Bitcoin Forum
September 27, 2016, 07:00:30 AM *
News: Due to DDoS attacks, there may be periodic downtime.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3151 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3915

Pages: « 1 ... 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 [592] 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 ... 1104 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3854408 times)
Herp-a-derp
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48


View Profile
August 30, 2013, 04:33:49 PM
 #11821

is the pool still maintained by slush or is he completely busy with Trezzor?

I believe he does maintain the pool, but he said recently that his circumstances were not good.

Mix that in with Trezzor project and I think we could have the reason for his absence. His account at this point in time shows he has not logged in since 21st August.

I may have to move pools soon since I am unable to lower my user diff after testing some higher values. Website shows diff 1, proxy shows diff 5  Roll Eyes and no reply from Slush Undecided



If I were you I would create a new worker, then switch the miner over to the new worker.  The new worker should default at a 1 difficulty.  Then you can delete, abandon (you can have as many as you want anyway), or have slush fix the old worker when he can...



I will give that a go, thanks!



Do NOT, and i repeat again...NOT delete your old worker until you have received your reward from it!!

Point noted. Do you speak from experience on this?
1474959630
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474959630

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474959630
Reply with quote  #2

1474959630
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1474959630
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474959630

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474959630
Reply with quote  #2

1474959630
Report to moderator
BadAss.Sx
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 994


Bulletproof VPS/VPN @ BadAss.Sx


View Profile WWW
August 30, 2013, 05:28:21 PM
 #11822

Quote
Point noted. Do you speak from experience on this?

I have read somewhere that if you delete workers while their reward ain't approved yet or paid out yet, it reduces your total reward. And why should you delete it?  

Need BadAss Bulletproof VPS or Bulletproof VPN or just mail safe with Safe-Mail.
Trongersoll
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


Retired Software Engineer


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 03:02:04 AM
 #11823

The website is down for maintenance? no news on the FB page. Huh

*insert appropriate begging line here* 
BTC: 1CS6AV7VnjcPLxaTFoUhTjXK4mQCTzfSxE
Doge: DB22tiynvXKg7SyPpnH9jyfitKLTZb6ejc
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 06:28:24 AM
 #11824

The website is down for maintenance? no news on the FB page. Huh

I am loading the website fine.
however I am here because I am seeing something odd, and wanted to see if there was something wrong.

several miners are showing abnormally low Hashrates on the website. I checked them locally and they all look fine.
Actually all my miners seem to be 10% lower than normal which is quite odd. across the board losses is a sign something is wrong. I should have some high some low. I have never seen this before.
visdude
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 642


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 06:30:09 AM
 #11825

Well, it's back on but I got terribly shorted:

19826    2013-08-31 04:52:18    2:47:25    88406573    21795    0.00167814
kabopar
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 08:14:52 AM
 #11826

Well, it's back on but I got terribly shorted:

19826    2013-08-31 04:52:18    2:47:25    88406573    21795    0.00167814
Similar situation here

19826    2013-08-31 04:52:18    2:47:25    88406573    4316    0.00044992
Let's hope this will eventually be fixed.

Payout is not happening as usual either  (crossed my payout threshold more than an hour ago,
and it's still there.
Looks like Slush's attention is not on this pool, hope that he's well
TiborB
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 10:29:38 AM
 #11827

Well, it's back on but I got terribly shorted:

19826    2013-08-31 04:52:18    2:47:25    88406573    21795    0.00167814
Similar situation here

19826    2013-08-31 04:52:18    2:47:25    88406573    4316    0.00044992
Let's hope this will eventually be fixed.

Payout is not happening as usual either  (crossed my payout threshold more than an hour ago,
and it's still there.
Looks like Slush's attention is not on this pool, hope that he's well

+1, seems this is a global issue. 49 confirmations left for the block to mature, so there is still some time to get it fixed.
Hiver
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 01:43:46 PM
 #11828

Just adding another confirmation that payout is missing.

Edit: payout was received. Yay!
inevertell
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 02:17:35 PM
 #11829

Just adding another confirmation that payout is missing.

I'm waiting for my payout to happen as well.

We're having wonderful luck right now but something is up, 2 invalid blocks in a row both valid on blockchain.info.  Hopefully our current luck is not effected by anything strange and hopefully slush can pull together the invalid blocks and payout issue.

