Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 06:38:10 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 [68] 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 ... 294 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [POOL][Scrypt][Scrypt-N][X11] Profit switching pool - wafflepool.com  (Read 465522 times)
RickJamesBTC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 01:17:21 AM
 #1341

3-4 a day.. I wish, I get them hourly. It's irritating.
(slightly OT):
RickJamesBTC... you're mining with CM?  How's the payouts/MH (by your calculations, not CMs)?

I've had great luck with WP for the last few weeks, my trials with CM didn't fair so well.

I'm mining all three. CM is ahead of MC right now, but that's because MC is having major problems. I'm getting a little higher than .01 / (cm)mh with cm, but I'm seriously losing 5-10 mh at any given time from rejects. I am getting around .08 / mh actual...  I've brought a bunch of rigs to WP now, see how it goes.
1714675090
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714675090

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714675090
Reply with quote  #2

1714675090
Report to moderator
1714675090
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714675090

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714675090
Reply with quote  #2

1714675090
Report to moderator
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714675090
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714675090

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714675090
Reply with quote  #2

1714675090
Report to moderator
ANJULE
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2014, 04:03:48 AM
 #1342

Wow, the payout looking good. 0,015/mh!
The stats page shows a different figure (0.00849307), maby it depends where the calculations
start,  since two different timed payouts? Or WAFFLEStats being wrong?

CoinWare.eu - Just started an online-store that accepts BTC!
For now only few items, but more to come! Shipping allover the World by Express-mail.
Europe: 3-6workdays| USA: 4-7workdays | Rest of the World: 4-11 workdays
Zoella
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 04:16:45 AM
 #1343

Wow, the payout looking good. 0,015/mh!
The stats page shows a different figure (0.00849307), maby it depends where the calculations
start,  since two different timed payouts? Or WAFFLEStats being wrong?

I believe the stats are from midnight to midnight UTC, where as the payments happen at varying time (and not at midnight).
igroock
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 04:27:01 AM
 #1344

Waffle and team, I want to make a suggestion to you guys.

I think you should implement registrations to control the number of hashing power. The faster you grow the faster you will encounter issues, and the need to expand. Now, if you are willing to continue to keep upgrading your gear and do all the work on software, and manage to do it with no much downtime, more power to you. But, I wouldnt want to see you fall because of technical problems. One of the many reasons MiddleCoin went down the tubes.

I dont think it would inconvenience people to go and register, it takes no time. What it will give you is an ability to regulate traffic and how much youre willing to accept at any moment. Say you want to add 5 more GH, you resume registrations and when a specific number is reached you close it down.

Thoughts? 
phzi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 04:33:49 AM
 #1345

Waffle and team, I want to make a suggestion to you guys.

I think you should implement registrations to control the number of hashing power. The faster you grow the faster you will encounter issues, and the need to expand. Now, if you are willing to continue to keep upgrading your gear and do all the work on software, and manage to do it with no much downtime, more power to you. But, I wouldnt want to see you fall because of technical problems. One of the many reasons MiddleCoin went down the tubes.

I dont think it would inconvenience people to go and register, it takes no time. What it will give you is an ability to regulate traffic and how much youre willing to accept at any moment. Say you want to add 5 more GH, you resume registrations and when a specific number is reached you close it down.

Thoughts? 
No...

Besides, WafflePool has handled a 10fold increase in hashing power almost overnight quite well... I foresee little problem stemming from future growth.
mr_fakename
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 04:41:51 AM
 #1346

Waffle and team, I want to make a suggestion to you guys.

I think you should implement registrations to control the number of hashing power. The faster you grow the faster you will encounter issues, and the need to expand. Now, if you are willing to continue to keep upgrading your gear and do all the work on software, and manage to do it with no much downtime, more power to you. But, I wouldnt want to see you fall because of technical problems. One of the many reasons MiddleCoin went down the tubes.

I dont think it would inconvenience people to go and register, it takes no time. What it will give you is an ability to regulate traffic and how much youre willing to accept at any moment. Say you want to add 5 more GH, you resume registrations and when a specific number is reached you close it down.

Thoughts? 
No...

Besides, WafflePool has handled a 10fold increase in hashing power almost overnight quite well... I foresee little problem stemming from future growth.

