...and that transfer that precariousness abroad like an open book, canceling the expansion of DASH to new interested people , with what, in addition to having tied the past and present potential of the project ... you also condition its future growth capacity: Well, even for the proven limitation of the active / executive mass of DASH ... absolutely ROUND, GREAT ! ).
Well , sorry for the pedantic autoquote... but i think it is going to lengthen a bit and I need to expose another point for a more complete overview of the problem that I exposed in this last post. And it is the precariousness of DASH as a social trigger, as a magnetic point to live a "crypto revolution" that is already seducing worldwide by the brilliance of BTC.
Is the indifference / contempt of DASH towards those who are not part of its reduced hierarchy bonded a good strategy of reception, integration and exploitation of masses potentially interested in crypto? (and attention, not only because of the USE of crypto as money ... although the DASH brilliant thinking heads organize and assign their cascade of roles of everybody ... people are very free, sorry, to interpret a sector based on their own interest ... whichever they want , either as users or as "investors" - and on how productive certain collective synergies can be in crypto, we have little to clarify here - ).
I wrote a fairly empathetic post on Reddit about my surprise when, after an absence from the day-to-day running of DASH from Spring 2017 to mid-2018, I resumed my interest and involvement in "the community" of DASH.
I found a project where the particular expectations of integration, the projection of that potential for synergy and "popular" contribution that was transmitted in 2016 and early 17 had not only disappeared, but a surprising tone circulated in the forum or in discord of "appropriation arrogant " of that collective trigger that was SO attractive one day.
You were trying to contribute, analyze points of obvious mistake/limitation/improvement of the situation at that time (the biggest surprise was, obviously, that Evolution was still "in the laboratory" after the asynchronies that arose from the global projection meeting in London ... just as it is still two years later) and the most common response line was: "Do you want to participate in DASH? ... Buy five Mnodes!"
That project, that open meeting point of 2016/17 had simply disappeared. The "particular" integration had been reduced to a massive looting of resources, authorized by the decision-making body of Mnodes, financing an endless and millionaire succession of "occurrences", each one more absurd, in favor of any newcomer, many without any linking to the project, who came to DASH specifically to "put the pot" (ask for "their share").
The point is that that situation after the ATH and Evo's fall prevented any practical integration of the real community, the popular one, the "on foot" community. - in fact, and imo, it was the end of the "Real Community" of DASH ... or, at least, so I perceived it with absolute clarity. You walked into Dash TROLLK DIscord, an absolutely disgusting cave of arbitrary censorship, and you were trying to promote reorientations (in favor of the collective interest of the project, not ridiculous "Keynesian" mass deliveries or anything like that) and group attacks, insults and slights included, by the shameful collective that frequents the aforementioned discord, they left your eyes wide. Beyond the logical disagreements that any particular position can generate - of course, with all legitimacy -, integral idiots, mods included, insulting and disqualifying in a group with total impunity ... other retardeds proudly boasting of the right to marginalize (ideas, not personal participation) that their status as Mnodes conferred on them ... bans without the slightest rigor and out of sheer whim by pathetic and conceited mods (to the surprising applause and collective laughter of other members - let's not even talk about expecting the least collective empathy before an avoidable censure on another participant - ... many of them, perfectly authorized to harass and insult) ... open acknowledgments of receiving incentives from the DAO - through payments of initiatives financed with the common treasure - to harass and marginalize "alleged "trolls (of course, qualified as such by those same censors) ... absolutely shameful and unconscionable insults and harassment in tweeter towards executives of relevant partners of DASH, as in the embarrassing case of the CEO of Bitrefill, responded with the most absolute silence of the censor ghetto "comrades" and not the slightest recrimination of this type of indefensible acts (my first ban it was in Discord for reproaching that mindless attitude, without the least personal respect OR COMMERCIAL CONVENIENCE to his still proud cause, who identified his participation in the incident with that of a true champion, a warrior in defense of a DASH "trolled by the human species "- delirium close to persecution mania - that did not allow the manager of a DASH partner to be a conceptual supporter of Bitcoin. Absolutely hallucinogenic).
Well ... I think that the context, obviously from my point of view, is perfectly defined. But beyond subjective expositions that could cloud the view, it is advisable to try to anticipate the "conceptual" consequences that a status quo of this kind could carry DASH as a crypto currency project :
THE first obvious consequence is:
- Beyond the executive hierarchy, with greater or lesser range of decision and participation ... IS THERE REALLY a simple community, at street level ... in this project?
- If so ... what is its role in the organization chart? (Even more so in an organization that shows less and less intentions to finance proposals, which are the last small crack of active participation that someone without a Mnode or a salary at DCG had left to join a project of supposed collective collaboration?
- If not ... or its role is merely decorative at the level of integration beyond simple consumption ... what does this resignation of "massive activism" mean for DASH? - imo, a luxury that only a stupid can afford, sorry -
- When we still see how a characteristic collective synergy in crypto is capable of driving projects to the top and their capitalization to very important levels (which in DASH would be an added bonus thanks to its feedback system on project financing) ...
... is it smart to assign the lowest expression in the project hierarchy the role of simple "clients"?
... It will be its satisfaction as users enough - attention! : in a system based on ridiculous service charges - to sustain the necessary enrichment in the upper layers of the project? ... We need a legion of satisfied customers , or a tsunami of really retardeds that make rich 4 smart guys with a smile on our lips ... while in other projects they can obtain consideration, integration and even economic benefits from their contribution as users and / or holders?
... Will this structure generate sufficient incentives for Mnodes and miners to face their task of maintaining the network?
... Will the DAO have adequate budgets to finance necessary developments? - even more necessary when you cannot count on "free" activities of a basic militancy that is marginalized from any economic return and participation in the system, including an elementary right to vote regarding the project with which it identifies? -.
... Despite the fact that a paid Instant Send was already a disastrous financial precedent...will the platform bring new financing resources to solve the project's budgetary precariousness?
And finally :
... Does this gang of just a few hundred chumps really measure the consequences of their arrogant, conceited, selfish AND EXCLUSIVE attitudes? ... because, perhaps, those who have not yet come down from the throne of late 2017 and stepped on solid ground, are them.
The general dump that they insist so much on reminding us to justify this precariousness of money, productivity, leadership and talent ... has it also reached their pathetic egos? Or is someone still taking a nap and enjoying their best dreams in the Top 3 ... believing that the world public will come to eat in their hand out of sheer inertia of our excellence?
To the people, to the public ... you have to deserve it over, friends ... EVERY DAY. It is not enough to put on the big mouth of 4 charlatans demagogically and to exhaustion the word "community" so empty of content in this project ... while treating them like "Don nobody".
Anyway ... a few little things to ponder over, imho. (Troll stuff , in the opinion of others...arrogant and self-proclaimed Lancelots in defense of DASH
).
