No takers? How about 0.01?

Cut the dev some slack 

WTS 1000 XCT. PM me an offer.

Guys, I am all for taking as long as necessary to develop something and getting one's ducks in a row, even if it takes a year. In the ugly world of virtual currencies there is very little that can be done to assess devs and whether they are above board or not. One of the few things that can be looked at is actions and if a promise is made if the promise is kept. I am therefore a strong believer in less is more. If a dev is working on something then dont give a fixed deadline unless you have the resources to deliver - project management 101. Rather talk about in the next few weeks or couple of months or when it is ready or keep a low profile. If you want to be loud, fine, but have the resources in place to make good then on what you say.

Lets look at 2 scenarios:

Dev A:
Ill deliver feature X by next Monday. On Monday the dev posts his dev did not have access to the internet. By Wednesday he is sick. By Friday who knows? People get anxious and start to ask questions. Dev finally delivers by the next Monday.

Dev B:
Ill deliver over the next few weeks or so. Monday in 2 weeks the dev delivers and makes a post with the links. Everyone claps hands for the dev for delivering.

Both achieve the same delivery date but dev B has also achieved some credibility whereas dev A has lost credibility.

I re-iterate that I would like to see warp succeed, but I have lost twice recently with coins where the dev starts with excuses after making promises and it turned out to be a duck. Apologies for saying if something looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and walks like a duck that it probably is a duck. It is possible though that it could not be a duck, but statistics in virtual currencies are heavily against that. I would appreciate if the dev can work on his delivery statements and rather make statements when the delivery is ready for release or then if he decides to make a promise, to keep to it. It is not my coin though so I have no say in how dev wants to run things. It is important to make sure that there is nothing that could make the public think it is a duck (perhaps mistakenly), especially if the coin has the potential to get onto a big exchange like Polo and if the dev team wants to be taken seriously. This actually makes me think that I tweeted Polo to consider warp a few hours before the promised release which then did not happen (which in hind-sight was premature). This should be enough evidence that my intentions are pure.

Observing what is going on here I get the same feeling as with Axiom (where I lost some). The warp dev also seems to be outsourcing his dev work, which in itself is not a problem, just that it creates more risk especially if the 3rd party is not joining the party. At some stage also the funds will run out. It just seems that the excuses are lame - in the old days "the dog ate the homework" and today "the Internet was down".

I would like to see warp being successful just like anyone else, I am just observing the warning signs.

The dev did not specify any languages so Ill get going on the Njerep translation  . Refer link

The dev has coded POW in as well at 0 rewards, probably to move the chain along if POS gets stuck. The question is how will the dev distribute the bulk of the coins.

At least POW is working with SHA256 but giving 0 block rewards alas.

Updated the bootstrap to 935688

So you will have a testnet up just for yourself or for the public as well? The public will then have the opportunity to optimise the GPU miners which will effectively exclude the CPU miners at the time of re-launch. Is this correct?

I am sure he can handle the complexity and make up for the initial ****up. If the rewards were working properly, it would have been more than just a few coins.

That is less than the 0.1 that djselery offered you.

I first want to see what the 2nd virustotal hit means - the "malware" one. The first seems a false positive. Id rather run this wallet on Linux.

https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/d8c1d84be3013990b6117393f61821e0d2b3dc40950e45c278e958dfa782869a/analysis/

Will current miners be able to send you their wallets for a swap to the re-launched coin?

PS: And maybe make the block rewards a bit smaller as the large blocks will only benefit a few.

Here is a suggestion:

When you relaunch, premine the rewards that would have been at this block height and let the people with current 0.00000001 blocks swap those for the correct rewards.

I wonder what the next reward will be after 0.00000001 

PS: blocks still 0.00000001

If you can get a block explorer up we can monitor the chain.

Your blocks give 0.00000001 reward 

Yes, but my steps are teaching the grammar where your step is easier but teaching them the phrase in the foreign language  

Because I am a nice guy

1) open neptuniumd and let it sync
2) open simplewallet.exe and setup wallet
3) get address by typing address in simplewallet
4) in neptuniumd window type start_mining <addressfromsimplewallet> 7

Notes:
1) choose 1 core less than your max.
2) leave both windows open and open the daemon first and simplewallet second.
3) remember to allow the daemon access through your firewall.