[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[Lauda]

guys...Do you think that in the 14th the price will rise up to the MOON

This would actually be damaging for the coin overall. A quick pump is usually followed by a crash in the market. If we have a steady increase of 10-20% in price per day, that would be great.

[1715132986]

1715132986

[1715132986]

1715132986

[1715132986]

1715132986

[binaryclock]

Come check our new GUI, Single-Login site out.  Ajax controls that update, SSO so you

only have to create one account for all the new pools on our v2.0 site.




Hope to see you here!



DARK.V2.DEDICATEDPOOL.COM



Mining Information

• SSO (single sign-on) - one account for all our pools on Dedicated v2.0
  
• Custom stratum/mpos environment
• Vardiff enabled
• PPNLS payout system
• Everything is transparent - blocks, donations, fees.

Server Infrastructure

• SIX(6) SERVERS IN CLUSTER
• DDoS level 7 cloudflare, 5 and 3 stratum, and level at 1 switch level
• 8 Core servers, 256GB DDR3 RAM, RAID 10 SSD
• Ramdisks, memcaches, to make things go extremely quick

[TanteStefana]

finally figured it out For some reason the MN list is showing the public IP broadcasted by my home router, it's not showing the elastic IP of the EC2 instance. Any idea why this is happening?

When setting this up, did you start darkcoind normally on your remote computer?  IE: ./darkcoind ?

When starting your local server, did you start it with the  masternode=ip:9999
then unlock the wallet, then start masternode - all on the local wallet?

Does your remote configure have your ip address in the right spot?

Finally, do both wallet config files have masternode=1 in them and the proper needed ip address "addnode=25.25.XXX.XXX"?

Those are the main things I can think of???

yep, i followed all these instructions, my home router IP is shown in the list still instead of the IP of the EC2 instance.

Ok, well it seems like your local wallet is not hooking up with the EC2

Have you possibly started your local darkcoind first with a normal start up, like ./darkcoind before doing ./darkcoind masternodeaddr=ip:9999 ?

If so, you must stop your darkcoind, and start it up from the beginning with ./darkcoind masternodeaddr=(ip_of_remote_server):9999

THEN, you need to unlock your local (hopefully passphrased wallet)
Then do the ./darkcoind masternode start passphrase

something got messed up in the steps, we just have to figure out where   I do this all the time, it's common to get a blind spot, sometimes it's better after walking away from it for a few hours

[Macno]

Well, it looks like we're going to hit the minimum coins to be paid, 5 coins per block, very soon.  I believe if this continues, we'll only ultimately mine 11 million coins, no?  The 22 million or so coins originally predicted assumed a much less drastic increase in hash rate.

Bump! Really???

[jimhuang]

That coin is Going Crazy

[Dusty11]

Are the devs planning to release a hardened masternode ISO?

[reflexmk]

So with ccminer finally supporting X11, I've moved my Nvidia 750ti rig over to mining darkcoin (which felt AWESOME). Some rough numbers:

5x 750ti cards at load:
- 7650 kh/s (1530 kh/s per card)
- 240W total system draw at the wall

So if we assume ~40W draw from rest of the system (motherboard, cpu, hdd, psu inefficiencies), that leads to some pretty nice stats

38 kh/s/W for Nvidia 750ti (1530kh / 40W)
22 kh/s/W for AMD 7970 (2200kh / 100W)

From memory, this is even better performance (relative to AMD) than scrypt gets. Which means Nvidia is the clear winner for X11 mining, at least for the moment.

I'm very interested in this, please do try some overclocking, I've read somewhere that 750ti did 2,6 Mh/s which is insane  

edit: here it is, if you can confirm it I'm buying 5-6 cards ASAP https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.12780

[LimLims]

So with ccminer finally supporting X11, I've moved my Nvidia 750ti rig over to mining darkcoin (which felt AWESOME). Some rough numbers:

5x 750ti cards at load:
- 7650 kh/s (1530 kh/s per card)
- 240W total system draw at the wall

So if we assume ~40W draw from rest of the system (motherboard, cpu, hdd, psu inefficiencies), that leads to some pretty nice stats

38 kh/s/W for Nvidia 750ti (1530kh / 40W)
22 kh/s/W for AMD 7970 (2200kh / 100W)

From memory, this is even better performance (relative to AMD) than scrypt gets. Which means Nvidia is the clear winner for X11 mining, at least for the moment.

I'm very interested in this, please do try some overclocking, I've read somewhere that 750ti did 2,6 Mh/s which is insane  

edit: here it is, if you can confirm it I'm buying 5-6 cards ASAP https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.12780

I don't think I quite believe the 2.6Mh/s figure. It might have been a typo?

[blajde]

The latest release of wallet and MNsupply will be working on RC2 or will new update come again?

We have had to update our wallets due to bug fixes since May 1st, but it is still considered RC2.  We may have many updates (but at the moment only one fork) in the near future.  However, regular updates to the wallet should not be such a big deal and shouldn't be terribly time sensitive.

Nah, I'm just checking if there's anything else to sort out before my node starts collecting my retirement

[raze182]

Are the devs planning to release a hardened masternode ISO?

