Bitcoin Forum
September 25, 2016, 05:27:34 AM *
News: Due to DDoS attacks, there may be periodic downtime.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3151 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3915

Pages: « 1 ... 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 [602] 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 ... 1103 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3852495 times)
scooter
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100


View Profile
September 15, 2013, 10:49:46 PM
 #12021



My suggestion: quit running that card.
My question: how much more do you pay on energy compared to your BTC reward? Smiley

Nothing wrong with using a utility as a currency exchange.
The higher cost is just the premium the utility is charging you to convert one currency to another.
1474781254
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474781254

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474781254
Reply with quote  #2

1474781254
Report to moderator
1474781254
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474781254

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474781254
Reply with quote  #2

1474781254
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
visdude
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 642


View Profile
September 16, 2013, 03:47:42 AM
 #12022



My suggestion: quit running that card.
My question: how much more do you pay on energy compared to your BTC reward? Smiley

Nothing wrong with using a utility as a currency exchange.
The higher cost is just the premium the utility is charging you to convert one currency to another.

Interesting.  I try to present a similar concept when I get asked about operating expenses (hardware, power bill, etc.) versus BTC mined.  For example: if mining one BTC ends up yielding a negative bottom line of -$100 (technically a loss) after all the operating expenses are applied, it can be argued that it is akin to buying one BTC at $100.  Therefore, based on the current BTC-USD average exchange rate of $138, it would then be an excellent buy.  It's all relative.
mdopro1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 290



View Profile
September 16, 2013, 04:06:26 AM
 #12023

I have 3 GPU miners each with a single 7950 card. One of the cards suddenly is going extremely high in temperature reaching cutoff within a minute. Fan speed shows as if it's spinning at normal rate. This is my first GPU issue since I started mining a couple of months ago. Can anyone tell me what I should look for?

I have since turned it down too  750MHz GPU speed and temps are steady at 87C - and this thing is doing as much hash rate as a USB block erupter, which is a shame.

Any help is appreciated.

When you physically look at the fans - are they both spinning full speed?

I'll see it today when I'm at the site but thanks for the pointer, sensor could say one thing and fan could be off. Are they easy to find and replace?

I had a 7970 that suddenly began to run at much higher temps - turned out one of the fans had stopped turning - see here for the various suggestions from the community...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=250705.0


It turned out to be one of my high cfm fan controller going bad and stopped a case fan that was directly pushing air onto the card. This was also at night time so there was no air conditioning, hence temp jump. I removed the controller and all is back to normal but noisy as hell because this fan does 260cfm and sounds like a vacuum cleaner going.



My suggestion: quit running that card.
My question: how much more do you pay on energy compared to your BTC reward? Smiley

I have free power... or say included in rent so whatever.

Keep Slush rounds short by donating to my wallet 1Pbmm1L69wNG7HaCHGLmVKzVCsq6p3UTds and also in case I actually helped someone.
jmevz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 251


View Profile
September 16, 2013, 04:19:26 AM
 #12024

holy hashrates batman! anyone else been watching the next difficulty prediction?  0_o

lmao!

trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 639



View Profile
September 16, 2013, 05:46:44 AM
 #12025

Interesting.  I try to present a similar concept when I get asked about operating expenses (hardware, power bill, etc.) versus BTC mined.  For example: if mining one BTC ends up yielding a negative bottom line of -$100 (technically a loss) after all the operating expenses are applied, it can be argued that it is akin to buying one BTC at $100.  Therefore, based on the current BTC-USD average exchange rate of $138, it would then be an excellent buy.  It's all relative.

In that case, you hace counted the coins' value twice.
Unless, of course, "if mining one BTC ends up yielding a negative bottom line of -$100" does mean you have counted costs and not subtracted the coins value yet.
But with a GPU, you definitely use way way more than 138$ on energy per coin you mine.

The "i convert currencies" explanation is perfectly fine, its just interesting that some trade a BTC for 300$ using the GPU, which is loud and hot in your room all the time, instead of buying from some guy at 138$ Smiley Not paying for energy could be one good reason, but there are stories where the miners found out these kind of deals can easily get cancelled when they start consuming way more than before all the time. The only explanation where i dont feel someone is really mis-calculating, is "its my hobby, i have no problem with my hobby costing money".
visdude
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 642


View Profile
September 16, 2013, 07:44:10 AM
 #12026

Interesting.  I try to present a similar concept when I get asked about operating expenses (hardware, power bill, etc.) versus BTC mined.  For example: if mining one BTC ends up yielding a negative bottom line of -$100 (technically a loss) after all the operating expenses are applied, it can be argued that it is akin to buying one BTC at $100.  Therefore, based on the current BTC-USD average exchange rate of $138, it would then be an excellent buy.  It's all relative.

