Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history)

[Simcom]

So due to volume I wanted to transfer my Anoncoins from Bittrex back to Cryptsy. Now it seems Bittrex has "confirmed" my withdrawal, but nothing is showing up on the blockchain. It has been 2 hours since I requested my withdrawal.

As I read above (stupidly I read more of this thread after my withdrawal) it seems that bigger transactions are struggling to get through
I lack knowledge when it comes to techs & specifications. Is this problem solved/being solved?

Sorry for bothering ;-)


Thanks in advance,

Clyze

Hi guys, referring back to this post;

It has been quite a while since I requested my withdrawal from Bittrex to Cryptsy. Here is some more information regarding my withdrawal.

Withdrawal History    Hide cancelled withdrawals
Search:
DATE   CURRENCY   UNITS   STATUS
   10/13/2014 12:37:03 PM   ANC   969.26520089   Completed
Address: AYUpQqCftJbQEqpuvw4RrQKz19gFtC2VFC
TxId: 838e3b333ac6a64e5eed95c320bdee2ff2121dac170a634fbe498f739d2257c9

It does not show up on the blockchain and I am quite sure we're at a new block at the moment. Time passes by and I am getting more concerned. As I am incredibly clueless on this whole situation.

The last information I could provide is the address of my Bittrex account; AWQNFCwMBomJWxNLT2RrXnvtVbt1tL4yQU
If you search that addy on the blockchain it still shows the funds before my withdrawal.

I hope someone can clarify things for me. Is there a reason to be concerned?

Thanks in advance,

Clyze

No you should not be concerned - the fact that the transaction has not hit the blockchain yet suggests this is a problem on bittrex's end.  Open a support ticket with bittrex and they will take care of it for you.

[1715535251]

1715535251

[mullick]

So due to volume I wanted to transfer my Anoncoins from Bittrex back to Cryptsy. Now it seems Bittrex has "confirmed" my withdrawal, but nothing is showing up on the blockchain. It has been 2 hours since I requested my withdrawal.

As I read above (stupidly I read more of this thread after my withdrawal) it seems that bigger transactions are struggling to get through
I lack knowledge when it comes to techs & specifications. Is this problem solved/being solved?

Sorry for bothering ;-)


Thanks in advance,

Clyze

Hi guys, referring back to this post;

It has been quite a while since I requested my withdrawal from Bittrex to Cryptsy. Here is some more information regarding my withdrawal.

Withdrawal History    Hide cancelled withdrawals
Search:
DATE   CURRENCY   UNITS   STATUS
   10/13/2014 12:37:03 PM   ANC   969.26520089   Completed
Address: AYUpQqCftJbQEqpuvw4RrQKz19gFtC2VFC
TxId: 838e3b333ac6a64e5eed95c320bdee2ff2121dac170a634fbe498f739d2257c9

It does not show up on the blockchain and I am quite sure we're at a new block at the moment. Time passes by and I am getting more concerned. As I am incredibly clueless on this whole situation.

The last information I could provide is the address of my Bittrex account; AWQNFCwMBomJWxNLT2RrXnvtVbt1tL4yQU
If you search that addy on the blockchain it still shows the funds before my withdrawal.

I hope someone can clarify things for me. Is there a reason to be concerned?

Thanks in advance,

Clyze

No you should not be concerned - the fact that the transaction has not hit the blockchain yet suggests this is a problem on bittrex's end.  Open a support ticket with bittrex and they will take care of it for you.

EDIT: I just confirmed with bittrex they seem to be having the same issue. But on a smaller scale as they have far less unspent inputs

You seem to have solved it, now he knows what to do?

Still, perhaps the following might help?  Cryptsy, are you ever looking at the error reports of your (failed) RPC commands? If the error is "{"code":-4,"message":"Transaction too large"}", then I might once have encountered a not un-comparable problem, when I tried to send coins aggregated from thousands of p2pool mining micropayments. Have a look at my error description, and how (unelegantly) I solved it back then:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=488167.msg5399167#msg5399167 "sendmany.sh"  -Sometimes analogous cases help to find your way out  

Yes, reward me, please :-)
BTC 1JLKNFxKjkU3YsLs38y4e672iWiXBeFYP3
[ANC] ATAgJzuA7djZ8DijQPqtNieAughLPaFaa2
thx.

Yes the problem is we never get that message. We work those errors into our scripts if encountered but the daemon isnt presenting us with any warning. It happily sends the transaction and reports all is well

We do not send rawtransactions

All withdrawals are processed via "sendtoaddress"

Hi mullick,

I took a close look at the behavior of "sendtoaddress" in the most up to date version of our code and I have determined that it will always refuse to make a transaction greater than 100KB. I did not verify this for older versions (too busy with Zerocoin), but it looks like the best course of action for Cryptsy is to make sure you all are compiling anoncoind from the latest version in Github (either "master" or "newbase" branches). Either perform a "git checkout newbase && git pull" or download the zip file from Github.

