Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2017, 09:13:01 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3175 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 408 (10.3%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 362 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3943

Pages: « 1 ... 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 [565] 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 ... 1113 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [150+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 4141007 times)
cosurgi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298


View Profile
July 24, 2013, 12:23:33 PM
 #11281

Looks as it was network wide, Difficulty dropped to 0 for a bit. Shocked

http://btc.marki-online.net/


I think that's a bug on marki-online. Look, the glitch happens exactly when daily avg. hits a 325 TH limit on the plot. Also compare with:
http://bitcoin.sipa.be/speed-lin-2k.png

1495703581
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1495703581

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1495703581
Reply with quote  #2

1495703581
Report to moderator
1495703581
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1495703581

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1495703581
Reply with quote  #2

1495703581
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1495703581
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1495703581

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1495703581
Reply with quote  #2

1495703581
Report to moderator
macsheadroom
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 97


Computer Service Tech


View Profile
July 24, 2013, 06:39:39 PM
 #11282

Looks as it was network wide, Difficulty dropped to 0 for a bit. Shocked

http://btc.marki-online.net/


I think that's a bug on marki-online. Look, the glitch happens exactly when daily avg. hits a 325 TH limit on the plot. Also compare with:
http://bitcoin.sipa.be/speed-lin-2k.png

Ah, I see said the blind man.

1FQkmrwQ7yf9MKGLsAUhY2jgMT8WjepwL7
CheezWiz
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31



View Profile
July 24, 2013, 10:27:46 PM
 #11283

Does this look right?
19256   2013-07-23 14:49:27   4:07:06   81656872   3142   0.00000000

No cut for over 3K shares...

-------------
Cheez\/\/iz
haveagr8day
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
July 25, 2013, 06:40:21 AM
 #11284

Does this look right?
19256   2013-07-23 14:49:27   4:07:06   81656872   3142   0.00000000

No cut for over 3K shares...

Were you mining for the whole round?

░▒▓█ Coinroll.it - 1% House Edge Dice Game █▓▒░ • Coinroll Thread • *FREE* 100 BTC Raffle
Tips: 14pw9gn35ueAWHvdkesQV298QLPWGBESjs
el_rlee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1438


View Profile
July 25, 2013, 12:44:48 PM
 #11285

Is something wrong with the pool luck calculation?
cosurgi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298


View Profile
July 25, 2013, 02:28:28 PM
 #11286

Is something wrong with the pool luck calculation?

According to http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/old_calculator.php average round time at 24.775889 Thash/s  and difficulty 31256960 should be 1 hour 30 minutes. See for yourself what is our current average round time.

Luck is calculated correctly. We are just plain crazy lucky these days.


Synethstesia
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42



View Profile
July 25, 2013, 02:45:43 PM
 #11287

25000 GH/s!

If You're Feeling Generous:
1Jhh2ZA59tmzyaNpX9hG1WvdwcuqJ4mhPG
micalith
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 505



View Profile
July 25, 2013, 02:59:58 PM
 #11288

Ever since an all-night wifi outage, I'm getting frequently underpaid. When calculating the expected btc before my wifi outage, I was getting consistently more than expected. I guess this is a nice example of how the slush points work.

                                                                                         my btc                                  my expected btc     
19289   2013-07-25 14:25:20   3:10:10   65087874   8914   0.00267229   25*8914/   65087874  = 0.0034
19288   2013-07-25 11:15:10   1:06:44   22496665   3072   0.00314420   25*3072/   22496665  = 0.0034
19287   2013-07-25 10:08:26   0:05:58   2027467   308   0.00380032   25*308/   2027467    = 0.0038
19286   2013-07-25 10:02:28   0:01:30   497916   70   0.00342332   25*70 /497916           = 0.0035
19285   2013-07-25 10:00:58   2:29:49   50785547   4448   0.00315257   25*4448/50785547     = 0.0022

(The last one is higher than expected as I switched on my miners half way through that round)


My question is, how long does it take to get back on to better than expected btc? Cheers

nullius in verba
Trongersoll
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


Retired Software Engineer


View Profile
July 25, 2013, 04:10:13 PM
 #11289

Ever since an all-night wifi outage, I'm getting frequently underpaid. When calculating the expected btc before my wifi outage, I was getting consistently more than expected. I guess this is a nice example of how the slush points work.

