Me alegro de que todo haya salido bien al final!

Por como hablas, deduzco que solo tenías 1 dirección con fondos en todo el wallet de blockchain? Si estás completamente seguro de eso, puedes dejar de actualizar Core (no lo borres hasta que hayas terminado con todo) y ya cuando tengas algo de tiempo, proceder a limpiar el resto.

En principio, lo más sencillo de conseguir el Bitcoin Cash; puedes instalar Electron Cash (una variante de Electrum para BCH) y repetir la operación, O instalar coinomi en un móvil (o bluestacks en pc) y de la que importas la clave privada; barres BCH, BTG, BTX y las pocas más que soporta ese monedero. Para el resto de los forks; como mucho vas a sacar unos centimillos de nada (depende también de cuanto fuese la cantidad inicial de BTC, claro está), pero si tienes tiempo y ganas, pues adelante con ello. El proceso para estos es un poco más complicado; tienes que descargar Bither Y Bitpie en un teléfono (o bluestacks); importar la clave privada en una de ellas, e ir barriendo las monedas una por una al monedero de la otra app (o directamente un exchange, pero no se si esto se podía).

Una vez tengas reclamadas todas las monedas, podrías venderlas en un exchange por BTC, y mandartelo todo a coinbase otra vez para cambiarlo a euros (que supongo es lo que has hecho con el BTC). Cualquier duda, ya sabes donde encontrarnos.

Edit: Puedes encontrar un valor aproximado de cuanto dinero vale cada fork que podrías reclamar en findimycoins.ninja. Con esos datos, puedes ponderar si de verdad te merece la pena rescatar las más pequeñas (BCH por lo menos, sí merecerá la pena). Es una estimación MUY burda, ya que los precios no están actualizados tampoco; pero te vale para ver cuanto de cada tienes, y en coingecko comparar el valor real.

PS: si le das a quote a alguno de los mensajes, en mi caso por lo menos, recibo una notificación y tardo algo menos en responder

Si te digo la verdad, nunca he tenido que hacer un barrido de ese tipo en Electrum, por lo que no se si el monedero debería mostrar algo. Sin embargo, puedes usar cualquier explorador de bloques para ver el balance de la dirección, o ver si tiene transacciones no confirmadas. Te recomiendo usar blockchair.com, ya que aporta bastantes más datos que blockchain

Me alegro de que los bloques de texto de anoche hayan servido para algo; y no te preocupes si tienes dudas, estamos aquí para ayudar en la medida de lo posible (algunos por lo menos). No se como andas de inglés, pero hay una guia bastante buena escrita en dicho idioma (enlace); si no andas con muchas prisa ni bien del idioma, no pasa nada que vamos haciendo de puente los que nos hemos dejado caer por aquí  . Pero la prioridad, antes de tocar ninguna altcoin, pon los bitcoins a buen recaudo!

Yeah, I know that's a thing, same used to happen in some signature campaigns; but what bothered me was it was exclusively happening in that thread, not in several ones. Maybe I'm being overly paranoid

Working fine now! Still puzzled about the 11th hour thing tho

I've been seeing a lot of empty bounty reports on the same thread today, example below:


At first I thought that it could be some bumping attempt, but on the altcoin bounty board? It's only strange because they all come from the same thread

You sure about that? I may be reloading a bit too fast so changes haven't applied, but it's showing a big empty space.

Also, I see that hours are counted every 2, except for 11-12

Am I reading this the wrong way, or does the graphic show the merit transactions on a certain day, rather than the number of merits from said day?

Loving the whole update!

Edit: Saw that the landing page displays "Posts in the last 24 hours" but the bars say "merits"?

La cantidad de programas, noticias, artículos y debates que hubo sobre bitcoin en el ATH de 2017 era una autentica pasada. Sin embargo, esta vez salvo alguna noticia o artículo de refilon y 4 tontos por twitter; no ha habido nada de ruido. Me acuerdo que hasta en Cuarto Milenio se hablo sobre BTC, con sus respectivas teorías conspiranoicas de gorro de papel albal; pero como se suele decir, "there is no such thing as bad press".

Si por lo que sea vuelve a haber esta sobrecarga de noticias, si que los números irán para arriba, pero de lo contrario....

