Bitcoin Forum
April 28, 2024, 06:34:30 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 [591] 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 ... 1154 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool  (Read 4381856 times)
console_cowboy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 03:30:40 PM
 #11801

Looks like blockchain.info is undergoing maintenance currently. Perhaps that is why blocks are showing up invalid? If Slush is using blockchain.info for verification (as it appears he might be), then this could be causing our invalid block issues.
1714286070
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714286070

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714286070
Reply with quote  #2

1714286070
Report to moderator
1714286070
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714286070

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714286070
Reply with quote  #2

1714286070
Report to moderator
1714286070
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714286070

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714286070
Reply with quote  #2

1714286070
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714286070
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714286070

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714286070
Reply with quote  #2

1714286070
Report to moderator
TiborB
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 03:33:56 PM
 #11802

Make that three invalid blocks in a row.

I would guess this is a sign of work being done in the background. I believe these blocks are not invalid but marked as such on the pool level (so they do not interfere with rewards), so the operator has some headroom to fix things. We can confirm this once blockchain.info gets back up again.
TiborB
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 03:34:59 PM
 #11803

Looks like blockchain.info is undergoing maintenance currently. Perhaps that is why blocks are showing up invalid? If Slush is using blockchain.info for verification (as it appears he might be), then this could be causing our invalid block issues.

actually, the first 2 were invalid at a time when blockchain.info was still up.
TiborB
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 03:37:26 PM
 #11804

Make that three invalid blocks in a row.

I would guess this is a sign of work being done in the background. I believe these blocks are not invalid but marked as such on the pool level (so they do not interfere with rewards), so the operator has some headroom to fix things. We can confirm this once blockchain.info gets back up again.

Bockchain.info is back. My assumption was wrong, these blocks seem to be orphaned indeed. All 3.
Herp-a-derp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 03:55:26 PM
 #11805

According to blockexplorer.com, valid Slush block #255116 paid out to address: 1AqTMY7kmHZxBuLUR5wJjPFUvqGs23sesr

http://blockexplorer.com/block/000000000000002d82d1dba4a81329a57a6572be936ff0f4debc09b2d93ff92b

Blocks #255153, #255157 and #255177 also paid out the same address making them valid Slush blocks.

255153 http://blockexplorer.com/block/000000000000003f0e0aa2097d5d965b489adf21fb7a27edb8da688af31c5562
255157 http://blockexplorer.com/block/00000000000000077381a7848fa5059ee5c038e0f8083696d61f8d253fc0b130
255177 http://blockexplorer.com/block/000000000000000fbcaf090fec56f5834891663e133104f7b9e241d3bbf2905e

Someone correct me if I am wrong here.

Edit: #255153 appears to be valid again according to the stats page.
Edit 2: All blocks valid again and 255177 has correct pay out value.
BuhTuglia
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 137
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
August 31, 2013, 04:09:24 PM
 #11806


Not a bad run so far...

Just another dust miner... Enquiring Gnomes want to Mine!
Send nothing to 16SVa2iQA6HuNPDGYShpmeEvUBRi2gW7f1
console_cowboy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 04:17:45 PM
 #11807

Looks like blockchain.info is undergoing maintenance currently. Perhaps that is why blocks are showing up invalid? If Slush is using blockchain.info for verification (as it appears he might be), then this could be causing our invalid block issues.

actually, the first 2 were invalid at a time when blockchain.info was still up.

I wonder what mechanism they are using to pull the data from blockchain.info. If only part of the site was down, say the mechanism that feeds out block information, then it is possible this could have caused an error on the pool. Could also just be Slush's pool having some issues as well. I am very glad this is now fixed though.
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 04:32:36 PM
 #11808


Not a bad run so far...


Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF.
so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff.
T3NU0US
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 05:03:40 PM
 #11809


Not a bad run so far...


Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF.
so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff.

*apology* I am new to this whole thing and even though I've been trying to read as much as I can the last few weeks, it's a lot to absorb. Please forgive this possibly stupid question.*/apology*

What is DIFF?
bspurloc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 05:29:40 PM
 #11810


Not a bad run so far...


Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF.
so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff.

*apology* I am new to this whole thing and even though I've been trying to read as much as I can the last few weeks, it's a lot to absorb. Please forgive this possibly stupid question.*/apology*

What is DIFF?


(I was being sarcastic)

Current Bitcoin block, difficulty:   255299, 65750060
http://dot-bit.org/tools/nextDifficulty.php

simple terms how hard it is to find a block. next GUESS increase is .... 89 516 328  +24million wow its getting crazy up in here!
crhys
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109
Merit: 10

Bitcoin Foundation Member


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 05:33:52 PM
 #11811


Not a bad run so far...


Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF.
so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff.

*apology* I am new to this whole thing and even though I've been trying to read as much as I can the last few weeks, it's a lot to absorb. Please forgive this possibly stupid question.*/apology*

What is DIFF?



It refers to difficulty, it an automatic thing which makes mining bitcoin more difficult the faster they are found, basically its to keep the bitcoin law true "coins can only be found once every 10 minutes (on average)".

That the jist of it, I am also a newb so might have forgotten something :-)

 

16JZWC433XRxjWwR7X65uxRVFdLTmoPr4t
unknown.usr
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 06:27:37 PM
 #11812


Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF.
so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff.

+1  Smiley
Trongersoll
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 501



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 06:46:27 PM
 #11813


Not a bad run so far...


Yeah! I want to go on record and blame this good luck on the DIFF.
so keep that in mind when we have bad luck it cant be the diff.

*apology* I am new to this whole thing and even though I've been trying to read as much as I can the last few weeks, it's a lot to absorb. Please forgive this possibly stupid question.*/apology*

What is DIFF?


(I was being sarcastic)

Current Bitcoin block, difficulty:   255299, 65750060
http://dot-bit.org/tools/nextDifficulty.php

simple terms how hard it is to find a block. next GUESS increase is .... 89 516 328  +24million wow its getting crazy up in here!


Everytime we have a run of bad luck people blame it on the difficulty, which isn't likely. so he was being funny.
TiborB
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 31, 2013, 07:27:06 PM
 #11814

Looks like blockchain.info is undergoing maintenance currently. Perhaps that is why blocks are showing up invalid? If Slush is using blockchain.info for verification (as it appears he might be), then this could be causing our invalid block issues.

actually, the first 2 were invalid at a time when blockchain.info was still up.

I wonder what mechanism they are using to pull the data from blockchain.info. If only part of the site was down, say the mechanism that feeds out block information, then it is possible this could have caused an error on the pool. Could also just be Slush's pool having some issues as well. I am very glad this is now fixed though.

Actually, I am rather surprised to see those blocks valid on blockchain.info, then after an outage as orphaned, then later as valid again. What I saw there made me draw premature conclusions...
I would not take if for granted that the pool uses blockchain.info services to decide if a block is valid (on the main chain, not orphaned) or not... AFAIK any bitcoin client can give you that information.
console_cowboy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 08:01:57 PM
 #11815

Looks like blockchain.info is undergoing maintenance currently. Perhaps that is why blocks are showing up invalid? If Slush is using blockchain.info for verification (as it appears he might be), then this could be causing our invalid block issues.

actually, the first 2 were invalid at a time when blockchain.info was still up.

I wonder what mechanism they are using to pull the data from blockchain.info. If only part of the site was down, say the mechanism that feeds out block information, then it is possible this could have caused an error on the pool. Could also just be Slush's pool having some issues as well. I am very glad this is now fixed though.

Actually, I am rather surprised to see those blocks valid on blockchain.info, then after an outage as orphaned, then later as valid again. What I saw there made me draw premature conclusions...
I would not take if for granted that the pool uses blockchain.info services to decide if a block is valid (on the main chain, not orphaned) or not... AFAIK any bitcoin client can give you that information.



This is very true. I imagine that someone with Slush's knowledge would not be relying on an external service. Good call.
cosurgi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 10:33:57 AM
 #11816

190% luck! Incredible.

Quote
Pool luck (1 day, 7 days, 30 days):   190%, 100%, 101%

unknown.usr
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 03:36:23 PM
 #11817

Just curious, why does this happen?


19854   2013-09-01 15:26:31   0:09:01   5753209   none   none   255501   25.18890280    99 confirmations left


Never mind, it updated a few moments later.
BuhTuglia
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 137
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 01, 2013, 05:57:49 PM
 #11818


Great run until that six hour iceberg hit. Well, can't have everything.

russell

Just another dust miner... Enquiring Gnomes want to Mine!
Send nothing to 16SVa2iQA6HuNPDGYShpmeEvUBRi2gW7f1
Behemot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 152
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
September 01, 2013, 10:14:57 PM
 #11819

If I'd delete my account in pool, will I be payed off automatically?

pembo210
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 74
Merit: 10



View Profile
September 01, 2013, 10:58:12 PM
 #11820

If I'd delete my account in pool, will I be payed off automatically?
I think if you set your Send Threshold to lower than your Confirmed Reward, it will auto payout. Same with leftover NMC.
Pages: « 1 ... 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 [591] 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 ... 1154 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!