macsheadroom
Member
 Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
Computer Service Tech
|
 |
July 23, 2013, 04:11:14 PM |
|
19250 2013-07-23 05:36:38 4:34:50 89788804 11521 0.00316287 248040 25.15286879 38 confirmations left
19249 2013-07-23 01:01:48 0:28:16 9155717 1075 0.00343916 248010 25.16305000 invalid
19248 2013-07-23 00:33:32 0:11:46 3758514 452 0.00316709 248007 25.00730000 invalid
19247 2013-07-23 00:21:46 0:26:08 8454348 1091 0.00333553 248003 25.26793713 invalid
19246 2013-07-22 23:55:38 0:54:42 17599345 2333 0.00322146 248000 25.19543899 confirmed
What the heck happened here? I have never seen this, are we getting DDOS'd?
|
1FQkmrwQ7yf9MKGLsAUhY2jgMT8WjepwL7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
Fassade
Member
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
|
|
July 23, 2013, 04:17:55 PM |
|
Guys, exist a problem with the mining_proxy? This disconnects so much times to me..  |
|
|
|
|
Synethstesia
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
July 23, 2013, 04:20:10 PM |
|
We have been having a lot of problems with the servers over the past few days... If this is the new norm, I'm gonna have to point my miners elsewhere permanently  |
|
|
|
|
5120-01-518-6126
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
< My mining rig >
|
|
July 23, 2013, 04:29:39 PM |
|
I think slush gotta add another server or two to keep up with 23+ Thash for the pool and increasing competition on the network.
|
|
|
|
|
Synethstesia
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
July 23, 2013, 04:34:43 PM |
|
I think slush gotta add another server or two to keep up with 23+ Thash for the pool and increasing competition on the network.
This may very well be the issue... We're pushing up 24TH/s, and it happened fairly quickly. |
|
|
|
|
|
xjack
|
|
July 23, 2013, 04:40:52 PM |
|
19250 2013-07-23 05:36:38 4:34:50 89788804 11521 0.00316287 248040 25.15286879 38 confirmations left
19249 2013-07-23 01:01:48 0:28:16 9155717 1075 0.00343916 248010 25.16305000 invalid
19248 2013-07-23 00:33:32 0:11:46 3758514 452 0.00316709 248007 25.00730000 invalid
19247 2013-07-23 00:21:46 0:26:08 8454348 1091 0.00333553 248003 25.26793713 invalid
19246 2013-07-22 23:55:38 0:54:42 17599345 2333 0.00322146 248000 25.19543899 confirmed
What the heck happened here? I have never seen this, are we getting DDOS'd?
19250 2013-07-23 05:36:38 4:34:50 89788804 60689 0.01666101 248040 25.15286879 38 confirmations left 19249 2013-07-23 01:01:48 0:28:16 9155717 6176 0.01569624 248010 25.16305000 invalid 19248 2013-07-23 00:33:32 0:11:46 3758514 2640 0.01761587 248007 25.00730000 invalid 19247 2013-07-23 00:21:46 0:26:08 8454348 5872 0.01782417 248003 25.26793713 invalid 19246 2013-07-22 23:55:38 0:54:42 17599345 12156 0.01560406 248000 25.19543899 confirmed Not sure - blockchain.info shows those blocks as being valid and relayed by Slush? |
|
|
|
|
desired_username
|
|
July 23, 2013, 04:53:42 PM |
|
What's that?
Three invalid blocks in a row?
19247, 19248 and 19249
On the first one only a few validation were missing ....
Weird indeed. Wanted to look up but blockchain.info is down. Does anyone have info about what was happening? T It shows ok on blockchain. I really hope it's possible to fix :S |
|
|
|
|
|
silverston
|
|
July 23, 2013, 04:59:12 PM |
|
What's that?
Three invalid blocks in a row?
19247, 19248 and 19249
On the first one only a few validation were missing ....
Weird indeed. Wanted to look up but blockchain.info is down. Does anyone have info about what was happening? T It shows ok on blockchain. I really hope it's possible to fix :S I see all`s good right now |
|
|
|
TiborB
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
July 23, 2013, 05:16:26 PM |
|
What's that?
Three invalid blocks in a row?
19247, 19248 and 19249
On the first one only a few validation were missing ....
Weird indeed. Wanted to look up but blockchain.info is down. Does anyone have info about what was happening? T It shows ok on blockchain. I really hope it's possible to fix :S Yes, I have also confirmed it via blockexplorer during the outage of blockchain.info. Everything is back to normal by now on the stats page as well. T |
|
|
|
|
|
desired_username
|
|
July 23, 2013, 05:45:33 PM |
|
What's that?
Three invalid blocks in a row?
19247, 19248 and 19249
On the first one only a few validation were missing ....
