It's 2022 and almost 2023 and people still use AVs?

Why bother with an antivirus, yet you can keep your computer super clean by not visiting and downloading from random links?

The much preferred method is taking a screenshot and upload it to one of the popular image hosting sites like Imgur or imgBB and then share the link in the OP. Open-source screen capturing software programs like sharex can make the job easier.

RSI and MACD are very old indicators, but they still work if you have observed the markets. Not 100% but they still get the job done, especially on higher time frames. One such strategy that's effective is the RSI convergence and divergence.

If the strategy was to get obsolete by now, then such strategies wouldn't work at all.

I believe bots are only meant to help reduce the human emotions in trade plus maybe execute a well-thought-out strategy by the trader in order to reduce on screen time for the trader. So they still have to be often monitored where possible.

I am looking forward to using bots in the future just for the above reasons. The reason I have not used a bot yet is because I feel I don't have enough technical knowledge when it comes to python and API (everything seems alien to me at the moment)

I am just learning how to code strategies on trading view using pine script. My goal next year is to probably learning Python scripting language as I continue trading.

Spokesman, Public Relations Officer... If there was any career I had to take again, anything close to PR would be off my list instantly. Lies flow in their blood. I am not a fan of CZ but when I saw a video of Kevin O’Leary trying to change the blame game to CZ, I was baffled.

A good talker or a good manipulator? Spokesmen! 

10 BTC for an email address that is just similar to the name "satoshi"! How much would you charge if it was Satoshi@protonmail.com? 100 BTC maybe?
Not to try and bring you down, but going past $1,000 would be a miracle.

It's overpriced, and it would take someone who is equally crazy to buy it at that price.

Futures trading is banned for anyone in the US jurisdiction. The only advantage you have right now is that you are from Turkey and your account is verified using documents from Turkey. So you could just buy a very good VPN service that offers Turkish IP address so that when you relocate to the US, you keep using the VPN service.

You could cash out using p2p exchanges like bisq or the c2c marketplace available in Binance.

Alternatively, you can try using "decentralized" derivatives exchange
like
Like dydx (they still block US IP addresses, again you will have to used VPN. The advantage is, no KYC for now), Apollox DEX, Helix, Read all the terms and conditions first plus DYOR

Has tron network changed the way they operate?

Last I remember, you need to send some TRON in the newly created address in order to be able to carry out a transaction out of the account. This is totally different from how Bitcoin works.

I never came across such a thread, but it's really amazing how people always want to make weird theories when it’s something involving Satoshi or the early Bitcoin users. Of all things, why would someone think a transaction getting sent from the future?

I guess some people just don't prefer simplicity anymore.

Sounds bogus, isn't it? 

It reminds me of the old days when random "devs" would create an ERC20 token on Ethereum network and them make a bold claim that their new token (Like Ethereum dark, Ethereum Blue or Ethereum White) would process transactions 100 times faster than Ethereum and then gullible newbies would actually buy it.

What's wrong with the facial recognition?

Are you already verified with them?

As far as I know, at one point, they let US citizen be able to withdraw their funds as the accounts were only on withdrawal mode. So what could have been the beginning of your woes?

Regardless try to recover your funds as fast as possible. You don't want to wait until Binance and BNB collapse.

I will quote the first 3 posts




What exactly was a baseless claim here?

And why was it so hard to positively respond to this with a cool head if you are legitimate? I have seen far worse questions and criticism. Maybe you just can't handle business or responding to critism/crisis. Hire someone who can.

Welps, like I thought before, this kind of campaign won't favor those wearing the signature unless if the person wearing the signature has a casino review site, youtube channel or blog with good traffic, which i very well know most members here don't have.

The casino will keep getting the exposure via one's signature while, they won't get anything in return for weeks or even months. The only option is probably to shill the casino as hard as one can in every post while asking users to sign up using the ref link in the signature.

Why would he do so, it would be a dick move to delete an account that has not spammed in the past and last tweeted in 2018 

If you check the tweet history, the purpose of the account was to update about outages in the forum. The last major outages were in 2018.

Are you willing to perform a DDoS attack? *Joke*

Bitcointalk will always move on even if it was deleted.

Funding rate is deducted or added every 8 hours. If you close your position before the 8th hour, funding rate won't affect your equity in the derivatives account

Yes, it possible to see it under your trade history depending on the kind of exchange you are using

Here is an example of a trade history of my experimental BTCUSD open position sometime back


Never used Kucoin for trading derivatives. Are you sure it's not the normal trading fee for closing the position?

You might want to check out their FAQs.

Perhaps you are talking about margin trading offered by Binance and a few other exchanges?
Well, I am not a fun of it and not so familiar with it.

But as for trading derivatives (perpetual swaps and futures). There's funding rate that keeps changing from positive to negative every 8 hours according to most derivative exchanges and the market conditions dictate it, not how long someone keeps their position open.

Also, the exchange does not benefit from the funding rate, as the traders pay themselves depending on what side of the funding rate they are. The exchange only benefits from trading fees, theoretically.

---

Way riskier than even futures or perpetual swaps if you use the same leverage as that of leveraged tokens. It is the reason Binance has delisted leverage token twice now. A lot of people lost money.

Use a much lower leverage instead of "shorting with DCA" maybe even x3 or lower so that you learn how the market works whilst not putting your funds at a high risk when using high leverage and panicking to adjust the margin of the open position.

Also, look out for Bitcoin historic support and resistance levels, they can be helpful for you to determine where your stop loss, take profit and liquidation price should be.

I know how funding rate works, but what I didn't understand was what @SquirrelJulietGarden said that the rate would reduce with time if the position was kept for long or did he give some wrong information?

Here:

---

All are risky

Yes, it's a derivative instrument because it's price "derived" from the spot price of the underlying asset

Huobi support, maybe the only people to help you in this case

This is just another example of why you should not copy your previously used addresses and just send funds without confirming the status of the address or wallet in an exchange you are sending funds to.

Exchanges can periodically suspend deposits due to wallet maintenance, coin delisting, etc. and the warnings are usually displayed when generate a deposit address. If you just send directly, you will only realize when it's too late.

Isn't the funding rate dynamic in perpetual swaps? Like longs pay shorts and shorts pay longs depending on the market conditions and the position one has opened?

So how will rates reduce as time goes on if market conditions are what mostly dictate the funding rates and who is going to get paid and who is paying?
Help me understand  

I don't think any Government or authority would really care about protecting funds of their Citizens. It's always just about trying to gain control. Most Governments see cryptocurrencies and rogue unregulated exchanges as a threat to their power when more people start using them. Unfortunately, very many scammers lurk in the same waters too and with the very sad events of scams and hacks, the Government finds an excuse of banning cryptos or the crypto exchanges and their services.


They already have a list of banned exchanges, though not yet so big. It's Kucoin and Poloniex, so I believe such exchanges would reject Canadian KYC verified customers to use their platforms.