Thank you Sir , you said everything , appreciate that
It would be awesome if you updated the findings in the OP to make it look like a proper scam accusation. A few members have pointed out on what needs to be done. You wouldn't love to have a scam accusations board were members do not trust the scam accusations because it's filled with bad unproven scam reports... would you?  |
|
|
|
Well, I understand you. In the Meta there are not many appeals. I hope you make a fair decision.
It's not what you think mate... Some good people have been banned and have even never appealed. So the number of people to be handled is actually bigger |
|
|
|
Please make your scam accusation in this given report format so that it's readable and easy to follow up by members. Some can even help you did up more info about the exchange. Don't also forget to show transaction hashes and PM/Email chat screenshots [b][color=black]What happened:: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Scammers Profile Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Reference Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Amount Scammed: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Payment Method: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Proof of Payment: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]PM/Chat Logs: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Additional Notes: [/color][/b] |
|
|
|
|
In order encourage every member to fight for their rank and not just relax because they have airdropped merit.
How about the Merit system be modified in away that those who have airdropped merits for each rank and have never bothered to earn any merit have their signature limit reduced to a lower rank next to their current rank for a beginning, for example,
Legendary with Earned Merits - Can wear a Legendary Signature.
Legendary without certain number of Earned Merits - Can only wear a Hero Member Signature.
Hero Member with Earned Merits - Can wear Hero member Signature.
Hero Member without certain Earned Merits - Can only wear a senior member Signature
Senior member with Earned Merits - Can wear Senior Member Signature.
Senior member without certain number of Earned Merits - Can only wear a Full Member Signature
and so on...
What do you members think about this?
|
|
|
|
yes, project that held IEO protected bounty hunter because there would be no word scam there andbounty hunter would not work in vain while supporting the project
It protects them but how much worth do they get from tokens in the end? As far as i know, bounty hunters have always been allocated tokens much later after the token has started trading and what i observed from IEOs is they dump so hard after getting listed so in the end bounty hunters get less value for their tokens after the distribution. In my Opinion, IEO/ICOs are no longer worthy of a bounty hunter's time and resources. |
|
|
|
|
Taking small 2-3% profits daily is less risky.
All you have to do is first learn basics of Technical analysis so that you can know when there is a strong signal to buy. 2 to 3 percent is not hard to achieve in a short time and Once you achieve your target, always exit and never try to be so greedy.
|
|
|
|
-snip-
I think you should take time to read the OP and thread before applying. - No open slot as per the spreadsheet so far. - Hhampuz does not accept applications that are posted before he makes an announcement of an open slot. - Next announcement will probably be made on the 16th May in case there is an open slot, so you will have to wait. |
|
|
|
Yup, perfect example of exit scam. The deleted twitter account had only 4 tweets since September 2018 when it was launched   Their ANN: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5127956I think DT members should tag their profile and not get away with it. Date Registered: January 17, 2019, 06:23:30 AM
Last Active: May 07, 2019, 04:22:22 AM
|
|
|
|
I think the current BTC0.5-per-month fee is ridiculously high and having 7 treasurers wouldn't require paying each one a similar fee.
Probably BTC0.02 or BTC0.05 for each one would be more than enough.
I think it would even be better to peg the fee to the US Dollar rate. From what I can see.. BTC's volatility seem to be back. |
|
|
|
Still, all full members so far( hell_slayer, NavI_027, Lpim01 ) have not removed the bad links from the signatures. I think Wapinter should come out as soon as possible and make an update in the thread and OP about the new signature codes which every full member should wear otherwise the people behind the campaign will think the campaign is not working out and may decide to discontinue it sooner as some bit.ly links lead to a dead end. Full member bit.ly Link Codes from the OP that don't work[url=http://bit.ly/BitForexOMI/] [url=http://bit.ly/ECOMIfl/] (Remove the last forward slash) [url=http://bit.ly/BitForexOMI] [url=http://bit.ly/ECOMIfl] |
|
|
|
Post from June 2018. Thank you.