We will be working on creating AWS AMI’s for you to use as well as Ubuntu ISO images for you to setup a server, you will still be responsible for making sure the host is secure and firewall rules are complete based on your specific configuration. When these are created we will put out additional information on what you will need to do after installation.

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/darkcoin-update-masternode-requirements-masternode-payments.225/

[tersagun]

Guys,

trying to mine Darkcoin with my 280x but this is what I'm getting:

GPU 0:  60.0C 1053RPM | 16.86K/17.51Kh/s

What am I doing wrong? :-)

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer -o stratum+tcp://drkpool.com:3333 -u xxx.ersan -p xxx

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475795.0

-k darkcoin

Thanks mate

[Wh1teKn1ght]

finally figured it out For some reason the MN list is showing the public IP broadcasted by my home router, it's not showing the elastic IP of the EC2 instance. Any idea why this is happening?

When setting this up, did you start darkcoind normally on your remote computer?  IE: ./darkcoind ?

When starting your local server, did you start it with the  masternode=ip:9999
then unlock the wallet, then start masternode - all on the local wallet?

Does your remote configure have your ip address in the right spot?

Finally, do both wallet config files have masternode=1 in them and the proper needed ip address "addnode=25.25.XXX.XXX"?

Those are the main things I can think of???

yep, i followed all these instructions, my home router IP is shown in the list still instead of the IP of the EC2 instance.

Ok, well it seems like your local wallet is not hooking up with the EC2

Have you possibly started your local darkcoind first with a normal start up, like ./darkcoind before doing ./darkcoind masternodeaddr=ip:9999 ?

If so, you must stop your darkcoind, and start it up from the beginning with ./darkcoind masternodeaddr=(ip_of_remote_server):9999

THEN, you need to unlock your local (hopefully passphrased wallet)
Then do the ./darkcoind masternode start passphrase

something got messed up in the steps, we just have to figure out where   I do this all the time, it's common to get a blind spot, sometimes it's better after walking away from it for a few hours

i'm using the windows qt wallet locally, only darkcoind is on the remote server. Do you mean that if I have in the past ever started the window QT wallet without the -masternodeaddr=<remote server ip:port> switch that I need to install a new Windows QT wallet and start it with the switch. Or do you mean I just need to close the Windows QT wallet and then restart with the -masternodeaddr switch?
thanks!

[boy play]

Looking forward to the new project quickly out

[Edraket31]

Nice Sellorder......20btc brought us from 600 to 580
I don't know how you all see it, but since Saturday I am expecting a big correction dip before we definitely go up. I wouldn't be surprised if we go back to 500-525

[splawik21]

LOL !!!!

I have just received info from my wallet when I wanted to send 1000 drk for new wallet address that the amount which I want to send it too large eeeee???

Any idea???

I have more than 1000 drk on wallet

http://scr.hu/1ame/bzjqk

EDIT: with new updated wallet the problem disappeared

[Macno]

Nice Sellorder......20btc brought us from 600 to 580
I don't know how you all see it, but since Saturday I am expecting a big correction dip before we definitely go up. I wouldn't be surprised if we go back to 500-525

Well, if it really turns out to be true that only 11 Million are going to be mined...can anyone confirm that?

[WCIR]

price chart http://worldcoinindex.com/coin/Darkcoin

[TanteStefana]

Nice Sellorder......20btc brought us from 600 to 580
I don't know how you all see it, but since Saturday I am expecting a big correction dip before we definitely go up. I wouldn't be surprised if we go back to 500-525

Well, if it really turns out to be true that only 11 Million are going to be mined...can anyone confirm that?

Well, I'm off a bit, but this chart that was made a while back when the total number of coins were going to be reduced, I just looked at a copy I downloaded to my computer, and it's more like 14 million



Is this still true?  We're about to hit minimum, and I don't see us coming back from that?

[ilic]

I dont get the whole "how many coins will be mined" thing sorry, would someone care to explain why the total amount of DRK to be mined might be going from 22 million to 11 million and what the implications are?  can this be changed etc?

[TanteStefana]

I dont get the whole "how many coins will be mined" thing sorry, would someone care to explain why the total amount of DRK to be mined might be going from 22 million to 11 million and what the implications are?  can this be changed etc?

I'm sorry for causing trouble.  I was going by memory, but it's more like 14 million.  What happens is that the rewards are diminished when more people mine.  The more hash rate on this coin, the lower the reward until it hits a minimum of 5 coins.  If we really are at 7 coins right now, I imagine we'll be at 5 in a week or so.  Next year, and each year after, the number of coins will also be reduced 7%.  So our minimum of 5 coins will be reduced more and more each year.  That is what the chart shows.  I always thought it was likely that we'd "hug the minimum number of coins line" as I said back then, and it seems that's indeed what is happening now.

However, we must remember that if this coin becomes less popular to mine, and the difficulty goes back down, the rewards will increase again.  The system is designed to encourage people to mine if mining becomes unprofitable or people leave for whatever reason via the increase in rewards.  It's supposed to find it's own balance and so I may be wrong and people may stop mining and the rewards increased again as intended.  However, if the coins value keeps going up, and it remains profitable to mine despite having minimum rewards, then it will continue along that minimum line.