Since some people are confused about their status, I wrote a detail description about stakeholder list making process here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=450200.msg5186684#msg5186684

Following is the protocol I use to make up the stakeholder list from the information in the registration thread:

1. considering every posts in registration thread in an order

2. check if a post satisfying the fee or promotion condition in that page. All valid accounts start with Y condition.

3. if the account sent a fee in, I check the transaction hash in block explorer for valid transaction and add the hash in a separate column. Invalid hashes are noted "bogus transaction" next to the accounts and change condition to blank.

4. After finishing the list for that update (10 pages). The list is sorted by transaction hashes.

5. Checking for duplicate hashes. If two accounts have the same hash, then one will be legitimate and the other is a stolen hash fraudster. A prioritization protocol is followed: if 1. veteran account vs new account then veteran account is considered legitimate and is noted with "duplicate hash"  and new account's condition changes to blank and is noted with "possible duplicate hash fraudster" ; 2. new account vs new account then the account posted the hash first is considered legitimate and is noted with "duplicate hash"  and the other account's condition changes to blank and is noted with "possible duplicate hash fraudster". All these labels will be reversed when the accounts with ""possible duplicate hash fraudster" label can provide the ultimate proof of owning the transaction hash by sending a very small amount from the same sending address of the duplicate transaction to the NEM address and notifying the public here. So the "burden of proof" falls into the accounts with blank condition and label "possible duplicate hash fraudster" but that does not mean they are proven duplicate hash fraudsters

6. After a period of of public reviewing. All cases of duplicate hashes could be solved following the above protocol.

I started following this duplicate hash checking protocol after page 30 and few cases of duplicate hashes are spotted after that. Kooream has been starting to apply the same protocol back to thread 1 to weed out all the fraudsters.

I hope this explains clearly the process I has been following and you should get the same results from the registration threads too if you do the same thing. I said the registration thread is the original list of stakeholder for that reason - anyone can construct the stakeholder list from these raw materials.

We will do another check for duplicate hash for the whole list when the fundraising is over. Ultimately, no case of duplicate should remain ambiguous following this protocol.

However, it will take sometimes so please be patient.

Why do I only update the list every 10 pages? because the fee changes every 10 pages therefore stolen hash fraudsters can only steal hashes from this range, that makes checking much easier.
    

Thank you. This will be a great community driven by a positive attitude and generosity.

while some earlier entrants can causally posted "interested" and get in. Late entrant and new to the forum has to go through quite a few processes that takes times and effort and they still need to send money in. So the plan does not just rely on people being honest but also rely on people being passionate about the project.

You should engage them in the introduction thread then you can know if they are real or fake accounts. Many new accounts are friends of earlier NEM participants. Doing so smaller groups can be formed within a bigger group/ community. That's a powerful force to push things forward.
I received a lot of PM these days and there is no denying that NEM attracting many new people.

Our new P-O-I is a new innovative way of forging which I believe will make NEM a more sustainable system. Makoto is writing the white paper and when all the theoretical aspects are considered we will implement it in the core codes.

I see no problem with you in the list  1403   treviso32   Y Kooream has probably corrected it.

You are safe. Condition Y means you are fine and is being considered the owner of the transaction. The note " duplicate hash" means your transaction was used by someone else but the burden of proof falls on that other person.

just update the list to page 80. It is normal to update every 10 pages. Thanks.

I can't locate here easily unless you let me know which page/ post she is in. Also I has allowed comments directly on the list so you can do that too. Thanks.

I donate 1K. Thanks for the initiative.

Sent. transaction id 3041746654500171882.

Hi I am still here, but I have some other works to do. Thank you all for supporting NEM. Pm me if you have a private question, otherwise post them in our discussion/ update thread, someone will answer you.

If you have time and new to this venture, I would suggest you reading the discussion thread from beginning. Understanding how we get here would help you know how we are going forward. Again, thank you all and we would need all your helps in the future.

Update to page 70 currently. Sorry for the delay as I have some other works to do, but it is scheduled to be updated today to page 80.

Thanks for the comments. The cheesy parts was originated from a source I do not dare to name here I am working on wording for the front site of NEM and I like a more direct and forceful sentencing style too. So it will be more professional, more inspirational without the cheesy parts. I will solicit comments when the site is open for preview.  

While I am not a native speaker, the front page did get edited by an English writer.

some updates:

1. My last ad in Doge subreddit is from 2/15 (today) to 2/16. I want people there to see our development plan not the bunch of envy comments so go there and upvote my development plan comments http://www.reddit.com/comments/1wq6wj/envy_no_more_the_first_egalitarian_coin_join_the/?sort=new . Now despite of all "envy" and" hate" comments, we have close to 2000 click-though from Doge-Reddit. It is getting attention

2. Koream has checked thoroughly thread 1 for duplicate hashes https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AhnotCbeR7nrdDlfanJzQS1lQkVGT1J2ZktWNmVCX2c&usp=sharing#gid=15
If you are not qualified in the stakeholder list (no Y next to your account) and your account is in duplicate hash thread, you will need to prove that you own the sending account by sending a very small amount to NEM address and let us know the transaction ID.
As long as your accounts have a "Y" then you are fine.

3. News but not sure good or bad. Before I have a chance to buy them, Neweconomymovement.com and Neweconomymovement.org have been taken by someone else, probably a NEM stakeholder I will have Nemcoin.info up in a few days for a preview.

Great look. I will buy one from you, Anon. Thanks.

Our introduction thread is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=467027.new#new; please move your post there.

Thanks for your interest. Please understand that the rules are there for a certain purpose. But welcome you to join in.

Hi all. Thanks for joining in and supporting NEM. A new introduction thread is made here for introduction purpose. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=467027.new#new

It could end up not so well if you join NEM but you can't read future instructions in English.
 

If you have a new BTT account and want to join NEM, please make a short introduction about yourself to join in here.

Update 2/21: the NEM fundraising was over on 2/17, but we may have more people after the public auditing of the stakeholder list. Please make an introduction post in this thread to join the waiting list. Thanks for supporting NEM.