not sure where you picked that definition of being on the DT from but atleast in 2018 it does not mean a DT member should be blindly trusted with money unless of course they have had records of doing it successfully.

Not to mention but MasterP's case is quite evident.

What ? That is absolutely wrong.Speaking practically,you mean only people who can afford millions are added on the default trust ?