In that case, you hace counted the coins' value twice.
Unless, of course, "if mining one BTC ends up yielding a negative bottom line of -$100" does mean you have counted costs and not subtracted the coins value yet.
But with a GPU, you definitely use way way more than 138$ on energy per coin you mine.

The "i convert currencies" explanation is perfectly fine, its just interesting that some trade a BTC for 300$ using the GPU, which is loud and hot in your room all the time, instead of buying from some guy at 138$ Smiley Not paying for energy could be one good reason, but there are stories where the miners found out these kind of deals can easily get cancelled when they start consuming way more than before all the time. The only explanation where i dont feel someone is really mis-calculating, is "its my hobby, i have no problem with my hobby costing money".

My example is just that, an example.  I didn't specifically say that GPUs would yield a -$100 loss per BTC.  Just in case you didn't get the gist of it, it's just a different way of looking at it (hence I stated, "It's all relative").  Why would it be counting the value of coins twice?  Please explain in detail.  What part of "after all the operating expenses are applied" makes it "counting the coin's value twice"?  I reiterate: if I ended up with a -$100 (loss) after all the expenses are subtracted, it stands that I have one BTC that cost me $100 (debit) which is actually worth $138 or so in the market.  Doesn't it mean that I'm still ahead $38 if I exchange that one BTC for $138?
tccd
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47


View Profile
September 16, 2013, 07:52:41 AM
 #12027

I am pulling my BF from Slush's. Sad
From BitFury page I am hitting 36-39GH/s (running 24/7 obviously)
Lately there have been to many instances where BF is reporting 36Gh lets say ans Slush's is saying my reward is not what is should be.
My only temporary fix for this was to restart my miner every few hours or when I catch the rewards levels drifting off to where I know it's a problem somewhere.
(I am going to test a few days with Bitminter to see if any difference. The last 30min it's been 37 to 40Gh.)

Let the test begin.


#   Block found at   Duration   Total shares   Your shares   Your BTC reward   Block #   Block value   Validity
20058   2013-09-15 17:29:19   0:13:43   12548741   6854   0.01344081   258178   25.19760381    73 confirmations left
20057   2013-09-15 17:15:36   0:30:45   27923822   15687   0.01340737   258176   25.03930960    71 confirmations left
20056   2013-09-15 16:44:51   1:41:51   92542754   53523   0.01400364   258172   25.17849582    67 confirmations left
20055   2013-09-15 15:03:00   0:28:30   25660964   8143   0.00795845   258164   25.10434846    59 confirmations left
20054   2013-09-15 14:34:30   3:54:12   212791583   113196   0.00777608   258159   25.08676663    54 confirmations left
20053   2013-09-15 10:40:18   2:36:46   141656128   82434   0.01397730   258135   25.18045046    30 confirmations left
20052   2013-09-15 08:03:32   1:00:39   54904212   33131   0.01343850   258117   25.02893680    12 confirmations left
20051   2013-09-15 07:02:53   4:03:00   218937938   126283   0.01426751   258108   25.32093276    3 confirmations left
20050   2013-09-15 02:59:53   5:12:41   284428611   135114   0.01408910   258072   25.12901062    confirmed
20049   2013-09-14 21:47:12   2:13:35   122161653   56129   0.00753105   258034   25.14307541    confirmed
20048   2013-09-14 19:33:37   0:50:57   46401717   27014   0.01465370   258015   25.01535462    confirmed
20047   2013-09-14 18:42:40   0:13:34   12502023   6850   0.01222630   258003   25.07640000    confirmed
20046   2013-09-14 18:29:06   0:02:01   1829874   929   0.01257313   258001   25.03120000    confirmed
20045   2013-09-14 18:27:05   1:37:26   88768628   41450   0.01300920   258000   25.09370015    confirmed
20044   2013-09-14 16:49:39   0:31:22   28885734   16083   0.01064981   257982   25.24410730    confirmed
20043   2013-09-14 16:18:17   2:17:04   122606366   52388   0.01310560   257979   25.25859928    confirmed
20042   2013-09-14 14:01:13   0:34:28   29963805   18377   0.01397606   257961   25.08078998    confirmed
20041   2013-09-14 13:26:45   3:19:09   170795001   77586   0.01602968   257953   25.09193760    confirmed


