Похвально конечно что ты попытаешься Ратимова догнать, но это просто невозможно

Желаю всем добраться до такой же цифры в ваших профилях, и конечно же больше. Всё-таки есть стимул двигаться вперёд, догонять Ratimov'a

Why this is happening is of course impossible to say, but maybe should we learn something about this for the future, i will check this up for the close future.  

This is why I check the people behind it, if there is a project with people who have been good for a while, then I would understand that it is also quite similar for the next project. If those people worked on different projects before and made some money, that means it is going to be quite great for the next one as well.

So, bunch of people who worked in maybe over a dozen different projects as part of something, then could become a bigger deal and make a profit later on as well if they end up building something together. This is why I believe that we should be careful about it, I know that it is not going to end up being that terrible but it is also not going to be that amazing neither if we are not careful. Always look at the team, that always matters.

I think it depends on what the prospects you've for the project are. I know there are shrewd investors who lurk on this forum for projects to invest in. Such investors are going to take projects that run their adverts here more serious than projects they stumble on Twitter, IG, Facebook or even Telegram. In the past, many people picked projects they invested in from Twitter & co until they started realising most of those projects were scam. I think that sort of scared so many off investing in things they see on those social media. However, if you ever choose to make it strictly a bounty campaign; make sure to make the payment in stable coin on a weekly and not stake based. That way you will get handles that are very much active with great stats for engagement, not just accounts that will post without others viewing and reading what they've posted.

A new investor will have a hard time following hints to identify scam projects, because everything is new to him. He won't have any measures to compare one coin to another, because he doesn't know anything yet. For that reason, I would advise him to start investing only in Bitcoin. And only when he gets used to it and experienced about conversations involving altcoins I would suggest him to select some altcoins for his portfolio, following the guidelines mentioned by OP on this thread.

Some things can't be rushed. Time is needed until the investor learns and understands the difference between a promising and unfavorable coin/token, until he learns what is a coin, token, stablecoin, memecoin and their respective features such as PoW, PoS... If you supply too much information at same time, trying to help, he will just get confused.

Third factor: PancakeSwap is not that unknown, is it? You may say that there are 99% of scam tokens on Pancakeswap, but that's a different argument. PancakeSwap is very well known, and you can trust that exchange.

Altcoin (ATC) brings the best features of Bitcoin to the Ethereum network, offering holders an alternative digital currency built on the most robust ecosystem in the space. Altcoin is Ethereum's answer to Bitcoin, as it provides the same fixed supply of 21 million, allowing for ATC to serve as the store of value asset and digital cash for the Ethereum network. ATC is completely decentralized, with a renounced contract, no VCs or team tokens, and no control over it by any centralized entity.

I think the better one is the signature campaign and it will target the real users. When it comes to bounty campaigns, anyone who can create multiple accounts can participate. So this is not good for the project long run.

Bullish is on the way and memecoin will likely be the main actor to start bullish, because that also happens in 2020 to 2021,
where memecoin experiences a quick pump to the moon, and after that the altcoin season starts,
so we have to choose memecoin first and I suggest it's in Floki, because Floki has a good future.

This coin has huge potential!

#TumpCoin, @TrumpCoinDTC, $DTC

Contract:  0xAb8c98491816FEde394582f7758A5eFfeb4368d7

I am aware a market price of $1 is an unrealistic prediction for a "meme" coin like TAMADOGE. After all, there are too many coins in circulation. Not only that, but the coin also lacks utility. I've only said about the possibility of TAMADOGE going to $1 in the future due to the hype surrounding "meme" coins. All it needs is someone (particularly a celebrity) to endorse it, and prices should "pump" all the way to the moon.

One thing about TAMADOGE is that it has fun play to earn games. I guess that will keep market demand from going all the way down the drain. With so many "meme" coins out there, it's hard to predict which one will "pump" next. You could lose more money than what you'll earn in the long run. Who knows how long TAMADOGE will last?

You've made your stance clear on meme coins: risky, whimsical, and basically a roll of the dice. True, they might bring profit to the surfers of the hype wave, but its a tightrope walk. Yet, isnt investing always a gamble? Be it stocks, bonds, even gold, they all carry inherent risks. Granted, their swings aren't as fierce as meme coins, but the mantra is identical: buy at the dip, sell at the peak.

You advocate for safer, high-yield coins with credible histories. But, isnt the reward typically proportional to risk? While I'm not championing meme coins, outright dismissal isnt justified. They've minted fortunes. Maybe, rather than shunning them, mastering their rules of the game could be a wiser move.

Hello guys,I learnt that pi network is a crytocurrency that is beneficial in the community ecosystem that you can mine with,I want to know their clarified differences and if the pi network and bBTC does same functions.

Here I agree with Xal0lex. We have to take into account that there were, until now, only two cycles of about 4 years (2013-17 and 2017-21), the previous cycle had only 2 years, and the 2017-21 cycle is debatable due to the low in 2020 and the 2019 high (in some graphs, it's shown as two cycles: 2017-19 and 2019-21).

However I don't see really the connection to the SEC "securities" debate. That's clearly a move independent from market cycles, triggered by a identifiable event (or a group of events, as there are various lawsuits and SEC statements involved which have driven the value of those coins down).

See how ETH went from $200 to a price of $4000 in just a few months when Bitcoin also hit ATH. here there will be 2 advantages gained. The advantages of Bitcoin are obvious and coupled with the advantages of Altcoin ethereum.

Personally I just think it's part of the 4 year cycle that occurs, the inner workings of it as it were. It's not just Bitcoin going up for a year, then correction, recovery and consolidation, but also the recovery year in the past has been with altcoins failing to keep up with Bitcoin (such as in 2019). 4 years later, we are at the same period as Bitcoin begins to recover in price and it's dominance recovers as a consequence.

Then naturally next year the diversification will return to altcoins, in anticipation of another bull market. It's also not necessarily speculators selling altcoins for fiat currency in order to get them cheaper. They may well be more expensive next year against the dollar. But I'd say it's very likely they will be cheaper to buy with Bitcoin next year, hence there is no reason for speculating on them directly right now.