|
Do you have an eta of when the first services will be delivered?
|
|
|
|
almost 50 sat!
Will go up when features are delivered and implemented. |
|
|
|
Volume and price rise will happen when something useful is implemented as per the roadmap eg. TOR and so on. |
|
|
|
Dont use. Looks like a scam site for all coins. |
|
|
|
|
The tournament has to be this coming weekend.
|
|
|
|
Guys we already gathered 55 000 MIN for the tournament. Devs will also donate 15 000. Platform is almost ready. Great jub everyone - prize pool of 70 000 should attract some attention to us. Lets pick a date?
The sooner the better. |
|
|
|
Can someone explain to me why the price dropped so low? It was doing so well a few weeks ago.
1 week in cryptoworld = 1 year in real life. Traders and investors have a 2-3 weeks max interest span. If devs dont deliver fully in that time or keep them interested then people start to move on. MIN still in "development" and have been in "development" for weeks with a test here and there. MIN is on borrowed time and needs something quick and fast to turn the ship around, because once a coin is <1k then it is difficult to recover. That is why I say a quick and dirty life line would be an anon mixer. Also, Coinier has some good emergency measures mentioned above. The ball is in the devs hands to step things up and make some good important strategic decisions. If devs insist that the tournament is the next thing, then it must happen within this week still or by next weekend latest, with lots of hype on social media etc. Fast. |
|
|
|
at this point i will only suggest that minerals, if they are interested in protecting their investors, raising the value of their currency, and preventing their community from falling into disgruntled chaos, or all of the above. offer real world prizes for the most dedicated users of the multipool. game keys, usb miners, gameconsoles/laptops if possible etc. if they like i can work with them to help make the multipool reward efficiency more profitable for multipool users. if interested pm me and we can work out a strategy.
Best Regards,
Coinler
They should have listened to you and implemented anon first and then all the rest. |
|
|
|
|
What I don't get is why anon was not done first (day or two implementation) so that the coin could hover around 20-50k while the rest of the "development" happens. Now it is just development all the time with nothing else to hold its value. That is why the price is <2k. People lose interest if development takes so long. 1 week in crypto time = 1 year in real life. At least with anon there would have been interest in the coin while the development happens until whenever it is finished.
All the cryptocoins with no plans and no purpose that have anon trades at high prices. If MIN has anon and plans it can trade so much higher. You can call anon whatever you want, but face it, it provides higher prices and volume to all those other meaningless coins. Imagine what it can do for MIN.
Can the devs not just take 2 days out of the 2+ months development plan and implement an anon mixer. Just a couple of days to put the coin and volumes back up there. 2 days will not have an impact on the project plan - consider it a "bug" that has to be fixed like any of the other bugs you have found so far. By developing until whenever, you just risk the chance that volumes will remain low and become lower and perhaps exchanges might de-list the coin. All that is needed is a couple of days deviation to implement anon. It is not much of an ask to support the community. Just this one little thing, then you can carry on with development until you feel you have finished. What is going to have more value to the coin - a) anon by the end of the week, b) still be in development and no final implementation of betting by end of the week? Not having fully implemented and live betting by end of this week or the week after or the one after that will not have an impact as tournaments still have to be organised, coin has to be adopted by the non-crypto community etc. One week is not going to make a difference on the betting side of things. Having anon by the end of the week will have a big, a huge impact.
Don't be hard a$$es and so stubborn, take a step back, look at reality and implement anon now. Its just common sense. You as dev team can make the difference.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe traders in crypt do not care about delivery of anything in a coin. Maybe everyone just wants to make a quick buck.
|
|
|
|
ZS is so undervalued right now. It has no premine, no instamine and on top of that, the dev is actively trying to promote it.
Right now it only has < 1 BTC volume at mintpal. All it takes is 5 BTC and the price of 1 ZS will be back to 8k! What do you think? I think ZS is about to skyrocket.
Lets hope so. Something as small as an anon mixer will do it which has been suggested several times already. |
|
|
|
that buy at 94192 coins? its us or the bot? i am starting not to see anything...
and believe that its a user and not a bot...
Definitely a user and not a bot. |
|
|
|
|
and dont forget some sort of anon to get the volumes going.
|
|
|
|
|
All cryptonote coins failed except XMR. Why would this one be different? Alternatively sell at the pump and move on.
|
|
|
|
|
The graphs are turning around in a positive way. Trust buys > sells and BTC buys almost = sells. Now it is just volume that needs to increase.
|
|
|
|
PS - Has everyone seen Revocoin, seems to be a similar distribution method to MIN. I plan to plant the allowed 10mh/s there as soon as it gets going. Just thought it might appeal to the miners here too  They are going with other pools, meaning that if any of those pools break trust and leaks the wallet the launch and POW fails. |
|
|
|
Is there any chance that the price will return to its previous value - 1200sat or more?
If the dev delivers on his plan it should go much higher. Patience and time will tell. The fudder above though seems to try and make it impossible, so yes there are also negative factors that negatively impact from the side during the process. I have patience. I am one of those who bought at the price 300sat and have never sold. It is possible that this is nonsense. Could be, but that is venture capital and the crypto game. Six or a nix. |
|
|
|
Is there any chance that the price will return to its previous value - 1200sat or more?
If the dev delivers on his plan it should go much higher. Patience and time will tell. The fudder above though seems to try and make it impossible, so yes there are also negative factors that negatively impact from the side during the process. |
|
|
|
|
I agree. If he made a post or two listing concerns, one could have said yes ok he is legit. But making so many posts and keep coming back? Of all the coins out there he picks this one. I dont see him causing this amount of %^&*% at any other coin. There are coins out there that are real scams yet he keeps picking here, where there is an identified dev and a plan.
He must be rent-a-fud.
|
|
|
|
|
Dont post your addresses in the thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
