Puffy23
Member
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 11
|
|
December 13, 2016, 03:54:20 AM |
|
Hey guys, just wondering what your hashrates were for a 1070? I hear they hash at about 100 watts, but I can't seem to get a solid figure on hashrate.
With my RX 480's (on Clay's 9.1 miner), I'm doing about 230 sol/s at 1333/2100 with a decent under-volt.
So I'm thinking of building a new rig, and so I'm wondering if I should go with maybe 2 1070's. My power is already cheap, but at current zcash price, it takes me about 4 months to ROI on an RX 480. So would 1070's ROI faster?
What is your guys' hashrates with a 1070 on Claymore 9.1, and approx what is your power consumption? Thanks so much!
I believe you can get 300 H/s at 100W or 370 at 150W. I can't confirm as I don't own any. Also, Claymore is AMD only.
|
|
|
|
BitJunkie556
|
|
December 13, 2016, 04:15:18 AM |
|
I believe you can get 300 H/s at 100W or 370 at 150W. I can't confirm as I don't own any. Also, Claymore is AMD only.
Yeah, that probably sounds more realistic... If that is the case, it would seem the 1070 is only a little more efficient than the RX 480. RX 480: 100 watt consumption / 230 sols = .43 sol per watt... GTX 1070: 150 watt consumption / 370 sols = .41 sol per watt... Now, I guess for someone with a huge power bill, that would make sense for multiple rigs. But on my end... With only about 4 cents per kilowatt hour, I would need to get a 1070 for $350 or less to meet the same ROI as an RX-480. Plus, I only have two rigs. I guess for multiple rigs, high power cost etc, it makes sense to go with 1070's. Less power consumption, more hashing power on a single rig (less boards, CPU and RAM to buy, etc... Not so much for me though, at least at the moment... Though if I could find a 1070 for $350, I'd buy several in a heartbeat considering all those factors...
|
|
|
|
yun9999
|
|
December 13, 2016, 04:43:45 AM |
|
Claymore,
what is causing this issue? I'm seeing this problem on multiple rigs with V9 and V9.1
19:20:52:148 13fc srv: remove pck 4 19:20:52:148 13fc srv bs: 4 19:20:52:148 13fc srv buf: \r\n 19:20:52:148 13fc sent: 151 19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0 19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6 19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12 19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18 19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24 19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0 19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6 19:20:57:866 1568 recv: 54 19:20:57:867 1568 srv pck: 50 19:21:05:139 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12 19:21:05:156 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18 19:21:05:324 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24 19:21:05:325 c5c em hbt: 15, fm hbt: 93, 19:21:05:326 c5c watchdog - thread 0, hb time 103218 19:21:05:372 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:374 c5c watchdog - thread 1, hb time 103281 19:21:05:481 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:482 c5c watchdog - thread 2, hb time 103078 19:21:05:588 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:589 c5c watchdog - thread 3, hb time 103156 19:21:05:710 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:711 c5c watchdog - thread 4, hb time 103843 19:21:05:747 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:749 c5c watchdog - thread 5, hb time 104093 19:21:05:805 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:807 c5c watchdog - thread 6, hb time 104031 19:21:05:861 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:887 c5c watchdog - thread 7, hb time 103328 19:21:05:924 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:925 c5c watchdog - thread 8, hb time 104171 19:21:05:957 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:958 c5c watchdog - thread 9, hb time 104062 19:21:05:993 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:994 c5c watchdog - thread 10, hb time 104218 19:21:06:034 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:035 c5c watchdog - thread 11, hb time 104109 19:21:06:072 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:073 c5c watchdog - thread 12, hb time 103125 19:21:06:111 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:113 c5c watchdog - thread 13, hb time 102578 19:21:06:151 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:164 c5c watchdog - thread 14, hb time 102687 19:21:06:224 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:226 c5c watchdog - thread 15, hb time 102468 19:21:06:288 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:289 c5c watchdog - thread 16, hb time 103328 19:21:06:348 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:349 c5c watchdog - thread 17, hb time 104078 19:21:06:386 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:387 c5c watchdog - thread 18, hb time 104031 19:21:06:428 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:429 c5c watchdog - thread 19, hb time 103843 19:21:06:444 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:496 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0 19:21:06:500 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6 19:21:06:505 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12 19:21:06:510 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18 19:21:06:514 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24 19:21:06:516 1568 srv: remove pck 4 19:21:06:517 1568 srv bs: 4 19:21:06:518 1568 srv buf: \r\n 19:21:06:519 1568 sent: 151 19:21:06:572 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0 19:21:08:491 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6 19:21:08:491 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12 19:21:08:507 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18 19:21:08:507 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24 19:21:09:539 c5c Restarting OK, exit...
