wtfvanity
|
|
February 05, 2013, 09:59:33 PM |
|
Yep I'm getting the same error. I just updated to CCC 13.1, which updated the OCL runtime to 1084.4.
Getting same issue I assume as others. Anyone got a solution? I think the solution that was working for everyone else was rolling back your drivers
|
WTF! Don't Click Here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 07, 2013, 05:16:03 AM |
|
Yep I'm getting the same error. I just updated to CCC 13.1, which updated the OCL runtime to 1084.4.
Getting same issue I assume as others. Anyone got a solution? [img]http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/6134/errfv.jpg[/img I think the solution that was working for everyone else was rolling back your drivers Which is a terrible solution, IMO. I've actually stopped using this on my 7970, as it doesn't run as fast as it should - it seems it's not fully compatible with SDK 2.6 or newer on 7xxx cards, and these newer drivers (which also updates your OCL runtime) just make things worse.
|
|
|
|
wtfvanity
|
|
February 07, 2013, 02:58:17 PM |
|
Yep I'm getting the same error. I just updated to CCC 13.1, which updated the OCL runtime to 1084.4.
Getting same issue I assume as others. Anyone got a solution? [img]http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/6134/errfv.jpg[/img I think the solution that was working for everyone else was rolling back your drivers Which is a terrible solution, IMO. I've actually stopped using this on my 7970, as it doesn't run as fast as it should - it seems it's not fully compatible with SDK 2.6 or newer on 7xxx cards, and these newer drivers (which also updates your OCL runtime) just make things worse. You could always put a bounty up for someone to fix it if you don't like it.
|
WTF! Don't Click Here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
wizkid057
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1223
Merit: 1006
|
|
February 07, 2013, 11:10:49 PM |
|
Yep I'm getting the same error. I just updated to CCC 13.1, which updated the OCL runtime to 1084.4.
Getting same issue I assume as others. Anyone got a solution? [img]http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www.cgi/http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/6134/errfv.jpg[/img I think the solution that was working for everyone else was rolling back your drivers Which is a terrible solution, IMO. I've actually stopped using this on my 7970, as it doesn't run as fast as it should - it seems it's not fully compatible with SDK 2.6 or newer on 7xxx cards, and these newer drivers (which also updates your OCL runtime) just make things worse. You could always put a bounty up for someone to fix it if you don't like it. I'm in for 0.1 BTC
|
|
|
|
mokahless
|
|
February 08, 2013, 04:56:23 AM |
|
I just happened to find this program today. Then I find out it is broken with the latest AMD drivers. Rolling back drivers isn't exactly an option on my main machine unless I find a weekend of spare time and my BAMT miner can't compile because it is missing dependencies and has write issues due to the wear on the flash drive. This also seems to be the time to move this project forward to give people a use for their GPUs. The oclvanityminer looks interesting.
|
|
|
|
Beans
|
|
February 14, 2013, 12:08:16 PM |
|
It seems simple but I just get a code 4 error when trying to add the private key, am I missing something? I updated to the newest client and tried several addresses. importprivkey 5JR1q13wc8JxPxaggs7zm292LVYb2L2FzUYvCLsrq4fFLsP44wW
Error adding key to wallet (code -4)
|
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
|
February 14, 2013, 02:57:03 PM |
|
It seems simple but I just get a code 4 error when trying to add the private key, am I missing something? I updated to the newest client and tried several addresses. importprivkey 5JR1q13wc8JxPxaggs7zm292LVYb2L2FzUYvCLsrq4fFLsP44wW
Error adding key to wallet (code -4)
did you unlock it? btw, really bad idea posting the privkey!
