|
poolwaffle (OP)
|
 |
February 22, 2014, 12:01:35 PM |
|
Please check those to start with:
1Y9My747MgN9jVovucztEKSgLengPrsm6_off1
1Y9My747MgN9jVovucztEKSgLengPrsm6_off2
1Y9My747MgN9jVovucztEKSgLengPrsm6_garage1
1Y9My747MgN9jVovucztEKSgLengPrsm6_garage2
And for the third time. Please email me. We don't keep full logs of why workers are getting rejects, it runs at about 2-3gig of data per hour. We only keep the last hour of detailed stats, the rest are summed up. I need to coordinate with you to be able to watch whats happening when you're mining with separate workers. Please email me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
tiagocis
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2014, 12:12:22 PM |
|
Hi poowaffle,
Great job on maintaining this pool and explaining the situation for everyone (with patience).
I just have one question: If the vardiff is disabled for now, it would be interesting removing that from the FAQ on the site?
That FAQ session would be confusing for new people that think vardiff is enabled and check that is locked in 512.
Best regards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
poolwaffle (OP)
|
|
February 22, 2014, 12:32:01 PM |
|
Hi poowaffle,
Great job on maintaining this pool and explaining the situation for everyone (with patience).
I just have one question: If the vardiff is disabled for now, it would be interesting removing that from the FAQ on the site?
That FAQ session would be confusing for new people that think vardiff is enabled and check that is locked in 512.
Best regards.
Agreed! Made some notes around the site (News, index, miner page). Posted a link to the wilshrader page (I never thanked you sir!) |
|
|
|
|
dency45
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2014, 12:40:47 PM |
|
I think the biggest thing is this: Because shares per round is fluctuating so much, reported hash rate is also fluctuating. Shares over time should average out to being the same, thus reported hash rate should average out to being the same.
Yep, I'll increase the timespan for hashrate calcs. Right now its over 5min, which was fine for lower difficulty. Just bumping it higher means more DB access (storing more data, more calculations, etc). It also means a longer time until people see their hashrate at what it should be. Not too worried, just some side effects of the change. I agree though, this is probably what is confusing people. I should have just done more research before speaking. Sorry about that. :-)
No worries. Sorry if it came off as curt (I actually edited it almost immediately after). Just got 30 things on my plate, and explaining variance 5x a day to people gets tiring  Add variance explanation to FAQs. |
|
|
|
|
|
oktay50000
|
|
February 22, 2014, 02:53:17 PM |
|
rejects are good but im getting too many stales...any one getting stales too?
|
BTC : bc1qqz9hvv806w2zs42mx4rn576whxmr202yxp00e9
feel free to buy me a bear
|
|
|
Khelgaar
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
"If you are going through hell, keep going"-Sir WC
|
|
February 22, 2014, 03:29:53 PM |
|
rejects are good but im getting too many stales...any one getting stales too?
nope, it`s ok on eu server |
|
|
|
|
dmc82
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2014, 03:38:31 PM |
|
Poolwaffle, What u have done today/last night is great! 0.044BTC after 23 hours with 3.45MH/s. Can you do this everyday? Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
|
Zoella
|
|
February 22, 2014, 03:57:57 PM |
|
I think the biggest thing is this: Because shares per round is fluctuating so much, reported hash rate is also fluctuating. Shares over time should average out to being the same, thus reported hash rate should average out to being the same.
Yep, I'll increase the timespan for hashrate calcs. Right now its over 5min, which was fine for lower difficulty. Just bumping it higher means more DB access (storing more data, more calculations, etc). It also means a longer time until people see their hashrate at what it should be. Not too worried, just some side effects of the change. I agree though, this is probably what is confusing people. I should have just done more research before speaking. Sorry about that. :-)
No worries. Sorry if it came off as curt (I actually edited it almost immediately after). Just got 30 things on my plate, and explaining variance 5x a day to people gets tiring Add variance explanation to FAQs. Might as well ask for instructions on how to tie your shoes or brush your teeth. Some topics are basics and it should be expected you know them or research them yourself. |
|
|
|
|
|
phzi
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:02:51 PM |
|
Might as well ask for instructions on how to tie your shoes or brush your teeth. Some topics are basics and it should be expected you know them or research them yourself.
That is the idea of "Frequently Asked Questions"... --- Poolwaffle: since you already have round data in the database (end time + number of shares), why not just calculate hashrate based on that? (for say, 10 rounds, and for the current round). No extra processing or data storage required that way. |
|
|
|
|
azebro
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:30:01 PM |
|
No payout today?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zels
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:31:51 PM |
|
Anything wrong on eu server again ?? Balance didn't move since 4hours  |
|
|
|
|
|
Zoella
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:50:46 PM |
|
No payout today?
