This I will not stand for! MADNESS! |
|
|
|
It's a strange world they live in!  |
|
|
|
Na, I knew Tom would chicken out and run back into his hole, so it was largely irrelevant as far as Tom goes. I'm offering 1000 BTC on behalf of BFL regardless of what Tom does. I never expected Tom to honor the intent of his bet anyway (Simply because he had no intention of going through with it from the start), so it was largely altruistic on my part to begin with, but only in so far as I don't think I will have to pay up and I know Tom would... but I'm more than willing to escrow the amount until such time as is required.
Another mother fuckin' memo I didn't get! When the hell did it become okay for a COO of a company to make bets on behalf of the company they work for? Now read the last bold statement carefully! Josh is stating that he's confident that he would win the bet if Tom followed through, but since Tom back out, Josh offers up 1000 BTC on behalf of the company and is willing to put said amount in escrow, of which he didn't do, for he didn't need to because he's a man of his word. That's Bet one/1/uno for 1000 BTC. Now, for bet(?) two/2/dos for 1000 BTC. A representative of BFL (not Josh, though not stipulated) offers up a guarantee of 1000 BTC on their official forum, done so to garner more sales, of which they accomplished said task. Now, let's get this mother fuckin' straight! There are two, not one, 1000 BTC bets/guarantees that need to be honored. Both were offered up on separate channels and were never meant to be of the same ilk, albeit they may have been combined as such at a later date. |
|
|
|
When is the Jalapeno getting FCC approval?
Maybe two weeks? We are waiting for the test lab to issue the test report. With the bump in power requirements on the MR and the new screen, we had to make changes, although the new screen is already certified. We are doing all the devices at once, since they all share the same board. Soon, we will get to the bottom of this. I just sent out 5 emails to the FCC. Tomorrow, I make a call. I tried earlier but they were already closed. Make no mistake, I will not make the same mistake tomorrow. Josh/BFL, you want to play hardball? Let's Play! GAME ON! |
|
|
|
Said the guy that I just proved to, showing that Josh/BFL lies.
Oh? Care to provide a single shred of proof that I've lied? There's not a single person here that's been able to back up this claim, yet I've demonstrated it through your own posts multiple times that you're a liar. Here's just one single shred of proof, you lyin' cocksucker! Josh Zerlan, a BFL representative, expects to have chips in hand by the end of November and begin initial shipments shortly after. Ergo, it was utterly impossible for you to make the following claim, let alone that to this day the FCC has no record of BF Labs Inc.'s existence. When is the Jalapeno getting FCC approval?
Maybe two weeks? We are waiting for the test lab to issue the test report. With the bump in power requirements on the MR and the new screen, we had to make changes, although the new screen is already certified. We are doing all the devices at once, since they all share the same board.Please note the date of this post by Josh Zerlan, COO, of Butterfly Labs--Nov. 3, 2012. He is clearly implying that at least some devices were submitted in October, 2012. But the FCC is not going to test ANY piece of equipment that's not complete because it would be impossible to get ANY results if the circuit is not complete, in this case there would have been no chips in place. Now, Joshy Boy, would you be so kind as to point out why this shred of evidence doesn't satisfy your request to prove you've lied? |
|
|
|
You guys have some kind of sick obsession with BFL and Josh himself.
Can you not tell he doesn't give two fucks about what anyone here says? You are basically getting trolled by even responding to him.
Why not just do the lawsuit instead of the endless banter?
It's like the special Olympics in here.
Nut up or shut up.
QFMFT! Josh makes mistakes. When he gets angry or has to post a lot, he makes mistakes. That is why most of his posts contain little more than insults. If they contained actual content then it might contradict something he said earlier. The stakes are a little higher now (judging from BFL_Josh/Inaba's prolonged presence in this thread) so they are trying extra hard to derail the thread and bury any actual information about the lawsuit. That is why these sorts of threads need to be in self-moderated threads so that the organizer can delete off topic posts. I just thought of something, K9. That motherfuckin' Josh was awfly quiet prior to BFL started taking orders for their Monarch. But, as soon as BFL's coffer was once again filled with $7M+ USD, he returns here worse than he was before. It wouldn't surprise me the least if somebody truly does try to stick a broomstick up his ass. |
|
|
|
Josh, would you be so kind as to state which, what and when the screen was passed by the FCC? Us monumental assholes ain't got a clue as to how the FCC site works and desperately need your expertise in helping us find the info.
