não sei se ajuda mas eu uso a ferramento do grammarly no chrome e é muito util, ele mostra os erros nas sentenças e palavras em inglês e eu uso sempre pra evitar escrever errado nas boards gringas. https://www.grammarly.com/Ele não foi banido por escrever com erros gramaticais. Ninguém é. Ele foi banido por fazer spam. Escrever coisas inúteis em tópicos inúteis. Contudo, sim, essa ferramenta é muito boa e eu usei muito, especialmente quando comecei a usar o forum e nao escrevia tão bem em ingles. Meu inglês escrito melhorou muito quando comecei a usar o forum.
|
|
|
The good thing about billionaires :-
They can actually afford to invest money in volatile market and even if they loose a lot they are still going to be financially stable.
You don't need to be a billionaire to invest 2% of your portfolio in cryptocurrency. If you total portfolio is 1000 USD you can invest 20 USD in bitcoin and it will be 2%. If bitcoin fails, you get 2% poorer. If not, well, you get 1000% richer I believe everyone should invest at least 1% of your overall portfolio in bitcoin
|
|
|
Chipmixer Campaign Representation on Local Boards (as of today):
German: 3-4
Arabic: at least 3
Indonesian: at least 3
French: 3-4
Russian: 2-3
Spanish: 1-2
Turkish: absolute 0
Shouldn't Turkish users ask money from their government? Demanding a private company from another country to reach a minimum quota of users who feel "excluded" and disadvantaged in its list of payments for a service provided is completely delusional.
|
|
|
Hello. I will be forced to use Livecoin.net for a transaction. Can someone please tell me what is the situation there? Do I need to do KYC? Is there a minimum withdrawal without KYC?
I couldn't even find where to verify my account there.
|
|
|
A meme is worth a thousand words: Anyway, according to coinmarket the volume is 600 EUR in the last 24hours. This token is worthless. Someone just bought 600 EUR and price pumped, but there is no liquidity
|
|
|
Vi que de certa forma já responderam sua pergunta, mas vou dizer minha opiniao de uma forma mais direta e sucinta. Eu participo mais da aba gringa do que da local, e eu penso dessa forma: Você leu a maioria das postagens da megathread de 15 páginas? Você pretende que alguém leia o que você escreveu e você tem certeza de que ninguém escreveu aquilo antes de você? Se você não for capaz de responder SIM as duas perguntas acima sem pensar, não poste. Isso deveria ser obvio, não é?
Na minha opinião você foi banido por motivos bastante justos, afinal você só queria spammar pra ganhar +1 post e mais alguns satoshis. Você está ganhando para escrever? Então vamos respeitar o forum e a pessoa que está te pagando: Faça posts construtivos e de qualidade. Que as pessoas se interessem em ler. Que você se interesse em escrever também. No longo prazo essa atitude é muito mais lucrativa para você (pois você será notado e entrará em campanhas que pagam mais por post) e mais comunitária (pois assim você estará contribuindo para o forum, e ñao apenas parasitando-o). E pense alto: Queira entrar numa campanha que te pague bem de verdade. Sabe como fazer isso? Basta você contribuir pro forum. Tem gente que contribui com estatisticas, outros com conhecimentos de BTC, outros sendo engraçados em posts inúteis, outros na drama da reputation board, outros caçando ICOs SCAM, etc. Existe espaço todo mundo aqui. Se você tem alguma habilidade ou conhecimento, use-o aqui. Tenho certeza de que todo mundo pode contribuir muito para esse forum.
Acho que vale a pena ler meu post que fiz quando comecei a utilizar o forum, com as minhas experiências: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3315812
|
|
|
Alem de seguir tópicos tem como alertar sobre postagens novas de um usuário em especifico?
Isso é interessante, seria tipo um Follow das redes sociais. Há muito tempo sugeri isso, quando comecei a usar o forum, mas theymos não costuma implementar novas funções no forum... Daria até para fazer uma "watchlist" personalizada para cada usuário, tipo uma magazine do bitcointalk. Voce escolheria que boards e usuarios deseja seguir, e ainda veria todos os seus quotes na pagina. Poderia ser interessante.
|
|
|
Could this be alright after halving happened?
There are two big famous citations in investing world: "Buy the rumor, sell the news" "Buy the rumor, sell the fact" Halving was already priced in before it happens (rumor). When it happened, i.e, the fact, whales just sold out. This is very common in investments of any asset.
|
|
|
Username: bitmover Post Count: 4178 BTC Address (must be SegWit): 3EQWxQpxtUb3WUAidtszteYTFPrT6MgAvr
|
|
|
Please move this topic to Scam Accusations: To move a topic, just click on the bottom left corner of the page: The admin on Adzbux seems to be scamming high earners, i have proof since im one of the victims.