                                                                                         my btc                                  my expected btc     
19289   2013-07-25 14:25:20   3:10:10   65087874   8914   0.00267229   25*8914/   65087874  = 0.0034
19288   2013-07-25 11:15:10   1:06:44   22496665   3072   0.00314420   25*3072/   22496665  = 0.0034
19287   2013-07-25 10:08:26   0:05:58   2027467   308   0.00380032   25*308/   2027467    = 0.0038
19286   2013-07-25 10:02:28   0:01:30   497916   70   0.00342332   25*70 /497916           = 0.0035
19285   2013-07-25 10:00:58   2:29:49   50785547   4448   0.00315257   25*4448/50785547     = 0.0022

(The last one is higher than expected as I switched on my miners half way through that round)


My question is, how long does it take to get back on to better than expected btc? Cheers


This is also affected by increases in our Hashrate. If our hashrate goes up your return will go down. But, it should be offset by increasing the number of blocks we find. You really can't tell much looking at each individual block, your graph 7 day average is a better indicater.

angryrob
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 251



View Profile
July 25, 2013, 04:37:31 PM
 #11290

i just noticed that it broke thru 25 TH/s

that is the highest i've ever seen the 30-minute average for slush ^_^

gg

bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
July 25, 2013, 04:48:34 PM
 #11291

i just noticed that it broke thru 25 TH/s

that is the highest i've ever seen the 30-minute average for slush ^_^

gg

It is cuz I added another GPU Miner... I do that and someone adds like 200 Jalapenos!
Trongersoll
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


Retired Software Engineer


View Profile
July 25, 2013, 05:35:12 PM
 #11292

i just noticed that it broke thru 25 TH/s

that is the highest i've ever seen the 30-minute average for slush ^_^

gg

It is cuz I added another GPU Miner... I do that and someone adds like 200 Jalapenos!

I feel that way everytime i add a ASICminer stick.  Undecided

micalith
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 505



View Profile
July 25, 2013, 06:02:47 PM
 #11293

Ever since an all-night wifi outage, I'm getting frequently underpaid. When calculating the expected btc before my wifi outage, I was getting consistently more than expected. I guess this is a nice example of how the slush points work.

                                                                                         my btc                                  my expected btc      
19289   2013-07-25 14:25:20   3:10:10   65087874   8914   0.00267229   25*8914/   65087874  = 0.0034
19288   2013-07-25 11:15:10   1:06:44   22496665   3072   0.00314420   25*3072/   22496665  = 0.0034
19287   2013-07-25 10:08:26   0:05:58   2027467   308   0.00380032   25*308/   2027467    = 0.0038
19286   2013-07-25 10:02:28   0:01:30   497916   70   0.00342332   25*70 /497916           = 0.0035
19285   2013-07-25 10:00:58   2:29:49   50785547   4448   0.00315257   25*4448/50785547     = 0.0022

(The last one is higher than expected as I switched on my miners half way through that round)


My question is, how long does it take to get back on to better than expected btc? Cheers


This is also affected by increases in our Hashrate. If our hashrate goes up your return will go down. But, it should be offset by increasing the number of blocks we find. You really can't tell much looking at each individual block, your graph 7 day average is a better indicater.

OK, so you're saying it was a coincidence that this hashrate increase, at the apex of my going from >expected to <expected happened while my miners were having a nap. I wonder what the odds are.