As soon as you show us, I will send that $200 I owe you/BFL, and you can use if for whatevery you want. It doesn't have to go to any charity. You, Sonny, and your wifes/lady friends can go to a fancy restaurant and enjoy a fine meal using the funds. No problem here, bud.
All you have to do is show us monumental assholes where to look, and your golden, and we're square.
I'll also take a week off and not state one iota negative comment about you, Sonny, BFL, et al. I promise... I mean Honest Abe.
Bruno Kucinskas
406 W. Center St.
Sandwich, IL 60548
815-508-1668
Surrrre you will. Just like you lied last time about sending $200 to charity? You are a habitual liar, Bruno. You are a thief. You are an embezzler. You have no redeeming quality... But lets see you hang yourself this time, here you go: https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=132722&fcc_id='MSQME370T' It is clearly obvious that I did indeed inquire about a screen. But I honestly mistaken that screen as some component of the MR and not a peripheral device, in this case turning out to be the obsolete forerunner of the Nexus 7, of which Josh was so kindly provided the FCC link to. I am now having this stuck up my ass because of the way I asked a question, a question I, among others, have asked easily a hundred times, all of which Josh and BFL have ignored. This motherfuckin' cocksucker is now trying to turn the tables on me, and question my integrity. This I will not stand for! Nobody is questioning your integrity here, Bruno Kucinskas. We've already established that you have no integrity and that you're a liar and a thief. This was established a long time ago. We are just confirming it again and again, every time you post. Seriously, what is your fixation with cocksucking? Seriously, when I Google cocksucking, I get excited when I see a banana.  Seriously, what's your fixation on ignoring the question pertaining to Sonny K. of whom you claimed to have met upon your first visit to BFL? Or are you waiting for the same exact question to be posed a different way so that you can then safely address it as you think you so cleverly done with the FCC concern? |
|
|
|
Said the guy that I just proved to, showing that Josh/BFL lies.
Oh? Care to provide a single shred of proof that I've lied? There's not a single person here that's been able to back up this claim, yet I've demonstrated it through your own posts multiple times that you're a liar. Another open invite, everybody! |
|
|
|
Josh, would you be so kind as to state which, what and when the screen was passed by the FCC? Us monumental assholes ain't got a clue as to how the FCC site works and desperately need your expertise in helping us find the info.
As soon as you show us, I will send that $200 I owe you/BFL, and you can use if for whatevery you want. It doesn't have to go to any charity. You, Sonny, and your wifes/lady friends can go to a fancy restaurant and enjoy a fine meal using the funds. No problem here, bud.
All you have to do is show us monumental assholes where to look, and your golden, and we're square.
I'll also take a week off and not state one iota negative comment about you, Sonny, BFL, et al. I promise... I mean Honest Abe.
Bruno Kucinskas
406 W. Center St.
Sandwich, IL 60548
815-508-1668
Surrrre you will. Just like you lied last time about sending $200 to charity? You are a habitual liar, Bruno. You are a thief. You are an embezzler. You have no redeeming quality... But lets see you hang yourself this time, here you go: https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=132722&fcc_id='MSQME370T' It is clearly obvious that I did indeed inquire about a screen. But I honestly mistaken that screen as some component of the MR and not a peripheral device, in this case turning out to be the obsolete forerunner of the Nexus 7, of which Josh was so kindly provided the FCC link to. I am now having this stuck up my ass because of the way I asked a question, a question I, among others, have asked easily a hundred times with various sentence structures, all of which Josh and BFL have ignored. But, this one time he saw an opening to take the same exact request, albeit asked differently, and provide false information. This motherfuckin' cocksucker is now trying to turn the tables on me, and question my integrity. This I will not stand for! MADNESS! |
|
|
|
Said the guy that I just proved to, showing that Josh/BFL lies.
Oh? Care to provide a single shred of proof that I've lied? There's not a single person here that's been able to back up this claim, yet I've demonstrated it through your own posts multiple times that you're a liar. |
|
|
|
Darin, you really need to seek help. You are in contact with children on a daily basis and you are unstable and delusional. I honestly fear for the children you are in charge of. You see me in every poster on this forum. You disbelieve benign government websites like the FCC's (You probably think I somehow hacked into the FCC's DB and changed things, no doubt.). You are one screwed up individual man. It's no wonder you had to travel to Asia to start your own school, no Canadian or US institution would allow you within 250 feet of a child after seeing your mental evaluation scores.