Here is my butcoin adress: 1MQcKJ9fQxMk3zdYRAYCaoBP6QuhLNzEQo
Is this and address form Adzbux, right? It looks like, as there are many transactions from the same wallet as this address. This address is not yours, its from Adzbux wallet, and Adzbux admin is the only one with the private key. Nobody can do anything about. Just make a scam accusation and hopefully he wont be scamming anyone again.
|
|
|
Te digo que se isso acontecesse lá nos boards gringos, você ia 100% levar no mínimo um feedback neutral e no máximo vários negativos
Ainda pode levar se voce entrar em uma campanha concorrida. O pessoal aqui nao tem dó nem piedade pra te queimar e pegarem sua vaga. Sugiro fortemente que voce nunca mais fale nesse assunto kkkk
|
|
|
Quite some time ago they added the features to (almost) completely adjust the fee. Even though you can't directly type the fee you want to use, the slider lets you always choose 1 sat/B.
It is divided into 4 groups (low-priority, economy, normal, high-priority), of which each group has 10-12 fees to choose from. That's a bit inconvenient that you can't choose the exact fee, but i guess its good enough for not that techy people.
Most of those wallets that have those low-high priority overprice fees. I think lowpriority should always be 1-2sat/byte. However, I have seen those wallets (even coinomi, which is a little better than most) setting like 20-30 sat/byte a low priority transaction. Even if the network is highly congested a 1 sat/byte transaction will be confirmed eventually. Just as easy as it is to slide from low to high, a no techy person can slide from 1 to 100 sat/byte.
|
|
|
Note: sending '1 input - 1 output transaction' are pretty uncommon unless you have a UTXO with the exact balance (+few satoshi more) to be sent. Otherwise you'll be sending all of that UTXO's amount (minus the fee) or send the desired amount but use the excess as fee.
They are not very uncommon, at least for me. I made some in my life, especially when I used a lot of exchanges, when I was buying and selling bitcoin. A few times I have dumped all BTC from some wallet to an exchange address, or just to another wallet. In this case it would be more than 1 input but only 1 output.
|
|
|
I am not an expert on this field, but probably because most of casinos can't operate with fiat due legislation and they are "forced" to use crypto currency. Legally speaking Stable coins have a TOS (Terms of Service) and probably gambling isn't an usage that they don't allow.
This was the first thing I tought as well. However, usdt and others are not really fiat, si there must be some other reason...I would certainly prefer to gamble with btc, just because holding btc is a gamble by itself
|
|
|
Thanks for your response. AYK there are times when SPV mining or Selfish mning happens & some pools/miners mine empty blocks only sending block reward to their address. In such situations they don't reveal their mind blocks making a secret chain until creating a longer chain thus dropping other candidate chains after a while.
I was wondering if there is a way to watch every candidate chain being created to see which chains & which blocks were mined through a selfish style. I know its hard to address this kind of attack using current protocol state, but may be there is a way to find some solution by watching/logging & analyzing pools/miners behaviors in the past.
I don't think that mining an empty block can be considered an attack, neither selfish. The miner usually just was luck and found the nonce before updating mempool data, or it may be even empty if the block is too fast. It is a run and a competition... And imo this has nothing to do with orphan blocks (temporary side chains). And we don't see an orphan block for years, according to blockchain.com data
|
|
|
The reason why I am charging for bigger addresses, it requires a lot of CPU power to generate, the servers I have are costly and it's only fair to earn something right? I apologize if I came across looking bad.
This is not the best way to sell your CPU power. You can look to join pools to generate vanity addresses, or even mining. What you are proposing here will certainly look bad because you have no reputation. You are a newbie with 0 merits, which is highly suspicious. Many users like you came here offering services just to steal people' money. If you want to do this, you need to build a reputation here first.
|
|
|
In Bitcoin network an address or output or coins or whatever cannot be blocked. I don't know what shitcoin you are using, maybe you could tell us more....... But it is highly unlikely that your coins are "blocked" by this hacker.
|
|
|
I'll provide you with a set up on ubuntu and open source files
Open source makes no different, as you are selling the private key ofc you know it. You can just withdrawal the funds from any address you sell at any moment.
|
|
|
So the idea is to submit a contract with in parameters: A1:owner public address, RTL:relative time lock(probably in days) and A2:failover address (could be third party escrow or another owner address not related to the same seed) ... I hope you understand what I have in mind: people often write there hardware wallets mnemonic on paper and it could be compromised without they know it, adding a relative time lock will alow owner to secure there funds to another secure place once it has been compromised. Of course I suppose it have to be part of hardfork since all the network has to implement it to be functional. Thanks for reading, hope it wasn't so silly idea I don't think the idea is silly. The thing is, you are suggesting people to store 2 seeds instead of one with this failover address. If people lack responsibility to store one seed, they will just store 2 seeds together. You can split your seed, use a mnemonic phrase, etc to increase security.
|
|
|
|