Hopefully Wink
visdude
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 642


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 03:21:07 PM
 #11830

Make that three invalid blocks in a row.

Edit:  What the kcuf is going on?
console_cowboy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 03:30:40 PM
 #11831

Looks like blockchain.info is undergoing maintenance currently. Perhaps that is why blocks are showing up invalid? If Slush is using blockchain.info for verification (as it appears he might be), then this could be causing our invalid block issues.
TiborB
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 03:33:56 PM
 #11832

Make that three invalid blocks in a row.

I would guess this is a sign of work being done in the background. I believe these blocks are not invalid but marked as such on the pool level (so they do not interfere with rewards), so the operator has some headroom to fix things. We can confirm this once blockchain.info gets back up again.
TiborB
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 03:34:59 PM
 #11833

Looks like blockchain.info is undergoing maintenance currently. Perhaps that is why blocks are showing up invalid? If Slush is using blockchain.info for verification (as it appears he might be), then this could be causing our invalid block issues.

actually, the first 2 were invalid at a time when blockchain.info was still up.
TiborB
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 03:37:26 PM
 #11834

Make that three invalid blocks in a row.

I would guess this is a sign of work being done in the background. I believe these blocks are not invalid but marked as such on the pool level (so they do not interfere with rewards), so the operator has some headroom to fix things. We can confirm this once blockchain.info gets back up again.

Bockchain.info is back. My assumption was wrong, these blocks seem to be orphaned indeed. All 3.
Herp-a-derp
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 03:55:26 PM
 #11835

According to blockexplorer.com, valid Slush block #255116 paid out to address: 1AqTMY7kmHZxBuLUR5wJjPFUvqGs23sesr

http://blockexplorer.com/block/000000000000002d82d1dba4a81329a57a6572be936ff0f4debc09b2d93ff92b

Blocks #255153, #255157 and #255177 also paid out the same address making them valid Slush blocks.

255153 http://blockexplorer.com/block/000000000000003f0e0aa2097d5d965b489adf21fb7a27edb8da688af31c5562
255157 http://blockexplorer.com/block/00000000000000077381a7848fa5059ee5c038e0f8083696d61f8d253fc0b130
255177 http://blockexplorer.com/block/000000000000000fbcaf090fec56f5834891663e133104f7b9e241d3bbf2905e

Someone correct me if I am wrong here.

Edit: #255153 appears to be valid again according to the stats page.
Edit 2: All blocks valid again and 255177 has correct pay out value.
BuhTuglia
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 137



View Profile WWW
August 31, 2013, 04:09:24 PM
 #11836


Not a bad run so far...

Just another dust miner... Enquiring Gnomes want to Mine!
Send nothing to 16SVa2iQA6HuNPDGYShpmeEvUBRi2gW7f1
console_cowboy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 04:17:45 PM
 #11837

Looks like blockchain.info is undergoing maintenance currently. Perhaps that is why blocks are showing up invalid? If Slush is using blockchain.info for verification (as it appears he might be), then this could be causing our invalid block issues.

actually, the first 2 were invalid at a time when blockchain.info was still up.

I wonder what mechanism they are using to pull the data from blockchain.info. If only part of the site was down, say the mechanism that feeds out block information, then it is possible this could have caused an error on the pool. Could also just be Slush's pool having some issues as well. I am very glad this is now fixed though.
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 04:32:36 PM
 #11838


Not a bad run so far...


Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF.
so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff.
T3NU0US
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 05:03:40 PM
 #11839


Not a bad run so far...


Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF.
so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff.

*apology* I am new to this whole thing and even though I've been trying to read as much as I can the last few weeks, it's a lot to absorb. Please forgive this possibly stupid question.*/apology*

What is DIFF?

I'm a dork. I'm not smart enough to be a geek.
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 05:29:40 PM
 #11840


Not a bad run so far...


Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF.
so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff.

*apology* I am new to this whole thing and even though I've been trying to read as much as I can the last few weeks, it's a lot to absorb. Please forgive this possibly stupid question.*/apology*

What is DIFF?


(I was being sarcastic)

Current Bitcoin block, difficulty:   255299, 65750060
http://dot-bit.org/tools/nextDifficulty.php

simple terms how hard it is to find a block. next GUESS increase is .... 89 516 328  +24million wow its getting crazy up in here!
Pages: « 1 ... 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 [592] 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 ... 1104 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!