Zamboniman
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 26, 2014, 07:13:55 PM |
|
Yes, it probably should.
Also, people should ensure, in any forum anywhere on the internet where they post a question that they refrain from posting the question until the read at least the last several pages first. Chances are always more than 90% the question has already been answered.
In this case, I was chuckling to myself at the absurdity of it. Poolwaffle explains about payouts, then four or five people, right below, are asking about payouts. It's eye-rolling stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's
computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be
reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uniphase21
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
February 26, 2014, 07:14:20 PM |
|
Waffle,
I sent you a pm on here a few days ago. Is there a better way to contact you?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
GalacticMiningCorp
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
February 26, 2014, 07:15:19 PM |
|
"he should display the message on the first page of the website.."
He probably would ... if he didn't have to spend time answering the same questions over and over again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ungaro59
|
|
February 26, 2014, 07:18:07 PM |
|
"he should display the message on the first page of the website.."
He probably would ... if he didn't have to spend time answering the same questions over and over again.
The last time this is what he did and that's fine.  |
|
|
|
|
knybe
|
|
February 26, 2014, 07:30:50 PM |
|
Yes, it probably should.
Also, people should ensure, in any forum anywhere on the internet where they post a question that they refrain from posting the question until the read at least the last several pages first. Chances are always more than 90% the question has already been answered.
In this case, I was chuckling to myself at the absurdity of it. Poolwaffle explains about payouts, then four or five people, right below, are asking about payouts. It's eye-rolling stuff.
first world problems... just ignore them and be done with it… like I'm ignoring all the people who moan about back reading the posts. |
|
|
|
|
luthan
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
February 26, 2014, 07:32:10 PM |
|
"he should display the message on the first page of the website.."
He probably would ... if he didn't have to spend time answering the same questions over and over again.
The last time this is what he did and that's fine. your coins probably get deposited to you and you do nothing with them anyway. what is the rush? it is pretty clear waffles isn't after ripping people off. let the man worry about his personal life, this pool, and NOT about things that are completely out of his control (cryptsy payments). patience! |
|
|
|
|
WaffleMaster
|
|
February 26, 2014, 07:40:09 PM |
|
What happened to the "better stats" page  I really liked that service! It was amazing |
|
|
|
|
igroock
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
February 26, 2014, 07:41:04 PM |
|
"he should display the message on the first page of the website.."
He probably would ... if he didn't have to spend time answering the same questions over and over again.
The last time this is what he did and that's fine. your coins probably get deposited to you and you do nothing with them anyway. what is the rush? it is pretty clear waffles isn't after ripping people off. let the man worry about his personal life, this pool, and NOT about things that are completely out of his control (cryptsy payments). patience! this |
|
|
|
|
FrankieSaysRelax
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
February 26, 2014, 07:44:29 PM |
|
Waffle is likely having the same issues h20 had on MC. Because he is flooding the market with sell orders for the coins he buys, he will have to take a very drastic loss and push market price for these coins down in order to cash in large chunks. He's at the will of the market as well. Since the pool has grown so large, you can expect this to be an ongoing issue. I would suggest using multiple exchanges such as H20 was using and sometimes manually trade extra coins if there is liquidity, even if it means selling at a slightly lower price.
|
|
|
|
|
Zamboniman
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
February 26, 2014, 07:44:44 PM |
|
What happened to the "better stats" page I really liked that service! It was amazing At a guess, it's being updated or worked on. That's why it went down temporarily on other occasions. Just hang on, chances are it'll be back up, and better than ever, in a bit of time. |
|
|
|
|
luthan
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
February 26, 2014, 07:47:45 PM |
|
Waffle is likely having the same issues h20 had on MC. Because he is flooding the market with sell orders for the coins he buys, he will have to take a very drastic loss and push market price for these coins down in order to cash in large chunks. He's at the will of the market as well. Since the pool has grown so large, you can expect this to be an ongoing issue. I would suggest using multiple exchanges such as H20 was using and sometimes manually trade extra coins if there is liquidity, even if it means selling at a slightly lower price.
