ZenFr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046
|
|
December 12, 2016, 10:16:36 PM |
|
nah ewbf is a clear different, one is GPU heavy and use a lot less memory controller, I bet if they would share code, we can see 500sol on OC-ed 1070 SUCK AMD! lol :-)
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
December 13, 2016, 01:52:06 AM |
|
people are pretty anal about getting 'hijacked' - using still Windows as a miner OS, usually they should really move to linux on USB stick then, long time ago... (e.g. KopiemTu ) Linux is more targeted and easier (because they can look in sources) to hijack, just you do not know that you were hijacked, because you need specialistic knowdlege to trace hacker in your system and trust me it is not easy task untrue. having the sources means that the whole world can fix vulnerabilities. and guess what? they do. You forget the whole world likes sitting in multiple different distributions.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
Viperho
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
December 13, 2016, 07:51:10 AM |
|
FYI, using the compute 2.0 version, my old Fermis:
stock GTX 590 converted to hydrocopper block GPU1: 22-23 sol/s GPU2: 22-23 sol/s
GTX 480 hydrocopper 26-28 sol/s
(all stock clocks)
|
|
|
|
Nesp
|
|
December 13, 2016, 10:00:49 AM |
|
Just tried nicehash fresh miner, 215 sol/s per 1060. I wish we can have it here too
|
|
|
|
fmz89
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
December 13, 2016, 12:06:24 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
wacko
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1014
|
|
December 13, 2016, 12:45:28 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Wotan Wipeout
Member
Offline
Activity: 438
Merit: 27
|
|
December 13, 2016, 01:47:58 PM Last edit: December 13, 2016, 02:34:57 PM by Wotan Wipeout |
|
1080 Gigabyte G1 Set Powerlimit 100% Used Power 75-90 % of 200 Watt --> 160 Watt (80%) --> 1,875 Sol per Watt 300 -310 Sols
Set Powerlimit 70 % of 200 Watt --> 140 Watt (70%) --> 1,893 Sol per Watt 265 Sols
Set Powerlimit 55 % of 200 Watt --> 110 Watt (55%) --> 2,31 Sol per Watt 250 - 260 Sols (255 Sols) (Thanks to Amph)
Set Powerlimit 50 % of 200 Watt --> 100 Watt (50%) --> 2,55 Sol per Watt 255
1070 Gigabyte G1 Set Powerlimit 100% Used Power 85 % of 200 Watt --> 170 Watt (85%)--> 1,51 Sol per Watt 257 Sols
Set Powerlimit 70 % of 200 Watt --> 140 Watt (70%) --> 1,82 Sol per Watt 255 Sols
Set Powerlimit 55 % of 200 Watt --> 110 Watt (55%) --> 2,13 Sol per Watt 235 Sols
Set Powerlimit 50 % of 200 Watt --> 100 Watt (50%) --> 2,30 Sol per Watt 230 Sols
Updated Didnt test Ram OC
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
December 13, 2016, 01:53:22 PM |
|
1080 Gigabyte G1 Set Powerlimit 100% Used Power 75-90 % of 200 Watt --> 160 Watt (80%) --> 1,875 Sol per Watt 300 -310 Sols
Set Powerlimit 70 % of 200 Watt --> 140 Watt (70%) --> 1,893 Sol per Watt 265 Sols
1070 Gigabyte G1 Set Powerlimit 100% Used Power 85 % of 200 Watt --> 170 Watt (85%)--> 1,51 Sol per Watt 257 Sols
Set Powerlimit 70 % of 200 Watt --> 140 Watt (70%) --> 1,82 Sol per Watt 255 Sols
Didnt test Ram OC
dude you can have 260 sol at 100 watt, don't waste electricity, tweak it right, 55% tdp is the key, then just oc mem and a bit the core
|
|
|
|
Wotan Wipeout
Member
Offline
Activity: 438
Merit: 27
|
|
December 13, 2016, 02:02:15 PM |
|
Thanks Amph, i just updated it.
|
|
|
|
jiggytom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1068
Merit: 1020
|
|
December 13, 2016, 06:48:24 PM |
|
Petr, any chance of an updated miner which matches nicehash speeds? Are you still planning on enhancements?
|
BTC: 174MGp3R5prNbuen31Kx5G5XuyuAXu9jye LBC: bWYN8NXGKWsgEAd6tQnJ5YRo2Z4r6PjxBH
|
|
|
coinwulf
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
December 13, 2016, 10:00:28 PM |
|
WOW!!! This miner rocks!! I´ve tried it with my notebooks simple NVidia Geforce 940MX My hashrate has more than doubled from 13-15 H/s to 35 H/s! Not bad
|
|
|
|
joniosbra
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
December 13, 2016, 10:20:52 PM Last edit: December 13, 2016, 10:43:41 PM by joniosbra |
|
1080 Gigabyte G1 Set Powerlimit 100% Used Power 75-90 % of 200 Watt --> 160 Watt (80%) --> 1,875 Sol per Watt 300 -310 Sols
Set Powerlimit 70 % of 200 Watt --> 140 Watt (70%) --> 1,893 Sol per Watt 265 Sols
1070 Gigabyte G1 Set Powerlimit 100% Used Power 85 % of 200 Watt --> 170 Watt (85%)--> 1,51 Sol per Watt 257 Sols
Set Powerlimit 70 % of 200 Watt --> 140 Watt (70%) --> 1,82 Sol per Watt 255 Sols
Didnt test Ram OC
dude you can have 260 sol at 100 watt, don't waste electricity, tweak it right, 55% tdp is the key, then just oc mem and a bit the core could u print screen your msi afterburner settings with tdp 55%? tks a lot! does the cpu matters using 5 gpus?
