RickJamesBTC
|
|
February 24, 2014, 01:17:21 AM |
|
3-4 a day.. I wish, I get them hourly. It's irritating.
(slightly OT): RickJamesBTC... you're mining with CM? How's the payouts/MH (by your calculations, not CMs)? I've had great luck with WP for the last few weeks, my trials with CM didn't fair so well. I'm mining all three. CM is ahead of MC right now, but that's because MC is having major problems. I'm getting a little higher than .01 / (cm)mh with cm, but I'm seriously losing 5-10 mh at any given time from rejects. I am getting around .08 / mh actual... I've brought a bunch of rigs to WP now, see how it goes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
ANJULE
|
|
February 24, 2014, 04:03:48 AM |
|
Wow, the payout looking good. 0,015/mh! The stats page shows a different figure (0.00849307), maby it depends where the calculations start, since two different timed payouts? Or WAFFLEStats being wrong?
|
CoinWare.eu - Just started an online-store that accepts BTC! For now only few items, but more to come! Shipping allover the World by Express-mail. Europe: 3-6workdays| USA: 4-7workdays | Rest of the World: 4-11 workdays
|
|
|
Zoella
|
|
February 24, 2014, 04:16:45 AM |
|
Wow, the payout looking good. 0,015/mh! The stats page shows a different figure (0.00849307), maby it depends where the calculations start, since two different timed payouts? Or WAFFLEStats being wrong?
I believe the stats are from midnight to midnight UTC, where as the payments happen at varying time (and not at midnight).
|
|
|
|
igroock
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
February 24, 2014, 04:27:01 AM |
|
Waffle and team, I want to make a suggestion to you guys.
I think you should implement registrations to control the number of hashing power. The faster you grow the faster you will encounter issues, and the need to expand. Now, if you are willing to continue to keep upgrading your gear and do all the work on software, and manage to do it with no much downtime, more power to you. But, I wouldnt want to see you fall because of technical problems. One of the many reasons MiddleCoin went down the tubes.
I dont think it would inconvenience people to go and register, it takes no time. What it will give you is an ability to regulate traffic and how much youre willing to accept at any moment. Say you want to add 5 more GH, you resume registrations and when a specific number is reached you close it down.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
phzi
|
|
February 24, 2014, 04:33:49 AM |
|
Waffle and team, I want to make a suggestion to you guys.
I think you should implement registrations to control the number of hashing power. The faster you grow the faster you will encounter issues, and the need to expand. Now, if you are willing to continue to keep upgrading your gear and do all the work on software, and manage to do it with no much downtime, more power to you. But, I wouldnt want to see you fall because of technical problems. One of the many reasons MiddleCoin went down the tubes.
I dont think it would inconvenience people to go and register, it takes no time. What it will give you is an ability to regulate traffic and how much youre willing to accept at any moment. Say you want to add 5 more GH, you resume registrations and when a specific number is reached you close it down.
Thoughts?
No... Besides, WafflePool has handled a 10fold increase in hashing power almost overnight quite well... I foresee little problem stemming from future growth.
|
|
|
|
mr_fakename
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
February 24, 2014, 04:41:51 AM |
|
Waffle and team, I want to make a suggestion to you guys.
I think you should implement registrations to control the number of hashing power. The faster you grow the faster you will encounter issues, and the need to expand. Now, if you are willing to continue to keep upgrading your gear and do all the work on software, and manage to do it with no much downtime, more power to you. But, I wouldnt want to see you fall because of technical problems. One of the many reasons MiddleCoin went down the tubes.
I dont think it would inconvenience people to go and register, it takes no time. What it will give you is an ability to regulate traffic and how much youre willing to accept at any moment. Say you want to add 5 more GH, you resume registrations and when a specific number is reached you close it down.
Thoughts?
No... Besides, WafflePool has handled a 10fold increase in hashing power almost overnight quite well... I foresee little problem stemming from future growth. I doubt it is necessary yet but is poolwaffles problem, if he can't handle the load then is certainly one way to go, I personally wouldn't mind not that hard to choose a username and password so long as he doesn't want my social security number, address and the name of my grade 2 teacher .