#   Block found at   Duration   Total shares    Your shares    Your BTC reward    Block #   Block value   Validity
20061    2013-09-16 05:16:58    1:14:04    66928719    49531    0.02453905    258271    25.17486378    85 confirmations left
20060    2013-09-16 04:02:54    2:42:23    146349338    4333    0.00076529    258261    25.11184913    75 confirmations left
20059    2013-09-16 01:20:31    7:51:12    427752608    384437    0.00074610    258243    25.33121055    57 confirmations left
20058    2013-09-15 17:29:19    0:13:43    12548741    12495    0.02438421    258178    25.19760381    confirmed
20057    2013-09-15 17:15:36    0:30:45    27923822    26600    0.02210033    258176    25.03930960    confirmed
20056    2013-09-15 16:44:51    1:41:51    92542754    87780    0.02440325    258172    25.17849582    confirmed
20055    2013-09-15 15:03:00    0:28:30    25660964    23275    0.02137285    258164    25.10434846    confirmed
20054    2013-09-15 14:34:30    3:54:12    212791583    203525    0.02038170    258159    25.08676663    confirmed
20053    2013-09-15 10:40:18    2:36:46    141656128    133525    0.02343147    258135    25.18045046    invalid
20052    2013-09-15 08:03:32    1:00:39    54904212    53235    0.02388774    258117    25.02893680    confirmed
20051    2013-09-15 07:02:53    4:03:00    218937938    209965    0.02502974    258108    25.32093276    confirmed

Same here. I restarted the mining proxy to fix it.
trasla
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 639



View Profile
September 16, 2013, 07:58:44 AM
 #12028

 What part of "after all the operating expenses are applied" makes it "counting the coin's value twice"?  I reiterate: if I ended up with a -$100 (loss) after all the expenses are subtracted, it stands that I have one BTC that cost me $100 (debit) which is actually worth $138 or so in the market.

Expenses are subtracted from what amount?
If you subtracted from the coins value, like:
1 BTC: 138$
minus energy 200$
minus value decrease of hardware 38$
= -100$

than its not a coin which cost 100$ and is a good buy, its a coin which cost 238$ and is worth 138$, thus a bad buy which made you loose 100$.


If you just list all expenses and get 100$, thats not a 100$ loss, its 100$ costs, and if compared to the BTC price, you end up with a 38$ win.
If you did it that way, you calculated right, and i was just confused by the terms u used.
But the point of my initial post was to say that there is really no way for energy costs alone to not exceed the value of the mined coins by far.
So what i want to say: If you mine BTC with GPUs, even when not considering hardware costs, you will always end up "buying" BTC at a very very very expensive rate.
visdude
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 642


View Profile
September 16, 2013, 10:09:40 AM
 #12029

What part of "after all the operating expenses are applied" makes it "counting the coin's value twice"?  I reiterate: if I ended up with a -$100 (loss) after all the expenses are subtracted, it stands that I have one BTC that cost me $100 (debit) which is actually worth $138 or so in the market.

Expenses are subtracted from what amount?
If you subtracted from the coins value, like:
1 BTC: 138$
minus energy 200$
minus value decrease of hardware 38$
= -100$

than its not a coin which cost 100$ and is a good buy, its a coin which cost 238$ and is worth 138$, thus a bad buy which made you loose 100$.


If you just list all expenses and get 100$, thats not a 100$ loss, its 100$ costs, and if compared to the BTC price, you end up with a 38$ win.
If you did it that way, you calculated right, and i was just confused by the terms u used.
But the point of my initial post was to say that there is really no way for energy costs alone to not exceed the value of the mined coins by far.
So what i want to say: If you mine BTC with GPUs, even when not considering hardware costs, you will always end up "buying" BTC at a very very very expensive rate.

Again, it's after all expenses (equipment depreciation, energy bill, etc.) are applied, i.e. if you create a balance sheet after producing one BTC, a -$100 balance resulted.  However, an asset worth $138 has also been acquired in the process (1 BTC) in my example.  That leaves a $38 profit ($138 less $100).