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
|
December 13, 2016, 04:45:11 AM |
|
Alert: doing an audit at dwarf shares to find they were not being counted. Set mport to zero and restarted the miner. Now the count is right on. Either my mport was hacked claymore has a overnight job or dwarf is ignoring shares. Any idea?
|
|
|
|
Xardas2014
|
|
December 13, 2016, 05:06:57 AM |
|
can any one tell me what does this red text means? i think it means if the miner has not been active for a full hour or more and is an estimate i may be wrong tho.... http://dwarfpool.com/faq/#hashrate
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
December 13, 2016, 05:12:16 AM |
|
i have a very old HD7790 cards
ZEC: GPU0 85.628 H/s, GPU1 85.425 H/s
Pretty much in line with my pair of single-card HD7870 rigs - 1024 cores instead of 896, 105 sol/s appx with v8 (haven't gotten v9.1 to work but seems to be a "not enough system ram" issue with v9.x on the systems they're in, and v9 just does not work on ANYTHING I've tried it on to date). HD 7750s at 512 cores but only 800/1125 clocks manage 45ish sol/s with v8
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
December 13, 2016, 05:16:03 AM |
|
EWBF miner 300 h/s 1080 61 C.... total power 73 %
So what...? With the price a 1080 cost I could get 3-4 rx470 so 600 to 800 sols/s 1070 can do 300 sol with 100watt, or 370 sol with 150watt, that is better than any amd out there, i'm still laughing thinking that there are poeple that believe amd is better... AMD is better in terms of $/hash, that's all they have right now until Vega comes out. I don't consider nVidia to be a better option, just too expensive for nothing. They will be easier to resell, though. I like my 1070s, but I didn't buy them to mine with because they aren't a good choice on a $/hash basis for pretty much any profitable cryptocoin (the ONE exception isn't anywhere near as profitable as the current basket of ETH/ZEC/ETC). I just mine with them 'cause RIGHT NOW they're more profitable to do that with then what I bought them FOR.
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
|
e46btc
|
|
December 13, 2016, 05:48:00 AM |
|
This happens sometimes, but usually all shares counted and it will be recalculated later. At least no isses with recalc for this year on Dwarf (ETH).
|
|
|
|
ol92
|
|
December 13, 2016, 05:56:09 AM |
|
EWBF miner 300 h/s 1080 61 C.... total power 73 %
So what...? With the price a 1080 cost I could get 3-4 rx470 so 600 to 800 sols/s 1070 can do 310 sol with 100watt, or 370 sol with 150watt, that is better than any amd out there, i'm still laughing thinking that there are poeple that believe amd is better... 1080 is doing 350 with oc with 150w, amd fury x is doing the same with undervolting without oc at around the same wattage. 1080 refurbished can be bought at around 550 euros, fury x around 350 euros. Both are good. But the fury x was mining at better speed since a few weeks...
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
|
December 13, 2016, 05:57:38 AM |
|
This happens sometimes, but usually all shares counted and it will be recalculated later. At least no isses with recalc for this year on Dwarf (ETH).
