Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history)

[00Smurf]

Still no apology or an actual steps to remedy this situation like showing some work being done? And by work I mean code, not a list of things anybody can pull out of their ass. A trusted person from the the larger bitcointalk community would be sufficient to take a look and give a brief summary.

Btw, its quite funny how they point to donations that have not been touched meanwhile big bucks where behind the recent p&d enabling them to take huge profits.

If anybody knows a team of devs working on a zerocoin implementation (not zerocash) let me know, I would very much much like to support them. I am really not interested in sociopaths, scammers or young boys learning to program. It is obvious Gnosis knows shit about programming and even when he finally implements ZC, the code would be shit and it will get hacked in no time.

Come check out SDC - Shadowcash, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.0 . Check out the roadmap and look at the projects released thus far. Head into IRC channel on freenode #shadowcash or #shadow on irc.anonops the dev is active and avail usually everyday if you have questions.

This is the only other promising altcoin developing ZK that isn't a scam. With ANC's 2-3 month delay this leaves only SDC with the ability to release ZK in the short term.

These shadow coin guys are assholes. At least the ones who spam other coins threads. Not long ago they completely fucked over StealthCoin spreading fud, a lot of good people lost a lot of money. I personally lost a lot of money. So whenever I see them spam other threads like this it really pisses me off.

So i answered a question and now that makes me an asshole?

I'm sure Blocknet will "save" xst.

I really don't know who you are, so I couldn't say. I'm just saying it seems to me a lot of you shadow coin guys have a nasty habit of posting stuff in other coins threads. Most people I know don't much care for that, and consider it spam. Can't your coin speak for itself without you guys spamming in ever other coins thread?

I hold ANC coin too, I feel i am entitled as a holder to express my opinion and hold a discussion as well as answer questions posted by other members.

Every coin has its eccentrics people, and die hard supporters, To dismiss any coin project just because of a few emotional people is not right.

As far as ANC goes i'm half a mind to believe that the delay is a ruse in order to gain cheap ANC, as the timing of the delay announcement is very convenient. On the flip side the delay announcement is also convenient as a way to run a hype/pump and dump.

That being said with the delay announcement, the only coin close to releasing ZK in the short term is SDC. For those of us here investing for the tech, it seems logical to keep and eye on it at the very least.

If the ANC delay is true, then it means they have dropped the ball, and now it leaves the way open for another coin to release ZK, while we are sitting here waiting 2-3 months on something that may still not even be delivered.

A smart investor hedges, I have reduced my ANC holdings a bit accordingly with the announcement of the delay. I still hope to see the tech development but a smart investor always diversify's.

[tljenson]

Still no apology or an actual steps to remedy this situation like showing some work being done? And by work I mean code, not a list of things anybody can pull out of their ass. A trusted person from the the larger bitcointalk community would be sufficient to take a look and give a brief summary.

Btw, its quite funny how they point to donations that have not been touched meanwhile big bucks where behind the recent p&d enabling them to take huge profits.

If anybody knows a team of devs working on a zerocoin implementation (not zerocash) let me know, I would very much much like to support them. I am really not interested in sociopaths, scammers or young boys learning to program. It is obvious Gnosis knows shit about programming and even when he finally implements ZC, the code would be shit and it will get hacked in no time.

Come check out SDC - Shadowcash, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.0 . Check out the roadmap and look at the projects released thus far. Head into IRC channel on freenode #shadowcash or #shadow on irc.anonops the dev is active and avail usually everyday if you have questions.

This is the only other promising altcoin developing ZK that isn't a scam. With ANC's 2-3 month delay this leaves only SDC with the ability to release ZK in the short term.

These shadow coin guys are assholes. At least the ones who spam other coins threads. Not long ago they completely fucked over StealthCoin spreading fud, a lot of good people lost a lot of money. I personally lost a lot of money. So whenever I see them spam other threads like this it really pisses me off.

So i answered a question and now that makes me an asshole?

