Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history)

[matthewh3]

Two weeks now until the expected test-net launch of Zerocoin.

[alacast]

I N F O G R A P H I C   F I N A L   V E R S I O N

Hi all !
If no one complains, this is final version, and maybe I'm posting tomorrow on reddit: /r/zerocoin /r/anoncoin /r/darknet (I'm not allowed to post in /r/deepdotweb so if there is an allowed member around...)

I'll also do a little emailing to some crypto websites and blogs, if everyone is OK?

If you want a .png version just ask (bigger size: 1.6 M). I'll have also snippets with visuals only, no text just in case you need to decorate documents...

Keep in mind that there will be another infographic more speficic on the zerocoin feature in the next wallet, it is in progress, but it has to wait until the new wallet is alive!
...and there should be another infographic about I2P embedded too, before that, if I have enough time !

https://cdn.anonfiles.com/1412171460930.jpg

[geekz]

I N F O G R A P H I C   F I N A L   V E R S I O N

Hi all !
If no one complains, this is final version, and maybe I'm posting tomorrow on reddit: /r/zerocoin /r/anoncoin /r/darknet (I'm not allowed to post in /r/deepdotweb so if there is an allowed member around...)

I'll also do a little emailing to some crypto websites and blogs, if everyone is OK?

If you want a .png version just ask (bigger size: 1.6 M). I'll have also snippets with visuals only, no text just in case you need to decorate documents...

Keep in mind that there will be another infographic more speficic on the zerocoin feature in the next wallet, it is in progress, but it has to wait until the new wallet is alive!
...and there should be another infographic about I2P embedded too, before that, if I have enough time !

Hey alacast , Great JOB.
I think , the heading text can be changed from White color to a darker one and can be made bold. ..

[tomothy]

I agree; great infographic! I think it could be a bit easier to read using the darker fonts too! Otherwise A++++

[Apraksin]

Geekz, did you fix the paperwallet?

[Simcom]

Excellent infographic.  I can't see any errors but I'm no expert. 

[lunokhod2]

I N F O G R A P H I C   F I N A L   V E R S I O N

Hi all !
If no one complains, this is final version, and maybe I'm posting tomorrow on reddit: /r/zerocoin /r/anoncoin /r/darknet (I'm not allowed to post in /r/deepdotweb so if there is an allowed member around...)

I'll also do a little emailing to some crypto websites and blogs, if everyone is OK?

If you want a .png version just ask (bigger size: 1.6 M). I'll have also snippets with visuals only, no text just in case you need to decorate documents...

Keep in mind that there will be another infographic more speficic on the zerocoin feature in the next wallet, it is in progress, but it has to wait until the new wallet is alive!
...and there should be another infographic about I2P embedded too, before that, if I have enough time !

Looks great! As soon as Geekz enables images on the wiki, we can add a copy there as well.

[gunzeon]

...
save space

...
save space

Hey, thanks K1773R, I took your advice and got an ubuntu VM which works fine, seems there is selinux issues with my mainstay centos box ... like: setsebool -P tor_bind_all_unreserved_ports 1

but have seen it work on the other box ... still investigating but looks a bit better

i'll be back soon with a custom anoncoinxxxxxx.onion shallot address soon

[varun555]

I N F O G R A P H I C   F I N A L   V E R S I O N

Hi all !
If no one complains, this is final version, and maybe I'm posting tomorrow on reddit: /r/zerocoin /r/anoncoin /r/darknet (I'm not allowed to post in /r/deepdotweb so if there is an allowed member around...)

I'll also do a little emailing to some crypto websites and blogs, if everyone is OK?

If you want a .png version just ask (bigger size: 1.6 M). I'll have also snippets with visuals only, no text just in case you need to decorate documents...

Keep in mind that there will be another infographic more speficic on the zerocoin feature in the next wallet, it is in progress, but it has to wait until the new wallet is alive!
...and there should be another infographic about I2P embedded too, before that, if I have enough time !

Looks great! As soon as Geekz enables images on the wiki, we can add a copy there as well.

"...after the fact the transaction linkages" (where mixing is being explained).  This sentence does no make complete sense. Needs to be edited,I think.

[Simcom]

Found something!  Blockchain is one word, same goes for websites.

[alacast]

Ok I'm taking into account three modifications:

-Headings in darker color
-changing "In practice, as the number of people participating in the "mix" increases, the harder it is to figure out after the fact the transaction linkages."

And about this

Found something!  Blockchain is one word, same goes for websites.

I was not too sure until I read this kind of official (?) websites where block chain is two words:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Block_chain

-so what do we decide, blockchain 1 word or 2 ?

after that's done, by tomorrow, I'll post the Final final version here, and start posting on other places !

