[ANN] [ETC] Ethereum Classic: Immutable Smart Contracts

Quote from: Bamsed on August 14, 2016, 07:32:19 AM

Quote from: usukan on August 14, 2016, 02:48:56 AM

Bity and the white hats

https://blog.bity.com/2016/08/13/the-white-hats-and-dao-wars-behind-the-scenes/

The actions of the White Hat Group (WHG) have been shrouded in mystery and it is time for this once-necessary precaution to come to an end. Transparency matters to all of us. Previously, it was deemed unwise for the WHG to elaborate on the details of the situation while the salvage operation was unfolding, to prevent new and old attackers from knowing their movements to better understand how to attack DAOs. Now that the community is questioning their actions and intentions, we, at Bity, feel it is necessary to share the details of what the WHG has been dealing and living with over the last few weeks.

the need to add this reddit of alex

here the links

https://www.reddit.com/r/EthereumClassic/comments/4wnn3k/alex_van_de_sande_uavsa_and_the_rest_of_the_robin/d68wfen

quote:
Also, even the small part I did, I acted as an individual, not as part of the Ethereum Foundation. I never told Vitalik about my plans and when Ming, the Executive Director, asked me about it I refused to tell her, so that the Foundation wouldn’t be in any way implicated or active in this.

so ming did know something was going on. or suspected something. he sais here he talked aobut it with her. what exatly did she ask?
and why did she let him get away with not answering ? to avoid harm from the foundation ( and i guess thats the job of an executive director too) she should have called a meeting and stop alex?

Last time I spoke to the White Hat Group about the status they had told me the attacker was able to run off with a big part of the funds and while they had recently won some battles, the funds were far from secure as they were still aware of possible attacks – which is why I didn’t want to make any public comment on that matter, otherwise the attention could jeopardize this whole thing. IMHO part of the reason they were more successful now was because the DAO had less value and was under a lot less scrutiny since the fork, I doubt such attack would be successful had the fork not taken place.

so he speaks to them ! he knows how to contact them ? he knows there names ?

quote:
I do not know what they intend to do now and I learned that the recovery was successful via reddit like everyone else. While I believe they have the best intentions they are also at risk for a lot of legal troubles and costs. On a personal note I’ve lended them DAO tokens for the attack, which I haven’t seen since. I’ll be asking them for the eth-dao to be returned, but I’m donating the etc-dao to them.

he sais he wasnt involved but lending tokens to make the hack posible is being involved or am i in alice in wunderland where big is smal and crime is good ?

	Author	Topic: [ANN] [ETC] Ethereum Classic: Immutable Smart Contracts (Read 821415 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (1 post by 1+ user deleted.)