I'm sure Blocknet will "save" xst.

I really don't know who you are, so I couldn't say. I'm just saying it seems to me a lot of you shadow coin guys have a nasty habit of posting stuff in other coins threads. Most people I know don't much care for that, and consider it spam. Can't your coin speak for itself without you guys spamming in ever other coins thread?

I hold ANC coin too, I feel i am entitled as a holder to express my opinion and hold a discussion as well as answer questions posted by other members.

Every coin has its eccentrics people, and die hard supporters, To dismiss any coin project just because of a few emotional people is not right.

As far as ANC goes i'm half a mind to believe that the delay is a ruse in order to gain cheap ANC, as the timing of the delay announcement is very convenient. On the flip side the delay announcement is also convenient as a way to run a hype/pump and dump.

That being said with the delay announcement, the only coin close to releasing ZK in the short term is SDC. For those of us here investing for the tech, it seems logical to keep and eye on it at the very least.

If the ANC delay is true, then it means they have dropped the ball, and now it leaves the way open for another coin to release ZK, while we are sitting here waiting 2-3 months on something that may still not even be delivered.

A smart investor hedges, I have reduced my ANC holdings a bit accordingly with the announcement of the delay. I still hope to see the tech development but a smart investor always diversify's.

I don't see how your helping anybody especially this coin. You damaging ANON coin by drawing investors away from a coin that is already in critical condition. After all the damage your trolls did over on the StealthCoin thread. I just don't have that much sympathy for Shadow coin. Trolls from you coin have already cost a lot of people a lot of money. Sure you have a right to be heard. You can post whatever you want on this thread, but as somebody who was fucked by trolls from Shadow Coin, I feel obligated to speak out.

Shadow coin is not the only option, as of now Stealth Coin and Boolberry are better coins in my opinion. LiteCoinDark has some interesting stuff in the works. Shadow coin isn't the only coin people might want to look at to hedge their bets against AnonCoin, but I don't see anybody from their threads spamming the AnonCoin thread about how good their coin is. If you ask me sounds like a lot of Shadow coin people are worried about their coin or they wouldn't be bothering people on other coins threads.

You've already made your point, but I can tell you from my experience with XST thread, I warn everybody reading this that Shadow coin fudders they really hurt a lot of people over on the Steath Coin thread. Here is an article about the whole fiasco. Read it for youselves and tell me there isn't a problem with spammers from Shadow Coin.

STEALTHCOIN PRICE PLUMMETS AMID OVERT COMMUNITY CHAOS

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/stealthcoin-price-plummets-amid-overt-community-chaos/

In fact the Fudding had reached so high the Shadow Coin dev felt compelled, to be intereview to defend his coin because it was causing that coin damage as well.

Interview With ShadowCoin’s Community Manager On Recent Concerns

http://www.coinssource.com/interview-with-shadowcoin-community-manager-recent-concerns/


All I am saying is Smurf is walking on egg Shells. I think he should be careful about what he says or does, because I hate to see it damage to AnonCoin as well.

[00Smurf]

Still no apology or an actual steps to remedy this situation like showing some work being done? And by work I mean code, not a list of things anybody can pull out of their ass. A trusted person from the the larger bitcointalk community would be sufficient to take a look and give a brief summary.

Btw, its quite funny how they point to donations that have not been touched meanwhile big bucks where behind the recent p&d enabling them to take huge profits.

If anybody knows a team of devs working on a zerocoin implementation (not zerocash) let me know, I would very much much like to support them. I am really not interested in sociopaths, scammers or young boys learning to program. It is obvious Gnosis knows shit about programming and even when he finally implements ZC, the code would be shit and it will get hacked in no time.

Come check out SDC - Shadowcash, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=745352.0 . Check out the roadmap and look at the projects released thus far. Head into IRC channel on freenode #shadowcash or #shadow on irc.anonops the dev is active and avail usually everyday if you have questions.