Banner on the website and recent post from poolwaffle explains the delay. |
|
|
|
|
|
Zoella
|
|
February 22, 2014, 04:59:19 PM |
|
Might as well ask for instructions on how to tie your shoes or brush your teeth. Some topics are basics and it should be expected you know them or research them yourself.
That is the idea of "Frequently Asked Questions"... ... Yes, but the idea of "Frequently Asked Questions" is for the specific topic, WAFFLEPOOL. There is already plenty of information for crypto, altcoins, pools, mining, GPUs, math, brushing your teeth, etc. Asking the pool owner to perform redundant work takes away from his time spent on profitability. That means you and I are paying out of our potential profits to educate people to lazy to bother reading a few posts back in this thread. What makes you think they'll read the FAQ? A section in the FAQ that is a collection of links to external resources on how to tie your shoes I could understand, but I don't think poolwaffle should have to spend his time redoing work that has already been done. |
|
|
|
|
|
zneww
|
|
February 22, 2014, 05:00:56 PM |
|
Might as well ask for instructions on how to tie your shoes or brush your teeth. Some topics are basics and it should be expected you know them or research them yourself.
That is the idea of "Frequently Asked Questions"... ... Yes, but the idea of "Frequently Asked Questions" is for the specific topic, WAFFLEPOOL. There is already plenty of information for crypto, altcoins, pools, mining, GPUs, math, brushing your teeth, etc. Asking the pool owner to perform redundant work takes away from his time spent on profitability. That means you and I are paying out of our potential profits to educate people to lazy to bother reading a few posts back in this thread. What makes you think they'll read the FAQ? A section in the FAQ that is a collection of links to external resources on how to tie your shoes I could understand, but I don't think poolwaffle should have to spend his time redoing work that has already been done. Is it the left lace first?  |
|
|
|
|
|
richmke
|
|
February 22, 2014, 05:06:41 PM |
|
Is there a way to see individual worker stats? If not, what is the purpose of the worker option? If so, how do you see individual worker stats?
Nevermind. I see on the individual stats page where you have a place for a future update to put individual miner information. In the meantime, I set up different bitcoin addresses for each miner. |
|
|
|
|
|
richmke
|
|
February 22, 2014, 05:12:39 PM |
|
With 10 times the hashing power vs. a week ago, that implies waffle pool is taking in 10 times the fees.
Do costs scale with hashing power (charged more for the server usage)?
With 10GH, and .01 btc/MH, that is about 100 BTC/day gross. At 1% fee, that is 1 BTC to the Pool, or about $200,000 per year at $600/btc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANJULE
|
|
February 22, 2014, 05:14:36 PM |
|
Yes, it seems that in every forum gets filled with people that like to know something about everything.
But they are too lazy to google or even read thru the same page where their question will appear.
It would be very nice to see people think about the question, maybe then write it to google or search box of that forum.
Generally 95-97% of the questions are already answered mostly on the same thread or at least easy to find thru google.
Sorry about this offtopic. Feel that the high information content is lost to one or two different questions that are asked 3-5times
per page.
FIND THE INFORMATION BY SEARCHING FOR IT FIRST, THEN ASK IF NO-ONE HAS ASKED IT BEFORE!
Thank you.
|
CoinWare.eu - Just started an online-store that accepts BTC! For now only few items, but more to come! Shipping allover the World by Express-mail. Europe: 3-6workdays| USA: 4-7workdays | Rest of the World: 4-11 workdays
|
|
|
|
zneww
|
|
February 22, 2014, 05:16:22 PM |
|
With 10 times the hashing power vs. a week ago, that implies waffle pool is taking in 10 times the fees.
Do costs scale with hashing power (charged more for the server usage)?
With 10GH, and .01 btc/MH, that is about 100 BTC/day gross. At 1% fee, that is 1 BTC to the Pool, or about $200,000 per year at $600/btc.
Yes. He has to keep upgrading as they get bigger. Or pay more for data. Adding more servers, etc.. |
|
|
|
|
azebro
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2014, 05:26:25 PM |
|
No payout today?
Banner on the website and recent post from poolwaffle explains the delay. The one from yesterday? |
|
|
|
|
cloudrck
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2014, 05:28:26 PM |
|
Generally 95-97% of the questions are already answered mostly on the same thread or at least easy to find thru google.
Welcome to the internet. Ironic isn't it? No payout today?
Banner on the website and recent post from poolwaffle explains the delay. The one from yesterday? The one from today. |
|
|
|
|
|