Weird indeed. Wanted to look up but blockchain.info is down. Does anyone have info about what was happening? T It shows ok on blockchain. I really hope it's possible to fix :S Yes, I have also confirmed it via blockexplorer during the outage of blockchain.info. Everything is back to normal by now on the stats page as well. T Interestingly, I'm still missing the reward for the invalid blocks :S The invalid entries on the stat page disappeared though |
|
|
|
|
|
cosurgi
|
|
July 23, 2013, 06:22:46 PM |
|
Rewards are OK (after some waiting until they are fixed), but estimated reward is definitely wrong, all day today.
|
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
|
July 23, 2013, 06:35:11 PM |
|
19250 2013-07-23 05:36:38 4:34:50 89788804 11521 0.00316287 248040 25.15286879 38 confirmations left
19249 2013-07-23 01:01:48 0:28:16 9155717 1075 0.00343916 248010 25.16305000 invalid
19248 2013-07-23 00:33:32 0:11:46 3758514 452 0.00316709 248007 25.00730000 invalid
19247 2013-07-23 00:21:46 0:26:08 8454348 1091 0.00333553 248003 25.26793713 invalid
19246 2013-07-22 23:55:38 0:54:42 17599345 2333 0.00322146 248000 25.19543899 confirmed
What the heck happened here? I have never seen this, are we getting DDOS'd?
19250 2013-07-23 05:36:38 4:34:50 89788804 60689 0.01666101 248040 25.15286879 38 confirmations left 19249 2013-07-23 01:01:48 0:28:16 9155717 6176 0.01569624 248010 25.16305000 invalid 19248 2013-07-23 00:33:32 0:11:46 3758514 2640 0.01761587 248007 25.00730000 invalid 19247 2013-07-23 00:21:46 0:26:08 8454348 5872 0.01782417 248003 25.26793713 invalid 19246 2013-07-22 23:55:38 0:54:42 17599345 12156 0.01560406 248000 25.19543899 confirmed Not sure - blockchain.info shows those blocks as being valid and relayed by Slush? glad I didnt check anything till now, after the correction! haha |
|
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
|
July 23, 2013, 06:36:28 PM |
|
did we notice the jump in DIFF?
248113, 31256960
+5 increase eh! I guess bfl is actually shipping!
|
|
|
|
|
|
cosurgi
|
|
July 23, 2013, 08:56:08 PM |
|
Rewards are OK (after some waiting until they are fixed), but estimated reward is definitely wrong, all day today.
Hmm. Now it shows that my last share was 10 hours ago, which is impossible, because I have correct reward on last 10 rounds.... But estimated reward is zero. |
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:06:43 PM |
|
Rewards are OK (after some waiting until they are fixed), but estimated reward is definitely wrong, all day today.
Hmm. Now it shows that my last share was 10 hours ago, which is impossible, because I have correct reward on last 10 rounds.... But estimated reward is zero. are you checking this on a block just ended? which it will show u an outrageous number till a share gets submitted |
|
|
|
|
Hippie Tech
aka Amenstop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1001
All cryptos are FIAT digital currency. Do not use.
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:15:42 PM |
|
We have been having a lot of problems with the servers over the past few days... If this is the new norm, I'm gonna have to point my miners elsewhere permanently I was having trouble connecting until I used the old getwork url and let cgminger/guiminer handle the redirect to the stratum server.  ---> http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332HT xD |
|
|
|
|
bspurloc
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:55:09 PM |
|
We have been having a lot of problems with the servers over the past few days... If this is the new norm, I'm gonna have to point my miners elsewhere permanently I was having trouble connecting until I used the old getwork url and let cgminger/guiminer handle the redirect to the stratum server. ---> http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332HT xD you could save yourself time trying to find tricks to get to a different IP by making it your choice which IP to connect too, there are only 3 allowed right now. It isnt rocket science, if you can type stratum.bitcoin.cz you can type 54.225.117.74 or 54.215.3.101 or 95.211.52.40. It is easy to lead a horse to water pointing this out but u cant make the person understand the simple concept of it. Name: stratum.bitcoin.cz Addresses: 54.225.117.74 54.215.3.101 95.211.52.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
cosurgi
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:57:15 PM |
|
We have been having a lot of problems with the servers over the past few days... If this is the new norm, I'm gonna have to point my miners elsewhere permanently I was having trouble connecting until I used the old getwork url and let cgminger/guiminer handle the redirect to the stratum server. ---> http://api.bitcoin.cz:8332HT xD Hmm... Avalon shows in log that connection refused, on this stratum.bitcoin.cz:3333 and this api.bitcoin.cz:8332. Which of those three IPs is working now? |
|
|
|
TObject
Member
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:59:06 PM |
|
Addresses: 54.225.117.74
54.215.3.101
95.211.52.40
How long will these addresses be good for? |
|
|
|
|
|
angryrob
|
|
July 23, 2013, 10:16:53 PM
Last edit: July 23, 2013, 10:27:32 PM by angryrob |
|
How long will these addresses be good for?
There is no way to know.* *(there may be a way to know that i don't know about  ) On a separate note, having multiple rounds each more than 20 minutes apart still displaying "processing..." greatly displeases me. not that it matters at all whether i am pleased, lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