This is the only other promising altcoin developing ZK that isn't a scam. With ANC's 2-3 month delay this leaves only SDC with the ability to release ZK in the short term.

These shadow coin guys are assholes. At least the ones who spam other coins threads. Not long ago they completely fucked over StealthCoin spreading fud, a lot of good people lost a lot of money. I personally lost a lot of money. So whenever I see them spam other threads like this it really pisses me off.

So i answered a question and now that makes me an asshole?

I'm sure Blocknet will "save" xst.

I really don't know who you are, so I couldn't say. I'm just saying it seems to me a lot of you shadow coin guys have a nasty habit of posting stuff in other coins threads. Most people I know don't much care for that, and consider it spam. Can't your coin speak for itself without you guys spamming in ever other coins thread?

I hold ANC coin too, I feel i am entitled as a holder to express my opinion and hold a discussion as well as answer questions posted by other members.

Every coin has its eccentrics people, and die hard supporters, To dismiss any coin project just because of a few emotional people is not right.

As far as ANC goes i'm half a mind to believe that the delay is a ruse in order to gain cheap ANC, as the timing of the delay announcement is very convenient. On the flip side the delay announcement is also convenient as a way to run a hype/pump and dump.

That being said with the delay announcement, the only coin close to releasing ZK in the short term is SDC. For those of us here investing for the tech, it seems logical to keep and eye on it at the very least.

If the ANC delay is true, then it means they have dropped the ball, and now it leaves the way open for another coin to release ZK, while we are sitting here waiting 2-3 months on something that may still not even be delivered.

A smart investor hedges, I have reduced my ANC holdings a bit accordingly with the announcement of the delay. I still hope to see the tech development but a smart investor always diversify's.

I don't see how your helping anybody especially this coin. You damaging ANON coin by drawing investors away from a coin that is already in critical condition. After all the damage your trolls did over on the StealthCoin thread. I just don't have that much sympathy for Shadow coin. Trolls from you coin have already cost a lot of people a lot of money. Sure you have a right to be heard. You can post whatever you want on this thread, but as somebody who was fucked by trolls from Shadow Coin, I feel obligated to speak out.

Shadow coin is not the only option, as of now Stealth Coin and Boolberry are better coins in my opinion. LiteCoinDark has some interesting stuff in the works. Shadow coin isn't the only coin people might want to look at to hedge their bets against AnonCoin, but I don't see anybody from their threads spamming the AnonCoin thread about how good their coin is. If you ask me sounds like a lot of Shadow coin people are worried about their coin or they wouldn't be bothering people on other coins threads.

You've already made your point, but I can tell you from my experience with XST thread, I warn everybody reading this that Shadow coin fudders they really hurt a lot of people over on the Steath Coin thread. Here is an article about the whole fiasco. Read it for youselves and tell me there isn't a problem with spammers from Shadow Coin.

STEALTHCOIN PRICE PLUMMETS AMID OVERT COMMUNITY CHAOS

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/stealthcoin-price-plummets-amid-overt-community-chaos/

In fact the Fudding had reached so high the Shadow Coin dev felt compelled, to be intereview to defend his coin because it was causing that coin damage as well.

Interview With ShadowCoin’s Community Manager On Recent Concerns

http://www.coinssource.com/interview-with-shadowcoin-community-manager-recent-concerns/


All I am saying is Smurf is walking on egg Shells. I think he should be careful about what he says or does, because I hate to see it damage to AnonCoin as well.

So i will be the scapegoat for the anoncoin failure? I lost value with the anoncoin delay too.

Lets not leave out a more relevant article on the XST - SDC cross posting.

