Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[Amph]

I believe you can get 300 H/s at 100W or 370 at 150W. I can't confirm as I don't own any. Also, Claymore is AMD only.

Yeah, that probably sounds more realistic... If that is the case, it would seem the 1070 is only a little more efficient than the RX 480.

RX 480: 100 watt consumption / 230 sols = .43 sol per watt...

GTX 1070: 150 watt consumption / 370 sols = .41 sol per watt...

Now, I guess for someone with a huge power bill, that would make sense for multiple rigs. But on my end... With only about 4 cents per kilowatt hour, I would need to get a 1070 for $350 or less to meet the same ROI as an RX-480. Plus, I only have two rigs.

I guess for multiple rigs, high power cost etc, it makes sense to go with 1070's. Less power consumption, more hashing power on a single rig (less boards, CPU and RAM to buy, etc... Not so much for me though, at least at the moment... Though if I could find a 1070 for $350, I'd buy several in a heartbeat considering all those factors...

370 at 150 watt is not the good choice, do 300 sol at 100 watt, that is 0.3 sol per watt, actually i'm not sure about the 150watt with 370 sol, it could be less, my gpu can't reach that speed you need a palit

[c2n14]

Something wrong with dwarfpool
0 workers, 0 hashrate
https://i.imgur.com/z6toNFy.png

Yes, I confirm. I woke up and I saw on the dwarf page that my worker is @ 0 sols....
I checked the miner and I saw that the connection with dwarf's EU server went down from 78ms yesterday to 3000ms now

That's why I have request:

@Claymore

Could you make a new switch that the connection could be change to failover if the lag is over some threshold (like in my case above)?
Thanks.

[nbkshocks]

quick Q. What is the difference between sols/s vs. Hash/s. Or are they the same? 

[Hotmetal]

quick Q. What is the difference between sols/s vs. Hash/s. Or are they the same? 

It's the same thing (not really, but for informational purposes, its the same).

[ghostfaceuk]

Something wrong with dwarfpool
0 workers, 0 hashrate

Yes, I confirm. I woke up and I saw on the dwarf page that my worker is @ 0 sols....
I checked the miner and I saw that the connection with dwarf's EU server went down from 78ms yesterday to 3000ms now

That's why I have request:

@Claymore

Could you make a new switch that the connection could be change to failover if the lag is over some threshold (like in my case above)?
Thanks.

my dwarf pool monitor page shows the same thing but my miner is showing me I am connected to EU server and still submitting shares as normal with roughly the same 68ms per share.

I'm wondering if I should just leave it running or move until seems to be resolved.

[osnwt]

quick Q. What is the difference between sols/s vs. Hash/s. Or are they the same? 

Other coins miners including Bitcoin and Ethereum calculate hash of some data that should be within some limitations. Miner for Zcash uses EquiHash algorithm, where not only lot of hashes calculated, but they also should be sorted and compared to find similar pairs (thus the algorithm name EquiHash). Such found pair is a solution to some math problem, more than just a single hash. So actually miner sends to pool such solutions. But they often called hashes while they are in reality more than just hashes.

This is also the reason why old miners used a lot of CPU: GPU calculated a lot of hashes and passed them all to CPU to sort and compare. Latest miner versions offload CPU and do this on the GPU directly returning just good solutions. But this also explains why there is no Dual miner for this: because now both GPU is busy calculating hashes and VRAM is also busy for sorting huge lists of them.

[e46btc]

my dwarf pool monitor page shows the same thing but my miner is showing me I am connected to EU server and still submitting shares as normal with roughly the same 68ms per share.

I'm wondering if I should just leave it running or move until seems to be resolved.

I am mining as usual, shares are accepted and no rejects.  
Looks like just Web backend died, it happened before some times.  
Not so good for sure to mine without stats, but everything was recovered and recalculated.

Your decision to leave or not, but I think no reasons to worry much  based on past experience.
Anyway I am not Dwarf-related so can't guarantee anything.