I hope you're right. Sent email to support and no reply yet.
|
|
|
|
oldisoft
|
|
December 13, 2016, 06:12:28 AM |
|
Added more samples to OP for encrypted connection:
miningpoolhub SSL/TLS connection (this pool detects encryption automatically so it uses same port as for unencrypted connection): ZecMiner64.exe -zpool ssl://us-east.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:20570 -zwal YourLogin.YourWorkerName -zpsw YourWorkerPassword
coinmine SSL/TLS connection: ZecMiner64.exe -zpool ssl://zec.coinmine.pl:7017 -zwal YourLogin.YourWorkerName -zpsw YourWorkerPassword
On this topic. What pool do people see the most consistent earning with? Seems flypool has ran on 'bad luck' (if you believe that) for weeks now. Getting sort of tired of it.I think that zec.nanopool.org absolutely not bad and it is working properly
|
|
|
|
ffthomas
|
|
December 13, 2016, 06:15:23 AM |
|
Claymore,
what is causing this issue? I'm seeing this problem on multiple rigs with V9 and V9.1
19:20:52:148 13fc srv: remove pck 4 19:20:52:148 13fc srv bs: 4 19:20:52:148 13fc srv buf: \r\n 19:20:52:148 13fc sent: 151 19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0 19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6 19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12 19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18 19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24 19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0 19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6 19:20:57:866 1568 recv: 54 19:20:57:867 1568 srv pck: 50 19:21:05:139 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12 19:21:05:156 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18 19:21:05:324 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24 19:21:05:325 c5c em hbt: 15, fm hbt: 93, 19:21:05:326 c5c watchdog - thread 0, hb time 103218 19:21:05:372 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:374 c5c watchdog - thread 1, hb time 103281 19:21:05:481 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:482 c5c watchdog - thread 2, hb time 103078 19:21:05:588 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:589 c5c watchdog - thread 3, hb time 103156 19:21:05:710 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:711 c5c watchdog - thread 4, hb time 103843 19:21:05:747 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:749 c5c watchdog - thread 5, hb time 104093 19:21:05:805 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:807 c5c watchdog - thread 6, hb time 104031 19:21:05:861 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:887 c5c watchdog - thread 7, hb time 103328 19:21:05:924 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:925 c5c watchdog - thread 8, hb time 104171 19:21:05:957 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:958 c5c watchdog - thread 9, hb time 104062 19:21:05:993 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:994 c5c watchdog - thread 10, hb time 104218 19:21:06:034 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:035 c5c watchdog - thread 11, hb time 104109 19:21:06:072 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:073 c5c watchdog - thread 12, hb time 103125 19:21:06:111 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:113 c5c watchdog - thread 13, hb time 102578 19:21:06:151 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:164 c5c watchdog - thread 14, hb time 102687 19:21:06:224 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:226 c5c watchdog - thread 15, hb time 102468 19:21:06:288 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:289 c5c watchdog - thread 16, hb time 103328 19:21:06:348 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:349 c5c watchdog - thread 17, hb time 104078 19:21:06:386 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:387 c5c watchdog - thread 18, hb time 104031 19:21:06:428 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:429 c5c watchdog - thread 19, hb time 103843 19:21:06:444 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:496 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0 19:21:06:500 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6 19:21:06:505 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12 19:21:06:510 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18 19:21:06:514 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24 19:21:06:516 1568 srv: remove pck 4 19:21:06:517 1568 srv bs: 4 19:21:06:518 1568 srv buf: \r\n 19:21:06:519 1568 sent: 151 19:21:06:572 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0 19:21:08:491 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6 19:21:08:491 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12 19:21:08:507 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18 19:21:08:507 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24 19:21:09:539 c5c Restarting OK, exit...
Try to connect a display or a dummy plug to one of the PCI-E cards. It seems to me that you use for primary graphics the onboard gpu and the miner (or ATI driver) can't control the fan speed, target temperature, etc. A display or a dummy plug will solve this problem. You need to connect the plug for only a few seconds. Maybe that cause the crash too.