|
|
|
|
abalam
|
|
February 24, 2014, 06:08:17 AM |
|
Mintcoin arrived on Cryptsy... As i know you are playing with Cryptsy's API, and the value of mintcoin now regarding it's difficulty, maybe you will use it now in wafflecoin ? ( i just made a temporary move to mintcoin "only" since saturday because of this ) Edit : the value on poloniex now https://poloniex.com/exchange/btc_mint
|
|
|
|
igroock
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
February 24, 2014, 06:17:27 AM |
|
Mintcoin arrived on Cryptsy... As i know you are playing with Cryptsy's API, and the value of mintcoin now regarding it's difficulty, maybe you will use it now in wafflecoin ? ( i just made a temporary move to mintcoin "only" since saturday because of this ) Edit : the value on poloniex now https://poloniex.com/exchange/btc_mintMint is not a 100% scrypt coin, I believe
|
|
|
|
Dawg75
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
February 24, 2014, 06:59:07 AM |
|
I am keeping tracking of 11 miners (28.37MH/s) and my average is 0.01128998 over 48.5 hours. Lowest is 0.00988053 and highest is 0.01150178. I count it against the average accepted hashrate which almost matches my clientside hashrate over that period of time.
|
|
|
|
WaffleMaster
|
|
February 24, 2014, 07:11:15 AM |
|
Checked my page and I'm/we are mining...Litecoin? What? Whyyyyy
|
|
|
|
abalam
|
|
February 24, 2014, 07:46:58 AM |
|
Mintcoin arrived on Cryptsy... As i know you are playing with Cryptsy's API, and the value of mintcoin now regarding it's difficulty, maybe you will use it now in wafflepool ? ( i just made a temporary move to mintcoin "only" since saturday because of this ) Edit : the value on poloniex now https://poloniex.com/exchange/btc_mintMint is not a 100% scrypt coin, I believe What do you mean ? I'm using CGMiner... didn't changed anything exept the pool address... if the algorithm is different it is a problem for wafflepool ?
|
|
|
|
mr_fakename
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
February 24, 2014, 08:02:18 AM |
|
Checked my page and I'm/we are mining...Litecoin? What? Whyyyyy
Because at various times of the day it is profitable to do so... why do you think?
|
|
|
|
cassimares
|
|
February 24, 2014, 02:19:15 PM |
|
Checked my page and I'm/we are mining...Litecoin? What? Whyyyyy
Because litecoin is more profitable at that moment.
|
|
|
|
vm_mpn
|
|
February 24, 2014, 02:31:01 PM |
|
Wow! Is WP officially largest multi-pool right now? You guys at over 15GH while MC is under 14. Congratulations are in order
|
|
|
|
cloudrck
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
February 24, 2014, 03:05:28 PM |
|
One of the many reasons MiddleCoin went down the tubes.
How so? I would also argue that MiddleCoin isn't down the tubes.
|
|
|
|
bttalkdim
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
February 24, 2014, 03:07:14 PM |
|
multipool.us - now on DOGE 20953.4 MH/s and on other coins some MH/s
PS now on wafflepool - Mining: litecoin
on multipool.us different list of proffitable coins
============== DOGE 20953.4 MH/s 0h4m 0.00000192 56.33 TIPS 652.6 MH/s 0h3m 0.00000001 59.74 MOON 384.1 MH/s 0h52m 0.00000005 57.89 CAP 20.6 MH/s 0h19m 0.00002210 55.39 LTC 111.6 MH/s 46h48m 0.02552883 54.27 ================
why different data ?
|
|
|
|
bttalkdim
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
February 24, 2014, 03:13:26 PM |
|
and on coinwarz.com for example Doge higher than LTC. Why WP think LTC is more proffitable now ?
|
|
|
|
WaffleMaster
|
|
February 24, 2014, 03:23:21 PM |
|
and on coinwarz.com for example Doge higher than LTC. Why WP think LTC is more proffitable now ?
Exactly. There's no way we should even try to be mining Litecoin at all honestly. It's always so far down the list it's a ridiculous idea
|
|
|
|
Gasai Yuno
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Yukki Yukki Yukki!
|
|
February 24, 2014, 03:59:07 PM |
|
hey guys should i insert "difficulty" value to my cgminer config?
i have two rigs 1,4mhs and 2,85mhs
what diff. value should i insert on wafflepool?
thanks.
|
|
|
|
poolwaffle (OP)
|
|
February 24, 2014, 04:03:31 PM |
|
and on coinwarz.com for example Doge higher than LTC. Why WP think LTC is more proffitable now ?
Exactly. There's no way we should even try to be mining Litecoin at all honestly. It's always so far down the list it's a ridiculous idea This is unfortunately where you're wrong. Litecoin has a constant block reward, dogecoin does not. For example, there are some blocks of dogecoin that are worth a tiny tiny fraction of what litecoin is worth. If it were just between these two coins, we would be mining litecoin. There is obviously more to it than that, but this is the main reason.
|
|
|
|
|