Кто-нибудь уже пробовал ставить токены в стейкинг?

Ставлю в стейкинг, в Метамаске идёт подтверждение, подтверждаю и... ничего. На странице стейкинга ничего не происходит, токены не добавляются. Только комиссия за действия снимается и всё



Два раза пробовал, ничего не добавляется.

P.S. Что за сервис такой гнилой? Биткоины воруют, стейкинг не работает...

You misunderstood, these users are not rewarded for their posts in this thread. They post reports about received remunerations in HYIP projects, in which they participate. Also rewards from Profit-Hunters BIZ project for participation in various quizzes, referral rewards and rewards received in various bounties. Thus, they confirm that these projects are not some kind of scams, but normally working projects where you can earn money.

It is unlikely that technical analysis can be wrong, rather a person misinterprets the data that technical analysis provides. Technical analysis is unique in that if the same chart is shown to 10 different traders, they can see 10 different scenarios. If we're talking about the long-term outlook, only a small proportion of traders and investors are able to analyze anything based on technical analysis.

In general, new tokens should always be checked carefully, this applies not only to CoinMarketCap, but also to other similar services, although Coingecko has much less trash and low-liquidity coins than CoinMarketCap. In addition, the audit does not guarantee that the new token will not scam in the near future, so this correlation is highly questionable. Even completely clean projects with an audit and some workable product suddenly become scam and lose all capitalization.

They have already become popular. The AI project is in the center of discussion right now, and in general the whole topic of artificial intelligence is trending right now. Many projects related to artificial intelligence, which were launched quite a long time ago, 3-4 years ago, are now growing well, giving thousands of percent profit. Now this hype is only gaining momentum. I'm sure by the time the new bull run comes, the category of these coins could give solid growth.

They can only make a profit if they are PR'd on social media. That's the only way meme-coins grow in value. When there is a hype in social networks and some big influencers constantly mention a particular coin, it attracts more and more hunters for easy profits, but mostly they all just lose money on meme koins. Perhaps FLOKI and BONK might do well in the foreseeable future.

Avalanche is a reliable conservative investment, it is not an altcoin from the category of gaming, NFT or meme token, this project has a product and utility, so the project can be considered relatively reliable, the so-called blue chip of the cryptocurrency world. Now AVAX is almost at the bottom, so you can buy coins at a good discount and count on a good profit by the next bullrun.

 

This is a HYIP projects aggregator topic. Users who participate in HYIP projects from this aggregator post reports about remunerations received in this or that HYIP project. Thereby they confirm solvency of this or that HYIP project. Such posts have no special value for a forum, but also do not break the rules of this section.

Вы всегда равняетесь на других? Если есть что сказать по теме топика, то кроме просто ссылок никто вам не мешает также и комментировать свои (чужие) ссылки, пишите. Это будет нелишним.

Фигня какая то, а не BRG. Хотел купить немного токенов на сайте https://bridge.link через форму покупки. Вчера отправил биткоин, прошла половина суток, а подтверждение до сих пор висит

UPD

Короче, кидалы какие-то, а не оракул Ни биткоина, ни токенов. Написал админам в телеграм и в твиттер. Тишина. Сутки прошли. Не знаю как в других местах, но у них на сайте https://bridge.link покупать токен через форму крайне не рекомендую. Особенно за биткоин.

There is a topic in the Russian-speaking section, where there are about a dozen newbies with activity Legendary and with more than 2000 posts. It is noteworthy that absolutely all posts of these newcomers are in one single topic. That is, if you delete this topic, they all become Brand New.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1661044.new#new

This GEM doesn't look like a GEM, but like a regular pump & dump shitcoin that tries to parasitize on the hype topic of AI. Now many projects insert this acronym in their names or descriptions, just to draw attention to themselves, but in fact, they have nothing to do with AI. The project trades on one DEX, in a small pair with micro liquidity, there are hundreds of such projects every day, but no project has brought investors a large profit over time. GEMs always appear on centralized platforms, not DEXs.

It is better to use USDC or DAI, there are negative events around BUSD right now, there are various accusations in the industry that BUSD does not have enough collateral. Although many of these accusations are FUD. In terms of long term reliability, I wouldn't use this stablecoin as no one knows what could happen to Binance and whether it will suffer the fate of FTX. Better to try to use projects like DAI, they are not centralized and do not depend on certain services or companies.

My thoughts.

Now many users are facing a sharp increase in TRON commissions, many exchanges and wallets have increased minimum commissions several times, TRON at the moment does not look a profitable option for transfers, as it is close to Ethereum. Use TronLink, block some TRX and then commissions will be much cheaper for you.

There is nothing worse than staking on a centralized exchange. Apparently you are forgetting some safety rules. Don't keep your money on centralized exchanges, for example. That is extremely bad risk management. Also don't forget that exchanges very often change terms and staking rates, even after you blocked the coins. At blocking there were one conditions, after unblocking there are other conditions. So, the last place to recommend centralized exchanges for staking is in the last place.

When was the last time mining was profitable? What year? Because of increased hash rates, energy prices, equipment prices, etc., it's long since been a not good way to make money, unless we're talking about industrial farms. Investing that kind of crazy money in equipment to wait 1-2 years for the equipment to pay off? It's easier to invest in some projects and wait for a good profit. In my opinion, it's a much more rational allocation of your money than trying to make money from mining.

Coins are moving towards PoS because it is easier to promote their business, regulators are more loyal to such projects and project can be controlled, censorship can be set, which again is good for regulators and all sorts of supervisors. I can't imagine Monero on PoS, it is tantamount to bitcoin switching to PoS, i.e. it will immediately decrease trust and maybe even kill the whole project and there will be a mass migration from this asset. If Monero changes the consensus, it will kill this coin because monero is very often used for private purposes, no one wants a censored private coin.

In my opinion, the safest and most reliable way of staking Stablecoins are the pools in Curve. The pools there are created exclusively for stablecoin, and there are pools not only with liquidity allocation between 2 assets, but also more exotic ones with 8 or 10 assets, as far as I remember. Although I can't say that Curve offers great rates on stablecoin staking, but when it comes to platform reliability, percentages shouldn't be the deciding factor when choosing a platform for staking.

I recently encountered this problem. It is noteworthy that when you send transactions in the wallet and if the status "FAILED -OUT OF ENERGY" appears, the TRX, which are charged by the wallet, are not returned. I thus once wasted 50 TRX, before I understood what the matter. That's why it's better to choose purses with dynamic commission, many purses like Atomic have fixed commission and it always stands on minimum values, so the risk of wasting your TRX is quite high.

Actually, many stablecoins have lost their bind even during the bullrun, which is not to say that anything very bad should happen soon. The collateral of these stablecoins itself is questionable and they price these tokens are not as stable as they should be, judging from their name. You don't even have to talk about algorithmic stablecoins, they were born to always experience de-peg. I think, if some major correction happens, then such stablecoins as DAI, USDC, BUSD won't suffer much.