How does the hashrate relate to the shares per block being different? I can't see how that works.


nullius in verba
5120-01-518-6126
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 175


< My mining rig >


View Profile
July 25, 2013, 08:07:57 PM
 #11294


This is also affected by increases in our Hashrate. If our hashrate goes up your return will go down. But, it should be offset by increasing the number of blocks we find. You really can't tell much looking at each individual block, your graph 7 day average is a better indicater.

OK, so you're saying it was a coincidence that this hashrate increase, at the apex of my going from >expected to <expected happened while my miners were having a nap. I wonder what the odds are.

How does the hashrate relate to the shares per block being different? I can't see how that works.


If the pool hash rate stays the same while the network hash rate increases, the pool's chance of finding a block decreases, i.e., it will take longer on average for the pool to find a block.  Similarly, if the pool hash rate is increasing while the network hash rate stays the same, the pool's chance of finding a block increases, resulting in shorter round times.

Now, if your hash rate stays the same while the pool's hash rate increases, your share of the pot decreases because your payout is based in part on your_shares_submitted_during_round divided by pool_shares_submitted_during_round.  Your lower payout will be offset a bit if the pool has an increasing hash rate because the pool will find on average, more blocks.
micalith
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 505



View Profile
July 25, 2013, 09:52:48 PM
 #11295


This is also affected by increases in our Hashrate. If our hashrate goes up your return will go down. But, it should be offset by increasing the number of blocks we find. You really can't tell much looking at each individual block, your graph 7 day average is a better indicater.

OK, so you're saying it was a coincidence that this hashrate increase, at the apex of my going from >expected to <expected happened while my miners were having a nap. I wonder what the odds are.

How does the hashrate relate to the shares per block being different? I can't see how that works.


If the pool hash rate stays the same while the network hash rate increases, the pool's chance of finding a block decreases, i.e., it will take longer on average for the pool to find a block.  Similarly, if the pool hash rate is increasing while the network hash rate stays the same, the pool's chance of finding a block increases, resulting in shorter round times.

Now, if your hash rate stays the same while the pool's hash rate increases, your share of the pot decreases because your payout is based in part on your_shares_submitted_during_round divided by pool_shares_submitted_during_round.  Your lower payout will be offset a bit if the pool has an increasing hash rate because the pool will find on average, more blocks.

I understand that  your_shares_submitted_during_round / pool_shares_submitted_during_round     is what is affected by respective varying hashrates. As such, an increase in the pool's total hashrate explains why I would get a smaller proportion of the total shares for a block. I know that here is added variance to do with how close your last share in the block is to the end of the block, which would explain why the shares proportion doesn't translate perfectly to my earnt BTC as with a proportional earning pool. What I didn't get was why my earnings might have been more than expected more often than less than expected, until I stopped mining for 8 hours, then started again, with more 'balanced' expected earnings.

To be sure, I plotted the numbers for before and after the outage, though not really enough points to confirm anything. I'm guessing that I was just having a lucky run before the outage. If that's right, then there's no long-term penalty for disconnecting other than the current round. Is that right?

nullius in verba
Trongersoll
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


Retired Software Engineer


View Profile
July 25, 2013, 11:38:37 PM
 #11296


This is also affected by increases in our Hashrate. If our hashrate goes up your return will go down. But, it should be offset by increasing the number of blocks we find. You really can't tell much looking at each individual block, your graph 7 day average is a better indicater.

OK, so you're saying it was a coincidence that this hashrate increase, at the apex of my going from >expected to <expected happened while my miners were having a nap. I wonder what the odds are.

How does the hashrate relate to the shares per block being different? I can't see how that works.


If the pool hash rate stays the same while the network hash rate increases, the pool's chance of finding a block decreases, i.e., it will take longer on average for the pool to find a block.  Similarly, if the pool hash rate is increasing while the network hash rate stays the same, the pool's chance of finding a block increases, resulting in shorter round times.

