Agree with you guys. Lets make these things happen. Anon is very important though and should be done quickly as one of the first items. I say this because something needs to be done fast to generate volume else ZS might get a delisting due to low volume. Painting a restaurant pink on the outside when your main market is girls is sometimes more important than how good the food inside tastes.
This time though, it will have to include advertising and saying in advance what will happen instead of landing a surprise. That is how this game works.
|
|
|
What can be done to turn the coin around to 8-10k where it was? How about implementing a quick and dirty anon, which on its own would bump the price up to at least 6-7k.
Look at BTCD with lower specs than ZS, also SHA256, it has 6x or so the number of ZS coins, has no features and only made a promise to implement anon by end of POW and the price is sky high and with that I mean 50k+. I have never seen a coin with 3.8M coins trading at 1000 sats. That is just ridiculous. A quick and dirty anon should do the trick.
I once heard a wise man say "Anyone selling ZS under 10k is a dick".
|
|
|
<MitchellMint> From what I can tell, someone wrote a bot to Buy TRUST, sell it 200% under to devalue it and... create a sell wall. <bittrex-rami> nothing wrong with that
The conversation continues, but you get the point.
Except it isn't Bittrex confirming the existence of a bot, it is you claiming one is there and Bittrex saying that there's nothing wrong with bots being used to trade in any direction. You are using it to pretend they have confirmed the existence of the bot, they have not. I already pointed out this glaring fallacy to you repeatedly yet you keep on using it again and again. Bittrex have not confirmed there is a bot, YOU are the only person claiming there is a bot and you have no evidence of a bot. "Oh but when I release bad news there is a dump" - Human traders dump on news, bots don't. Lets just bury the hatchet for a couple of weeks. If there is no delivery we can continue.
|
|
|
Lets just bury the hatchet for now and give Travis the opportunity to deliver the products.
|
|
|
is the dev working for some fantastic function?
The dev is working towards social media integration, which if he can pull it off and it works would be great.
|
|
|
All I am saying is give him the chance to prove himself. That is all. Are you another one who doesn't read your own posts? Or do you have a blind-spot for facts that run counter to your hopes? "Give him the chance to prove himself" You don't think he's already done plenty of that with his weird claims about buy-high-sell-low bots working to destroy his coin and that you can all help out by, guess what? Yes, that's right, buying more coins. Yeah, he's proving himself alright. I am referring to the product that he wants to deliver. Let him prove that. The proof is in the pudding. If the product is not delivered or fails then I will leave. Everything up to that is just speculation and there will be people arguing both sides. That is why I say, let him deliver the products then we will know exactly what is going on. No-one can at this point say if the products will be delivered or work or fail. That is where the venture capital comes in. That is what I am referring to. What you are attempting is to destroy the coin before he had the opportunity to deliver the products which is not fair. The more posts you make, the more difficult you make it for him to deliver and if you carry on long enough, you will make it impossible to deliver. At that point failure would not be because of the product, but because of your efforts which is again not fair. There are many other coins that you could rather focus on destroying. At least this coin has some plan, where there are countless others that launch a coin with no plan and for the sake of launching a coin. Even if you don't agree with the plan, give him a fair opportunity to deliver on it.
|
|
|
YOUR CONCERNS HAVE BEEN NOTED thanks.
NO THEY HAVE NOT. See, we can all use caps. My concerns are noted only by people who are able to note them. This thread contains numerous pages where my concerns were ignored until I repeated my reasonable challenges to what MitchellMint kept on asserting over and over again. So, while you might declare my concerns have been noted, it is Travis who needs to stop making claims about buy-high-sell-low bots as if he is in some epic trading battle to save your coin value, when he is not doing anything of the sort. Will you be happy when the price is 1 sat? That is what will happen if people follow your advice and dump and then many that you are trying to "protect" will lose. All I am saying is give him the chance to prove himself. That is all. And if you are right then fine and if you are wrong then fine. It is just a few more weeks until he has to deliver. Also, history is full of examples where people were laughed at for way out ideas which in the end turned out great. Lets just give him the chance to prove if it will work or not. Everyone in crypto is in anyways throwing money on the water as venture capital. The expectation is to lose it all and as a bonus to make some money if it works out.