Code:

ZEC: 12/13/16-10:12:56 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ZEC: Share accepted (203 ms)!
ZEC: 12/13/16-10:13:02 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
ZEC: Share accepted (188 ms)!
GPU0 t=60C fan=33%, GPU1 t=60C fan=34%, GPU2 t=58C fan=34%, GPU3 t=56C fan=34%, GPU4 t=58C fan=34%, GPU5 t=54C fan=34%
ZEC: 12/13/16-10:13:48 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (250 ms)!
GPU0 t=60C fan=33%, GPU1 t=60C fan=34%, GPU2 t=58C fan=34%, GPU3 t=56C fan=34%, GPU4 t=58C fan=34%, GPU5 t=55C fan=34%
ZEC: 12/13/16-10:13:58 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (203 ms)!
ZEC: 12/13/16-10:14:19 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
ZEC: Share accepted (203 ms)!
GPU0 t=60C fan=34%, GPU1 t=60C fan=34%, GPU2 t=58C fan=34%, GPU3 t=56C fan=35%, GPU4 t=58C fan=34%, GPU5 t=55C fan=34%
ZEC: 12/13/16-10:14:45 - New job from zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333
ZEC - Total Speed: 1130.672 H/s, Total Shares: 5596, Rejected: 5, Time: 25:52
ZEC: GPU0 187.960 H/s, GPU1 188.916 H/s, GPU2 187.811 H/s, GPU3 189.769 H/s, GPU4 187.552 H/s, GPU5 188.664 H/s
ZEC: 12/13/16-10:14:46 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 4)
ZEC: Share accepted (219 ms)!
ZEC: 12/13/16-10:14:52 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (219 ms)!
GPU0 t=60C fan=33%, GPU1 t=60C fan=34%, GPU2 t=58C fan=34%, GPU3 t=56C fan=35%, GPU4 t=58C fan=34%, GPU5 t=55C fan=34%
ZEC: 12/13/16-10:15:25 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 5)
ZEC: Share accepted (219 ms)!
GPU0 t=60C fan=34%, GPU1 t=60C fan=34%, GPU2 t=58C fan=34%, GPU3 t=56C fan=35%, GPU4 t=58C fan=34%, GPU5 t=54C fan=34%
ZEC: 12/13/16-10:15:32 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (187 ms)!

[ghostfaceuk]

my dwarf pool monitor page shows the same thing but my miner is showing me I am connected to EU server and still submitting shares as normal with roughly the same 68ms per share.

I'm wondering if I should just leave it running or move until seems to be resolved.

I am mining as usual, shares are accepted and no rejects.  
Looks like just Web backend died, it happened before some times.  
Not so good for sure to mine without stats, but everything was recovered and recalculated.

Your decision to leave or not, but I think no reasons to worry much  based on past experience.
Anyway I am not Dwarf-related so can't guarantee anything.

I'm staying, as you say its showing all shares as accepted as normal.

I have emailed Dwarf to let them know about the problem so hopefully we will have stats back shortly

[c2n14]

my dwarf pool monitor page shows the same thing but my miner is showing me I am connected to EU server and still submitting shares as normal with roughly the same 68ms per share.

I'm wondering if I should just leave it running or move until seems to be resolved.

In my case it was very easy: 78ms->3000ms, so I have changed it to another pool...

[beIbox]

my dwarf pool monitor page shows the same thing but my miner is showing me I am connected to EU server and still submitting shares as normal with roughly the same 68ms per share.

I'm wondering if I should just leave it running or move until seems to be resolved.

In my case it was very easy: 78ms->3000ms, so I have changed it to another pool...

Dwarfpool loosing miners

[fredeq]

Hey guys, just wondering what your hashrates were for a 1070? I hear they hash at about 100 watts, but I can't seem to get a solid figure on hashrate.

With my RX 480's (on Clay's 9.1 miner), I'm doing about 230 sol/s at 1333/2100 with a decent under-volt.

So I'm thinking of building a new rig, and so I'm wondering if I should go with maybe 2 1070's. My power is already cheap, but at current zcash price, it takes me about 4 months to ROI on an RX 480. So would 1070's ROI faster?