Now, if your hash rate stays the same while the pool's hash rate increases, your share of the pot decreases because your payout is based in part on your_shares_submitted_during_round divided by pool_shares_submitted_during_round.  Your lower payout will be offset a bit if the pool has an increasing hash rate because the pool will find on average, more blocks.

I understand that  your_shares_submitted_during_round / pool_shares_submitted_during_round     is what is affected by respective varying hashrates. As such, an increase in the pool's total hashrate explains why I would get a smaller proportion of the total shares for a block. I know that here is added variance to do with how close your last share in the block is to the end of the block, which would explain why the shares proportion doesn't translate perfectly to my earnt BTC as with a proportional earning pool. What I didn't get was why my earnings might have been more than expected more often than less than expected, until I stopped mining for 8 hours, then started again, with more 'balanced' expected earnings.

To be sure, I plotted the numbers for before and after the outage, though not really enough points to confirm anything. I'm guessing that I was just having a lucky run before the outage. If that's right, then there's no long-term penalty for disconnecting other than the current round. Is that right?

yes, i believe that is right.

CMMPro
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588



View Profile
July 26, 2013, 01:51:50 AM
 #11297

Is the pool address still having trouble?
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
July 26, 2013, 07:11:43 PM
 #11298

i just noticed that it broke thru 25 TH/s

that is the highest i've ever seen the 30-minute average for slush ^_^

gg

It is cuz I added another GPU Miner... I do that and someone adds like 200 Jalapenos!

I feel that way everytime i add a ASICminer stick.  Undecided

I was going to buy 4 ASICminer stick yesterday... but first I went to the calculator to see much my monthly BTC would increase.... then I increased the diff from 31256960 to 36256960 and noted it negated 2 ASICminer stick, so every 10 days 660mh/s gets negated... So I decided maybe I should stop chasing the diff. the Video cards I can sell at a profit, ASICminer stick will be useless soon. well to most people! people with 50+ already will love every single one tossed out heh
Trongersoll
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


Retired Software Engineer


View Profile
July 26, 2013, 07:54:33 PM
 #11299

i just noticed that it broke thru 25 TH/s

that is the highest i've ever seen the 30-minute average for slush ^_^

gg

It is cuz I added another GPU Miner... I do that and someone adds like 200 Jalapenos!

I feel that way everytime i add a ASICminer stick.  Undecided

I was going to buy 4 ASICminer stick yesterday... but first I went to the calculator to see much my monthly BTC would increase.... then I increased the diff from 31256960 to 36256960 and noted it negated 2 ASICminer stick, so every 10 days 660mh/s gets negated... So I decided maybe I should stop chasing the diff. the Video cards I can sell at a profit, ASICminer stick will be useless soon. well to most people! people with 50+ already will love every single one tossed out heh

or sold for cheap. Grin

digital
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
July 26, 2013, 08:12:49 PM
 #11300

i just noticed that it broke thru 25 TH/s

that is the highest i've ever seen the 30-minute average for slush ^_^

gg

It is cuz I added another GPU Miner... I do that and someone adds like 200 Jalapenos!

I feel that way everytime i add a ASICminer stick.  Undecided

I was going to buy 4 ASICminer stick yesterday... but first I went to the calculator to see much my monthly BTC would increase.... then I increased the diff from 31256960 to 36256960 and noted it negated 2 ASICminer stick, so every 10 days 660mh/s gets negated... So I decided maybe I should stop chasing the diff. the Video cards I can sell at a profit, ASICminer stick will be useless soon. well to most people! people with 50+ already will love every single one tossed out heh

or sold for cheap. Grin

That's what I'm waiting for.  It won't be long before you can get them for $100 or less...

If I help you out: 17QatvSdciyv2zsdAbphDEUzST1S6x46c3
References (bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=): 50051.20  50051.100  53668.0  53788.0  53571.0  53571.0  52212.0  50729.0  114804.0  115468  78106  69061  58572  54747
Pages: « 1 ... 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 [565] 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 ... 1113 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!