Bitcoin Forum
September 25, 2016, 02:00:10 PM *
News: Due to DDoS attacks, there may be periodic downtime.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3151 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3915

Pages: « 1 ... 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 [589] 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 ... 1103 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3852746 times)
JCaferJr
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68



View Profile
August 27, 2013, 08:03:22 PM
 #11761

I noticed on the account page that NameCoins unconfirmed rewards was temporarily N/A.  Does that mean we aren't currently merge mining and will receive no NameCoin?  Or that we just don't have a nice unconfirmed indicator?

1474812010
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474812010

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474812010
Reply with quote  #2

1474812010
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1474812010
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474812010

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474812010
Reply with quote  #2

1474812010
Report to moderator
1474812010
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474812010

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474812010
Reply with quote  #2

1474812010
Report to moderator
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750


BTC Guild Owner


View Profile WWW
August 27, 2013, 08:06:15 PM
 #11762

I noticed on the account page that NameCoins unconfirmed rewards was temporarily N/A.  Does that mean we aren't currently merge mining and will receive no NameCoin?  Or that we just don't have a nice unconfirmed indicator?

Slush's pool stopped merged mining when the getwork servers were shut down.  Slush has not stated any plans to add NMC merged mining to the Stratum pools.

R.I.P. BTC Guild, 2011 - 2015.
BTC Guild Forum Thread
mdopro1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 290



View Profile
August 28, 2013, 03:49:21 AM
 #11763

What process takes place behind 100 confirmations counting down to zero when earnings become confirmed. I joined a different pool for a couple of days but there was no such thing there.

I'm back to slush for the fact that it is so simple... and I've gotten a lot of support here.

Keep Slush rounds short by donating to my wallet 1Pbmm1L69wNG7HaCHGLmVKzVCsq6p3UTds and also in case I actually helped someone.
trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 639



View Profile
August 28, 2013, 05:04:46 AM
 #11764

What process takes place behind 100 confirmations counting down to zero when earnings become confirmed. I joined a different pool for a couple of days but there was no such thing there.
I'm back to slush for the fact that it is so simple... and I've gotten a lot of support here.

The process is just waiting for other blocks to be generated, to make sure the block found by the pool is part of the (longest) valid chain and not an orphaned fork.
The pool operator has to decide how much risk to take, some pay right away and hope its valid, some count down without displaying (and have the earnings show as unconfirmed reward, too).
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
August 28, 2013, 01:07:56 PM
 #11765

Pool stats are not showing an increase.

heh another diff boost
75'711'668.90
 +5 used to be so nice! now we are getting +10 +12!
When?  Today?

That's why I was asking...

Oh sorry I left off the projected date 9/5
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
August 28, 2013, 01:10:20 PM
 #11766

Approx. cluster performance (30 min average):    43869.247 Ghash/s

blah!

need more asics now!
unknown.usr
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106


View Profile
August 28, 2013, 04:02:02 PM
 #11767

Approx. cluster performance (30 min average):    43869.247 Ghash/s

blah!

need more asics now!

I need more, too.  crap.
unknown.usr
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106


View Profile
August 28, 2013, 04:09:36 PM
 #11768

Crap:

19795   2013-08-28 02:51:20   1:38:49   56764727   2700   0.00123863   254585   25.23460961    invalid
Herp-a-derp
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48


View Profile
August 28, 2013, 04:23:09 PM
 #11769

Approx. cluster performance (30 min average):    43869.247 Ghash/s

blah!

need more asics now!



BTC Guild helps it self grow massively and quickly by selling ASICs.

Maybe Slush could employ someone to do something similar?
mdopro1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 290



View Profile
August 28, 2013, 05:09:11 PM
 #11770

Crap:

19795   2013-08-28 02:51:20   1:38:49   56764727   2700   0.00123863   254585   25.23460961    invalid
Same here. Sucks to see 1.5 hours of mining go bad.

19795 2013-08-28 02:51:20 1:38:49 56764727 23106 0.01018349 254585  25.23460961 invalid 

Keep Slush rounds short by donating to my wallet 1Pbmm1L69wNG7HaCHGLmVKzVCsq6p3UTds and also in case I actually helped someone.
Trongersoll
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


Retired Software Engineer


View Profile
August 28, 2013, 05:49:58 PM
 #11771

Approx. cluster performance (30 min average):    43869.247 Ghash/s

blah!

need more asics now!



BTC Guild helps it self grow massively and quickly by selling ASICs.

Maybe Slush could employ someone to do something similar?


or you could buy from btcguild and use them here. That is what i do.

*insert appropriate begging line here* 
BTC: 1CS6AV7VnjcPLxaTFoUhTjXK4mQCTzfSxE
Doge: DB22tiynvXKg7SyPpnH9jyfitKLTZb6ejc
nite423
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47



View Profile
August 28, 2013, 08:51:06 PM
 #11772

Anyone else using the little ASIC's have one that puts out way more hardware errors then the rest?  I have 9 in an Anker USB 3.0 hub and after 24 hours most of them show 40-60 errors but one of them is showing over 800 errors.  I know what one it is, I've removed it and looked it over and I couldn't see any type of damage.  I've tried plugging it in different ports in the hub but its always giving more errors then the rest.

I have a second batch of miners in an Airtech hub and they all show about the same amount of hardware errors, not one of them stands out like that other one.