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
December 14, 2016, 06:31:14 AM |
|
In some of my early testing of the eqm 3a miner on two of my Gigabyte 2-fan 1070s (I don't member the exact model number), I saw just a hair shy of 300 sol/s per card with Afterburner set for -200 core, +500 memory, and TDP 60% - at 108 watts.
I'm sure further experimentation with the settings could do better, but I was aiming more for "best settings to achieve max sol/s" not "most efficient".
80% TDP, 0 core, +500 memory yields 330-345 sol/s depending on which card (I have a mix of at least 3 different Gigabyte models *INCLUDING* the "mini-ITX" model, and some EVGAs).
370 sol/s has been reported for that miner, but I suspect you have to have one of the "very good memory" 1070 models that can also manage 32+ MH/s on ETH (I've never seen more than 29 on any of my 1070s).
Real world performance targets to aim for - assuming Nicehash doesn't manage to come up with an even faster miner.
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
December 14, 2016, 07:01:09 AM |
|
1080 Gigabyte G1 Set Powerlimit 100% Used Power 75-90 % of 200 Watt --> 160 Watt (80%) --> 1,875 Sol per Watt 300 -310 Sols
Set Powerlimit 70 % of 200 Watt --> 140 Watt (70%) --> 1,893 Sol per Watt 265 Sols
1070 Gigabyte G1 Set Powerlimit 100% Used Power 85 % of 200 Watt --> 170 Watt (85%)--> 1,51 Sol per Watt 257 Sols
Set Powerlimit 70 % of 200 Watt --> 140 Watt (70%) --> 1,82 Sol per Watt 255 Sols
Didnt test Ram OC
dude you can have 260 sol at 100 watt, don't waste electricity, tweak it right, 55% tdp is the key, then just oc mem and a bit the core could u print screen your msi afterburner settings with tdp 55%? tks a lot! does the cpu matters using 5 gpus? no just use the cheap 1840 from intel here
|
|
|
|
jiggytom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1068
Merit: 1020
|
|
December 14, 2016, 10:16:18 AM |
|
That's not the ewbf miner. Is that nicehash? 1080 Gigabyte G1 Set Powerlimit 100% Used Power 75-90 % of 200 Watt --> 160 Watt (80%) --> 1,875 Sol per Watt 300 -310 Sols
Set Powerlimit 70 % of 200 Watt --> 140 Watt (70%) --> 1,893 Sol per Watt 265 Sols
1070 Gigabyte G1 Set Powerlimit 100% Used Power 85 % of 200 Watt --> 170 Watt (85%)--> 1,51 Sol per Watt 257 Sols
Set Powerlimit 70 % of 200 Watt --> 140 Watt (70%) --> 1,82 Sol per Watt 255 Sols
Didnt test Ram OC
dude you can have 260 sol at 100 watt, don't waste electricity, tweak it right, 55% tdp is the key, then just oc mem and a bit the core could u print screen your msi afterburner settings with tdp 55%? tks a lot! does the cpu matters using 5 gpus? no just use the cheap 1840 from intel here
|
BTC: 174MGp3R5prNbuen31Kx5G5XuyuAXu9jye LBC: bWYN8NXGKWsgEAd6tQnJ5YRo2Z4r6PjxBH
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
December 14, 2016, 10:23:54 AM |
|
ah yeah, but it's the same for the EWBF miner, but i'm getting 260 sol for each gpu instead of 306
|
|
|
|
batko
|
|
December 14, 2016, 03:26:45 PM |
|
nah ewbf is a clear different, one is GPU heavy and use a lot less memory controller, I bet if they would share code, we can see 500sol on OC-ed 1070 SUCK AMD! NVIDIA Trol
|
Donation: ETH: 0x0c8ce94dd3d1bfd09c0f887559c61d1b551e4b4d
|
|
|
Nesp
|
|
December 14, 2016, 07:12:58 PM |
|
Cmon dev, we want nicehash miner speeds on your miner
|
|
|
|
Xdragon
|
|
December 14, 2016, 07:14:45 PM |
|
nah ewbf is a clear different, one is GPU heavy and use a lot less memory controller, I bet if they would share code, we can see 500sol on OC-ed 1070 SUCK AMD! NVIDIA Trol nVdia was rekt yesterday by VEGA. Now I regret buying gtx1070, in few months new gtx1070 will be 300 USD or less. Now on ZEC nV is too damn hot, myth about nV low power usage and low temps is officially busted.
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1901
Merit: 1024
|
|
December 14, 2016, 07:18:16 PM |
|
nah ewbf is a clear different, one is GPU heavy and use a lot less memory controller, I bet if they would share code, we can see 500sol on OC-ed 1070 SUCK AMD! NVIDIA Trol nVdia was rekt yesterday by VEGA. Now I regret buying gtx1070, in few months new gtx1070 will be 300 USD or less. Now on ZEC nV is too damn hot, myth about nV low power usage and low temps is officially busted. Are you ppl insane or what?? Vega is 3 month from shop and some proper availability, and performance will be in par with 1080, HBM2 memory still is not good for memory intensive mining so zcash and ETH will prolly be slow, but we need to see it first/test, and only then someone need to make use of 4096bit memory interface and very slow access time! NV 1070 is not hot it use less power then RX 480, FFS stop FUD and shit if you know nothing at all And we don`t need to match speed in zcash for nice hash miner we need 400+ sol/s !
|
|
|
|
|