according to this - "we've got 2 withdrawals pending at Cryptsy" - he already made the required trades. simply waiting for the coins to get to him. this isn't the issue. |
|
|
|
The Fat Miner
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Please give me Bitcoins so I can buy more food
|
|
February 26, 2014, 07:53:18 PM |
|
Waffle is likely having the same issues h20 had on MC. Because he is flooding the market with sell orders for the coins he buys, he will have to take a very drastic loss and push market price for these coins down in order to cash in large chunks. He's at the will of the market as well. Since the pool has grown so large, you can expect this to be an ongoing issue. I would suggest using multiple exchanges such as H20 was using and sometimes manually trade extra coins if there is liquidity, even if it means selling at a slightly lower price.
according to this - "we've got 2 withdrawals pending at Cryptsy" - he already made the required trades. simply waiting for the coins to get to him. this isn't the issue. It's just crysptsy taking the piss, Place is a joke if you ask me. |
|
|
|
|
igroock
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
February 26, 2014, 08:03:28 PM |
|
Waffle is there a place to check rejected MH %? My hashes seem to be lower on the stat page than usual. I know its not the best place to check for the correct reject % but thought id ask where that can be checked. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
luthan
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
February 26, 2014, 08:06:44 PM |
|
Waffle is likely having the same issues h20 had on MC. Because he is flooding the market with sell orders for the coins he buys, he will have to take a very drastic loss and push market price for these coins down in order to cash in large chunks. He's at the will of the market as well. Since the pool has grown so large, you can expect this to be an ongoing issue. I would suggest using multiple exchanges such as H20 was using and sometimes manually trade extra coins if there is liquidity, even if it means selling at a slightly lower price.
according to this - "we've got 2 withdrawals pending at Cryptsy" - he already made the required trades. simply waiting for the coins to get to him. this isn't the issue. It's just crysptsy taking the piss, Place is a joke if you ask me. wish vault of satoshi would do crypto trading. those people seem to know what they're doing. but who knows, maybe with the volume, everyone starts to have issues. |
|
|
|
|
WaffleMaster
|
|
February 26, 2014, 08:08:23 PM |
|
Waffle is there a place to check rejected MH %? My hashes seem to be lower on the stat page than usual. I know its not the best place to check for the correct reject % but thought id ask where that can be checked. Thanks.
There's variance with the 512 difficulty, along with any other difficulty. I swing from -1mh/s to +1mh/s all the time. My average is ON POINT though. |
|
|
|
|
saxo50
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 26, 2014, 08:19:44 PM |
|
I need to be paid daily cuz its how I buy my supper. No BTC, no supper. Joking...
I wouldn't mind getting paid every two weeks (like a real job) if it meant better payout per MH/24 - even a little! Not worried.
|
|
|
|
|
tblack
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
February 26, 2014, 08:45:46 PM |
|
I gotta admit, I never had problems with waffle. Really low reject rates too. I also admit that I am testing out clevermining to see if their claims of profitability match their stats. My reject rate there though....  Please report back, as this is a great piece of info. We can obviously claim 10% higher stats, if 10% of everyones hashrate gets rejected I'm personally too involved to give any sort of non-biased stats, and I appreciate anyone that can come back and say "from time A to B, I earned C on wafflepool, and D on <whoeverelse>". WP has things to learn from other pools, they have things to learn from us Ran for 24h at clevermining, hashing at 3.6 MH/s, their website reports I had a 13% reject rate (0.5 MH) and my profits were 0.03139240 btc. If you do the math vs my actual hashrate, that would only be 0.00872 btc/MH. If you calculate it out vs my accepted MH, that would be 0.0101265 btc/MH. So read it however you want. Your btc/MH is fairly accurate there based on accepted MH, not your actual hash rate. Only 13%?? You got LUCKY ^_^ as for me I'll stick to my less than 1% on WafflePool haha I tried out clevermining last weekend and my reject rate was 30-60% depending on miners. Here it's less than 1%. |
|
|
|
|
|
zneww
|
|
February 26, 2014, 08:57:46 PM |
|