Maybe I just have a runt in the group?


Oh, and if your looking for other places to get these miners, I've ordered a couple from bitcanary.com right now.  They only cost .37 btc there, I'll let you all know if I have any issues with them.

Just passing time.
jborkl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 234



View Profile WWW
August 28, 2013, 09:26:36 PM
 #11773

CanaryInTheMine or BitCanary - same person - Is really solid on delivery

nite423
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47



View Profile
August 28, 2013, 09:54:55 PM
 #11774

CanaryInTheMine or BitCanary - same person - Is really solid on delivery

Yea, I received my tracking info just a few minutes ago. 

 

Just passing time.
wavez
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6


View Profile
August 29, 2013, 10:04:24 AM
 #11775

Hi, been using slushs pool for a while now but have a question which I can't find the answer for anywhere obvious.
The email I registered with on the pool I no longer have access to. I need to change the address my payouts go to but believe this requires an email to verify. I can't see anywhere on the site or within my profile to change the registered address and have an amount of coins I don't want to lose in just registering a new account.
Thank you in advance.
kabopar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616


View Profile
August 29, 2013, 10:32:57 AM
 #11776

Are we mining the already found block?

Slush's stat page shows that we are mining 254832, however according to BTC Guild, this was already found by them:
19306   254832   2013-08-29 08:23:07 PM   8c7866382409677faee120b9c26bda0221a850fe9bfb3b6317496a927247c8ae   25.01180001

This is consistent with blockchain.info

Is that why we are stuck for more than 8 hours?  "barking up the wrong tree"?!
visdude
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 642


View Profile
August 29, 2013, 11:37:40 AM
 #11777

Are we mining the already found block?

Slush's stat page shows that we are mining 254832, however according to BTC Guild, this was already found by them:
19306   254832   2013-08-29 08:23:07 PM   8c7866382409677faee120b9c26bda0221a850fe9bfb3b6317496a927247c8ae   25.01180001

This is consistent with blockchain.info

Is that why we are stuck for more than 8 hours?  "barking up the wrong tree"?!
10+ hours now and counting.
trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 639



View Profile
August 29, 2013, 11:39:54 AM
 #11778

Are we mining the already found block?

Slush's stat page shows that we are mining 254832, however according to BTC Guild, this was already found by them:
19306   254832   2013-08-29 08:23:07 PM   8c7866382409677faee120b9c26bda0221a850fe9bfb3b6317496a927247c8ae   25.01180001

This is consistent with blockchain.info

Is that why we are stuck for more than 8 hours?  "barking up the wrong tree"?!

No.
The page is showing which is the latest block it knows about, not the one we are working on.
At the moment, its showing 254837, which is the latest one, found by deepbit.

Even if we were working based on a too old block, this would not prevent us from eventually finding a share and going on with the next round. That found block would end up being invalid, but we would not be stuck. The current 10 hour round is, depending on how you want to see it, either just bad luck or totally probable within the variance caused by the systems. (Don't get me wrong, its quite unlikely for a round to last 10 hours - as you can see via CDF statistics, its only 0.3 %, but its very likely that at least some of our many rounds last that long.)
Herp-a-derp
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48


View Profile
!
August 29, 2013, 11:57:59 AM
 #11779

Approx. cluster performance (30 min average):    43869.247 Ghash/s

blah!

need more asics now!



BTC Guild helps it self grow massively and quickly by selling ASICs.

Maybe Slush could employ someone to do something similar?


or you could buy from btcguild and use them here. That is what i do.

True, although not everyone here will visit BTC Guild... I hope they will after seeing these posts!
kabopar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616


View Profile
August 29, 2013, 12:12:48 PM
 #11780

Are we mining the already found block?

Slush's stat page shows that we are mining 254832, however according to BTC Guild, this was already found by them:
19306   254832   2013-08-29 08:23:07 PM   8c7866382409677faee120b9c26bda0221a850fe9bfb3b6317496a927247c8ae   25.01180001

This is consistent with blockchain.info

Is that why we are stuck for more than 8 hours?  "barking up the wrong tree"?!

No.
The page is showing which is the latest block it knows about, not the one we are working on.
At the moment, its showing 254837, which is the latest one, found by deepbit.

Even if we were working based on a too old block, this would not prevent us from eventually finding a share and going on with the next round. That found block would end up being invalid, but we would not be stuck. The current 10 hour round is, depending on how you want to see it, either just bad luck or totally probable within the variance caused by the systems. (Don't get me wrong, its quite unlikely for a round to last 10 hours - as you can see via CDF statistics, its only 0.3 %, but its very likely that at least some of our many rounds last that long.)

Usually the block shown in stats has the block number which has not been solved yet  (last block shown on blockinfo.org for example + 1), what happened now is that Slush's pool was trying to solve a block that has already been solved by another pool.  It is not clear how solving the previous block would lead us to the next one...
right now
Height    Age    Transactions    Total Sent    Relayed By    Size (kB)
254841    3 minutes    559    7,093.70 BTC    82.28.96.243    224.09
and Slush's stats says: Current Bitcoin block, difficulty:   254841, 65750060
so again it looks like we are out of synch with the network
(bfgminer shows the next block number, in case we do not trust blockchain.info)
Pages: « 1 ... 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 [589] 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 ... 1103 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!