Perhaps, I should have taken your post from my original quote; my post was in reference to my concept being similar to scooter's and not your post.

p.s.  I see your point though.  It would not be a loss.  I tend to isolate BTC mined and apply them last (since they are very volatile) in my way of accounting (more like ghetto accounting).
jagallout
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29


View Profile
September 16, 2013, 03:24:41 PM
 #12030

Is the website offline right now?

stylesuxx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14


View Profile
September 16, 2013, 03:53:45 PM
 #12031

Is the website offline right now?


I can access it.
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311


View Profile
September 16, 2013, 09:54:14 PM
 #12032

What part of "after all the operating expenses are applied" makes it "counting the coin's value twice"?  I reiterate: if I ended up with a -$100 (loss) after all the expenses are subtracted, it stands that I have one BTC that cost me $100 (debit) which is actually worth $138 or so in the market.

Expenses are subtracted from what amount?
If you subtracted from the coins value, like:
1 BTC: 138$
minus energy 200$
minus value decrease of hardware 38$
= -100$

than its not a coin which cost 100$ and is a good buy, its a coin which cost 238$ and is worth 138$, thus a bad buy which made you loose 100$.


If you just list all expenses and get 100$, thats not a 100$ loss, its 100$ costs, and if compared to the BTC price, you end up with a 38$ win.
If you did it that way, you calculated right, and i was just confused by the terms u used.
But the point of my initial post was to say that there is really no way for energy costs alone to not exceed the value of the mined coins by far.
So what i want to say: If you mine BTC with GPUs, even when not considering hardware costs, you will always end up "buying" BTC at a very very very expensive rate.

Again, it's after all expenses (equipment depreciation, energy bill, etc.) are applied, i.e. if you create a balance sheet after producing one BTC, a -$100 balance resulted.  However, an asset worth $138 has also been acquired in the process (1 BTC) in my example.  That leaves a $38 profit ($138 less $100).

Perhaps, I should have taken your post from my original quote; my post was in reference to my concept being similar to scooter's and not your post.

p.s.  I see your point though.  It would not be a loss.  I tend to isolate BTC mined and apply them last (since they are very volatile) in my way of accounting (more like ghetto accounting).
(emphasis mine)

Again: To what are the expenses applied? To the market price of the BTC generated?

If you create a balance, as you say, there's -$238 on one side and +$138 on the other side, the result being -$100. But you have accounted for the BTC value once already (as if you have "sold" it). So you can't say you have one BTC for $100. You have it for $238. You can't get $138 for the one BTC and still have it. :-)

You say an asset worth $138 has also been acquired.
Yes, it has. But you can either keep it (and it costs you $238 at your expenses) or sell it for $138, then you decrease your direct loss to "only" $100.

You can't say I have one BTC that cost me $100 (debit). If you are in the position that the process has cost you $100, you already do not have the BTC. If you still have it, it cost you $238.

[edit]:
In case you mean $100 are only the expenses and you really end with $38 profit, then you can't call the $100 amount balance. In that case, it's no balance, it's just expenses. Balance has always two sides, one being the earnings, i.e. the BTC value in this case. In that case, balance would be those +$38.
It's impossible to have a balance of -$100 and a profit of +$38 at the same time. :-)))
gourmet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311


View Profile
September 17, 2013, 12:47:07 AM
 #12033

Difficulty settings dictate what level of difficulty the miner will accept and send to the pool.  Higher difficulty means higher rejects.  Diff 16 means harder hashes, but every hash counts as 16 shares.

Why does higher difficulty mean higher rejects? (Does it really?)
I think what he means is with the higher worker diff rate it just appears they have a higher rejection rate only because you need to take your accepted shares x worker diff then divide by your rejects to see what the rejected % is.

In fact, you have to swap the numerator and the denominator in your clause. ;-)
I.e., divide the rejects by the total shares, not reversely.
Yes, and you have to divide by total shares, i.e. accepted and rejected together, to get the rejected percentage.
aurel57
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 09:06:20 AM
 #12034

Difficulty settings dictate what level of difficulty the miner will accept and send to the pool.  Higher difficulty means higher rejects.  Diff 16 means harder hashes, but every hash counts as 16 shares.