I gotta admit, I never had problems with waffle. Really low reject rates too. I also admit that I am testing out clevermining to see if their claims of profitability match their stats. My reject rate there though.... Please report back, as this is a great piece of info. We can obviously claim 10% higher stats, if 10% of everyones hashrate gets rejected I'm personally too involved to give any sort of non-biased stats, and I appreciate anyone that can come back and say "from time A to B, I earned C on wafflepool, and D on <whoeverelse>". WP has things to learn from other pools, they have things to learn from us Ran for 24h at clevermining, hashing at 3.6 MH/s, their website reports I had a 13% reject rate (0.5 MH) and my profits were 0.03139240 btc. If you do the math vs my actual hashrate, that would only be 0.00872 btc/MH. If you calculate it out vs my accepted MH, that would be 0.0101265 btc/MH. So read it however you want. Your btc/MH is fairly accurate there based on accepted MH, not your actual hash rate. Only 13%?? You got LUCKY ^_^ as for me I'll stick to my less than 1% on WafflePool haha I tried out clevermining last weekend and my reject rate was 30-60% depending on miners. Here it's less than 1%. thats crazy lol. im under 1% on coinsolver too. idk why clever has so many rejects |
|
|
|
|
|
maxpowerzz92
|
|
February 26, 2014, 09:18:53 PM |
|
I gotta admit, I never had problems with waffle. Really low reject rates too. I also admit that I am testing out clevermining to see if their claims of profitability match their stats. My reject rate there though.... Please report back, as this is a great piece of info. We can obviously claim 10% higher stats, if 10% of everyones hashrate gets rejected I'm personally too involved to give any sort of non-biased stats, and I appreciate anyone that can come back and say "from time A to B, I earned C on wafflepool, and D on <whoeverelse>". WP has things to learn from other pools, they have things to learn from us Ran for 24h at clevermining, hashing at 3.6 MH/s, their website reports I had a 13% reject rate (0.5 MH) and my profits were 0.03139240 btc. If you do the math vs my actual hashrate, that would only be 0.00872 btc/MH. If you calculate it out vs my accepted MH, that would be 0.0101265 btc/MH. So read it however you want. Your btc/MH is fairly accurate there based on accepted MH, not your actual hash rate. Only 13%?? You got LUCKY ^_^ as for me I'll stick to my less than 1% on WafflePool haha I tried out clevermining last weekend and my reject rate was 30-60% depending on miners. Here it's less than 1%. thats crazy lol. im under 1% on coinsolver too. idk why clever has so many rejects Have a couple of rigs pointed to clevermining. Rejects are anywhere between 5-20%, but if the whole pool is affected then I wouldn't mind since it should even out. What I don't like is the supposed bitcoin per megahash rate listed at the top of the page since it only includes accepted shares & not your total mining power. |
|
|
|
|
poolwaffle (OP)
|
|
February 26, 2014, 10:46:44 PM |
|
Hey guys, payment update. Our withdrawals from last night and this morning went through a bit ago, but we have the same problem as a few days ago. Essentially the amount withdrawn doesn't cover all of the new earnings since the withdrawal started. So I've got another withdrawal pending now (I'm expecting it to take the normal 6-12 hours cryptsy is taking), and for now I'll do what I did last time, which is run payouts in order of longest time since payout. I think this is probably going to become more of a standard thing due to the delays at cryptsy. I know there was a bit of dislike to it last time, as it brings up the question "why did half the users get paid", but at least for the immediate future while we figure out how to get these withdrawals processed faster (I'll look into their new auto-withdrawal API), it does at least let us get some of the payments out to miners. And as long as its done in a consistent manner, I don't think its a huge issue.
So the current plan, for the next few days (at least) is to pay out users as we have the funds. Anyone over the threshold (0.01btc) will be eligible for payouts, and we'll select users who haven't been paid in the longest time first. We'll pay out all of the funds we have at the time, and run another set of payouts every time a cryptsy deposit clears. We'll likely be running them twice a day (we'll see).
This method will work nicely in the future as well assuming constant delays from cryptsy (I'm doubtful of them getting fixed), so we can make multiple requests throughout the day, and payouts as they come in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