That weirdo work with children ?!?  In Asia...yeah...yeah...ok...i have the picture now... Yeah, check this out: http://www.canadianmontessori.org/about.htmlClick the mail to link on the top. Guess who's name pops up... and the whois registration for the domain, you guessed it, our friend Darin Bicknell. Talk about frightening. He couldn't get approved in Canada (I suspect because of his legal problems) and decided to move somewhere with less stringent laws governing people such as himself coming in contact with children. I believe his wife is listed as the "owner" of the school, which is probably why he was able to pass a background check to get the place started. For bonus points, check out his video's on Youtube. Dude is classic coiled spring waiting to go off. When did it become acceptable for COOs of companies to go Full-Dox on people? I missed that memo. Enlighten us, Josh. I bet you don't have an answer. THIS BOY AIN'T RIGHT!And you complain a lot. It is acceptable as long as the person he answers to allows it, full stop. If it wasn't, he likely would no longer be employed. Really, get a hobby that doesn't involve Josh or BFL. You look like a creepy stalker on here. Said the guy that I just proved to, showing that Josh/BFL lies. |
|
|
|
PG, I knew you would lie and back out of your commit yet (again). Once again, you've shown yourself to be a thief and a liar. You asked for a link to the screen FCC documents, I sent you that. That's what you asked for.
Too bad we don't give scammer tags anymore. You are worse than Matthew, as you've now verifably and without question commited twice to sending $200 if I provided information you requested. I have now done that twice and you are refusing to pay up.
Now you owe me $200 and you owe a charity of my choice $200. Not that you'll ever honor your word and commitment, but what can you expect from someone who can't tell the truth and steals from charities?
Pathetic.
Let's this $200 aspect straighten up really quick, you cocksucker! There is only one $200 aspect in question here and it's the original one. The only... I repeat... THE ONLY thing that changed with respect to that $200 is that I was authorizing you to do with it as you wish oppose to having it go to a charity. The kind gesture including you and Sonny using it toward a fine dinner. Do not... I repeat... DO NOT make the mistake of bringing up that there are now two $200 that I'm obligated to pay, for there is clearly only ONE. Of all the hundred plus times that you been asked about providing FCC proof as it relates to BFL miners, you never replied, but the first motherfuckin' time you saw an opportunity to take the same MF request outta content, you provide proof via a Nexus 7, claiming that that's the screen that you were in reference to. Now, we're going to have mega-posts about screens. I honestly didn't even know what was meant when you mentioned screen in that infamous November, 2012, post. I honestly thought it had something to do with some component of BFL miners. I only learnt last night that the screen in question was of the forerunner to the Nexus 7, as I'm sure so did many reading those and this post. I have more to read on the remainder of this thread, thus apologies for not expressing more ire, for I'm saving it up for what I'm sure to be a subsequent post. Right, so your complete lack of understanding of the situation didn't prevent you from making an ill informed post (Seems to be par for the course, for you), agreeing to an ill informed agreement and generally making an ass of yourself... but it DOES prevent you from honoring your commitment, got it. It's nice to be selective like that, I would imagine. You lying piece of shit. PS - what is your obsession with cocks? Seriously, I love cocks! Big ones, small ones, different colored ones. Why do you ask? Is there a major Cock Festival that BFL is hosting with Jody as the MC?  |
|
|
|
Darin, you really need to seek help. You are in contact with children on a daily basis and you are unstable and delusional. I honestly fear for the children you are in charge of. You see me in every poster on this forum. You disbelieve benign government websites like the FCC's (You probably think I somehow hacked into the FCC's DB and changed things, no doubt.). You are one screwed up individual man. It's no wonder you had to travel to Asia to start your own school, no Canadian or US institution would allow you within 250 feet of a child after seeing your mental evaluation scores.