What is your guys' hashrates with a 1070 on Claymore 9.1, and approx what is your power consumption? Thanks so much!

 Per my limited testing on the new eqm version, I can get my 1070s *which are NOT the good memory type* to about 300 sol/s at 108 watts, no mods Afterburner set to 60% TDP +500 mem clock -200 core clock.

 I suspect someone that played more with settings could better that efficiency some, especially on 1070 models with better memory.

 Optimal settings for me *so far* net a bit over 330 sol/s on 140ish watts, 80% TDP +500 mem stock core clock in Afterburner.

 My pair of RX 470s manage a little over 200 sol/s each on v9.1 (one is at 201 the other 206), which is quite nice for a pair of cards that cost me $332 with shipping (less than ANY f my single 1070s).

My best settings so far:
+170 core, +500 mem, 65% TDP => 330h/s. This pulls around 120W

[osnwt]

I'm wondering if I should just leave it running or move until seems to be resolved.

Shares are counted:

accumulated up to now   ca.1935232   precalculation   precalculation*   wait for block

This number is being increased, only stats are missing.

[ginmac]

RX 480: 100 watt consumption / 230 sols = .43 sol per watt...

GTX 1070: 150 watt consumption / 370 sols = .41 sol per watt...

RX 480: 2.3 Sol/s  per watt
GTX 1070: 2.47 Sol/s per watt

Nicehash EQM looks very good: http://cryptomining-blog.com/8386-new-faster-nicehash-eqm-zcash-nvidia-optimized-miner/

[riser]

What driver for amd need.. windows 10. Give link please.

[Bitbit017]

The largest theft is on FLYPOOL!!!!! They are stealing a lot of shares.  DEV, leave home the stories with shares, don't be ridiculous

[gaah]

Any news from Dwarfpool? I have the same problem.

[Bitbit017]

Any news from Dwarfpool? I have the same problem.

I do not know what happened with dwarfpool... I hope to solve their problems soon

[HardwarePal]

The largest theft is on FLYPOOL!!!!! They are stealing a lot of shares.  DEV, leave home the stories with shares, don't be ridiculous

Funny how 1K Sol/s pays out the same as 2K Sol/s on Flypool

[marvykkio]

Hey guys, just wondering what your hashrates were for a 1070? I hear they hash at about 100 watts, but I can't seem to get a solid figure on hashrate.

With my RX 480's (on Clay's 9.1 miner), I'm doing about 230 sol/s at 1333/2100 with a decent under-volt.

So I'm thinking of building a new rig, and so I'm wondering if I should go with maybe 2 1070's. My power is already cheap, but at current zcash price, it takes me about 4 months to ROI on an RX 480. So would 1070's ROI faster?

What is your guys' hashrates with a 1070 on Claymore 9.1, and approx what is your power consumption? Thanks so much!

 Per my limited testing on the new eqm version, I can get my 1070s *which are NOT the good memory type* to about 300 sol/s at 108 watts, no mods Afterburner set to 60% TDP +500 mem clock -200 core clock.

 I suspect someone that played more with settings could better that efficiency some, especially on 1070 models with better memory.

 Optimal settings for me *so far* net a bit over 330 sol/s on 140ish watts, 80% TDP +500 mem stock core clock in Afterburner.

 My pair of RX 470s manage a little over 200 sol/s each on v9.1 (one is at 201 the other 206), which is quite nice for a pair of cards that cost me $332 with shipping (less than ANY f my single 1070s).

My best settings so far:
+170 core, +500 mem, 65% TDP => 330h/s. This pulls around 120W

sorry you could post a picture of your afterburner of the configuration of the 1070 gtx? because I see that you speak of 370 h / s per card, while I do not pass the 310 h / s
I would be able to screanshot one of your configuration

[gaah]

Any news from Dwarfpool? I have the same problem.

I do not know what happened with dwarfpool... I hope to solve their problems soon

Webserver issue, therefore delay in fetching of stats. Pool servers work.