Why does higher difficulty mean higher rejects? (Does it really?)
I think what he means is with the higher worker diff rate it just appears they have a higher rejection rate only because you need to take your accepted shares x worker diff then divide by your rejects to see what the rejected % is.

In fact, you have to swap the numerator and the denominator in your clause. ;-)
I.e., divide the rejects by the total shares, not reversely.
Yes, and you have to divide by total shares, i.e. accepted and rejected together, to get the rejected percentage.
Yes I was wrong and had that backwards. But that is a good point about adding back in the rejects which I totally missed. Thanks

██████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████
█████                                    █████
█████                                    █████
█████                                    █████
█████           ▄█▄        ▄█▄           █████
█████          ████████████████          █████
█████           ▀████████████▀           █████
█████           ████▀    ▀████           █████
█████           ████▄    ▄████           █████
█████           ▄████████████▄           █████
█████          ████████████████          █████
█████           ▀█▀        ▀█▀           █████
█████                                    █████
█████                                    █████
█████                                    █████
██████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████
▄██████████████████████████▄
██                        ██
██                        ██
██                        ██
██             ▄█▀███████████
██              ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀
██                        ██
██                        ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▄██████████████████████████▄
██                        ██
██                        ██
██                        ██
██                        ██
████████████████████████████
██                        ██
██                        ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▄██████████████████████████▄
██                 ▄███▀  ██
██             ▄▄██▀▀  ▄█ ██
██     ▄    ▄███▀▀  ▄███  ██
██    ██▄▄██▀▀   ▄█████   ██
██   ████▀▀  ▄▄██▀▀ ▀█    ██
██  █▀▀   ▄▄██▀           ██
██    ▄▄███▀              ██
██▄▄▄████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▄██████████████████████████▄
██                        ██
██  ████▄  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ██
██     ▀█▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██    ██
██      ██         ██     ██
██       ███████████      ██
██        ▄▄     ▄▄       ██
██       ▀██▀   ▀██▀      ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▄██████████████████████████▄
██                       ▄██
██                     █████
██         ▄         ███▀ ██
██       ▄███     ▄███▀   ██
██   ▄▄███▀▀███▄████▀     ██
██▄▄███▀     ▀███▀        ██
████▀                     ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▄███████████▄  ██████████████
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
██████▀██████  ██████▀███████
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
zurg
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 12:13:18 PM
 #12035

I am pulling my BF from Slush's. Sad
From BitFury page I am hitting 36-39GH/s (running 24/7 obviously)
Lately there have been to many instances where BF is reporting 36Gh lets say ans Slush's is saying my reward is not what is should be.
My only temporary fix for this was to restart my miner every few hours or when I catch the rewards levels drifting off to where I know it's a problem somewhere.
(I am going to test a few days with Bitminter to see if any difference. The last 30min it's been 37 to 40Gh.)

Let the test begin.


#   Block found at   Duration   Total shares   Your shares   Your BTC reward   Block #   Block value   Validity
20058   2013-09-15 17:29:19   0:13:43   12548741   6854   0.01344081   258178   25.19760381    73 confirmations left
20057   2013-09-15 17:15:36   0:30:45   27923822   15687   0.01340737   258176   25.03930960    71 confirmations left
20056   2013-09-15 16:44:51   1:41:51   92542754   53523   0.01400364   258172   25.17849582    67 confirmations left
20055   2013-09-15 15:03:00   0:28:30   25660964   8143   0.00795845   258164   25.10434846    59 confirmations left
20054   2013-09-15 14:34:30   3:54:12   212791583   113196   0.00777608   258159   25.08676663    54 confirmations left
20053   2013-09-15 10:40:18   2:36:46   141656128   82434   0.01397730   258135   25.18045046    30 confirmations left
20052   2013-09-15 08:03:32   1:00:39   54904212   33131   0.01343850   258117   25.02893680    12 confirmations left
20051   2013-09-15 07:02:53   4:03:00   218937938   126283   0.01426751   258108   25.32093276    3 confirmations left
20050   2013-09-15 02:59:53   5:12:41   284428611   135114   0.01408910   258072   25.12901062    confirmed
20049   2013-09-14 21:47:12   2:13:35   122161653   56129   0.00753105   258034   25.14307541    confirmed
20048   2013-09-14 19:33:37   0:50:57   46401717   27014   0.01465370   258015   25.01535462    confirmed
20047   2013-09-14 18:42:40   0:13:34   12502023   6850   0.01222630   258003   25.07640000    confirmed
20046   2013-09-14 18:29:06   0:02:01   1829874   929   0.01257313   258001   25.03120000    confirmed
20045   2013-09-14 18:27:05   1:37:26   88768628   41450   0.01300920   258000   25.09370015    confirmed
20044   2013-09-14 16:49:39   0:31:22   28885734   16083   0.01064981   257982   25.24410730    confirmed
20043   2013-09-14 16:18:17   2:17:04   122606366   52388   0.01310560   257979   25.25859928    confirmed
20042   2013-09-14 14:01:13   0:34:28   29963805   18377   0.01397606   257961   25.08078998    confirmed
20041   2013-09-14 13:26:45   3:19:09   170795001   77586   0.01602968   257953   25.09193760    confirmed