That weirdo work with children ?!? In Asia...yeah...yeah...ok...i have the picture now... Yeah, check this out: http://www.canadianmontessori.org/about.htmlClick the mail to link on the top. Guess who's name pops up... and the whois registration for the domain, you guessed it, our friend Darin Bicknell. Talk about frightening. He couldn't get approved in Canada (I suspect because of his legal problems) and decided to move somewhere with less stringent laws governing people such as himself coming in contact with children. I believe his wife is listed as the "owner" of the school, which is probably why he was able to pass a background check to get the place started. For bonus points, check out his video's on Youtube. Dude is classic coiled spring waiting to go off. When did it become acceptable for COOs of companies to go Full-Dox on people? I missed that memo. Enlighten us, Josh. I bet you don't have an answer. THIS BOY AIN'T RIGHT! |
|
|
|
Inaba seems to be getting a bit like Adolf Hitler in the last days of the Third Reich when he retreated to his Berlin bunker and called people names and blamed everyone but himself for the impending disaster of losing the war.  My $.02. We could only hope it ends the same way, but I do feel sorry for his lover, the rainbow-color poodle. Then again, there's this crowbar idea floating around... |
|
|
|
Wow, interesting turn of events. Makes me think one thing... Everyone is looking for FCC approval of the Jalapeno and the LS and teh Single and the Mini... What if only the board needs to be FCC approved? That, like the scren, would not be "manufactured" by BFL...
Food for thought.
We have been asking this question for 9 months. If there were a simple answer, Josh would have given it 9 months ago. He refuses to even discuss it. Not once in 9 months. He will spend hours insulting his customers, but won't spend 15 seconds to clear up a valid question? But the second he was able to misconstrue the same request I'm on record in making for the past 9-10 months, he offers up a Nexus 7. THIS BOY AIN'T RIGHT! |
|
|
|
Are you not reading this thread? WTF? How do you teach children and be completely unable to follow a conversation for more than 10 minutes? It's no wonder you had to start your own school, no real school would hire you I'd wager, once they learn of your disability.
PG committed to sending $200 and to stop posting about BFL for a week if I provided him with the FCC ID/certification of the screen in the Minirig. I did.
PG then proceeded to not send $200 or stop posting about BFL. There's your proof.
IF I fucked up, it was because I clearly did not know what the screen in question was, safely assuming it was some component of the MR built by BFL, thus since November of last year requesting FCC certs for such a device, receiving only crickets. But, now that I have made the same montherfuckin' request, albeit possibly worded incorrectly, it's stuck up my ass. THIS I WILL NOT TOLERATE! |
|
|
|
PG, I knew you would lie and back out of your commit yet (again). Once again, you've shown yourself to be a thief and a liar. You asked for a link to the screen FCC documents, I sent you that. That's what you asked for.
Too bad we don't give scammer tags anymore. You are worse than Matthew, as you've now verifably and without question commited twice to sending $200 if I provided information you requested. I have now done that twice and you are refusing to pay up.
Now you owe me $200 and you owe a charity of my choice $200. Not that you'll ever honor your word and commitment, but what can you expect from someone who can't tell the truth and steals from charities?
Pathetic.
Let's get this $200 aspect straighten up really quick, you cocksucker! There is only one $200 aspect in question here and it's the original one. The only... I repeat... THE ONLY thing that changed with respect to that $200 is that I was authorizing you to do with it as you wish oppose to having it go to a charity. The kind gesture including you and Sonny using it toward a fine dinner. Do not... I repeat... DO NOT make the mistake of bringing up that there are now two $200 that I'm obligated to pay, for there is clearly only ONE. Of all the hundred plus times that you been asked about providing FCC proof as it relates to BFL miners, you never replied, but the first motherfuckin' time you saw an opportunity to take the same MF request outta content, you provide proof via a Nexus 7, claiming that that's the screen that you were in reference to. Now, we're going to have mega-posts about screens. I honestly didn't even know what was meant when you mentioned screen in that infamous November, 2012, post. I honestly thought it had something to do with some component of BFL miners. I only learnt last night that the screen in question was of the forerunner to the Nexus 7, as I'm sure so did many reading those and this post. I have more to read on the remainder of this thread, thus apologies for not expressing more ire, for I'm saving it up for what I'm sure to be a subsequent post. |
|
|
|
Good news! Josh will be right here to take care of this issue in a satisfactory manner, for he stated on BFL's forum, in no uncertain terms, that having a thread over there was useless since you already had one here on this forum, thus implying to all outstanding Butterfly Labs customers that he will be addressing this important issue here and not there. https://forums.butterflylabs.com/pre-sales-questions/4538-possible-fraud-deception-bfl.html#post54476Since you've got the thread on Bitcointalk, there's no need to have one here. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
is for FAILED your BBB rating.