|
|
|
|
xeridea
|
|
December 13, 2016, 06:29:47 AM |
|
Claymore,
what is causing this issue? I'm seeing this problem on multiple rigs with V9 and V9.1
19:20:52:148 13fc srv: remove pck 4 19:20:52:148 13fc srv bs: 4 19:20:52:148 13fc srv buf: \r\n 19:20:52:148 13fc sent: 151 19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0 19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6 19:20:55:149 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12 19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18 19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24 19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0 19:20:55:321 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6 19:20:57:866 1568 recv: 54 19:20:57:867 1568 srv pck: 50 19:21:05:139 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12 19:21:05:156 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18 19:21:05:324 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24 19:21:05:325 c5c em hbt: 15, fm hbt: 93, 19:21:05:326 c5c watchdog - thread 0, hb time 103218 19:21:05:372 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:374 c5c watchdog - thread 1, hb time 103281 19:21:05:481 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:482 c5c watchdog - thread 2, hb time 103078 19:21:05:588 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:589 c5c watchdog - thread 3, hb time 103156 19:21:05:710 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:711 c5c watchdog - thread 4, hb time 103843 19:21:05:747 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:749 c5c watchdog - thread 5, hb time 104093 19:21:05:805 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:807 c5c watchdog - thread 6, hb time 104031 19:21:05:861 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:887 c5c watchdog - thread 7, hb time 103328 19:21:05:924 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 1 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:925 c5c watchdog - thread 8, hb time 104171 19:21:05:957 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:958 c5c watchdog - thread 9, hb time 104062 19:21:05:993 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:05:994 c5c watchdog - thread 10, hb time 104218 19:21:06:034 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:035 c5c watchdog - thread 11, hb time 104109 19:21:06:072 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 2 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:073 c5c watchdog - thread 12, hb time 103125 19:21:06:111 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:113 c5c watchdog - thread 13, hb time 102578 19:21:06:151 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:164 c5c watchdog - thread 14, hb time 102687 19:21:06:224 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:226 c5c watchdog - thread 15, hb time 102468 19:21:06:288 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 3 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:289 c5c watchdog - thread 16, hb time 103328 19:21:06:348 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:349 c5c watchdog - thread 17, hb time 104078 19:21:06:386 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:387 c5c watchdog - thread 18, hb time 104031 19:21:06:428 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:429 c5c watchdog - thread 19, hb time 103843 19:21:06:444 c5c WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit 19:21:06:496 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0 19:21:06:500 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6 19:21:06:505 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12 19:21:06:510 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18 19:21:06:514 1568 Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24 19:21:06:516 1568 srv: remove pck 4 19:21:06:517 1568 srv bs: 4 19:21:06:518 1568 srv buf: \r\n 19:21:06:519 1568 sent: 151 19:21:06:572 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 0 19:21:08:491 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 6 19:21:08:491 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 12 19:21:08:507 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 18 19:21:08:507 c5c Cannot get Overdrive capabilities for adapter 24 19:21:09:539 c5c Restarting OK, exit...
Try to connect a display or a dummy plug to one of the PCI-E cards. It seems to me that you use for primary graphics the onboard gpu and the miner (or ATI driver) can't control the fan speed, target temperature, etc. A display or a dummy plug will solve this problem. You need to connect the plug for only a few seconds. Maybe that cause the crash too. GPU hang is 100% hardware issue. Either GPUs too undervolted, too overclocked, or PSU is unstable, or has bad ripple suppression. As far as dummy plug, this only affects temperature control, and possibly stuck idle clocks, it would not cause a crash. Attempting to mine with onboard graphics will crash, but this shows every card in rig crashing pretty much at same time, indicating a big hardware issue.
|
Profitability over time charts for many GPUs - http://xeridea.us/chartsBTC: bc1qr2xwjwfmjn43zhrlp6pn7vwdjrjnv5z0anhjhn LTC: LXDm6sR4dkyqtEWfUbPumMnVEiUFQvxSbZ Eth: 0x44cCe2cf90C8FEE4C9e4338Ae7049913D4F6fC24
|
|
|
ffthomas
|
|
December 13, 2016, 06:37:23 AM |
|
Claymore,
what is causing this issue? I'm seeing this problem on multiple rigs with V9 and V9.1
....
Try to connect a display or a dummy plug to one of the PCI-E cards. It seems to me that you use for primary graphics the onboard gpu and the miner (or ATI driver) can't control the fan speed, target temperature, etc. A display or a dummy plug will solve this problem. You need to connect the plug for only a few seconds. Maybe that cause the crash too. GPU hang is 100% hardware issue. Either GPUs too undervolted, too overclocked, or PSU is unstable, or has bad ripple suppression. As far as dummy plug, this only affects temperature control, and possibly stuck idle clocks, it would not cause a crash. Attempting to mine with onboard graphics will crash, but this shows every card in rig crashing pretty much at same time, indicating a big hardware issue. I meant that maybe the cards are overheated and that caused the crash. Anyway it is good to know these values and can control the fans and target temp. Of course if you use to much overclock and/or undervolt that is the main problem.
