1741
|
Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: I was SCAMMED , Please HELP!
|
on: October 29, 2022, 11:14:55 PM
|
Too late, nobody can help you recover those funds here. Next time when making deals please try to use escrow as some members have already suggested. Do not just trust internet strangers because most are scammers and it's very unlikely you trace them since you used crypto as a means of payment
|
|
|
1742
|
Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Could such a thing be possible? Crypto Triangular Arbitrage
|
on: October 29, 2022, 10:47:49 PM
|
yes, I've seen a lot of bots too and they were all scams. but this is something very different video is a very clear and possible arbitrage
Why does it seem like you are trying so hard to make us here watch the video and contact you on telegram for your bot? Obviously, if you think the bot is different and OK, the have at it. Try out the bot and tell us if it worked for you well. This could as well be scam you are trying to sugar coat for us here.
|
|
|
1743
|
Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Automatic Crypto Swap - No KYC or account needed
|
on: October 28, 2022, 11:55:26 PM
|
Why are you saying it's a swap service while it's an incorrect and misleading definition for your project? It would be better to call it 'ChangeNow alternative frontend' or something like that, more straightforward and without omitting the fact you do not operate a swap service.
Nice catch. To make matters worse, ChangeNow will require KYC at certain times according to their terms of use. Given that they claim that no KYC is needed, one really wonders what would happen if changeNow blocked some funds and requested for KYC? Typical scam.
|
|
|
1744
|
Other / Meta / Re: Appeal the ban "CoinIdol News" account
|
on: October 28, 2022, 11:37:08 PM
|
Makes you wonder why.
Was CoinIdol News banned permanently, and then they got unbanned? If so, then mods need to revise the decision, CoinIdol News is of the most annoying spam account I have ever come across here. No way mods can let such a knob-head have a second chance here. If it was just a temporary ban with a warning then I understand, but clearly they haven't changed, have they?
|
|
|
1745
|
Other / Archival / Re: Most investors think regulation is a good thing
|
on: October 28, 2022, 11:00:45 PM
|
I hope you are differentiating between scam tokens/companies and privacy, Of course, I do. Actually, the fact that things like ICOs are heavily regulated now is a good thing, if you look back at the time when this forum was buzzing with scam ICOs to such an extent that Wikipedia blacklisted us.
Are ICO's still a thing? Try another form of shitcoins... Like NFTs Governments don't give a damn about regulating ICOs so that the general population do not get scammed. You and I know better why the Government's are trying to put a tight grip on cryptos. Bloomberg although notoriously being a hater of bitcoin actually had a fair point in this one, at least to some degree. Regulating bitcoin or cryptocurrencies for that matter warrants more sophisticated systems of security that would then force scammers and hackers to be very tricky to get the upper hand in this cat and mouse game. Besides that I don't think there's any other benefit one could get from a centralized cryptocurrency regulated by an authoritative power like the governments.
There goes your privacy! Governments don't care! If they did, then why are we still seeing scam and ponzi ads on Google which is a centralized service?
|
|
|
1746
|
Economy / Reputation / Re: I wish I could contact jolly good
|
on: October 28, 2022, 10:39:31 PM
|
>>snip<<
Do the right things, and also try to heed pieces of advice from different members. When you see your name come up in the reputation board every passing week or month, then maybe there's something you need to change about you and not the people around you. I have been here long enough to see how such tales end.
|
|
|
1747
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: PINK mining
|
on: October 27, 2022, 11:57:48 PM
|
Another one of the many chains that are not really trying to be original, or at least having that one feature that is unique from the rest. Not trying to discredit the work the creators are trying to do, but it just feels like one of those projects that will first get some hype and then slowly go behind the shadows as months pass by because people already have alternatives they are used to.
|
|
|
1749
|
Economy / Reputation / Re: I wish I could contact jolly good
|
on: October 27, 2022, 11:16:54 PM
|
Make your case or move this post to the reputations board. One of the members may pick up interest and contact him or the mentions will get his attention.
In my opinion, some negatives are just too harsh and uncalled-for, making the Trust system look like a big joke. Reporting the spam or at most a neutral feedback should do.
|
|
|
1750
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Faketoshi: a Short Story
|
on: October 25, 2022, 11:35:54 PM
|
Another classic. ...
Indeed classic! What do you expect from an impersonating clown who can't even do the simplest thing of signing a message from the satoshi related Bitcoin address to prove that he indeed is who he claims he is? When are you going to learn to give a deaf ears to all claims on being Satoshi? more are still coming underway, they know themselves they aren't and cant proof the fact they are, the more we keep getting much concerns about their weirdness the more they grow wings, let anybody claim he's Satoshi it's a good name everyone would love to bear and be identified with, but we know how the real Satoshi can be claimed.
It's better he keeps getting exposed so that newbies won't easily be fooled by his gimmicks when they come across such information.
|
|
|
1751
|
Other / Archival / Re: Most investors think regulation is a good thing
|
on: October 25, 2022, 11:25:22 PM
|
With this kind of article, It had to be Bloomberg. Not surprised, they are always negative about Bitcoin and crypto in general. What will the industry look like in 10 years in terms of regulation and KYC?
I think we are already seeing the signs. Remember the old days when there were not stablecoins and one has to determine trading pair prices in sats? And then came the centralized stablecoins and before we know it there will be CBCDs in most crypto exchanges. The problem is that masses tend to trust centralized and custodial services where they have to sign up and avoid being responsible with their own money. It why custodial services like Coinbase and blockchain wallet are so popular among new users and noncustodial wallets like Electrum less popular. Some people just don't want to go an extra mile.
|
|
|
1756
|
Local / Обменники / Re: Exflow.money - service for the exchange and storage of cryptocurrencies
|
on: October 24, 2022, 11:42:30 PM
|
Welcome to the forum. I see Best Change is one of your partners. Would you elaborate the partnership.
There is no official partnership with BestChange as the exchanger isn't even listed in the exchange monitor. They just placed their logo on the site, perhaps to capture attention from the users The misleading stats they have on their website is also a big concern.
|
|
|
1757
|
Economy / Service Announcements / Re: Such signal providers are worth watching out for 😡
|
on: October 24, 2022, 10:42:51 PM
|
Is 26% supposed to be good accuracy percentage?
Obviously it's so bad, Not so many traders would even love the idea of going below 50% OP is trying to advertise a site that shows statistics and the accuracy of different "signal providers" so in the post he gave an example of a single provider that has a number of followers but his stats are so bad.
|
|
|
1758
|
Economy / Currency exchange / Re: SELLING BTC/USDT/ETH +1.5%
|
on: October 23, 2022, 11:53:33 PM
|
If your intentions are genuine, then use and exchange
Need KYC from your partners? Then I guess you shouldn't have any problem KYCing on exchanges like Binance such that you can even by the coins at much better rates, right?
|
|
|
1759
|
Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Limit order higher or lower than spread in opposite side?
|
on: October 23, 2022, 10:23:59 PM
|
Yep, I clearly understand how to limit orders works in ideal case. My question was about unusual case which can be handled ambiguously..
Maybe you might want to rephrase your query on what you want to understand. I have some experience in trading(well, not so much like 15 years, but I could help if I see something) and I could assist you to decipher what's going on. If you have screenshots or video, don't hesitate to share them, they can be helpful.
|
|
|
|