T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion

[Vishnu.Reang]

@bryant.coleman there is a big gap between the popularity of IPL and PSL. PSL is still very fresh and has a long way to go.

I am not surprised. IPL features the best players from all the major countries (obviously, with the exception of Pakistan). PSL on the other hand mostly features the Pakistani players, with a smattering of some of the second tier players from other countries. The superstars are not there, and therefore the interest from the fans will be quite low. You need players such as Virat Kohli, Steve Smith, Pat Cummins, Ben Stokes, Stuart Broad, David Warner, Chris Gayle, Mitchell Santner, Faf du Plessis.etc to attract the fans.

[1714667655]

1714667655

[1714667655]

1714667655

[1714667655]

1714667655

[1714667655]

1714667655

[1714667655]

1714667655

[AB de Royse777]

Everyone!
Just a heads up.

Prize pot

|

Entry fee : 0.001 BTC

Now we have a pool of 0.082 BTC and in current BTC rate the amount is $875+
Are you still thinking to stay in the sideline?

Join our pool and win BIG!

[mersal]

@bryant.coleman there is a big gap between the popularity of IPL and PSL. PSL is still very fresh and has a long way to go.

I am not surprised. IPL features the best players from all the major countries (obviously, with the exception of Pakistan). PSL on the other hand mostly features the Pakistani players, with a smattering of some of the second tier players from other countries. The superstars are not there, and therefore the interest from the fans will be quite low. You need players such as Virat Kohli, Steve Smith, Pat Cummins, Ben Stokes, Stuart Broad, David Warner, Chris Gayle, Mitchell Santner, Faf du Plessis.etc to attract the fans.

BCCI is one of the richest cricket borad which can even influence ICC but which is not the case of PCB, they cannot afford huge expenses to organize their their league with such super star players but PSL is also getting good record views for various reasons so its good for the cricket enthusiasts in that country.

[TalkStar]

there is a big gap between the popularity of IPL and PSL. PSL is still very fresh and has a long way to go.

PSL need more time to get popular and if you make  comparison with IPL then they have to go a long way to match that level. After big bash league IPL has been the most popular cricket league and worldwide cricket fans eagerly wait to enjoy this league. Its just not only like that IPL got strong support from BCCI but also indian bollywood community gave tremendous support which bring massive popularity in a short time. I haven't seen this type of celebrity and business tycoons involvement in other cricket leagues. Even their football leagues are also getting popular day by day and have same support source.    

Due to Pakistan's terrorist attack on Srilanka cricket team ICC put restrictions on hosting cricket matches and it was a really bad time for PCB. After this few years later with the support of their government Pakistan cricket board managed to run cricket matches again and as a result PSL launched. So in a situation like this its need more time and hopefully they will be able to get best players on their league in upcoming seasons.                        

[Indymoney]

there is a big gap between the popularity of IPL and PSL. PSL is still very fresh and has a long way to go.

PSL need more time to get popular and if you make  comparison with IPL then they have to go a long way to match that level. After big bash league IPL has been the most popular cricket league and worldwide cricket fans eagerly wait to enjoy this league. Its just not only like that IPL got strong support from BCCI but also indian bollywood community gave tremendous support which bring massive popularity in a short time. I haven't seen this type of celebrity and business tycoons involvement in other cricket leagues. Even their football leagues are also getting popular day by day and have same support source.    

Due to Pakistan's terrorist attack on Srilanka cricket team ICC put restrictions on hosting cricket matches and it was a really bad time for PCB. After this few years later with the support of their government Pakistan cricket board managed to run cricket matches again and as a result PSL launched. So in a situation like this its need more time and hopefully they will be able to get best players on their league in upcoming seasons.                        

Right now IPL is just like EPL which is world's best soccer league and after this we have some good leagues in Europe same happening in cricket IPL, BBL and Vitalty Blast then we can talk about PSL but if we have some good seasons in Pakistan then surely this can increase in ranking even not near to IPL but surely could be good and popular league in future for good and quality cricket.

[bryant.coleman]

BCCI is one of the richest cricket borad which can even influence ICC but which is not the case of PCB, they cannot afford huge expenses to organize their their league with such super star players but PSL is also getting good record views for various reasons so its good for the cricket enthusiasts in that country.

Pakistan do have a cricket crazy population of more than 200 million, and more importantly there are large expat communities in the UK, US and the middle east. But then, the franchise T20 calendar is already saturated. Almost all of the test nations (perhaps with the exception of New Zealand) have come up with such leagues. Obviously this will mean less viewership, and thereby less revenue for each of them.

