Bitcoin Forum
December 02, 2016, 06:35:33 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3160 (80.5%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.1%)
Total Voters: 3924

Pages: « 1 ... 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 [594] 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 ... 1105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3924763 times)
OmegaNemesis28
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280



View Profile WWW
September 02, 2013, 03:30:43 PM
 #11861

Im having issues connecting to the pool. It was fine, but I needed to reboot, and upon reboot it would say "Pool 1 is hiding work"

I tried both stratum and non stratum in BFGminer.

I'm not one for donations but if you must go ahead and I will keep you in mind. =)
http://payb.tc/omeganemesis28
1480703733
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480703733

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480703733
Reply with quote  #2

1480703733
Report to moderator
1480703733
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480703733

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480703733
Reply with quote  #2

1480703733
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480703733
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480703733

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480703733
Reply with quote  #2

1480703733
Report to moderator
tylerik1
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 67


View Profile
September 02, 2013, 04:53:23 PM
 #11862

I cannot withdrawal my coins from the pool.  it has been 2 days since I crossed over the threshold but I am not being credited.  Is something wrong?

Runnea
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile
September 02, 2013, 04:55:58 PM
 #11863

Hi! let's see if anyone can help me i want to get a usb mining think for a birthday present !
if anyone know a cheap site that shipping to sweden ?  Smiley
T3NU0US
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13



View Profile
September 02, 2013, 05:09:25 PM
 #11864


a Diff 65750061/1 share will find a block
Pools distribute Diff1 shares historically to give miners something easier to work on and to count so miners can be paid - now that pools distribute variable difficulty shares (higher for faster miners) they usually convert back to diff1 for counting shares and paying miners

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Difficulty

Pools do not distribute shares.
You find shares and send them to the pool.
Difficulty does not effect how long it takes to calculate the hash, you dont get "something easier to work on", you just dont have to calculate that many hashes before one fits given diff.

Your miners calculate hundreds of thousands of hashes per second. Those match a certain difficulty (and all lower ones).
You choose a diff and send all hashes matching at least that diff as shares to the server.
You tell the server which number is yours, and based on that the server can calculate your hashing power.

If you set a higher diff in the pool config, your miners will do exactly what they did before, they will not calculate more or less or easier tasks or anything.
Your mining client will just send less of your hashes to the pool, and they will be rated higher.

The pool suggests a difficulty of 64 for ASICS running 60 - 120 GH/s.  I would think that the difficulty could be set much higher than 64.  Maybe the purpose is to submit many shares to smooth out the variance?  I am not sure how this number is chosen.  I noticed on one pool I set it very low by mistake and I hardly had any earnings.

So what you're saying then is that the 1/1 shares have value at the cost of devaluation of the higher rated shares?

I'm a dork. I'm not smart enough to be a geek.
OmegaNemesis28
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280



View Profile WWW
September 02, 2013, 05:39:10 PM
 #11865

Im having issues connecting to the pool. It was fine, but I needed to reboot, and upon reboot it would say "Pool 1 is hiding work"

I tried both stratum and non stratum in BFGminer.

sorry "Pool 1 is hiding block contents from us"

I'm not one for donations but if you must go ahead and I will keep you in mind. =)
http://payb.tc/omeganemesis28
-Redacted-
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378



View Profile
September 02, 2013, 05:41:42 PM
 #11866

And is it mining?  Nearly ALL the pools give that error message.  It doesn't keep you from mining.

Now hanging out on Atomic-Trade.com...
gramma
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 194



View Profile
September 02, 2013, 06:19:20 PM
 #11867

And is it mining?  Nearly ALL the pools give that error message.  It doesn't keep you from mining.

If you get stuff like this after that message

    [2013-09-02 12:12:04] Accepted c9fa67f8 ICA 0  pool 0 Diff 1/1

then you're mining.  A lot more help can be found at https://bitcointalk.org/?topic=168174.

BTC: 1MrNRPo7p8DEyxn87c9BCGwrbatBQeCHc1
trasla
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 662



View Profile
September 02, 2013, 08:39:14 PM
 #11868


So what you're saying then is that the 1/1 shares have value at the cost of devaluation of the higher rated shares?

I am not quite sure i get what you are saying, but probably: yes.
If you submit 1-shares, you will submit more shares to the server, but they will give you less score.
If you set the diff higher, you will submit less shares, but they will score higher.
That way, your average score will always be the same.

Higher diff means more variance but less network load.
Trongersoll
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


Retired Software Engineer


View Profile
September 02, 2013, 10:26:48 PM
 #11869

um... i have no use for namecoins, other that to convert them to bitcoins. I have the namcoin address pointing to my address on BTC-e everything was fat, dumb, and happy. the address worked ok on BTCguild. I've never had enough namecoin to pay out on Slush. Well, today, Slush pool is saying that the address isn't valid and that i sould get a namecoin client. Tongue

Any idea what is going on? Not enough namecoin to go crazy about.