Let me know if you are still having issues with this after the above has been deployed.

I have compiled from the master branch about 8 times to make sure we were up to date and even did a dif of the source to verify

We are running from the master branch last compiled on

Aug 19 22:07 anoncoin

[K1773R]

Seems bleutrade suspended my account because i said their retarded! If this wont get resolved (they refuse to answer), i'l publish details in a new thread. Is this another usual BR business?

They "normalized" my account again. Tough no message about why it was suspended.

[CryptoClub]

https://plus.google.com/106439999066446869159/posts/dQxHhqvKGQx

Here is something I typed up real quick explaining why I am buying ANC now.

[Clyze]

So due to volume I wanted to transfer my Anoncoins from Bittrex back to Cryptsy. Now it seems Bittrex has "confirmed" my withdrawal, but nothing is showing up on the blockchain. It has been 2 hours since I requested my withdrawal.

As I read above (stupidly I read more of this thread after my withdrawal) it seems that bigger transactions are struggling to get through
I lack knowledge when it comes to techs & specifications. Is this problem solved/being solved?

Sorry for bothering ;-)


Thanks in advance,

Clyze

Hi guys, referring back to this post;

It has been quite a while since I requested my withdrawal from Bittrex to Cryptsy. Here is some more information regarding my withdrawal.

Withdrawal History    Hide cancelled withdrawals
Search:
DATE   CURRENCY   UNITS   STATUS
   10/13/2014 12:37:03 PM   ANC   969.26520089   Completed
Address: AYUpQqCftJbQEqpuvw4RrQKz19gFtC2VFC
TxId: 838e3b333ac6a64e5eed95c320bdee2ff2121dac170a634fbe498f739d2257c9

It does not show up on the blockchain and I am quite sure we're at a new block at the moment. Time passes by and I am getting more concerned. As I am incredibly clueless on this whole situation.

The last information I could provide is the address of my Bittrex account; AWQNFCwMBomJWxNLT2RrXnvtVbt1tL4yQU
If you search that addy on the blockchain it still shows the funds before my withdrawal.

I hope someone can clarify things for me. Is there a reason to be concerned?

Thanks in advance,

Clyze

No you should not be concerned - the fact that the transaction has not hit the blockchain yet suggests this is a problem on bittrex's end.  Open a support ticket with bittrex and they will take care of it for you.

EDIT: I just confirmed with bittrex they seem to be having the same issue. But on a smaller scale as they have far less unspent inputs

You seem to have solved it, now he knows what to do?

Still, perhaps the following might help?  Cryptsy, are you ever looking at the error reports of your (failed) RPC commands? If the error is "{"code":-4,"message":"Transaction too large"}", then I might once have encountered a not un-comparable problem, when I tried to send coins aggregated from thousands of p2pool mining micropayments. Have a look at my error description, and how (unelegantly) I solved it back then:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=488167.msg5399167#msg5399167 "sendmany.sh"  -Sometimes analogous cases help to find your way out  

Yes, reward me, please :-)
BTC 1JLKNFxKjkU3YsLs38y4e672iWiXBeFYP3
[ANC] ATAgJzuA7djZ8DijQPqtNieAughLPaFaa2
thx.

Yes the problem is we never get that message. We work those errors into our scripts if encountered but the daemon isnt presenting us with any warning. It happily sends the transaction and reports all is well

We do not send rawtransactions

All withdrawals are processed via "sendtoaddress"

Hi mullick,

I took a close look at the behavior of "sendtoaddress" in the most up to date version of our code and I have determined that it will always refuse to make a transaction greater than 100KB. I did not verify this for older versions (too busy with Zerocoin), but it looks like the best course of action for Cryptsy is to make sure you all are compiling anoncoind from the latest version in Github (either "master" or "newbase" branches). Either perform a "git checkout newbase && git pull" or download the zip file from Github.

Let me know if you are still having issues with this after the above has been deployed.

I have compiled from the master branch about 8 times to make sure we were up to date and even did a dif of the source to verify

We are running from the master branch last compiled on

Aug 19 22:07 anoncoin

Thanks about the update.
I have indeed contacted both Cryptsy and Bittrex and both of them forward me to this thread. What does this situation mean for me? How long would it approximately take to solve this problem? Are my coins in danger?

Once again, sorry for bothering; just a tidy bit concerned.