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
Beans
|
|
February 14, 2013, 03:10:16 PM |
|
It seems simple but I just get a code 4 error when trying to add the private key, am I missing something? I updated to the newest client and tried several addresses. importprivkey 5JR1q13wc8JxPxaggs7zm292LVYb2L2FzUYvCLsrq4fFLsP44wW
Error adding key to wallet (code -4)
did you unlock it? btw, really bad idea posting the privkey! Unlock it? I don't see any references to anything like that.. That's just some random private key.
|
|
|
|
wtfvanity
|
|
February 14, 2013, 03:13:59 PM |
|
It seems simple but I just get a code 4 error when trying to add the private key, am I missing something? I updated to the newest client and tried several addresses. importprivkey 5JR1q13wc8JxPxaggs7zm292LVYb2L2FzUYvCLsrq4fFLsP44wW
Error adding key to wallet (code -4)
did you unlock it? btw, really bad idea posting the privkey! Unlock it? I don't see any references to anything like that.. That's just some random private key. Yeah, 114hGBRkH4CYEPfCjWLnjmqTij2ymwcddu doesn't look like a vanity address. Do you have your wallet encrypted? If you do, what he is saying, you have to unlock it first. Can you import any privatekey? Or are all of them giving you this message? Are you using bitcoind or qt?
|
WTF! Don't Click Here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
|
February 15, 2013, 08:37:23 AM |
|
It seems simple but I just get a code 4 error when trying to add the private key, am I missing something? I updated to the newest client and tried several addresses. importprivkey 5JR1q13wc8JxPxaggs7zm292LVYb2L2FzUYvCLsrq4fFLsP44wW
Error adding key to wallet (code -4)
did you unlock it? btw, really bad idea posting the privkey! Unlock it? I don't see any references to anything like that.. That's just some random private key. $ bitcoind help walletpassphrase walletpassphrase <passphrase> <timeout> Stores the wallet decryption key in memory for <timeout> seconds.
afterwards u should be able to import it
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
Atruk
|
|
February 15, 2013, 08:44:54 AM |
|
It seems simple but I just get a code 4 error when trying to add the private key, am I missing something? I updated to the newest client and tried several addresses. importprivkey 5JR1q13wc8JxPxaggs7zm292LVYb2L2FzUYvCLsrq4fFLsP44wW
Error adding key to wallet (code -4)
did you unlock it? btw, really bad idea posting the privkey! Unlock it? I don't see any references to anything like that.. That's just some random private key. $ bitcoind help walletpassphrase walletpassphrase <passphrase> <timeout> Stores the wallet decryption key in memory for <timeout> seconds.
afterwards u should be able to import it Beautiful.
|
|
|
|
Beans
|
|
February 15, 2013, 10:13:06 AM |
|
It seems simple but I just get a code 4 error when trying to add the private key, am I missing something? I updated to the newest client and tried several addresses. importprivkey 5JR1q13wc8JxPxaggs7zm292LVYb2L2FzUYvCLsrq4fFLsP44wW
Error adding key to wallet (code -4)
did you unlock it? btw, really bad idea posting the privkey! Unlock it? I don't see any references to anything like that.. That's just some random private key. $ bitcoind help walletpassphrase walletpassphrase <passphrase> <timeout> Stores the wallet decryption key in memory for <timeout> seconds.
afterwards u should be able to import it Awesome, Thanks
|
|
|
|
sal002
|
|
February 21, 2013, 09:34:52 PM |
|
I must be missing something on Ubuntu.
1. I download the latest AMD SDK and installed it 2. I editted the Makefile to include /opt/AMDAPP/include/ (where the AMD SDK is installed) 3. I ran "make oclvanitminer"
However, when I run it, all it says is my CPU is available (have a 5850 that works fine with cgminer).