*insert appropriate begging line here* 
BTC: 1CS6AV7VnjcPLxaTFoUhTjXK4mQCTzfSxE
Doge: DB22tiynvXKg7SyPpnH9jyfitKLTZb6ejc
T3NU0US
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13



View Profile
September 02, 2013, 10:29:01 PM
 #11870


So what you're saying then is that the 1/1 shares have value at the cost of devaluation of the higher rated shares?

I am not quite sure i get what you are saying, but probably: yes.
If you submit 1-shares, you will submit more shares to the server, but they will give you less score.
If you set the diff higher, you will submit less shares, but they will score higher.
That way, your average score will always be the same.

Higher diff means more variance but less network load.

Okay, that is helpful to know. I'm still wrapping my head around all of this so I appreciate the responses.

I'm a dork. I'm not smart enough to be a geek.
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
September 02, 2013, 10:44:26 PM
 #11871

Im having issues connecting to the pool. It was fine, but I needed to reboot, and upon reboot it would say "Pool 1 is hiding work"

I tried both stratum and non stratum in BFGminer.

sorry "Pool 1 is hiding block contents from us"

as far as I know that is a normal message to be ignored.
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569


View Profile
September 02, 2013, 10:46:53 PM
 #11872


So what you're saying then is that the 1/1 shares have value at the cost of devaluation of the higher rated shares?

I am not quite sure i get what you are saying, but probably: yes.
If you submit 1-shares, you will submit more shares to the server, but they will give you less score.
If you set the diff higher, you will submit less shares, but they will score higher.
That way, your average score will always be the same.

Higher diff means more variance but less network load.

Okay, that is helpful to know. I'm still wrapping my head around all of this so I appreciate the responses.

kind of like how BFL is wrapping their head around all the people contacting their credit card company for non delivery, and getting their money back via paypal haha...
cableiso
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 74


View Profile
September 02, 2013, 10:49:54 PM
 #11873

I also noticed the new namecoin warning, when using a valid address.  Is this the first glimpses of merged mining coming back to life? 


um... i have no use for namecoins, other that to convert them to bitcoins. I have the namcoin address pointing to my address on BTC-e everything was fat, dumb, and happy. the address worked ok on BTCguild. I've never had enough namecoin to pay out on Slush. Well, today, Slush pool is saying that the address isn't valid and that i sould get a namecoin client. Tongue

Any idea what is going on? Not enough namecoin to go crazy about.

bitzip
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54



View Profile
September 02, 2013, 11:02:09 PM
 #11874

I also noticed the new namecoin warning, when using a valid address.  Is this the first glimpses of merged mining coming back to life? 


um... i have no use for namecoins, other that to convert them to bitcoins. I have the namcoin address pointing to my address on BTC-e everything was fat, dumb, and happy. the address worked ok on BTCguild. I've never had enough namecoin to pay out on Slush. Well, today, Slush pool is saying that the address isn't valid and that i sould get a namecoin client. Tongue

Any idea what is going on? Not enough namecoin to go crazy about.



I got the same message.   Huh  I think it is a valid address, I never had enough coins to get a payout.

Trongersoll
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


Retired Software Engineer


View Profile
September 02, 2013, 11:02:41 PM
 #11875

I also noticed the new namecoin warning, when using a valid address.  Is this the first glimpses of merged mining coming back to life? 


um... i have no use for namecoins, other that to convert them to bitcoins. I have the namcoin address pointing to my address on BTC-e everything was fat, dumb, and happy. the address worked ok on BTCguild. I've never had enough namecoin to pay out on Slush. Well, today, Slush pool is saying that the address isn't valid and that i sould get a namecoin client. Tongue

Any idea what is going on? Not enough namecoin to go crazy about.

Slush was playing around with the website this week, maybe he borked sumptin.

*insert appropriate begging line here* 
BTC: 1CS6AV7VnjcPLxaTFoUhTjXK4mQCTzfSxE
Doge: DB22tiynvXKg7SyPpnH9jyfitKLTZb6ejc
cableiso
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 74


View Profile
September 02, 2013, 11:22:32 PM
 #11876

Why is it that slush's pool doesn't do merged mining?  I saw the explanation about stratum, but other pools seem to use stratum and merged mining.  Different daemon or something?
TheJamesFund
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 44


View Profile
September 03, 2013, 02:47:15 AM
 #11877

What..... we getting Name Coins? I don't see anything on account status of getting any? Says 0?
cableiso
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 74


View Profile
September 03, 2013, 03:13:53 AM
 #11878

Probably not, just hopeful.

What..... we getting Name Coins? I don't see anything on account status of getting any? Says 0?
unknown.usr
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106


View Profile
September 03, 2013, 01:55:50 PM
 #11879

Slow again.  Bleh.
bigbeninlondon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
September 03, 2013, 01:56:29 PM
 #11880

I also noticed the new namecoin warning, when using a valid address.  Is this the first glimpses of merged mining coming back to life? 

Or it's final death throes.
Pages: « 1 ... 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 [594] 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 ... 1105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!