STEALTHCOIN, SHADOWCASH, CHANDRAN SIGNATURES, BITCOIN-WIZARDS : WHAT REALLY HAPPENED AND WHY THERE IS A REASON FOR CONCERN

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/stealthcoin-shadowcash-chandran-signatures-bitcoin-wizards-what-really-happened-and-why-there-is-a-reason-for-concern

"Shadow coin is not the only option, as of now Stealth Coin and Boolberry are better coins in my opinion. LiteCoinDark has some interesting stuff in the works. Shadow coin isn't the only coin people might want to look at to hedge their bets against AnonCoin, but I don't see anybody from their threads spamming the AnonCoin thread about how good their coin is. If you ask me sounds like a lot of Shadow coin people are worried about their coin or they wouldn't be bothering people on other coins threads. "

  Your right though, Sdc isn't the only coin to hedge bets on, But it is the only other one that i am aware of that will be implementing a ZK solution, anything less is not 100% anonymous or trustless and thus is not really a competitor in the technical sense to anoncoin.

I do like boolberry over XMR or XST for a cryptonote tech solution though.

[tljenson]

STEALTHCOIN, SHADOWCASH, CHANDRAN SIGNATURES, BITCOIN-WIZARDS : WHAT REALLY HAPPENED AND WHY THERE IS A REASON FOR CONCERN

http://www.cryptoarticles.com/crypto-news/stealthcoin-shadowcash-chandran-signatures-bitcoin-wizards-what-really-happened-and-why-there-is-a-reason-for-concern
[/quote]


Ok you've made you point. I get it you think that Shadow Coin is the cats meow. Now can we get back to talking about AnonCoin. Instead of spaming the shit out of the thread about other coins. Now I've become part of the problem. So I'm stoping, I hope Smurf stops as well.  

[TheKoziTwo]

I made a transfer from my anoncoin wallet and it's closing in on 48 hours yet nothing in the blockchain. I paid 0.2 ANC in fee.

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Transaction id: 01231a2a5ff2adcc6b4fe6b5a4da86483621c8906bfaa0f552d23d0987fefa4f

This leads me to believe this is an Anon problem not a Cryptsy problem.

The transaction finally went through, but yes, I agree this indicates issues with the anoncoin network

[Arbitrageur]

can some of the devs please help the exchanges to fix their wallets? cryptsy is fucked up, bittrex is fucked up, vircurex could be, and btc38 I don't have any clue but they are probably in the same conditions.

come on, first thing to do is help these chaps fix their wallets. whatever it takes.

[TheKoziTwo]

can some of the devs please help the exchanges to fix their wallets? cryptsy is fucked up, bittrex is fucked up, vircurex could be, and btc38 I don't have any clue but they are probably in the same conditions.

come on, first thing to do is help these chaps fix their wallets. whatever it takes.

[00Smurf]

can some of the devs please help the exchanges to fix their wallets? cryptsy is fucked up, bittrex is fucked up, vircurex could be, and btc38 I don't have any clue but they are probably in the same conditions.

come on, first thing to do is help these chaps fix their wallets. whatever it takes.

Is there a coin that cryptsy hasn't had a problem with, i'm more inclined to think the problem is cryptsy. Just based on history alone, their exchange code is spaghetti.

[tljenson]

Ok you've made you point. I get it you think that Shadow Coin is the cats meow. Now can we get back to talking about AnonCoin. Instead of spaming the shit out of the thread about other coins. Now I've become part of the problem. So I'm stoping, I hope Smurf stops as well.  

And you guy... you are spamming that thread with stealth coin... no one here give a fuck to stealth coin and your loss. Stop crying like baby with your loss. You are the only one responsable with your money. If you want express your disappointment with shadowcash guys open a fucking new thread and run out.

Hey fuck head, I don't give a fuck about StealthCoin either because I'm invested in this fucking coin. When I left Stealth I went into this coin, and have been fucked as well. Though I still have faith in this coin.

So quit being a fucking asshole!!!

[btc38]

Welcome to our exchange to trade ANC.

ANC/CNY: http://www.btc38.com/trade_en.html?btc38_trade_coin_name=anc
ANC/BTC: http://www.btc38.com/trade_en.html?mk_type=btc&btc38_trade_coin_name=anc

ANC is great coin, please keep going on it.
Thanks for your support.