Cheers,
Clyze

[Gnosis-]

[...]

Yeah I agree we shouldn't post any more.  We don't want copycat coins taking all the credit! Also, sorry if this question has already been answered but would copycat coins need to do their own RSA UFOs or would they be able to copy ours? If so, we DEFINITELY shouldn't post anything more to github.

They would be able to use our RSA UFOs, but they would need a lot more to have a functional implementation of Zerocoin. No worries, I won't be pushing any more commits until mainnet launch.

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

That was a lot of ANONcoins

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

So due to volume I wanted to transfer my Anoncoins from Bittrex back to Cryptsy. Now it seems Bittrex has "confirmed" my withdrawal, but nothing is showing up on the blockchain. It has been 2 hours since I requested my withdrawal.

As I read above (stupidly I read more of this thread after my withdrawal) it seems that bigger transactions are struggling to get through
I lack knowledge when it comes to techs & specifications. Is this problem solved/being solved?

Sorry for bothering ;-)


Thanks in advance,

Clyze

Will the hard fork unstick them?
Hi guys, referring back to this post;

It has been quite a while since I requested my withdrawal from Bittrex to Cryptsy. Here is some more information regarding my withdrawal.

Withdrawal History    Hide cancelled withdrawals
Search:
DATE   CURRENCY   UNITS   STATUS
   10/13/2014 12:37:03 PM   ANC   969.26520089   Completed
Address: AYUpQqCftJbQEqpuvw4RrQKz19gFtC2VFC
TxId: 838e3b333ac6a64e5eed95c320bdee2ff2121dac170a634fbe498f739d2257c9

It does not show up on the blockchain and I am quite sure we're at a new block at the moment. Time passes by and I am getting more concerned. As I am incredibly clueless on this whole situation.

The last information I could provide is the address of my Bittrex account; AWQNFCwMBomJWxNLT2RrXnvtVbt1tL4yQU
If you search that addy on the blockchain it still shows the funds before my withdrawal.

I hope someone can clarify things for me. Is there a reason to be concerned?

Thanks in advance,

Clyze

No you should not be concerned - the fact that the transaction has not hit the blockchain yet suggests this is a problem on bittrex's end.  Open a support ticket with bittrex and they will take care of it for you.

EDIT: I just confirmed with bittrex they seem to be having the same issue. But on a smaller scale as they have far less unspent inputs

You seem to have solved it, now he knows what to do?

Still, perhaps the following might help?  Cryptsy, are you ever looking at the error reports of your (failed) RPC commands? If the error is "{"code":-4,"message":"Transaction too large"}", then I might once have encountered a not un-comparable problem, when I tried to send coins aggregated from thousands of p2pool mining micropayments. Have a look at my error description, and how (unelegantly) I solved it back then:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=488167.msg5399167#msg5399167 "sendmany.sh"  -Sometimes analogous cases help to find your way out  

Yes, reward me, please :-)
BTC 1JLKNFxKjkU3YsLs38y4e672iWiXBeFYP3
[ANC] ATAgJzuA7djZ8DijQPqtNieAughLPaFaa2
thx.

Yes the problem is we never get that message. We work those errors into our scripts if encountered but the daemon isnt presenting us with any warning. It happily sends the transaction and reports all is well

We do not send rawtransactions

All withdrawals are processed via "sendtoaddress"

Hi mullick,

I took a close look at the behavior of "sendtoaddress" in the most up to date version of our code and I have determined that it will always refuse to make a transaction greater than 100KB. I did not verify this for older versions (too busy with Zerocoin), but it looks like the best course of action for Cryptsy is to make sure you all are compiling anoncoind from the latest version in Github (either "master" or "newbase" branches). Either perform a "git checkout newbase && git pull" or download the zip file from Github.

Let me know if you are still having issues with this after the above has been deployed.

I have compiled from the master branch about 8 times to make sure we were up to date and even did a dif of the source to verify

We are running from the master branch last compiled on

Aug 19 22:07 anoncoin

Thanks about the update.
I have indeed contacted both Cryptsy and Bittrex and both of them forward me to this thread. What does this situation mean for me? How long would it approximately take to solve this problem? Are my coins in danger?

Once again, sorry for bothering; just a tidy bit concerned.

Cheers,
Clyze

Will the hard fork unstick them?

[Clyze]

It would honestly make no sense if my coins after a withdrawal are gone due to a faulty. I would get furious. Im waiting patiently but my patience is running low.