Pues parece ser que lo de los colores es solo para newbies, pero creo que solo en la página de Patrol. Curioso que theymos implemente estas cosas para ayudarnos pero luego no nos comente que lo ha hecho

Edit: Confirmamos, se ha desactivado el atributo de color en la pagina de Patrol

Acabo de añadir un par de cambios que no se muy bien como se me habían escapado de la posible nueva estructuración.

En el caso de casinos/gambling, me queda la duda de si proceder como he puesto (dentro de servicios, diferenciando BTC y altcoins) O si crear una sección solo para ello; independientemente de si aceptan BTC o solo altcoins (los que aceptan todos irían en la de BTC)

I'm surprised it's taken so long before someone actually said nothing about this, but the way people have been acting towards Best_Change is far from good. Let me explain myself:

The trust system is not perfect, but it has its use cases. It's useful as we know, both with the feedback sent/received AND the one showed either by default or based on our custom trust lists.
BestChange is "just" a company; at the end of the day, the aim of that account is to build community around their bussines, and that's why they run their sig campaign, or sponsored the bitcointalk community awards etc, nothing wrong there. But the way users have been using the trust system regarding this account is a bit wrong.

As it is mentioned in OP, the trust list from that account is a bit unsettling.
First of all, the people trusting Best_Changes' judgement. The account has only sent 2 trust feedbacks; pretty generic if you ask me, and it's not a judgement worth trusting, to my eyes at least; so I'd consider it a wrong use of the trust system. Second of all, the trust list from Best_Change, on the judgementes they trust, there are many profiles that have left them positive feedback; although it's not a bad list if you ask me, so I have no complaint there.

There's plenty to be said about the feedbacks they have received too; but this could be applied to most signature managers, receiving positives (and merits) from the participants upon every payment.

My personal feeling about this particular user and campaign though, is that because they started as a rather fishy company and ended up being a legit one (and throwing a lot of money on the signature campaign), they have received a kind of special treatment. This again, is my personal feeling, as I wouldn't have sent that many (actually not a single one) positive feedbacks to a company promoting themselves (a neutral at a most) and even less added them to my trust list (but once again, personal).

However, the request OP does propose about wanting to know who is behind the account is plain stupid. Could there be a conflict of interest regarding feedbacks? Of course, and that has been addressed in this post; but there are very different concerns.

Something like adding a simple captcha to brand new/newbie accounts before posting?

It'd be a bit of a pain, but it's not restrictive, and most already do that on faucets, so doing another one to send the bounty report won't really matter to them. Bot owners could of course pay for the services that solve captchas for their bots, but it could reduce the number of bots (or so I want to believe).

The "only" downside I'd see is that depending on the captcha type, it wouldn't be very TOR friendly

Gambling is restricted depending on the country you are in, not your nationality. Going through some KYC doesn't prove anything in terms of accessing the site from a restricted countrys' IP

I know a person affected that bought it aproximately 2.5 years ago; so if you bought it 3 years ago, that kind of pinpoints the beginning of the leak

I think I've found something off....

User Hellmouth42 shows as DT1 in Bpip, but DT2 on verey Loyce data (DT overview and trust list viewer)

To be fair with the Romanians, the Spanish local december merit/post should have also been excluded; someone decided to do some reporting in the altcoin boards and ended up getting more than 200 posts deleted, so that does screw the data a bit too much. Still it's great to see how things develop on local boards.

I'm a bit surprised to see one of our top posters is a spammer service that only post "updates" in their ANN, but since they aren't breaking any rule...

On top of what fillippone said, considering how important local boards are, I shall remind everyone that there's a request to improve the SEO positioning of said boards, as their current position is bit lame (2nd/3rd page on google): search engine optimization for local boards 

And will you consider updating the number of RP needed to exchange for physical objects? The price used to match back when 1RP=11 satoshi (btc ~600$), but I don't think I've seen that number move, and everything is extremely overpriced now.

To name a few; I highly doubt any iphone can cost 0,33333333BTC and 2000$ (gift card) are not even close to 0,2666667BTC.

Ah! Thanks for the explanation!

But then, something else has been done, because all the new ones I've seen, show the links with the default blue; even if they had the color=black like a couple of days ago. It's impossible to miss them now

Update: For what I've been seeing today, I believe that the color atribute has been disabled in the patrol page... anyone else seeing this?

Ui, pues para claves privadas yo tampoco estoy viendo; que metedura de pata tan bonita Para direcciones de recepción si que se crean de forma predeterminada