BTC38 team

Thanks a lot for supporting ANC!!!

China shows her heart with strong prices!   

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/anoncoin/#markets

Some of our user give us a feedback that their deposit is not credited.
Our engineer check those deposit and find there are no record on block chain.
So if there are deposit issue, please check block chain first.

Please note: Our ANC withdrawal works well.

We have also made Proof of Reserve.
Total amount of ALL Users:115949.9262  Address of the Cold Storage:AQ4X6FMaSwX4ARenfK1mCTNAfa46TUnCR5
You must login to our website to check above information.

BTC38 team

Proof of Reserve.
Total amount of ALL Users:124823.791019  Address of the Cold Storage:AQ4X6FMaSwX4ARenfK1mCTNAfa46TUnCR5
You must login to our website to check above information.    http://www.btc38.com/trade/reserves_en.html

[robinson5]

This is ridiculous.  Are none of the devs going to come here and give an explanation for the zerocoin delays? What about the difficulty switch that was promised awhile ago? Anoncoin at this point in time is completely worthless.


How are the devs still blaming the problem on cryptsy?

[btc38]

Craptsy is now refusing to do anything to get their stuck TX's resolved:

Code:

<yoyo> K1773R: craptsy responded upon the request to give raw transaction to me (they had closed ticket) by their usual rambling about fixing this issue with anoncoin devs
<yoyo> damn its worse than before they dont even broadcast nor are willing to give raw transaction now
<K1773R> yoyo: you see! they refuse to do anything

They refuse to give me/us the transactions and refuse (no idea if its with intent) to broadcast the TX.
Therefore, all TX created by craptsy for ANC cannot be mined unless they change this again.

We had enough problems with Craptsy, this shows just another case of them refusing to follow the protocol or care about its customers. Please stay away for your own sake.

I received the first request for a raw transaction today. To say I have done nothing to remedy the situation is a blatant lie as I was cooperating in pm with you and the other developers.

In no way are we refusing to "Follow the protocol" We run an unmodified anoncoind and send all transactions via "sendtoaddress". Out of the 236 currencies we list. ANC is the only one with this issue

You can say its a cryptsy issue all you want. But anyone that reads the facts can see that is not the case

Hi,  how is possible that BTC38 working normal,
those who are stuck, I suppose they sent ANC from cryptsy.
I'm curious...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=227287.msg9275043#msg9275043

They are likely claiming everything is fine as they have no debug output to say anything is wrong with the transaction like everyone else

If they are running an unmodifed anoncoind they are subject to this issue. Just like us, bittrex and the mining pool ops who have stated so in this thread

Ok, maybe BTC38 reply you here. 
If is like you said,  I think it's not possible that nobody who stuck there not get here to complain.

However,  I hope problem solved soon!!

Regards

Few of ANC transaction will stuck when withdrawal from us, but it will be done within 2 days eventually.
We think it is within normal limit.

I just check the twitter and found Devs are working hard on stuck problem and zerocrash.
https://twitter.com/AnoncoinProject

Thanks for your hard work @meeh

BTC38 team

[Gnosis-]

I haven't replied here in a while because the signal-to-noise ratio is really low in here (where "noise" includes things like trash talking me and speculation on the price). If you said something addressed at me here, I probably didn't read it. PM me if it's important.

Yes, estimating the time to complete software is not my strong suit, but that is a difficult problem in any case. The fact remains that I have worked hard on this and will continue to do so. I am not aware of any other developers who have made nearly as much progress (judging by public commits) in adding zero-knowledge cryptography to cryptocurrency. As for ShadowCoin, I looked at their code briefly and did not see a single commit related to this; sure, they might be keeping all the development secret, but "talk is cheap". If you look at Github, you'll see that I did more than talk.

Anyway, I am now thinking it is better to have a series of testnets with gradually increasing Zerocoin functionality, rather than a single one with all the functionality as I originally planned. I'll set a date for the first one when I am actually code complete. You can think of these as "milestones" for completion.

