Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 09:31:48 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 ... 294 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [POOL][Scrypt][Scrypt-N][X11] Profit switching pool - wafflepool.com  (Read 465522 times)
oktay50000
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 10:21:13 PM
 #1041

Waffle when will you be adding USDe coin along with Karmacoin and DigiByte?

+1

BTC : bc1qqz9hvv806w2zs42mx4rn576whxmr202yxp00e9

feel free to buy me a bear
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
luthan
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 10:27:03 PM
 #1042



Clevermining's reject rate is a loss on it's own...i would personally suggest move to megamultipool, you would suddenly see why right now nothing compares...have you heard 1% reject rate for a damn multipool, megamultipool does just that! I doubt any multipool comes close to the earning per MH that megamultipool is offering right now!

what is it offering?  any place to check that?

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
PLINKO    |7| SLOTS     (+) ROULETTE    ▼ BIT SPINBITVESTPLAY or INVEST ║ ✔ Rainbot  ✔ Happy Hours  ✔ Faucet
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
LPCobris
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 129
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 10:50:45 PM
 #1043

Hi Guys!

A parallel question... What program do you use for remote desktop?

I was using Logmein Free, but now is payd and is very expensive for 5 computers...

Any good and cheaper or free alternative to Logmein?

Thanks!

LPC
zneww
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 20, 2014, 10:59:36 PM
 #1044

If you use Windows then Remote desktop. If not then i have heard Teamviewer.
phzi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 12:09:42 AM
 #1045



Clevermining's reject rate is a loss on it's own...i would personally suggest move to megamultipool, you would suddenly see why right now nothing compares...have you heard 1% reject rate for a damn multipool, megamultipool does just that! I doubt any multipool comes close to the earning per MH that megamultipool is offering right now!

what is it offering?  any place to check that?

No idea how luthan thinks megamultipool is profitable... when you look at their mining history, they are consistently below .008BTC/MH/day...
oktay50000
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 12:30:38 AM
 #1046

Feb 20, 2014   only   0.00888805 btc/mh    Huh Huh


lets see for 21 feb we can stay on 0.01826995  Grin Grin Grin

BTC : bc1qqz9hvv806w2zs42mx4rn576whxmr202yxp00e9

feel free to buy me a bear
Byja
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 12:47:56 AM
 #1047

Waffle when will you be adding USDe coin along with Karmacoin and DigiByte?
Isnt karmacoin on list of coins? http://wafflepool.com/faq ?
Anyway,+ for USDe and DigiByte.
mark613
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 02:06:45 AM
 #1048

.0018 btc/mh for today is a pipe dream.   Grin

Looks like I am averaging around .0087  btc/mh for the last 10 hours.
gsrcrxsi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 02:39:48 AM
 #1049


Sorry about that, guys! Server issues that are fixed as of a few hours ago. More details here.

For those of you that use this service that aren't over on reddit, I'd like to say thanks to those of you that have donated. I welcome suggestions and feedback, and, also, donations in the form of BTC or donated mining time are ALWAYS appreciated.

Wil

my suggestion, and probably the suggestion of A LOT of others, is to log the stat history so that we can get an accurate record without having to leave the page up all day.

it's quite annoying to close the site for 8hrs while i sleep, only to wake up, and have it draw a straight line from where it was to where the stats are NOW.
akeetlebeetle
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 221
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 02:46:55 AM
 #1050

Uswest is down and the stats for useast have tanked. The shares seem to be counting, but the ghs is off.
LPCobris
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 129
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 02:52:19 AM
 #1051

If you use Windows then Remote desktop. If not then i have heard Teamviewer.

Hi!
Just tryed TeamViewer and its great (even better then LogMeIn).

Thanks for the tip! Smiley
Free Software is like SEX... Its wayyyy better when its for free! Smiley

LPC!
Zoella
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 02:55:08 AM
 #1052

Uswest is down and the stats for useast have tanked. The shares seem to be counting, but the ghs is off.

Mine are still working on uswest (at the moment).
MisterWil
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 02:55:34 AM
 #1053

my suggestion, and probably the suggestion of A LOT of others, is to log the stat history so that we can get an accurate record without having to leave the page up all day.

it's quite annoying to close the site for 8hrs while i sleep, only to wake up, and have it draw a straight line from where it was to where the stats are NOW.

It's a great suggestion, but I deliberately designed the stats to function like this. I did this for several reasons:

1) I didn't want people to visit my stats once and then forget about it, meanwhile the stats continue to be downloaded. This was a waste not only for me storage wise, but for wafflepool and myself's network usage.

2) Related to above, but I didn't want to hit the API unless people were actually using it.

3) It was quicker to code it this way.

4) I figured that since people had their PC's on mining all the time anyways, if they wanted historical stats they could just keep the page open somewhere.

There's a way to get around this, of course, and that's by writing a bash script or something which will hit the URL: 'http://waffles.wilschrader.com/current/BTC_ADDR' every 60 seconds and then trash the results. I leave the finer details of that up to the user.

Now, I'd love it if poolwaffle would give me (all of us) access to historical data he's no doubt already storing, but since he has more important matters to attend to, I'll make do with what I have now. :-)
fcmatt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1001


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 03:07:00 AM
 #1054

yea, something did happen with the servers. i noticed too. when i finally got around to checking it looked like my share submission diff was way too low. like it reset to the lowest and is now working its way back up. my hash rate seems a tad low too.
Zoella
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 03:14:16 AM
Last edit: February 21, 2014, 12:38:44 PM by Zoella
 #1055

...
There's a way to get around this, of course, and that's by writing a bash script or something which will hit the URL: 'http://waffles.wilschrader.com/current/BTC_ADDR' every 60 seconds and then trash the results. I leave the finer details of that up to the user.

Now, I'd love it if poolwaffle would give me (all of us) access to historical data he's no doubt already storing, but since he has more important matters to attend to, I'll make do with what I have now. :-)

Thanks for the tip! Just modified my miner start script to include...

pkill watch
watch -n60 wget -qO http://waffles.wilschrader.com/current/BTC_ADDR &> /dev/null &
GunPowder
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 04:42:23 AM
 #1056

poolwaffle,

Fix please miners sorting. When I split several miners by different users (like <mywallet>_1, <mywallet>_2) sorting become incorrect. I down to the bottom of the list. Looks like it sorts by average hash of the 1 average miner.

Thank you!

richmke
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 06:52:22 AM
 #1057


Say these smaller coins are more profitable than a large coin 50% of the time (I think this is high), and are more profitable by 50% (also a bit high).  And we switch 5-10% of our pool to aim for them (500MHs-1GHs).  You're looking at a 1.25-2.5% boost to profit, without taking into consideration any of the context switching.
...
Thoughts?

Which is why you do not want the huge increase to the pool hash rate. If the pool was back to 1GH, that small increment would be much more over a smaller pool.

Regarding the botnet and how to terminate them without risking a DDoS attack:

Since payouts are done manually, or initiated manually, you could shave their payout by a few percent, and give it to everyone else. Slowly increase the percentage. Eventually they will see the declining profitability and go somewhere else.

herc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 07:24:06 AM
 #1058

WTF with servers???
bluntt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 07:27:09 AM
 #1059

today i am getting insane amounts of rejects on .eu?
phzi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 07:44:55 AM
 #1060

poolwaffle,

Fix please miners sorting. When I split several miners by different users (like <mywallet>_1, <mywallet>_2) sorting become incorrect. I down to the bottom of the list. Looks like it sorts by average hash of the 1 average miner.

Thank you!
Sort order is by your first worker.
Pages: « 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 ... 294 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!