|
|
|
Again, your concerns have been noted. Let the people make their own decisions. There is nothing more you can add. The only thing you are achieving is causing more harm by the price going down every time you post fud. FUD? This isn't FUD, this is reasonable challenge to unreasonable assertions. Unreasonable assertions that he keeps making over and over again. If left unchallenged, this thread would end up being filled with them to the point that no noob to the coin would ever know that the dev is talking nonsense. Just because you want to unload your bag on some unsuspecting noob, don't blame me for the mess, blame your esteemed leader. He's the one who started declaring the existence of nonsensical buy-high-sell-low trading bots. He's also the one who is declaring his intention to blacklist wallet addresses of people he considers as not supporting his coin, doesn't that alarm you? Trust Plus Coin @TrustPlusCoin · Jul 10 Please let us know if you are a #Trust Supporter and would like to be removed from the black list redeem@mitchellmint.comSo, again, how am I a FUDster when I am simply countering the bizarre assertions your dev is making and wanting to make sure that nobody else falls for these claims. I fail to understand what your objective is by repeating yourself over and over. PLEASE. Let the people make their own choices with this coin like they make their own choices on any other altcoin that comes to market. Your comments are used as input in each persons risk appetite decision. Leave it there. There is nothing else you can add that you have not said already. YOUR CONCERNS HAVE BEEN NOTED thanks.
|
|
|
What does the market caps look like for the contenders of the remaining 2 choices?
EDIT: They will probably chose XC and then a decision between ZS and NC2. ZS just needed 3 more votes to be in the first 3.
|
|
|
Give the dev a break to do his thing and stop with your hate speech. LOL. Seriously, I actually laughed out loud. The 'dev' of this coin *is* doing his thing, which is to make bizarre claims about why the coin isn't going anywhere and you lot lap it up, allowing him to continue making bizarre claims about the next round of coin sell-offs and the next round . . . .and the next. There is no hate in my speech, I am challenging fallacious argument with reason. You are the ones being lied to, but not by me. Why would you accuse me of being the bad guy in this, because my posts cause more sell off? Ladies and Gents, I've got bad news for you, there is nothing in this coin project that would indicate there is going to be anything other then sell-off occurring if the dev keeps on posting bizarre claims about buy-high-sell-low bots. Again, your concerns have been noted. Let the people make their own decisions. There is nothing more you can add. The only thing you are achieving is causing more harm by the price going down every time you post fud. Leave it now because you say the same thing over and over. Everyone can read and read your concerns the first time you posted them. Let the people make their own decisions based on their risk appetite. If you are correct fine if you are wrong fine. Let it be now.
|
|
|
His answers are nonsensical. He is destroying this coin in front of your very eyes.
Cryptodevil, You are destroying the coin in front of everyones eyes. Give the dev a break to do his thing and stop with your hate speech. The price is low already. Give it a chance. Are you going to continue until you have driven the price to 1 sat? You have done enough damage already. Give the dev the chance to prove himself. Lets see how things will pan out. Your concerns have been noted. Let the community make their own decision and choices from here on forward. This is venture capital. Everyone is aware of the risks of being involved with crypto coins.
|
|
|
i think the focus should be on making it as easy as possible to use minerals in pcgames it would be very cool if there would be an sc2 map which works with the wallet so you can challenge someone and after the game the winner gets the coins
If they are serious.. Don't focus on SC games only.. Dev team said earlier they will start with these and move into other games as well, so I think the objective is to be universal. You just have to start somewhere.
|
|
|
I think it's good news for minerals and clears the way +1, nothing to do with us guvnor, nothing to see here, please move along now Hopefully we will see some of the coin supporters here - all are welcome On a happier note 2.4btc buy wall disappeared from Bittrex, perhaps the forces of evil have had enough of holding this coin down Why would a buy wall keep the price down? Sorry, sell = was busy looking at something else - CSO coin Oh ok, that makes sense.
|
|
|
I think it's good news for minerals and clears the way +1, nothing to do with us guvnor, nothing to see here, please move along now Hopefully we will see some of the coin supporters here - all are welcome On a happier note 2.4btc buy wall disappeared from Bittrex, perhaps the forces of evil have had enough of holding this coin down Why would a buy wall keep the price down?
|
|
|
ZS just needs to pass Titcoin that is all.
|
|
|
Guys watch out for Kryptcoin on coinpayments.net. It is just 2 votes behind. Vote NOW.
|
|
|
indeed i tracked all forum topics but cant see any link to that or am i that blind ?
Maybe it was on IRC. Cannot remember. Ask the dev again.
|
|
|
i dont want to be unpatient, but why wasnt the update released yesterday?
Dev did release info yesterday. I did see his post with the update but i expected some kind of whitepaper as he mentioned "Executive Guide". the update itself was great though It was released. Go to the googledocs link.
|
|
|
i dont want to be unpatient, but why wasnt the update released yesterday?
Dev did release info yesterday.
|
|
|
zimstake pump it hard
buy soon
I would call it more of a correction to the previous rightful levels. it is quickly correcting to where it was.
|
|
|
|