As for the wild oscillations in difficulty, I am working with two other people on our IRC to get this resolved.

[stealth923]

I haven't replied here in a while because the signal-to-noise ratio is really low in here (where "noise" includes things like trash talking me and speculation on the price). If you said something addressed at me here, I probably didn't read it. PM me if it's important.

Yes, estimating the time to complete software is not my strong suit, but that is a difficult problem in any case. The fact remains that I have worked hard on this and will continue to do so. I am not aware of any other developers who have made nearly as much progress (judging by public commits) in adding zero-knowledge cryptography to cryptocurrency. As for ShadowCoin, I looked at their code briefly and did not see a single commit related to this; sure, they might be keeping all the development secret, but "talk is cheap". If you look at Github, you'll see that I did more than talk.

Anyway, I am now thinking it is better to have a series of testnets with gradually increasing Zerocoin functionality, rather than a single one with all the functionality as I originally planned. I'll set a date for the first one when I am actually code complete. You can think of these as "milestones" for completion.

As for the wild oscillations in difficulty, I am working with two other people on our IRC to get this resolved.

So your dumping / accumulation phase has finished again..Rinse/Repeat eh..

Please dont set anymore dates....Come back when its working, dont ask for anymore donations.

Fool me once shame on you, Fool me twice, shame on Me.

[robinson5]

I haven't replied here in a while because the signal-to-noise ratio is really low in here (where "noise" includes things like trash talking me and speculation on the price). If you said something addressed at me here, I probably didn't read it. PM me if it's important.

Yes, estimating the time to complete software is not my strong suit, but that is a difficult problem in any case. The fact remains that I have worked hard on this and will continue to do so. I am not aware of any other developers who have made nearly as much progress (judging by public commits) in adding zero-knowledge cryptography to cryptocurrency. As for ShadowCoin, I looked at their code briefly and did not see a single commit related to this; sure, they might be keeping all the development secret, but "talk is cheap". If you look at Github, you'll see that I did more than talk.

Anyway, I am now thinking it is better to have a series of testnets with gradually increasing Zerocoin functionality, rather than a single one with all the functionality as I originally planned. I'll set a date for the first one when I am actually code complete. You can think of these as "milestones" for completion.

As for the wild oscillations in difficulty, I am working with two other people on our IRC to get this resolved.

Do you have any reason why only 2 days before a release date you had to extend it 2-3 months? It's hard to understand why that announcement couldn't have happened earlier rather than misleading investors. 

[shtako]

I haven't replied here in a while because the signal-to-noise ratio is really low in here (where "noise" includes things like trash talking me and speculation on the price). If you said something addressed at me here, I probably didn't read it. PM me if it's important.

Yes, estimating the time to complete software is not my strong suit, but that is a difficult problem in any case. The fact remains that I have worked hard on this and will continue to do so. I am not aware of any other developers who have made nearly as much progress (judging by public commits) in adding zero-knowledge cryptography to cryptocurrency. As for ShadowCoin, I looked at their code briefly and did not see a single commit related to this; sure, they might be keeping all the development secret, but "talk is cheap". If you look at Github, you'll see that I did more than talk.

Anyway, I am now thinking it is better to have a series of testnets with gradually increasing Zerocoin functionality, rather than a single one with all the functionality as I originally planned. I'll set a date for the first one when I am actually code complete. You can think of these as "milestones" for completion.

As for the wild oscillations in difficulty, I am working with two other people on our IRC to get this resolved.

Keep up the good work! Don't care about the trolls or the people who are butt hurt after loosing some btc at the last pump/dump.

One thing people seem to have forgotten. The price is exactly the same as it was 2 months ago. That mean that in the last 2 months there have been absolutely no loss for anoncoin holders. But due to the volatility and the recent pump and dump some people have gained a lot and others have lost a lot.