#   Block found at   Duration   Total shares    Your shares    Your BTC reward    Block #   Block value   Validity
20061    2013-09-16 05:16:58    1:14:04    66928719    49531    0.02453905    258271    25.17486378    85 confirmations left
20060    2013-09-16 04:02:54    2:42:23    146349338    4333    0.00076529    258261    25.11184913    75 confirmations left
20059    2013-09-16 01:20:31    7:51:12    427752608    384437    0.00074610    258243    25.33121055    57 confirmations left
20058    2013-09-15 17:29:19    0:13:43    12548741    12495    0.02438421    258178    25.19760381    confirmed
20057    2013-09-15 17:15:36    0:30:45    27923822    26600    0.02210033    258176    25.03930960    confirmed
20056    2013-09-15 16:44:51    1:41:51    92542754    87780    0.02440325    258172    25.17849582    confirmed
20055    2013-09-15 15:03:00    0:28:30    25660964    23275    0.02137285    258164    25.10434846    confirmed
20054    2013-09-15 14:34:30    3:54:12    212791583    203525    0.02038170    258159    25.08676663    confirmed
20053    2013-09-15 10:40:18    2:36:46    141656128    133525    0.02343147    258135    25.18045046    invalid
20052    2013-09-15 08:03:32    1:00:39    54904212    53235    0.02388774    258117    25.02893680    confirmed
20051    2013-09-15 07:02:53    4:03:00    218937938    209965    0.02502974    258108    25.32093276    confirmed

Same here. I restarted the mining proxy to fix it.

Well, I've been mining with BitMinter and have zero of the issues I had with this pool. Sad
Which sux as I like Slush's!
I just tried again and BF was showing 45Gh/s while Slush's spiked to a whooping 375Mhashes/s.


GAW Hashlets! - http://gawminers.go2cloud.org/aff_c?offer_id=34&aff_id=790
BTC: 1CUADJDbuswmMA1izmQZbz9pQ5vxJxu2i8
Mudbankkeith
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 01:10:11 PM
 #12036


Well, I've been mining with BitMinter and have zero of the issues I had with this pool. Sad
Which sux as I like Slush's!
I just tried again and BF was showing 45Gh/s while Slush's spiked to a whooping 375Mhashes/s.



Be careful with the "375Mhashes/s" figure from Slush's Pool. This is only an estimate.
Quote from the website:-  (* The calculation is based on the number of shares so far, which may not be accurate for slower workers.)

So the figure will be low when you first connect and (will) (should) increase after a few hours connected.


The low Btc count can also be partly due to the large swings in the "daily pool luck" appearing on Slush's, 73% to 160% within a very few hours.
Block time can be 7 hours or more, and as short as 1 min, or less. If you lose 30 seconds, due to a restart, in a 1 min block your share count will be half of your normal count.

Another difficulty that will influence pool figures is the size of miners coming into the pool and being taken out again.(pool testing is as disruptive as pool skipping)
In June a 350Mh/s GPU miner was the normal size, Now in September 64Gh/s is the size for new rigs.


You need a 24 hour uninterupted run to compare figures.
 Also be aware that thousands of other people are currently experimenting with similar rigs, and looking for the "best pool for their configuration".
This is bound to cause variations in the short term results.


BTc donations welcome:-  13c2KuzWCaWFTXF171Zn1HrKhMYARPKv97
zurg
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 01:20:40 PM
 #12037


Well, I've been mining with BitMinter and have zero of the issues I had with this pool. Sad
Which sux as I like Slush's!
I just tried again and BF was showing 45Gh/s while Slush's spiked to a whooping 375Mhashes/s.