I must be missing something - any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
sal002
|
|
February 22, 2013, 05:20:50 PM |
|
UTS error - wasn't logging on.
|
|
|
|
Houseonfire
|
|
March 05, 2013, 06:21:41 PM |
|
C:\Users\Tim\Desktop\vanitygen-0.22-win>oclvanitygen.exe -S -d Barts -v -w256 -g 512x256 -b1024 1Tim Prefix difficulty: 4553521 1Tim Difficulty: 4553521 Device: Barts Vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (1002) Driver: 1084.2 (VM) Profile: FULL_PROFILE Version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1084.2) Max compute units: 14 Max workgroup size: 256 Global memory: 1073741824 Max allocation: 536870912 OpenCL compiler flags: Compiling kernel, can take minutes...LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: 0x590b1f0: i8 = setcc 0x59015e0, 0x5905e10, 0x5906f28 [ID=21] 0x59015e0: i32 = AMDILISD::ADD 0x5905e10, 0x5906580 [ID=20] 0x5905e10: i32,ch = CopyFromReg 0x49d0fe0, 0x59061c8 [ORD=166] [ID=15] 0x59061c8: i32 = Register %vreg33 [ORD=166] [ID=3] 0x5906580: i32,ch = load 0x49d0fe0, 0x5902ab0, 0x58ff658<LD4[getelementptr i nbounds ([8 x i32] addrspace(2)* @modulus, i32 0, i32 0)]> [ORD=165] [ID=18] 0x5902ab0: i32 = Constant<192> [ORD=164] [ID=14] 0x58ff658: i32 = undef [ORD=165] [ID=2] 0x5905e10: i32,ch = CopyFromReg 0x49d0fe0, 0x59061c8 [ORD=166] [ID=15] 0x59061c8: i32 = Register %vreg33 [ORD=166] [ID=3] So the ONLY solution is to rollback my drivers? REALLY?
|
|
|
|
crazyates
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 05, 2013, 07:20:26 PM |
|
So the ONLY solution is to rollback my drivers? REALLY?
Pretty much. :/
|
|
|
|
Houseonfire
|
|
March 06, 2013, 02:42:19 PM |
|
So the ONLY solution is to rollback my drivers? REALLY?
Pretty much. :/ What version of ATI drivers do I need?
|
|
|
|
cancis
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
March 13, 2013, 09:32:21 PM |
|
Can anyone explain what this bit of code is doing? (in pattern.c of the source) if ((b58pow - (p - zero_prefix)) < 6) { /* * Do not allow the prefix to constrain the * check value, this is ridiculous. */ fprintf(stderr, "Prefix '%s' is too long\n", pfx); goto out; }
It seems I'm hanging on this piece when trying to generate an address over 28 characters (And yes, yes, I realize it's a pipe dream to ever find anything close to that - let me have my fun!)
|
|
|
|
wtfvanity
|
|
March 13, 2013, 09:41:59 PM |
|
Can anyone explain what this bit of code is doing? (in pattern.c of the source) if ((b58pow - (p - zero_prefix)) < 6) { /* * Do not allow the prefix to constrain the * check value, this is ridiculous. */ fprintf(stderr, "Prefix '%s' is too long\n", pfx); goto out; }
It seems I'm hanging on this piece when trying to generate an address over 28 characters (And yes, yes, I realize it's a pipe dream to ever find anything close to that - let me have my fun!) A bitcoin address has a checksum to make sure that it is a valid address. If you are generating an address that is 30 characters long, the possibilities of getting your string and the checksum are zilch. Waste a couple of weeks looking for a 12 character address before you go for ones near 30. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Address
|
WTF! Don't Click Here . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
cancis
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
March 13, 2013, 10:20:59 PM |
|
Can anyone explain what this bit of code is doing? (in pattern.c of the source) if ((b58pow - (p - zero_prefix)) < 6) { /* * Do not allow the prefix to constrain the * check value, this is ridiculous. */ fprintf(stderr, "Prefix '%s' is too long\n", pfx); goto out; }
It seems I'm hanging on this piece when trying to generate an address over 28 characters (And yes, yes, I realize it's a pipe dream to ever find anything close to that - let me have my fun!) A bitcoin address has a checksum to make sure that it is a valid address. If you are generating an address that is 30 characters long, the possibilities of getting your string and the checksum are zilch. Waste a couple of weeks looking for a 12 character address before you go for ones near 30. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/AddressOh yeah, I understand that an address will never be found - finding the address is not my goal. I'm simply asking if the code can be modified to handle a larger string, and if so how?
|
|
|
|
|