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
December 13, 2016, 06:50:54 AM |
|
V9.1 with my HD7990's i get 201H/S per chip (400-405 in total, MSI brand), really good increase!
That's it? I have a MSI 7950 heavy overclocked doing stable 220-225 Can't push the 7990s as hard due to twice the heat generation (almost) in the same space.
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
December 13, 2016, 06:59:16 AM |
|
Hey guys, just wondering what your hashrates were for a 1070? I hear they hash at about 100 watts, but I can't seem to get a solid figure on hashrate.
With my RX 480's (on Clay's 9.1 miner), I'm doing about 230 sol/s at 1333/2100 with a decent under-volt.
So I'm thinking of building a new rig, and so I'm wondering if I should go with maybe 2 1070's. My power is already cheap, but at current zcash price, it takes me about 4 months to ROI on an RX 480. So would 1070's ROI faster?
What is your guys' hashrates with a 1070 on Claymore 9.1, and approx what is your power consumption? Thanks so much!
Per my limited testing on the new eqm version, I can get my 1070s *which are NOT the good memory type* to about 300 sol/s at 108 watts, no mods Afterburner set to 60% TDP +500 mem clock -200 core clock. I suspect someone that played more with settings could better that efficiency some, especially on 1070 models with better memory. Optimal settings for me *so far* net a bit over 330 sol/s on 140ish watts, 80% TDP +500 mem stock core clock in Afterburner. My pair of RX 470s manage a little over 200 sol/s each on v9.1 (one is at 201 the other 206), which is quite nice for a pair of cards that cost me $332 with shipping (less than ANY f my single 1070s).
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
majorlee
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
First DJ to play gigs for Bitcoin & Crypto Guru
|
|
December 13, 2016, 07:03:24 AM |
|
V9.1 with my HD7990's i get 201H/S per chip (400-405 in total, MSI brand), really good increase!
That's it? I have a MSI 7950 heavy overclocked doing stable 220-225 Can't push the 7990s as hard due to twice the heat generation (almost) in the same space. yes im on stock bios and settings too, these babies are my winter handwarmers! used to overclock them years back on other algos and nearly paid the price of melted power PCI-E cables! (not riser)
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
December 13, 2016, 07:04:58 AM |
|
I believe you can get 300 H/s at 100W or 370 at 150W. I can't confirm as I don't own any. Also, Claymore is AMD only.
Yeah, that probably sounds more realistic... If that is the case, it would seem the 1070 is only a little more efficient than the RX 480. RX 480: 100 watt consumption / 230 sols = .43 sol per watt... GTX 1070: 150 watt consumption / 370 sols = .41 sol per watt... Now, I guess for someone with a huge power bill, that would make sense for multiple rigs. But on my end... With only about 4 cents per kilowatt hour, I would need to get a 1070 for $350 or less to meet the same ROI as an RX-480. Plus, I only have two rigs. I guess for multiple rigs, high power cost etc, it makes sense to go with 1070's. Less power consumption, more hashing power on a single rig (less boards, CPU and RAM to buy, etc... Not so much for me though, at least at the moment... Though if I could find a 1070 for $350, I'd buy several in a heartbeat considering all those factors... 370 at 150 watt is not the good choice, do 300 sol at 100 watt, that is 0.3 sol per watt, actually i'm not sure about the 150watt with 370 sol, it could be less, my gpu can't reach that speed you need a palit
|
|
|
|
c2n14
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
December 13, 2016, 07:30:43 AM |
|
Yes, I confirm. I woke up and I saw on the dwarf page that my worker is @ 0 sols.... I checked the miner and I saw that the connection with dwarf's EU server went down from 78ms yesterday to 3000ms now That's why I have request: @Claymore Could you make a new switch that the connection could be change to failover if the lag is over some threshold (like in my case above)? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|