[Zarmung]

lol who said ZC will be emplement into Anoncoin - nonsense and scam...
The developers of ZC clearly wrote that their goal was Bitcoin but Bitcoin foundation rejected ZC's team offer.

btw ZC team is a group of scientist who work for the grants to find out something new and testing ZK protocol.
there is no connection between ZeroCash and AnonCoin except SCAM.

You, Sir, are a complete moron! We refer ZC to ZeroCoin, not ZeroCash.
Read the wiki, understand it or go elsewhere.

Stop fooling people!
First: Zerocoin is the coin which would converted from Bitcoin network through Zerocash protocol to coin called Zerocoin. There is nothing to do with Anoncoin.

Powerful group of scientists with huge funding are still working on ZC protocol becoz it has a lot of bugs and you want to say that two lame coders almost for free could do the same task? bugaga... yep.... maybe i'm not smart enough but this thing that Anon SCAM of the year i understood clearly

Second: you are huge bagholder who ignored a few rules:
- before invest money, try to understand the fact
- before say to someone moron try to say something intelligible

btw: i know some very very black rumors about Anoncoin but keep it a secret

[dotatbg]

2) Non standard transactions being propagated by Cryptsy. These transaction are more 100kb in size. By default anoncoin clients do not send out transaction of these size and standard miners do not accept them. Cryptsy has refused to acknowledge that they are doing anything wrong.

And then what? Coins will stay in then middle of nowhere forever?
Cryptsy said

The transaction does not need to be resent as it is a valid transaction.

but you told non standard transaction. I thing you should  patch anoncoin client asap because when this "non standard transaction" has valid txID and in that case it's a valid and should be send and confirmed.

nope, see my post above.
its not about having a "valid" txID nor anything like this. the problems lies in creating too big transactions. seems they managed to even lower the fee more which resulted in failure of tx broadcast (there is a limit).

How can you be sure about too long transactions? They still refuse all requests to post a raw transaction from his mempool. The only thing we know is "Cryptsy do not broadcast some kind of transactions" The right way IMHO:
- Cryptsy post a stuck raw transaction and all we will see what is going on.
- Update your client to broadcast any transaction without limit, or reasonable one.

If his API really use sendtoaddress the problem with too big transactions is your I mean in anc node soft

[dotatbg]

Craptsy is now refusing to do anything to get their stuck TX's resolved:

Code:

<yoyo> K1773R: craptsy responded upon the request to give raw transaction to me (they had closed ticket) by their usual rambling about fixing this issue with anoncoin devs
<yoyo> damn its worse than before they dont even broadcast nor are willing to give raw transaction now
<K1773R> yoyo: you see! they refuse to do anything

They refuse to give me/us the transactions and refuse (no idea if its with intent) to broadcast the TX.
Therefore, all TX created by craptsy for ANC cannot be mined unless they change this again.

We had enough problems with Craptsy, this shows just another case of them refusing to follow the protocol or care about its customers. Please stay away for your own sake.

I received the first request for a raw transaction today. To say I have done nothing to remedy the situation is a blatant lie as I was cooperating in pm with you and the other developers.

In no way are we refusing to "Follow the protocol" We run an unmodified anoncoind and send all transactions via "sendtoaddress". Out of the 236 currencies we list. ANC is the only one with this issue

You can say its a cryptsy issue all you want. But anyone that reads the facts can see that is not the case

So you can prove it very easy. Just post a non broadcast or stuck raw transaction  Because in my test node no pending withdraw transaction with ID from my Cryptsy account

[drAGon925]

We can see drk/sdc trolls , with well known methods , some is like supporting ANC..

I tested  BTC38 from my wallet to exchange, and back.. everything is ok for me.
I will not try to test cryptsy for now : )

BTC38 supporting ANC for long time as only anon coin, and I see they don't have drk..
By that, I can think that others are corrupt by drk fans/devs to make problems with ANC..
Just a thought..

drk had took good stake from their pump, they have much power/btc.
This is war my friends, there is much money in game.