Now you don't have to worry about old posts or threads As of today, the form for submitting reports now has a label for old posts or topics. If a reporter tries to submit a report on an old post or topic, they will get this warning:

Новости для всех репортеров. theymos официально установил новую планку давности для обрабатываемых репортов. С сегодняшнего дня все репорты на посты или топики старше 6 (шести) месяцев будут помечаться как "BAD". При попытке отправить репорт на пост и топик старше шести месяцев у вас на странице репортов будет появляться такое предупреждение:

Perhaps you bought tokens at the wrong time, at a time when the price of the token began to fall precipitously. At this time, it seems that the price of CAKE has stabilized and entered the stage of consolidation and accumulation. Of course, this is not a financial advice, but I think that soon the tendency of falling and consolidation can change and the price will return to some higher values.


Although I don't see much evidence of fraud in CAKE token, I'm more inclined to believe that the exchange has chosen not quite the right development strategy and many have a bad association when they hear about Pancakeswap.

Including FOMO, and also the unwillingness to think with one's own head. Musk has long understood that you can manipulate anything, even bitcoin, and the crowd will obediently follow him, while, due to imperfect regulation in the industry, Musk will not bear any responsibility for this blatant manipulation. In other words, he is doing it because he can afford it, bringing attention not only to DOGE, but also to Twitter.

It seems to me that USDT has become as important to the world of stablecoins as bitcoin is to the entire crypto industry. If USDT collapses, most likely the entire stablecoin industry will collapse and the market will have to be rebuilt somehow. It would be terrible if that is what is planned to happen, so that CBDC will take a niche in the crypto market instead of stablecoin. States can take the harshest steps just to make their product in demand.

Influencers are usually an element of market making. Forming a certain opinion in the information field can be done for the weakest hands to take the right actions. I have long noticed a correlation between the next forecasts from major investment banks and future bitcoin movements. If some representative of a bank says that bitcoin may soon rise to a certain point, then we can expect a correction in the market. And vice versa, respectively. Public people should not be trusted.

OMG, how many of these clones have been created already? Absolutely useless clones of DOGE and SHIB, created only to enrich their creators. As soon as any heightened interest appears around Doge, all sorts of memcoins pop up at once in information field and try to attract at least a little bit of liquidity. I've already lost count of how many of these "INUs" have appeared on the market, and the worst thing is that they will continue to appear.

ADA is no different from other successful coins, such as ETH, SOL, etc., they also often talk only bad and remember only negative sides of these coins, but they have positive sides that allowed them to achieve what their competitors could not. In this sense, ADA is no exception, and a portion of the hate is also prepared for it. Personally, I like ADA as an investment asset, it certainly does not look like a scam and you can get some profit here if we are talking about conservative investing. I never pay attention to the haters and those who speak well of the coin, only DYOR. Negative reviews as well as positive ones can be bought or pursue a certain interest, they are not to be particularly trusted.

Sushiswap has always been the most unreliable decentralized exchange, since the beginning of its appearance, so I tried to avoid it. These events show, that I didn't do it for nothing, thereby, probably, saved my money. It is also worth noting that smart contracts are still a sore point of decentralized protocols. No matter how many checks they pass, no matter how many audits they have, it still guarantees absolutely nothing.

I tried to find this ME Platform of yours on the Internet and found nothing about it at all. Why not provide a link to the platform you are presenting right away? So people can click on it right away, instead of searching for it in search engines.

Не нужно писать то, что не относится к вашему обменнику. И разнообразные справки в том числе. Как вы думаете, тот, кто придёт к вам менять австралийский доллар, ничего не знает о нём?

Будьте добры, прочтите правила раздела для авторов топиков

Об этом событии уже как минимум два раза написали

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4856359.msg62066519#msg62066519

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5362244.msg62059929#msg62059929

Давайте завалим весь локал.

No, he didn't get any punishment. Our global moderators and administrators have become too lenient to such users In any case, there is some good reason why they started treating such a violation as plagiarism this way, I think.

С разделом вы не ошиблись

Uniswap is developing and it does have some regulation rules, so there are not so many questionable tokens that sometimes live for days or weeks. I noticed that the increased interest in decentralized platforms comes after centralized exchanges start to have some problems. The crypto community wanted DEXs to be a full-fledged replacement for centralized exchanges, and it turns out that DEXs have become a kind of lifeline for those who want to use cryptocurrencies in times of market turmoil and FUD.

If the ban is lifted, it does not mean that investors will run to these old coins and start to frantically pump them. I expect that the lifting of the ban will not lead to the pumping of some old projects, it will lead to the fact that more teams will appear in this jurisdiction and present their new services and projects. Crypto industry has its own specifics, it is easier to make money on a new project than to try to revive an old one.

If it's so obvious, why do most people still fall into this trap and run to buy an asset after Musk did something with the logo. This is absurd. The coin didn't get any additional distribution, there were no new announcements or developments, someone just wanted to have fun and stick the badge where it didn't belong at all. People blame all their losses on Musk, but for some reason they still can't stop reacting to some of his next manipulations.

I don't quite agree that many altcoins are rising and showing good growth. Altcoins are rather recovering, they only show growth for those who bought at the bottom. What about those who bought last year or in 2021? There is no growth for them, as the assets have not recovered even 50% of the values they had during the bull run. Still, most investors in the crypto market are still at an unrealized loss.

I wonder what you're talking about? How can you share knowledge in CREW3, if there are tasks where you share your social networks to promote the project and perform various quests to get the appropriate ranks. This is not a forum of some kind. And how do you meet someone there, can you share your experience?

Metamask is becoming more and more feature-rich, transforming itself from a wallet into a multitasking machine. The question is whether this wallet will remain as secure as before or if hackers will have more opportunities to find vulnerabilities. Of course, I understand that the developers want to make their brainchild into something more than just a wallet, additionally attracting more and more attention to metamask, but nevertheless, I began to have more doubts that it will work perfectly and there will not be some data leakage.