[niteglider]

Ok I'm taking into account three modifications:

-Headings in darker color
-changing "In practice, as the number of people participating in the "mix" increases, the harder it is to figure out after the fact the transaction linkages."

And about this

Found something!  Blockchain is one word, same goes for websites.

I was not too sure until I read this kind of official (?) websites where block chain is two words:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Block_chain

-so what do we decide, blockchain 1 word or 2 ?

after that's done, by tomorrow, I'll post the Final final version here, and start posting on other places !

This looks fantastic, alacast!  Thank you for the great work.  I can't wait to share this.

I vote for blockchain to be one word.

One other thing, in the very last paragraph, I would suggest changing 'informations' to 'information.'

[geekz]

Looks great! As soon as Geekz enables images on the wiki, we can add a copy there as well.

Hey lunokhod2,
Images have been enabled for over few weeks now. I told n00n on how to use it.

[Gnosis-]

Wait a minute. You are saying it is better to trust one person who will not identify himself, rather than 7 ivy league experts who are public figures, when it comes to trusting whether a backdoor has been coded in? Especially when the one unidentified person has simply taken the work from others and claims to have completed it?

It looks like a pumpndump scam on a grand scale. I'm in. Keep on pumping and we'll see how many stupid people bite.

With RSA UFOs no trust is required from gnosis.  We DO need to trust that those who generated the UFOs are different entities - but gnosis couldn't implement a "back door" if he wanted to, that is the point of using RSA UFOs.

The difference between Zerocoin-in-Anoncoin and Zerocash is that with the former, studying the source (and relevant papers on the crypto, and the RSA-UFO wiki page) enables people to verify that there are no backdoors. On the other hand, no amount of studying the Zerocash source (if/when it comes out) will tell you the master key was destroyed as it's supposed to be. Nobody can be sure.

Also, blytecoin is on my troll list ignore list now.

[geekz]

Geekz, did you fix the paperwallet?

Hey, I have the code ready for over a month now..
Just have to PUT it in the site..

[Gnosis-]

Ok I'm taking into account three modifications:

-Headings in darker color
-changing "In practice, as the number of people participating in the "mix" increases, the harder it is to figure out after the fact the transaction linkages."

And about this

Found something!  Blockchain is one word, same goes for websites.

I was not too sure until I read this kind of official (?) websites where block chain is two words:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Block_chain

-so what do we decide, blockchain 1 word or 2 ?

after that's done, by tomorrow, I'll post the Final final version here, and start posting on other places !

With English, new phrases tend to do through this progression as more people use them: "wordA wordB" => "wordA-wordB" => "wordAwordB".

[newb4now]

SOMEONE PLEASE RESPOND TO THIS.

The issue seems to be continually ignored and is of extreme importance for Anoncoin. Before Zerocoin is launced can we please try to fix whatever bug in the Anoncoin code that is causing transactions to get stuck?

Cryptocurrencies are worthless if they cannot be used in transactions (without getting stuck). Merged inputs occur and are not an excuse to ignore the issue.

Ok lets clear this up once and for all.

I have NOT modified our daemon in anyway. We have built directly from source with no changes. Anoncoind is creating these transaction and paying the large fee required. yet they are not being accepted into the chain. As you can see by my previous post.

Hello everyone,

Im currently investigating an issue with our ANC wallet where the blockchain isnt picking up the majority of our send transactions. We apologize it took us so long to spot the issue. But we are working hard on correcting it and getting the unconfirmed transactions pushed to the blockchain

Some of them get confirmed after a simple restart of the daemon but others do not/ Ill keep everyone informed when I find the solution

Thank you for your patience

UPDATE:

I think it comes down to transaction sizes. Our daemon is sending transactions that are too large to be accpeted into the chain. Im basing this on the fact that all unconfirmed send transactions have unusually high fees paid. Our default Txfee is .01 ANC and the mean over the last 1000 transactions is 0.10169169169169 which is why our withdrawal fee is set to .1 ANC

Code:

anoncoind listtransactions "" 1000 | grep -A 1 -B 4 '"confirmations" : 0,' | grep fee
        "fee" : -0.82000000,
        "fee" : -0.90000000,
        "fee" : -0.98000000,
        "fee" : -0.65000000,
        "fee" : -0.69000000,
        "fee" : -0.72000000,
        "fee" : -0.74000000,
        "fee" : -0.76000000,
        "fee" : -0.77000000,
        "fee" : -0.81000000,
        "fee" : -1.00000000,
        "fee" : -0.68000000,
        "fee" : -0.72000000,
        "fee" : -0.73000000,
        "fee" : -0.74000000,
        "fee" : -0.74000000,
        "fee" : -0.74000000,
        "fee" : -0.75000000,
        "fee" : -0.75000000,
        "fee" : -0.75000000,
        "fee" : -0.75000000,
        "fee" : -0.75000000,
        "fee" : -0.75000000,
        "fee" : -0.75000000,
        "fee" : -0.75000000,
        "fee" : -0.76000000,
        "fee" : -0.76000000,
        "fee" : -0.77000000,
        "fee" : -0.77000000,
        "fee" : -0.77000000,
        "fee" : -0.78000000,
        "fee" : -0.79000000,
        "fee" : -0.85000000,
        "fee" : -0.96000000,
        "fee" : -0.64000000,
        "fee" : -0.66000000,
        "fee" : -0.67000000,
        "fee" : -0.69000000,
        "fee" : -0.71000000,
        "fee" : -0.72000000,
        "fee" : -0.73000000,
        "fee" : -0.74000000,
        "fee" : -0.75000000,
        "fee" : -0.77000000,
        "fee" : -0.79000000,
        "fee" : -0.84000000,
        "fee" : -0.87000000,
        "fee" : -0.92000000,
        "fee" : -0.95000000,
        "fee" : -0.98000000,
        "fee" : -0.63000000,
        "fee" : -0.64000000,
        "fee" : -0.65000000,
        "fee" : -0.66000000,
        "fee" : -0.68000000,
        "fee" : -0.68000000,
        "fee" : -0.69000000,
        "fee" : -0.70000000,
        "fee" : -0.71000000,
        "fee" : -0.71000000,
        "fee" : -0.72000000,
        "fee" : -0.73000000,
        "fee" : -0.74000000,
        "fee" : -0.74000000,
        "fee" : -0.74000000,
        "fee" : -0.74000000,
        "fee" : -0.74000000,
        "fee" : -0.75000000,
        "fee" : -0.75000000,
        "fee" : -0.75000000,
        "fee" : -0.75000000,
        "fee" : -0.76000000,
        "fee" : -0.78000000,
        "fee" : -0.80000000,
        "fee" : -0.83000000,
        "fee" : -0.88000000,
        "fee" : -0.92000000,
        "fee" : -0.99000000,
        "fee" : -0.98000000,
        "fee" : -0.97000000,
        "fee" : -0.87000000,
        "fee" : -0.81000000,
        "fee" : -0.86000000,

Our daemon is up to date so ill be going over the source to see if I can find anything that would cause this

As you can see from my request to the daemon:

Code:

anoncoind listtransactions "" 1000 | grep -A 1 -B 4 '"confirmations" : 0,' | grep fee

I grabbed the last 1000 transactions and searched for any with "confirmations" : 0, and grabbed the fee for the transaction.

All of the unconfirmed transactions in our wallet paid a high fee suggesting its due to block size.

To counteract this until the issue is resolved by the developers i have merged any input in our wallet less than .1 anc ( about 50k of them ) into inputs over 1 ANC. These may have broken down to some smaller ones now so ill likely have to run it again

Here are some others with the same problem

Same Problem.

It makes me mad all the time  

And It's not good at all for beginners who want to buy into ANC when there are problems with Buying and Withdrawing.

Same problem. Tried to withdraw from bleutrade 2 days ago and the transaction still havent gone trough. To fix this should be highest priority.

Anyone else with the following problems with ANC?  My multipool operator sent earned ANC to me on August 18 at 2:01AM CDT, was not received and posted to my wallet until August 21 at 13:58 CDT.  The multipool operator states:  "The transaction hasn't been included in a block yet.  It should make it into a block eventually and be confirmed.  I have no control over this.  It's been an ongoing issue with the ANC network for a few weeks now."  That would seem to be a very strong negative against this coin.

Yes, I am on the anonmining.com pool and it took a couple of days for an autotransfer to actually post to my wallet.

It was only 5 ANCs.

What gives?

In conclusion this is not a problem with cryptsy or "craptsy" as it is being called. It seems meeh and k1773R are aware and getting these transactions to confirm eventually so i see no reason to suspend the wallet as suggested above

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

This is why the insane pump the second after I divest...Big sticky transactions in teh blockchain How crypto

[Apraksin]

Geekz, did you fix the paperwallet?

Hey, I have the code ready for over a month now..
Just have to PUT it in the site..

Nice

[lunokhod2]

Looks great! As soon as Geekz enables images on the wiki, we can add a copy there as well.

Hey lunokhod2,
Images have been enabled for over few weeks now. I told n00n on how to use it.

Hi Geekz, as we discussed on IRC as few weeks ago, the image upload is not working. When I try to upload an image, I get the following error:

Upload warning
Could not create directory "mwstore://local-backend/local-public/4/46".