Taking into account that "Highest Daily Wagerer will win the jackpot", I'd say playing multiply does have an impact....

Please, point out where on the post you were replying to exchanges are mentioned, because I see no such word

A DEMO SOFTWARE IS NOT A SAMPLE OF A HARDWARE WALLET (AND BASICALLY NOTHING) I'm tired of repeating this on this thread, so I'll put it large so that you understand it

Hace ya casi (o hace ya) un mes del OP, asique no recuerdo bien lo que tenia en mente en ese momento. Sin embargo si me tocase analizarlo ahora, diria que con levantar la situacion de confinamiento me referia a poder salir a la calle de manera "normal". No hablo de volver a bares, y reuniones multitudinarias, pero si de poder salir a dar una vuelta al parque de enfrente de casa, o con unos amigos al monte.... No estar confinados, vaya

Their landing page is a copy of the former coinmixer.se, they've changed a couple of names and colours but it's basically the same. The site is most likely a scam, I'm sorry that you've lost your coins.


Addresses for mixers should be unique per session, altough maybe some mixer has a different system. Nevertheless, seen how the site is a copy of a former mixer, it's most likely a scam site

Or he is waiting to have the 2/3 BTC addresses to send the coins in a single transaction and pay tx fees only once, or maybe he went to the fridge to have some lunch. Take it easy, people have lifes out of the forum and don't reply immediately most of the times.

Besides, my post said you were the same person in different accounts, so if it isn't the case, I don't see how it'd affect

I must be high or something, but the users helping you were HCP (with the steps you had to follow) and Bitcryptex (solving the issues you had with the derivation path); and you are going to give a reward to a newbie account that came out of the blue just to copy paste with has been said in the post above it?

That'd most definately look like you are really an alt account of said user, created with the sole porpuse of getting help but not giving the reward you promised in the OP (and I'm 100% sure you'd have gotten the same help even with no bounty).

---

---

Thread archived in case my intuition is right here and someone feels like creating a flag for that shady behaviour

Lol, sorry, I'm a bit too on the edge this days and I must've skipped your post.

Yep, thanks for adding the info. Once I saw Direwolfs' reply, I started looking around; and found the Trezor blog entry about how passphrases work. I don't really know how I skipped it when I bought the device, but it was something interesting to read and learn about

Creo que la solucion podria ser algo tan sencillo como añadir una línea de texto en el resumen de merito del usuario que diga algo similar a "This user has XXX merit, out of those, the user has earned YYY" o similares.


Veo un pequeño problema con lo que propones. Que pasaria si un usuario que ha duplicado sus meritos de airdrop, pero no tiene la actividad suficiente como para el siguiente rango? Al reiniciarse parcialmente el contador, tendría que volver a duplicar los meritos ganados para poder ascender una vez obtenida la actividad

---

---

Edit: post capicua jejejeje

Accounts can't be deleted. The only way that he gets what he wants is that theymos hand removes all his merit; which I highly doubt he'll do because it's not a priority

But even if it was "just" to get rid of the cards, a 40% on market price.... it's a bit abusive to say the least; it's way easier to just sell the codes here on currency exchange, and even if you don't get a 100% value of the code, you won't be wasting that much. But it's a free market, so we can't really tell people what to do with their stuff

You... can't...? I'm going to take a wild guess and say that you are the first member to request such I thing.

I believe that theymos himself can do that, but I don't know if there's been any precedent (when the system was introduced with some abuse cases); but.... why would he....?

My guess always was that they charged a small percentage to the person placing the order. Anyway, I'm not really surprised people stopped using it; even if you could buy things with a "discount", someone had to pay for that discount, and it was crazy that people buying had to pay up to 40% on market price, it made no sense.

Que mal que esta envejeciendo este hilo.... ya llevamos un mes, se ha alargado minimo otro medio y pues ya estais viendo el panorama

If you are not using a passphrase on the Ledger, you could simply import the seed into electrum and sweep it into a new Ledger account (new seed and all, because you've exposed the previous one when importing).

If you can see the funds in electrum, note the address with the funds, and this is rather a wild guess, but maybe there's some sort of code/command that will let your Ledger show those addresses

Hey! If you are still sending I'd like to receive some on Spain   And paste them all around the university campus once the lockdown ends

También podriamos guiarnos por el merito general de un hilo/post; pero tampoco es un sistema perfecto. He visto posts de 1 sola línea recibir 50 meritos, asi como ejemplo rápido de casos de abuso. Y no termino de ver claro lo que se podria publicar.

En twitter, pues medianamente puede darse introduccion a un hilo y que de ahi se añada el enlace al mismo para seguir leyendo (muchos hilos muy buenos sobre seguridad). Pero en youtube? videos de un hilo y sus respuestas? Facebook descartamos tanto por libra como por su poca aficion a la privacidad de los usuarios... No lo termino de ver

No veo del todo sentido a hacer una cuenta en una red social de otra red social... un foro sigue siendo una especie de red social al fin y al cabo. Si que es cierto que conseguiriamos más atencion, pero a que precio? El sistema de merito consiguio eliminar gran parte del spam de la gente que solo venia a por dinero, y es muy probable que hay otra oleada de gente registrandose por esa misma razon. Siempre puedes ser tu mismo el que haga la propuesta en meta en lugar de esperar a que theymos lo plantee, pero le veo un gran inconveniente:

Que contenido se publicaría? Enlaces a hilos "utiles" entiendo
De quien son serían esos hilos? Del usuario X/Y/Z que forma parte del grupo....
"Esque elige siempre posts de esta persona, estas beneficiando a este grupo X haciendoles publicidad".... No se si ves por donde quiero ir....

Suficiente drama hay ya de por si en el foro, como para encima alimentarlo de esa manera.

Por otro lado, respondiendo a tu pregunta, teniendo en cuenta el perfil de la mayoria de usuarios y el publico objetivo.... Twitter de cabeza

Mi consejo es que no apuestes. Todo dinero apostado deberia considerarse como perdido, pero eso ya es mi opinion personal. Si lo que buscas son sitios seguros que se ha comprobado que funcionan y son legales:

-Primedice
-Stake
-777coin (enlace en mi firma)
-Fortunejack
-Freebitco.in*
-Cryptogames

Eston serian los primeros que se me vienen a la mente. Ten cuidado siempre con acceder a la pagina verdadera, y no a una web de phising. Te dejaria el enlace de referido, pero como va en contra de las normas del foro, pues no lo hago 

*Freebitco.in es una web "faucet"; que te da X bitcoins gratis cada hora. Sin embargo, tiene también la opcion de Hi-Lo y porras, aunque el House edge de esta es de los mas altos que hay (el house edge es el porcentaje que tiene la casa de ganar; en una apuesta x2, nunca vas a tener una posibilidad del 50% de ganar, siempre será un poco menor, y eso es el house edge).

Isn't the whole article based on the assumption of the user getting the Hardware wallet robbed, but with the seed not leaked? The attacker tries to bruteforce the password in order to access the device and steal the funds, that we all get.

But in the event of the seed being leaked, that's what I understood from OP, wouldn't the attacker be able of importing it without the need of the passphrase? I imagine how the scenario would be with say, electrum wallet, and if I have a seed, the it doesn't matter that I loose the password.

That Tx ID you provided does not exist.

I have another doubt regarding this particular case; how is it possible, that the same transaction only confirmed (and sent) 1 of the outputs and didn't broadcast the second output?