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

I spent a lot of time in the Cryptsy chatbox and at least once a week I would hear about it. I think the fork will fix it

[Clyze]

I spent a lot of time in the Cryptsy chatbox and at least once a week I would hear about it. I think the fork will fix it

Let's hope. Thanks for your empathy mate

[Simcom]

It would honestly make no sense if my coins after a withdrawal are gone due to a faulty. I would get furious. Im waiting patiently but my patience is running low.

Your coins are 100% safe. Bittrex should have made this clear to you.  Essentially your transaction is "stuck" because bittrex created a transaction larger than 100KB.  Our deamon has some sort of bug that allows this sort of transaction to occur and we are trying to figure out where the bug is so we can fix it.  Please do not worry because your coins ARE STILL IN THE BITTREX WALLET, bittrex just needs to combine some inputs and re-send your coins.

[robinson5]

[...]

Yeah I agree we shouldn't post any more.  We don't want copycat coins taking all the credit! Also, sorry if this question has already been answered but would copycat coins need to do their own RSA UFOs or would they be able to copy ours? If so, we DEFINITELY shouldn't post anything more to github.

They would be able to use our RSA UFOs, but they would need a lot more to have a functional implementation of Zerocoin. No worries, I won't be pushing any more commits until mainnet launch.

Sounds great, thanks!

[Clyze]

It would honestly make no sense if my coins after a withdrawal are gone due to a faulty. I would get furious. Im waiting patiently but my patience is running low.

Your coins are 100% safe. Bittrex should have made this clear to you.  Essentially your transaction is "stuck" because bittrex created a transaction larger than 100KB.  Our deamon has some sort of bug that allows this sort of transaction to occur and we are trying to figure out where the bug is so we can fix it.  Please do not worry because your coins ARE STILL IN THE BITTREX WALLET, bittrex just needs to combine some inputs and re-send your coins.

+1000 for making this clear to a monkey like me.
Much appreciated buddy.

[Nebulaz]

Hey guys,

I made an alternate logo as I feel the existing one sort of... leaves a bit to be desired.
The intention is to improve the image of the coin as, while it has fantastic technology being implemented behind the scenes, I think we need something cleaner and more effective to market it as a more 'professional' cryptocurrency.

Willing to take any suggestions as well - the color scheme could probably be improved, for example.

https://i.imgur.com/hYS3C7d.jpg

It can be used provided i'm allowed to accept donations for it.
I'll post a donation ANC address if it's used.

I'm also willing to re-do any other graphics for marketing or anything else of relevance.

[anonymousxx1503]

Hey guys,

I made an alternate logo as I feel the existing one sort of... leaves a bit to be desired.
The intention is to improve the image of the coin as, while it has fantastic technology being implemented behind the scenes, I think we need something cleaner and more effective to market it as a more 'professional' cryptocurrency.

Willing to take any suggestions as well - the color scheme could probably be improved, for example.



It can be used provided i'm allowed to accept donations for it.
I'll post a donation ANC address if it's used.

I'm also willing to re-do any other graphics for marketing or anything else of relevance.

Man sometimes I see people posting logos and designs and think to myself, what if I also only think that I'm good at this stuff but that I actually suck like all these other guys. Then going and asking for donations too... damn.

[Nebulaz]

Man sometimes I see people posting logos and designs and think to myself, what if I also only think that I'm good at this stuff but that I actually suck like all these other guys. Then going and asking for donations too... damn.

Everyone thinks their design is good, or they wouldn't post them. This includes you.

The reason I would ask for donations (again, upon completion and utilization, and primarily to further work on other content) is due to my extremely limited stake in the coin. I currently hold very little BTC or ANC, and it becomes a matter of where I should invest my time.

The point of working on a logo to begin with is to possibly come across a better design that could enhance the value of the coin itself by giving it a better and cleaner look than it currently has. This is only a first version, and an iteration of it actually has some design elements that you used in your own design. Lastly, it was a friend of mine who asked me to make a new logo about two weeks ago - I'm merely late to the party.

[gunzeon]

Hey guys,
 ... cleaned up to reduce roll bloat ...

Bud, no offence, but when a i see a triangle the engineer in me thinks delta and i spent 5 seconds looking and lo and behold i found this:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=510039.0

[AnonCoinTwitter]

Zercoin beta starts tomorrow 10/15 at 23:00 UTC!

[alacast]

A lot of activity here 

To everyone, be so kind to have a look at this thread on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Anoncoin/comments/2j79ze/anonymity_of_cryptocurrencies_we_need_this_wiki/

And also, about the logo, I'm not sure if we need a new one right now, I'm personally OK with the current one (that you can see on the main wiki page). But as I like creativity I started this wiki page with a listing of propositions, just to keep an eye on what can be done: https://wiki.anoncoin.net/Logo