Bitcoin Forum
February 23, 2019, 02:07:04 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 [525] 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 ... 586 »
  Print  
Author Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s  (Read 878377 times)
Easy2Mine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 500


einc.io


View Profile
August 21, 2014, 10:03:41 AM
 #10481

@Cedivad
Thanks for keeping us updated about HashLast

I missed Phin making jokes of the HashLast crooks

1550930824
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550930824

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550930824
Reply with quote  #2

1550930824
Report to moderator
1550930824
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550930824

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550930824
Reply with quote  #2

1550930824
Report to moderator
1550930824
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550930824

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550930824
Reply with quote  #2

1550930824
Report to moderator
Your Bitcoin transactions
The Ultimate Bitcoin mixer
made truly anonymous.
with an advanced technology.
Mix coins
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1550930824
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550930824

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550930824
Reply with quote  #2

1550930824
Report to moderator
1550930824
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1550930824

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1550930824
Reply with quote  #2

1550930824
Report to moderator
bayo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198
Merit: 100

mineoncloud.com


View Profile WWW
August 21, 2014, 11:18:22 AM
 #10482

I m waiting my refund like some other and receive some papers from clerk office or lawyers but really cant read this in american. What need to do be done on my side? I need to send back something ??


Thnks for help in advance..

cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 21, 2014, 11:25:54 AM
 #10483

Maybe I'm wrong, but this being a chapter 11 case, there is no need to file a proof of claim if you dont disagree with how HF scheduled your claim. You can check how your claim is already scheduled in the link from pmorici above. This is at least what I read online.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
bayo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198
Merit: 100

mineoncloud.com


View Profile WWW
August 21, 2014, 01:12:16 PM
Last edit: August 21, 2014, 01:25:08 PM by bayo
 #10484

Maybe I'm wrong, but this being a chapter 11 case, there is no need to file a proof of claim if you dont disagree with how HF scheduled your claim. You can check how your claim is already scheduled in the link from pmorici above. This is at least what I read online.
Only one point still trouble for me. Im listed in case 14-30866 a child of Case 14-30725 and i m not listed in https://cases.processgeneral.com/cases/case/5/hashfast-technologies-llc/ Normal ??



Thanks for this answer ! i will look update here !

winit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 21, 2014, 01:51:43 PM
 #10485

Not wanting to rub anyone up the wrong way... but I have 9 X Sierra units that I'm looking to sell. These are in the UK and as such full UK duty was paid on receipt.

Not certain but believe these to be the only units in the UK.

If anyone is interested in making an offer send me a PM.
starsoccer9
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1643
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
August 21, 2014, 03:28:38 PM
 #10486

Not wanting to rub anyone up the wrong way... but I have 9 X Sierra units that I'm looking to sell. These are in the UK and as such full UK duty was paid on receipt.

Not certain but believe these to be the only units in the UK.

If anyone is interested in making an offer send me a PM.
Pmed
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 21, 2014, 04:31:32 PM
 #10487

I genuinely see ActM as a failed business and not a scam.

Cheesy

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
pmorici
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 480
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 12:11:50 AM
 #10488

If anyone wants to get in touch with the Hashfast CRO you can contact them at the below email address...

    hashfast@provincefirm.com

The CRO is now completely in control of the company.  Any concerns you may have had about dealing with Hashfast due to the actions of the prior management and their past performance are no longer an issue. 

If you have any input in what should happen with the company's assets, want to purchase some or all of the assets, or have another proposal for the company the CRO is the person to contact.
mikelitv
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 02:01:34 PM
 #10489


...

 Any concerns you may have had about dealing with Hashfast due to the actions of the prior management and their past performance are no longer an issue. 

...



Wow!!!  Really?  No longer an issue?  Hands wiped clean? All forgotten? That easily?  Seriously?  Sadly: probably correct!

Why aren’t we all appalled by the Creditor's Council decisions over the past few months?  It is highly unlikely that such mismanagement, followed by targeted misinformation by family relatives of a lead member of the Council, is caused by simple incompetence or lack of experience.  There is indeed a compelling argument to be made for voluntary sabotage motivated by glaring self-interest.  After having actually read the transcripts, blaming the CFO of a few months (Monica) for everything that has transpired is as absurd as it is unjustifiable.  It was very likely an intentional diversion. 

The truth should emerge ultimately, but it will very probably be way too late for creditors (or anyone) to do anything about it. 

Scammed by Hashfast, and screwed by their Council will likely be Hashfast creditor's epitaph.

RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 02:16:44 PM
 #10490

Wow!!!  Really?  No longer an issue?  Hands wiped clean? All forgotten? That easily?  Seriously?  Sadly: probably correct!

So hands clean. Now I am waiting the return of cypherdoc and iCeTaRd.

H/w Hosting Directory & Reputation - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=622998.0
Ilan1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 02:40:53 PM
 #10491

Well I am just waiting for some bloody money back if it ever comes!!!