The time you copied the post doesn't matter mate, I have seen some members get permanent bans from posts of 2017 or 2016. It's unfortunate but that is the forum policy on bans. Already started thread here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5141561.0 and still don't know when I will get unban. Do you have any idea how much time it takes to get unban? Please read my thread first and replies before making any comment, your comments are valuable. Not really sure but you have got to be patient buddy. There is one particular chap, don't remember his name, some Dev... I think his appeal took about a month. Maybe you can look up a couple of chaps who have been unbanned then you can get in touch with them through PM to know what they did and how long it took them. Like http://ChiBitCTy |
|
|
|
|
Not a good idea at all for lower ranked accounts.
Somethings are better left untouched.
Reducing the limit could lead to abuse and overloading servers and in turn this would make searches to load much longer or even search errors due to servers taking forever to response.
Imagine how much worse and painful that could be.
|
|
|
|
I have seen even Legendary members get banned without having their bans overturned However, a few members whom Theymos thought were very valuable and contributed a lot to the community had their permanent bans lifted but signature bans put in place for some long periods after looking into their appeals. It is a very rare scenario though. |
|
|
|
Anyway i understand you have rules you need to follow in order to control the quality of the forum. If you can get my account un-banned please let me know. Otherwise i will leave this forum to others and i will use it only for reading it.
Looking forward to get reply to my appeal.
Thank you and best regards
Perhaps this? CopyZANTEPAY provides cryptocurrency multiwallet / debit card integration. You can spend your bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum and zantecoin anytime, anywhere. Sign up and pre-order your crypto card FREE of charge. Referral, affiliate bonus and cashback paid out in zantecoin and ethereum. Have a look at our awesome project, white paper, team and advisory board. Join ZANTEPAY, we bring cryptocurrency to the mainstream!
Source https://findico.io/ico/zantepay/milestoneZANTEPAY provides cryptocurrency multiwallet / debit card integration.You can spend your bitcoin, litecoin, ethereum and zantecoin anytime, anywhere. Sign up and pre-order your crypto card FREE of charge. Referral, affiliate bonus and cashback paid out in zantecoin and ethereum. Have a look at our awesome project, white paper, team and advisory board. Join ZANTEPAY, we bring cryptocurrency to the mainstream!
I doubt you will get your account unbanned mate |
|
|
|
so how can we give a red tag to the alt of the same person, remember having an alt is not against the rule,only abusing bounties with alts deserves red tag.
Having alts is very much allowed but under these circumstances. Someone is evading ban... It's against the forum rules and so members ought to know which kind of person they are dealing with before that person finally gets banned. DTs are not moderators.  Correct... but they also carry responsibility to safe guard community members. |
|
|
|
@S_Therapist, It's the same as tagging an account for being an alt for someone who has committed an offense in the past that is gravely against the forum rules. I don't seen why tagging a ban evader would be any different. It's like avoiding to tag chaps who spread malware around thinking that the report you have made to the mods will work and get them nuked. Sometimes they don't get nuked. I can even send you classical link of a malware scammer whose post has never been deleted to this date, and yet I did the reporting.
Why do you guys even indulge him?
Just trying to drive the point home from a different perspective |
|
|
|
Not sure how this is related to number of accounts waking up because in your stats, it's about account registrations. What we are seeing right now is a scenario where old newbie and brand-new accounts that were mostly registered back in 2017, 2018 waking up lately. |
|
|
|
Sorry about your loss but it looks like you already Opened another thread in this board about the same thing; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5141017It would be good to keep updating in one thread so that it is easy to follow-up by other members. |
|
|
|
Is it just me or the number of accounts waking up has been abnormal? It seems to have been so rampant especially lately. And If you look at Seclog, 99% of the accounts waking up and Brand New and Newbie. A massive 12,369 accounts have woken up in the last 30 days at the time of this post(is that figure really normal?)  Could it be some account farmers preparing for a spamfest now that Bitcoin Price looks a little good? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
