В правилах есть моя цитата о том, что такие действия приравниваются к пункту 3 (троллинг):

Why do you write all these complications? It was enough to write that you were the first to use this address and cite this post as an example:


Since you were the first to use this address on our forum, that's already enough to know that there is no ban evasion.

Is this some kind of joke? Did he jump in a time machine into the future, copy your address, and then go back in time and post his post? Look at the dates of the posts. Lekhac37's post is from 2021 and your post is from 2022 So who copied the address from whom?

A few posts above say that the campaign is closed to new participants (CFNP). So it's useless to send an application.


Plus, if you read the first post of this topic, it says that this campaign accepts members no lower than "member" rank. So this campaign is not for you.

Mitchell did tell you that he would contact an administrator to fix the problem and restore your account. You just have to wait a little while.
By the way, the person you wrote about in your topic, who sent out PMs with a phishing link, has been banned.

When did bitcoin drop from $60k to $12k? Maybe you meant up to $15k.


Theoretically, anything can happen. Bitcoin's zero value could be if the network is compromised or somehow the private keys can be cracked quickly. The probability of such events is extremely low.


Maybe a hardfork will happen and bitcoin will restart in a new chain as one of the options.

All the rules are written in the first post of this topic.

Please show us at least one post for which you can be given a merit. You don't have a single post to rate. You only have PROOF OF REGISTRATION posts and bounty reports. They don't give merits for such posts. So you're hoping in vain to get a merit for your posts.

There is now a possible hype for AI-related projects. Previously, this technology did not have such a use along with blockchain because there were few applications, but now that the industry has greatly expanded in the number of different products, AI projects may start to be in demand.


All of this is still at a very early stage of adoption. Objectively, it will take a long time for these technologies to reach their full potential and materialize. It is too early to talk about their success or to bury them.

Why are you focusing around this proposition? It's less than bitcoin and then what? This is not an indicator at all. The question of demand is extremely controversial and it is unknown whether it will be at the right level to allow this coin to rise so high in the rankings.


Solana has had rabid support from foundations, as well as huge demand for the blockchain space. So you shouldn't compare Solana and Quant. They are completely different classes of products.

No, definitely not this year. Even if this coin suddenly starts to grow, the catalyst for powerful growth can only be a new global bullrun. Until that happens, this coin will not reach its new ATH. Also, we should not rule out the possibility that this coin will never reach its ATH. Such cases are not uncommon even among the largest altcoins, so it will depend on the funds whether they want to continue supporting this coin or whether they have already fixed the profit and now they are not interested in this project.

Most coins are bubbles, as they are created on a hype wave in order to make a quick buck on a popular topic. In 2021, many investors invested in anything that contained the word "metaverse" and cunning developers took advantage of it. Not all coins are like that, there are so called blue chips that are constantly developing and have a large community. So don't invest in metaverse projects that don't have a good roadmap and funding rounds.

I don't think supply should have any effect on the ranking of cryptocurrencies. The most important thing is supply and demand, as well as the demand for the blockchain space. The top 10 is too competitive, with either native blockchain tokens or stablecoins concentrated there. It is unlikely that this token will be in that league in the near future, but even without the top 10 this token could be a good investment. DYOR.

All altcoins have developers and there are early investors. With these factors in place, it is already difficult to call such projects decentralized, but I do not support the opinion that it is not worth investing. It is worth investing, but it is important to determine the timing of investment. I agree that you should not invest in various altcoins for many years ahead, only bitcoin is suitable for that, everything else can turn into a scam at any time.

Although Solana is often referred to as a project that is pumped up by market makers from large funds, at the same time, a large number of NFT projects are unfolding on this network. Demand for the blockchain space was high even during the bearish trend. Despite its return to the top 10, Solana will have a long time of trouble with its blockchain, which is still in beta stage.

Until NFTs start applying utilitarian properties, NFTs have no good future. Right now NFTs are just a speculative tool. It is a very risky asset for speculation, and very few NFTs are developing utilitarian properties. As soon as this technology applies these properties on a larger scale, it will live, but until then it will enjoy the notoriety of shitcoins, which depreciate very quickly.

This is an extremely controversial statement. So you are suggesting to look for altcoins that have already grown a long time ago and can bring only a few hundred percent and refuse from projects that have not yet grown and can carry a potential 1000%? Don't forget, projects like Polygon or TrustWallet Token also used to be young and worth very little, and then they brought their early investors big profits. In general, you should not ignore young projects.

If the deposit is small, then investing the bulk of the portfolio in heavy assets that are expensive and have already given thousands of percent is too questionable. In my opinion, the portfolio is better to assemble among a variety of projects, with an optimal distribution, so that there is diversification in case of various unforeseen situations. Creating a portfolio that will consist of 2-3 projects is, in my opinion, too inefficient.

Because they want to attract more liquidity for various operations, be it arbitrage or swaps. Do not believe the great interest, in most cases this will not end well. Luna Classic is unlikely to ever recover, the project holds on only due to speculation and various initiatives promising holders a large percentage.

Many investors for some reason consider the top 50 or top 100 projects, on which you can't earn much. So to speak, they use conservative investing. But there is bitcoin for conservative investing. If I want to get 300-600% profit, then I'll go and buy bitcoin, because it's reliable and won't turn into a scam. If I want 1000-10000%, I go invest in altcoin, but definitely not the top 50 because those are heavy projects that have grown long ago. You have to look for Gems between top-200 and top-800, that's where the most interesting options for altcoin investing are, especially those that have successfully survived the cryptozyma. You will never find big profits with a small deposit in the top 50.