[pakhitheboss]

BCCI is one of the richest cricket borad which can even influence ICC but which is not the case of PCB, they cannot afford huge expenses to organize their their league with such super star players but PSL is also getting good record views for various reasons so its good for the cricket enthusiasts in that country.

Pakistan do have a cricket crazy population of more than 200 million, and more importantly there are large expat communities in the UK, US and the middle east. But then, the franchise T20 calendar is already saturated. Almost all of the test nations (perhaps with the exception of New Zealand) have come up with such leagues. Obviously this will mean less viewership, and thereby less revenue for each of them.

Almost all boards have started their leagues agreed but how many are popular? and how many have high-value international cricket players? How many are able to relocate their venue in a different country? You need money for everything and only BCCI and IPL franchises have that kind of money.

[Vishnu.Reang]

Almost all boards have started their leagues agreed but how many are popular? and how many have high-value international cricket players? How many are able to relocate their venue in a different country? You need money for everything and only BCCI and IPL franchises have that kind of money.

Franchise leagues are privately owned commercial enterprises and they will invest money only if they get good returns out of it. The BCCI has banned Indian players from participating in the other franchise leagues, and this has severely impacted their viewership and revenue generation from the Indian market. Only the CPL and BBL have some viewership in India, due to the presence of some of the big names in T20 cricket.

[AB de Royse777]

Guys! Free spot paid by vd309. Who is jumping first to claim it?

[Vishnu.Reang]

Guys! Free spot paid by vd309. Who is jumping first to claim it?

Can I take the spot?

Follow the instruction on the post from vd309, I see no problem at all unless he does.

Thanks. I have quoted his post as per the instruction.

And just now he has replied, confirming the slot.

This is really exciting!!! IPL 2020 will start in 3 days from now, and the first match is going to be between the Mumbai Indians and the Chennai Super Kings. I can't wait to bet in favor of MI!!!

[AB de Royse777]

Guys! Free spot paid by vd309. Who is jumping first to claim it?

Can I take the spot?

Follow the instruction on the post from vd309, I see no problem at all unless he does.

[Indymoney]

Guys! Free spot paid by vd309. Who is jumping first to claim it?

Can I take the spot?

Follow the instruction on the post from vd309, I see no problem at all unless he does.

Thanks. I have quoted his post as per the instruction.

And just now he has replied, confirming the slot.

This is really exciting!!! IPL 2020 will start in 3 days from now, and the first match is going to be between the Mumbai Indians and the Chennai Super Kings. I can't wait to bet in favor of MI!!!

Welcom Vishnu hopefully your solid revivews will help us in coming IPL as your are one of best predictables in this event just give your some views about all teams could be appreciated before start of this mega event.

[mersal]

Almost all boards have started their leagues agreed but how many are popular? and how many have high-value international cricket players? How many are able to relocate their venue in a different country? You need money for everything and only BCCI and IPL franchises have that kind of money.

Franchise leagues are privately owned commercial enterprises and they will invest money only if they get good returns out of it. The BCCI has banned Indian players from participating in the other franchise leagues, and this has severely impacted their viewership and revenue generation from the Indian market. Only the CPL and BBL have some viewership in India, due to the presence of some of the big names in T20 cricket.

BCCI refused the permission in the past but I am not sure BCCI completely banned Indian players from overseas t20 leagues and other other cricket boards too have just kind of need if they want to participate in T20 leagues organized by other boards.

[BitSat19]

Almost all boards have started their leagues agreed but how many are popular? and how many have high-value international cricket players? How many are able to relocate their venue in a different country? You need money for everything and only BCCI and IPL franchises have that kind of money.

Franchise leagues are privately owned commercial enterprises and they will invest money only if they get good returns out of it. The BCCI has banned Indian players from participating in the other franchise leagues, and this has severely impacted their viewership and revenue generation from the Indian market. Only the CPL and BBL have some viewership in India, due to the presence of some of the big names in T20 cricket.

BCCI refused the permission in the past but I am not sure BCCI completely banned Indian players from overseas t20 leagues and other other cricket boards too have just kind of need if they want to participate in T20 leagues organized by other boards.

Its still completely banned no Indian player can participate in any twenty/20 league other then IPL and they are very stick about this surely in future they are not going to allowed this as well because this can hurt their marketing strategy no other board can do policy like this because they have no enough funds to do this.