I doubt it is necessary yet but is poolwaffles problem, if he can't handle the load then is certainly one way to go, I personally wouldn't mind not that hard to choose a username and password so long as he doesn't want my social security number, address and the name of my grade 2 teacher Tongue.
abalam
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 06:08:17 AM
 #1347

Mintcoin arrived on Cryptsy...
As i know you are playing with Cryptsy's API, and the value of mintcoin now regarding it's difficulty, maybe you will use it now in wafflecoin ?
( i just made a temporary move to mintcoin "only" since saturday because of this )

Edit : the value on poloniex now https://poloniex.com/exchange/btc_mint
igroock
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 06:17:27 AM
 #1348

Mintcoin arrived on Cryptsy...
As i know you are playing with Cryptsy's API, and the value of mintcoin now regarding it's difficulty, maybe you will use it now in wafflecoin ?
( i just made a temporary move to mintcoin "only" since saturday because of this )

Edit : the value on poloniex now https://poloniex.com/exchange/btc_mint
Mint is not a 100% scrypt coin, I believe
Dawg75
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 06:59:07 AM
 #1349

Sad
why profotability dropped  to 0.00480181 per mh
 Angry Angry Angry

I am keeping tracking of 11 miners (28.37MH/s) and my average is 0.01128998 over 48.5 hours.  Lowest is 0.00988053 and highest is 0.01150178.  I  count it against the average accepted hashrate which almost matches my clientside hashrate over that period of time.


WaffleMaster
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 546



View Profile
February 24, 2014, 07:11:15 AM
 #1350

Checked my page and I'm/we are mining...Litecoin? What? Whyyyyy
abalam
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 07:46:58 AM
 #1351

Mintcoin arrived on Cryptsy...
As i know you are playing with Cryptsy's API, and the value of mintcoin now regarding it's difficulty, maybe you will use it now in wafflepool ?
( i just made a temporary move to mintcoin "only" since saturday because of this )

Edit : the value on poloniex now https://poloniex.com/exchange/btc_mint
Mint is not a 100% scrypt coin, I believe

What do you mean ?
I'm using CGMiner... didn't changed anything exept the pool address... if the algorithm is different it is a problem for wafflepool ?
mr_fakename
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 08:02:18 AM
 #1352

Checked my page and I'm/we are mining...Litecoin? What? Whyyyyy

Because at various times of the day it is profitable to do so... why do you think? Tongue
cassimares
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 236
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2014, 02:19:15 PM
 #1353

Checked my page and I'm/we are mining...Litecoin? What? Whyyyyy

Because litecoin is more profitable at that moment.

vm_mpn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 605
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 02:31:01 PM
 #1354

Wow! Is WP officially largest multi-pool right now? You guys at over 15GH while MC is under 14.

Congratulations are in order  Smiley
cloudrck
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 03:05:28 PM
 #1355

One of the many reasons MiddleCoin went down the tubes.


How so? I would also argue that MiddleCoin isn't down the tubes.
bttalkdim
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 03:07:14 PM
 #1356

multipool.us - now on  DOGE    20953.4 MH/s
and on other coins some MH/s

PS now on wafflepool - Mining: litecoin

on multipool.us different list of proffitable coins

==============
DOGE      20953.4 MH/s    0h4m    0.00000192    56.33
TIPS      652.6 MH/s    0h3m    0.00000001    59.74
MOON      384.1 MH/s    0h52m    0.00000005    57.89
CAP      20.6 MH/s    0h19m    0.00002210    55.39
LTC      111.6 MH/s    46h48m    0.02552883    54.27
================

why different data ?
bttalkdim
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 03:13:26 PM
 #1357

and on coinwarz.com
for example Doge higher than LTC.
Why WP think LTC is more proffitable now ?
WaffleMaster
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 546



View Profile
February 24, 2014, 03:23:21 PM
 #1358

and on coinwarz.com
for example Doge higher than LTC.
Why WP think LTC is more proffitable now ?
Exactly. There's no way we should even try to be mining Litecoin at all honestly. It's always so far down the list it's a ridiculous idea
Gasai Yuno
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100

Yukki Yukki Yukki!


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 03:59:07 PM
 #1359

hey guys should i insert "difficulty" value to my cgminer config?

i have two rigs 1,4mhs and 2,85mhs

what diff. value should i insert on wafflepool?

thanks.
poolwaffle (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 254


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 04:03:31 PM
 #1360

and on coinwarz.com
for example Doge higher than LTC.
Why WP think LTC is more proffitable now ?
Exactly. There's no way we should even try to be mining Litecoin at all honestly. It's always so far down the list it's a ridiculous idea

This is unfortunately where you're wrong.  Litecoin has a constant block reward, dogecoin does not.  For example, there are some blocks of dogecoin that are worth a tiny tiny fraction of what litecoin is worth.  If it were just between these two coins, we would be mining litecoin.  There is obviously more to it than that, but this is the main reason.
Pages: « 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 [68] 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 ... 294 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!