Be careful with the "375Mhashes/s" figure from Slush's Pool. This is only an estimate.
Quote from the website:-  (* The calculation is based on the number of shares so far, which may not be accurate for slower workers.)

So the figure will be low when you first connect and (will) (should) increase after a few hours connected.


The low Btc count can also be partly due to the large swings in the "daily pool luck" appearing on Slush's, 73% to 160% within a very few hours.
Block time can be 7 hours or more, and as short as 1 min, or less. If you lose 30 seconds, due to a restart, in a 1 min block your share count will be half of your normal count.

Another difficulty that will influence pool figures is the size of miners coming into the pool and being taken out again.(pool testing is as disruptive as pool skipping)
In June a 350Mh/s GPU miner was the normal size, Now in September 64Gh/s is the size for new rigs.


You need a 24 hour uninterupted run to compare figures.
 Also be aware that thousands of other people are currently experimenting with similar rigs, and looking for the "best pool for their configuration".
This is bound to cause variations in the short term results.



Thanks for the tip.
I might have jumped the gun on the 375 assumption today as I was used to Slush's normally show me the correct hashrate fairly quickly before.

Went up to 1.6k now.. Shares submitted is still kind of low to what it should be.., BitMinter and BTC Guild showed proper numbers within 5min.

GAW Hashlets! - http://gawminers.go2cloud.org/aff_c?offer_id=34&aff_id=790
BTC: 1CUADJDbuswmMA1izmQZbz9pQ5vxJxu2i8
aurel57
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 04:23:46 PM
 #12038

#258513 nice reward had a 12.43 transaction fee

██████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████
█████                                    █████
█████                                    █████
█████                                    █████
█████           ▄█▄        ▄█▄           █████
█████          ████████████████          █████
█████           ▀████████████▀           █████
█████           ████▀    ▀████           █████
█████           ████▄    ▄████           █████
█████           ▄████████████▄           █████
█████          ████████████████          █████
█████           ▀█▀        ▀█▀           █████
█████                                    █████
█████                                    █████
█████                                    █████
██████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████
▄██████████████████████████▄
██                        ██
██                        ██
██                        ██
██             ▄█▀███████████
██              ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀
██                        ██
██                        ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▄██████████████████████████▄
██                        ██
██                        ██
██                        ██
██                        ██
████████████████████████████
██                        ██
██                        ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▄██████████████████████████▄
██                 ▄███▀  ██
██             ▄▄██▀▀  ▄█ ██
██     ▄    ▄███▀▀  ▄███  ██
██    ██▄▄██▀▀   ▄█████   ██
██   ████▀▀  ▄▄██▀▀ ▀█    ██
██  █▀▀   ▄▄██▀           ██
██    ▄▄███▀              ██
██▄▄▄████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▄██████████████████████████▄
██                        ██
██  ████▄  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ██
██     ▀█▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██    ██
██      ██         ██     ██
██       ███████████      ██
██        ▄▄     ▄▄       ██
██       ▀██▀   ▀██▀      ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▄██████████████████████████▄
██                       ▄██
██                     █████
██         ▄         ███▀ ██
██       ▄███     ▄███▀   ██
██   ▄▄███▀▀███▄████▀     ██
██▄▄███▀     ▀███▀        ██
████▀                     ██
██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

▄███████████▄  ██████████████
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
█           █  █            █
██████▀██████  ██████▀███████
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
overunity
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 05:34:45 PM
 #12039

Just wondered if anyone could help ,Igot an asicminer usb stick today but I been trying to se it up all day .

I eventually got the drivers installed and the usb stick plugged in .

But the videos I watched are all for Bitminter were you download their program and the miner shows up and you click run .

But if I open open slushes website there is no such software it is just a place to register new workers .

Is there any videos of someone setting up a usb stick to mine on slush's pool .?

any help would be appreciated ty.

I prefer videos to a wall of text tbh .
bitcoiner49er
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 457



View Profile
September 17, 2013, 05:52:02 PM
 #12040

#258513 nice reward had a 12.43 transaction fee

Yeah this guy likes to put big fees on his transactions.  Shocked

Homo doctus is se semper divitias habet
Pages: « 1 ... 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 [602] 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 ... 1103 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!