[bryant.coleman]

BCCI refused the permission in the past but I am not sure BCCI completely banned Indian players from overseas t20 leagues and other other cricket boards too have just kind of need if they want to participate in T20 leagues organized by other boards.

These measures were implemented when N Srinivasan was controlling the BCCI, and I believe that they should remove this ban. It is very unfair from the part of BCCI to ban the Indian players from the other leagues, when all the other boards allow their players to take part in the IPL. Also, two months every year from the international calendar is devoted to the IPL. None of the other boards get such preferential treatment for their leagues. On top of that, despite the revenue redistribution, the BCCI still receives almost 4 times funds from the ICC when compared to some of the smaller boards such as CSA and NZC. The BCCI should not get too greedy and arrogant. If they do that, then the other boards may gang up against them.

[JSRAW]

BCCI refused the permission in the past but I am not sure BCCI completely banned Indian players from overseas t20 leagues and other other cricket boards too have just kind of need if they want to participate in T20 leagues organized by other boards.

These measures were implemented when N Srinivasan was controlling the BCCI, and I believe that they should remove this ban. It is very unfair from the part of BCCI to ban the Indian players from the other leagues, when all the other boards allow their players to take part in the IPL. Also, two months every year from the international calendar is devoted to the IPL. None of the other boards get such preferential treatment for their leagues. On top of that, despite the revenue redistribution, the BCCI still receives almost 4 times funds from the ICC when compared to some of the smaller boards such as CSA and NZC. The BCCI should not get too greedy and arrogant. If they do that, then the other boards may gang up against them.

That's sound like a good option, every board should stand up against BCCI and force ICC to ban India from the international cricket, so what if BCCI generates 70% of revenue and brings more on the table. I am sure all cricket boards and ICC won't mind reduction of funds once BCCI gets kicked out from the Int community.   

[AB de Royse777]

Only two days left for IPL to start and our pool has already 14 members with a pot of 0.084+ BTC which is in fiat currency $910+! Check this live:

Prize pot

|

Only 0.001BTC is in between you and the pool. Would you rather stay in the sideline and not joining the pool? Last two days guys, HURRY UP!

[pakhitheboss]

BCCI refused the permission in the past but I am not sure BCCI completely banned Indian players from overseas t20 leagues and other other cricket boards too have just kind of need if they want to participate in T20 leagues organized by other boards.

These measures were implemented when N Srinivasan was controlling the BCCI, and I believe that they should remove this ban. It is very unfair from the part of BCCI to ban the Indian players from the other leagues, when all the other boards allow their players to take part in the IPL. Also, two months every year from the international calendar is devoted to the IPL. None of the other boards get such preferential treatment for their leagues. On top of that, despite the revenue redistribution, the BCCI still receives almost 4 times funds from the ICC when compared to some of the smaller boards such as CSA and NZC. The BCCI should not get too greedy and arrogant. If they do that, then the other boards may gang up against them.

If other boards ban their players from playing IPL they will leave their boards because of the money. Indian players are happy with BCCI decision to ban them from playing with other boards because they know which board is capable of generating the highest revenue.

[Vishnu.Reang]

That's sound like a good option, every board should stand up against BCCI and force ICC to ban India from the international cricket, so what if BCCI generates 70% of revenue and brings more on the table. I am sure all cricket boards and ICC won't mind reduction of funds once BCCI gets kicked out from the Int community.   

The ICC needs BCCI, as much as the BCCI needs ICC. But that doesn't mean that the BCCI should be given lion's share of ICC revenues, at a time when some of the smaller boards are facing bankruptcy. None of the other sports bodies such as FIFA or FIH follows a similar model. They divide the revenues equally, without thinking about from where the revenues are originating.

[JSRAW]

That's sound like a good option, every board should stand up against BCCI and force ICC to ban India from the international cricket, so what if BCCI generates 70% of revenue and brings more on the table. I am sure all cricket boards and ICC won't mind reduction of funds once BCCI gets kicked out from the Int community.  

The ICC needs BCCI, as much as the BCCI needs ICC. But that doesn't mean that the BCCI should be given lion's share of ICC revenues, at a time when some of the smaller boards are facing bankruptcy. None of the other sports bodies such as FIFA or FIH follows a similar model. They divide the revenues equally, without thinking about from where the revenues are originating.

BCCI share already took a massive hit but anyway what do you propose in new policy, ICC should follow the FIFA's model?

NZ population is 5 million
Ind population is 1.35 Billion

Sure, kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.