LTCgear.com Review http://ltcgear.co.ukhttp://ltcgear.com/?apage=120 - 160mh/s for $850 use coupon code "anniversary1yr" - Active Multi Algorithm cloud mining in Scrypt, X11 and Scrypt-N - ROI in 5 Weeks
pmorici
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 480
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 03:13:13 PM
Last edit: August 22, 2014, 03:34:39 PM by pmorici
 #10492

Wow!!!  Really?  No longer an issue?  Hands wiped clean? All forgotten? That easily?  Seriously?  Sadly: probably correct!

Why aren’t we all appalled by the Creditor's Council decisions over the past few months?  It is highly unlikely that such mismanagement, followed by targeted misinformation by family relatives of a lead member of the Council, is caused by simple incompetence or lack of experience.  There is indeed a compelling argument to be made for voluntary sabotage motivated by glaring self-interest.  After having actually read the transcripts, blaming the CFO of a few months (Monica) for everything that has transpired is as absurd as it is unjustifiable.  It was very likely an intentional diversion.  

The truth should emerge ultimately, but it will very probably be way too late for creditors (or anyone) to do anything about it.  

Scammed by Hashfast, and screwed by their Council will likely be Hashfast creditor's epitaph.

No not wiped clean. Past transgressions will still be investigated and those responsible held to account.  But, Companies are run by people and none of the people that dealt with us dishonestly have any part in running the company anymore.  It's under the control of people with experience in winding down bankrupt companies and who take their accountability to the court seriously.

I know you're probably angry and hurt by this like many of us here but your accusations against the creditors who volunteered their time to be on the council are unfounded, false, and unhelpful.  Why didn't you volunteer your time to serve on the council if you thought it important?  I doubt you have actually taken the time to read and understand all the transcripts and documents in the case because they are quite clear about what has happened.  The notion that the creditor's committee has had any control in the management of the company is completely false.
scr3u.ucr3trs
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 23, 2014, 01:44:32 AM
 #10493


...

 Any concerns you may have had about dealing with Hashfast due to the actions of the prior management and their past performance are no longer an issue. 

...



Wow!!!  Really?  No longer an issue?  Hands wiped clean? All forgotten? That easily?  Seriously?  Sadly: probably correct!

Why aren’t we all appalled by the Creditor's Council decisions over the past few months?  It is highly unlikely that such mismanagement, followed by targeted misinformation by family relatives of a lead member of the Council, is caused by simple incompetence or lack of experience.  There is indeed a compelling argument to be made for voluntary sabotage motivated by glaring self-interest.  After having actually read the transcripts, blaming the CFO of a few months (Monica) for everything that has transpired is as absurd as it is unjustifiable.  It was very likely an intentional diversion. 

The truth should emerge ultimately, but it will very probably be way too late for creditors (or anyone) to do anything about it. 

Scammed by Hashfast, and screwed by their Council will likely be Hashfast creditor's epitaph.



Wow, a voice of competence and reason on here.  Terrific!!  Sadly there is only glaring glaring mismanagement by the creditors council.  There should be a class action lawsuit begun against them (and their family members) for purposely harming creditors, delay and stall tactics, in order to get their really expensive guy in office to work with the only two HF employees left (who didn't have the scruples to leave), Eddie and Simon, who we all know and love.  They screwed us creditors, and now the council has worked with them to screw us more.  Shameful.  Disgusting.  Revolting.  And trashing innocent HF employees in the process.  Hope you are all proud of yourselves, and glad I wrote off this money as a life lesson for burned funds singed by GREED and no ethics at all.

By the way, Ray Gallo, since your clients are now in a lose lose, why not get your energy renewed into suing the creditors committee and counsel?
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 23, 2014, 09:30:58 AM
 #10494

Wow, a voice of competence and reason on here.  Terrific!!
Yes, right, answering to yourself is one of the few things you can do here. Since that noone cares.

By the way, Ray Gallo, since your clients are now in a lose lose, why not get your energy renewed into suing the creditors committee and counsel?
Actually, talking to yourself is another thing you can certainly do. I'm your conscience: why the hell should you sue someone that worked for you instead of the people responsible for this massacre? Maybe because you can't see beyond your nose? Ok, I understand. I'm sorry for that.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
mikelitv
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 26, 2014, 04:58:04 PM
 #10495

Wow, a voice of competence and reason on here.  Terrific!!
Yes, right, answering to yourself is one of the few things you can do here. Since that noone cares.

By the way, Ray Gallo, since your clients are now in a lose lose, why not get your energy renewed into suing the creditors committee and counsel?
Actually, talking to yourself is another thing you can certainly do. I'm your conscience: why the hell should you sue someone that worked for you instead of the people responsible for this massacre? Maybe because you can't see beyond your nose? Ok, I understand. I'm sorry for that.


You lost your way Cedivad.  Your first posts were full of justified anger and action.  Your optimism regarding the judicial system was refreshing.  Wether we were active on the forums or just lurking, I think many of us rooted for you / us. 

Overall, it seems that you overestimated the assets of Hashfast, just as you got used to lashing out too quickly.

I am not scr3.ucr3trs nor do I have any form of communication with him other than this forum. 

I simply do my homework as rigorously as I can.  I base my comments on what I find and believe to be true.

There is no doubt that the current mess has been created by Hashfast's Eduardo and Simon.  Absolutely.  They should remain the real target of our wrath. I agree with you on that.  However, regarding the Creditor's Council, I have a different position than they "worked for us" on a voluntary basis.  I think others, directly on the council are now starting to agree with this.  There were serious conflict of interests.  That is simply a fact.  Not wanting to admit that and the consequences it had, that is "not seeing beyond your nose".  Now, admittedly, this is no longer important as there is nothing that can be done about it any longer.  The reality today is what it is, and in my opinion, there's no reason to be optimistic about the outcome for the unsecured creditors.





 

This being said,
HardwareReviewer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 256
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 26, 2014, 07:36:22 PM
 #10496

In any case, I'll be having plenty of court paper for my money to fire up the fireplace

Prepare to enter a world of stress
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 26, 2014, 09:07:38 PM
 #10497

I don't see the conflict of interests and I don't see how the committee damaged things. So please someone enlighten me. Maybe not saying that the LB deal was a good one.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
scr3u.ucr3trs
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 26, 2014, 09:56:47 PM
 #10498

Wow, a voice of competence and reason on here.  Terrific!!
Yes, right, answering to yourself is one of the few things you can do here. Since that noone cares.

By the way, Ray Gallo, since your clients are now in a lose lose, why not get your energy renewed into suing the creditors committee and counsel?
Actually, talking to yourself is another thing you can certainly do. I'm your conscience: why the hell should you sue someone that worked for you instead of the people responsible for this massacre? Maybe because you can't see beyond your nose? Ok, I understand. I'm sorry for that.


You lost your way Cedivad.  Your first posts were full of justified anger and action.  Your optimism regarding the judicial system was refreshing.  Wether we were active on the forums or just lurking, I think many of us rooted for you / us. 

Overall, it seems that you overestimated the assets of Hashfast, just as you got used to lashing out too quickly.

I am not scr3.ucr3trs nor do I have any form of communication with him other than this forum. 

I simply do my homework as rigorously as I can.  I base my comments on what I find and believe to be true.

There is no doubt that the current mess has been created by Hashfast's Eduardo and Simon.  Absolutely.  They should remain the real target of our wrath. I agree with you on that.  However, regarding the Creditor's Council, I have a different position than they "worked for us" on a voluntary basis.  I think others, directly on the council are now starting to agree with this.  There were serious conflict of interests.  That is simply a fact.  Not wanting to admit that and the consequences it had, that is "not seeing beyond your nose".  Now, admittedly, this is no longer important as there is nothing that can be done about it any longer.  The reality today is what it is, and in my opinion, there's no reason to be optimistic about the outcome for the unsecured creditors.




The sad but only truth remaining is this:  The ONLY people left at HF are Simon and Eddie.  Sad.  Those that created the mess are still collecting paychecks on behalf of the creditors.  Sick.  The CRO has been in charge for a week - the website still hasn't been touched, no news, no millions of dollars of recovery.  Everyone that has tried to reach out for anyone at HF meets with absolutely no response, as is typical with the current remaining employees.  There was a severe and serious conflict of interest, and it begins also with the lawyers who are "representing" the creditors.  They don't have a clue about business reality.  Millions of dollars are gone, wasted, and now we wait a slow spiral death for nothing to happen except for the CRO , who was recommended and selected by the committee and their counsel, to collect his fees, pay the lawyers, and screw the creditors more.  Where is the plan that was alluded to weeks ago?  There is no "secrecy" now that HF management isn't negotiating any more with the committee?  Where are all the sales that were promised now that management is no longer in charge?  Why not post what the CRO has accomplished over the past week, and how much progress has been made and what it has cost?  The silence is deafening. 
BitCoin Operated Boy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 26, 2014, 10:41:43 PM
 #10499

Guys...
Today, I received another 2 letters from US Bankruptcy Court Northern District of California.

First letter provides an advise about filing a claim. Which I already did online and I also send a letter directly to Office of The Clerk US Bankruptcy Court Northern District of California. Office of The Clerk replied that they received my form online and that I am already on the list of creditors.

Second letter provides a list of all creditors. I have not found my name on the list again.

I realy don't understand it. What should I think about it now. Does anyone know why I am still not on the list despite the confirmation from the clerk?
pmorici
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 480
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 27, 2014, 12:25:01 AM
 #10500

Guys...
Today, I received another 2 letters from US Bankruptcy Court Northern District of California.

First letter provides an advise about filing a claim. Which I already did online and I also send a letter directly to Office of The Clerk US Bankruptcy Court Northern District of California. Office of The Clerk replied that they received my form online and that I am already on the list of creditors.

Second letter provides a list of all creditors. I have not found my name on the list again.

I realy don't understand it. What should I think about it now. Does anyone know why I am still not on the list despite the confirmation from the clerk?

Hard to say w/o knowing what your name is.  If they are sending you notices though your name must be on some list.
Pages: « 1 ... 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 [525] 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 ... 586 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Bitcointalk.org is not available or authorized for sale. Do not believe any fake listings.
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!